RESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Traditional classification and prognostic approaches for chronic pain conditions focus primarily on anatomically based clinical characteristics not based on underlying biopsychosocial factors contributing to perception of clinical pain and future pain trajectories. Using a supervised clustering approach in a cohort of temporomandibular disorder cases and controls from the Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment study, we recently developed and validated a rapid algorithm (ROPA) to pragmatically classify chronic pain patients into 3 groups that differed in clinical pain report, biopsychosocial profiles, functional limitations, and comorbid conditions. The present aim was to examine the generalizability of this clustering procedure in 2 additional cohorts: a cohort of patients with chronic overlapping pain conditions (Complex Persistent Pain Conditions study) and a real-world clinical population of patients seeking treatment at duke innovative pain therapies. In each cohort, we applied a ROPA for cluster prediction, which requires only 4 input variables: pressure pain threshold and anxiety, depression, and somatization scales. In both complex persistent pain condition and duke innovative pain therapies, we distinguished 3 clusters, including one with more severe clinical characteristics and psychological distress. We observed strong concordance with observed cluster solutions, indicating the ROPA method allows for reliable subtyping of clinical populations with minimal patient burden. The ROPA clustering algorithm represents a rapid and valid stratification tool independent of anatomic diagnosis. ROPA holds promise in classifying patients based on pathophysiological mechanisms rather than structural or anatomical diagnoses. As such, this method of classifying patients will facilitate personalized pain medicine for patients with chronic pain.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Trastornos de Ansiedad , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Análisis por Conglomerados , Dolor Facial , Humanos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight the indications, procedural considerations, and data supporting the use of stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) for management of refractory ventricular arrhythmias. RECENT FINDINGS: In patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias, unilateral or bilateral SGB can reduce arrhythmia burden and defibrillation events for 24-72 h, allowing time for use of other therapies like catheter ablation, surgical sympathectomy, or heart transplantation. The efficacy of SGB appears to be consistent despite the type (monomorphic vs polymorphic) or etiology (ischemic vs non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) of the ventricular arrhythmia. Ultrasound-guided SGB is safe with low risk for complications, even when performed on anticoagulation. SGB is effective and safe and could be considered for patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Nervioso Autónomo , Hipertensión , Taquicardia Ventricular , Arritmias Cardíacas , Humanos , Ganglio Estrellado , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that splanchnic nerve blockade (SNB) would attenuate increased exercise-induced cardiac filling pressures in patients with chronic HF. BACKGROUND: Chronic heart failure (HF) is characterized by limited exercise capacity driven in part by an excessive elevation of cardiac filling pressures. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm interventional study in chronic HF patients. Eligible patients had a wedge pressure ≥15 mm Hg at rest or ≥25 mm Hg with exercise on baseline right heart catheterization. Patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with invasive hemodynamic assessment, followed by percutaneous SNB with ropivacaine. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled, 15 of whom underwent SNB. The average age was 58 ± 13 years, 7 (47%) patients were women and 6 (40%) were black. Left ventricular ejection fraction was ≤35% in 14 (93%) patients. No procedural complications were encountered. SNB reduced mean pulmonary arterial pressure at peak exercise from 54.1 ± 14.4 (pre-SNB) to 45.8 ± 17.7 mm Hg (p < 0.001) (post-SNB). Similarly, SNB reduced exercise-induced wedge pressure from 34.8 ± 10.0 (pre-SNB) to 25.1 ± 10.7 mm Hg (p < 0.001) (post-SNB). The cardiac index changed with peak exercise from 3.4 ± 1.2 (pre-SNB) to 3.8 ± 1.1 l/min/m2 (p = 0.011) (post-SNB). After SNB, patients exercised for approximately the same duration at a greater workload (33 ± 24 W vs. 50 ± 30 W; p = 0.019) and peak oxygen consumption VO2 (9.1 ± 2.5 vs. 9.8 ± 2.7 ml/kg/min; p = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: SNB reduced resting and exercise-induced pulmonary arterial and wedge pressure with favorable effects on cardiac output and exercise capacity. Continued efforts to investigate short- and long-term effects of SNB in chronic HF are warranted. Clinical Trials Registration (Abdominal Nerve Blockade in Chronic Heart Failure; NCT03453151).
