Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Malar J ; 20(1): 411, 2021 Oct 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34666766

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Microscopic examination of thick and thin blood films is the gold standard in current guidelines for the diagnosis of malaria, but guidelines do not uniformly agree on which combination of other methods should be used and when. METHODS: Three questionnaires were sent between March 2018 and September 2019 to laboratories subscribing to the external quality assessment scheme for the diagnosis of blood and intestinal parasites of the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Medical Laboratories in order to investigate how much variation in the laboratory diagnosis of malaria between different clinical laboratories is present in the Netherlands. RESULTS: The questionnaires were partially or fully completed by 67 of 77 (87%) laboratories. Only 9 laboratories reported 10 or more malaria positive patients per year. Most laboratories use a different diagnostic strategy, within office versus outside office hours depending on the screening assay result. Within office hours, 62.5% (35/56) of the responding laboratories perform an immunochromatographic test (ICT) in combination with microscopic examination of thick and thin blood films without additional examinations, such as Quantitative Buffy Coat and/or rtPCR analysis. Outside office hours 85.7% (48/56) of laboratories use an ICT as single screening assay and positive results are immediately confirmed by thick and thin blood films without additional examinations (89.6%, 43/48). In case of a negative ICT result outside office hours, 70.8% (34/48) of the laboratories perform microscopic examination of the thick film the next morning and 22.9% (11/48) confirm the negative ICT result immediately. Furthermore, substantial differences were found in the microscopic examinations of thick and thin blood films; the staining, theoretical sensitivity of the thick film and determination of parasitaemia. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a remarkably high variation between laboratories in both their diagnostic strategy as well as their methods for microscopic examination for the diagnosis of malaria in a clinical setting, despite existing national and international guidelines. While the impact of these variations on the accuracy of the diagnosis of malaria is yet unknown, these findings should stimulate clinical laboratories to critically review their own diagnostic strategy.


Asunto(s)
Laboratorios/normas , Malaria/diagnóstico , Colorantes Azulados/normas , Colorantes/normas , Humanos , Laboratorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Límite de Detección , Países Bajos , Parasitemia/diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Coloración y Etiquetado/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(1): 31-36, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31685058

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Nosocomial outbreaks due to multidrug-resistant microorganisms in rehabilitation centers have rarely been reported. We report an outbreak of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-K. pneumoniae) on a single ward in a rehabilitation center in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. DESIGN: Outbreak description. SETTING: A 40-bed ward of a rehabilitation center in the Netherlands. METHODS: In October 2016, 2 patients were found to be colonized by genetically indistinguishable ESBL-K. pneumoniae isolates. Therefore, an outbreak management team was installed, by whom a contact tracing plan was made. In addition to general outbreak measures, specific measures were formulated to allow continuation of the rehabilitation process. Also, environmental cultures were taken. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis and amplification fragment-length polymorphism were used to determine strain relatedness. Selected isolates were subjected to whole-genome multilocus sequence typing. RESULTS: The outbreak lasted 8 weeks. In total, 14 patients were colonized with an ESBL-K. pneumoniae, of whom 11 patients had an isolate belonging to sequence type 307. Overall, 163 environmental cultures were taken. Several sites of a household washing machine were repeatedly found to be contaminated with the outbreak strain. This machine was used to wash lifting slings and patient clothing contaminated with feces. The outbreak was contained after taking the machine temporarily out of service and implementing a reinforced and adapted protocol on the use of this machine. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in this outbreak, the route of transmission of the outbreak strain via the household washing machine played a major role.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Fómites/microbiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Lavandería/instrumentación , Vestuario , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Contaminación de Equipos , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/transmisión , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Centros de Rehabilitación , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...