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Nervios Esplácnicos , Anciano , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Consumo de Oxígeno , Estudios Prospectivos , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular IzquierdaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe our institutional experience with establishing a neurocardiology service in an attempt to provide autonomic modulation as a treatment for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). BACKGROUND: Treatment-refractory VAs are commonly driven and exacerbated by heightened sympathetic tone. METHODS: Among patients referred to the neurocardiology service (August 2016 to December 2018), we performed ultrasound-based, bilateral, temporary stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) in 20 consecutive patients. We analyzed outcomes of interest including sustained VA or VA requiring defibrillation in the 24 and 48 h before and 24 and 48 h after SGB. RESULTS: The majority of patients were men (n = 19, 95%), with a mean age of 58 ± 14 years. At the time of SGB, 10 (50%) were on inotropic support and 9 (45%) were on mechanical circulatory support. Besides 1 case of hoarseness, there were no apparent procedural complications. SGB was associated with a reduction in the number of VA episodes from the 24 h before (median 5.5 [interquartile range (IQR): 2.0 to 15.8]) to 24 h after SGB (median 0 [IQR: 0 to 3.8]) (p < 0.001). The number of defibrillation events decreased from 2.5 (IQR: 0 to 10.3) to 0 (IQR: 0 to 2.5) (p = 0.002). Similar findings were observed over the 48-h period before and after the SGB. Overall, 9 of 20 (45%) patients had a complete response with no recurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) for 48 h after SGB. Four (20%) patients had no recurrent VT or VF following SGB through discharge. Similar response rates were observed in those with ischemic (median 6 [IQR: 1.8 to 18.8] to 0.5 [IQR: 0 to 5.3] events; p = 0.031) and nonischemic (median 3.5 [IQR: 1.8 to 6.8] to 0 [IQR: 0 to 1.3] events; p = 0.012) cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive, ultrasound-guided bilateral SGB appears safe and provides substantial reduction in VA burden with approximately 1 in 2 patients exhibiting complete suppression of VT or VF for 48 h.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Nervioso Autónomo , Taquicardia Ventricular , Adulto , Anciano , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ganglio Estrellado , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapiaRESUMEN
Knee osteoarthritis is a common painful degenerative condition affecting the aging Canadian population. In addition to pain and disability, osteoarthritis is associated with depression, comorbid conditions such as diabetes, and increased caregiver burden. It is predicted to cost the Canadian healthcare system $7.6 billion dollars by 2031. Despite its high cost and prevalence, controversy persists in the medical community regarding optimal therapies to treat knee osteoarthritis. A variety of medications like nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories and opioids can cause severe side effects with limited benefits. Total knee arthroplasty, although a definitive management, comes with risk such as postoperative infections, revisions, and chronic pain. Newer injectable therapies are gaining attention as alternatives to medications because of a safer side effect profile and are much less invasive than a joint replacement. Platelet-rich plasma is beginning to replace the more common injectable therapies of intra-articular corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid, but larger trials are needed to confirm this effect. Small studies have examined prolotherapy and stem cell therapy and demonstrate some benefits. Trials involving genicular nerve block procedures have been successful. As treatments evolve, injectable therapies may offer a safe and effective pathway for patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis.
Asunto(s)
Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Canadá , Humanos , Ácido Hialurónico/uso terapéutico , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Proloterapia/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre/métodosAsunto(s)
Bloqueo Nervioso Autónomo/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Nervios Esplácnicos/fisiopatología , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Nervios Esplácnicos/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Bloqueo Nervioso Autónomo/métodos , Ganglios Simpáticos/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hemodinámica , Circulación Esplácnica , Nervios Esplácnicos/fisiopatología , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Recuperación de la Función , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Capacitancia VascularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intrathecal catheter placement has long-term therapeutic benefits in the management of chronic, intractable pain. Despite the diverse clinical applicability and rising prevalence of implantable drug delivery systems in pain medicine, the spectrum of complications associated with intrathecal catheterization remains largely understudied and underreported in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To report a case of thoracic nerve root entrapment resulting from intrathecal catheter migration. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Inpatient hospital service. RESULTS/ CASE REPORT: A 60-year-old man status post implanted intrathecal (IT) catheter for intractable low back pain secondary to failed back surgery syndrome returned to the operating room for removal of IT pump trial catheter after experiencing relapse of preoperative pain and pump occlusion. Initial attempt at ambulatory removal of the catheter was aborted after the patient reported acute onset of lower extremity radiculopathic pain during the extraction. Noncontrast computed tomography (CT) subsequently revealed that the catheter had ascended and coiled around the T10 nerve root. The patient was taken back to the operating room for removal of the catheter under fluoroscopic guidance, with possible laminectomy for direct visualization. Removal was ultimately achieved with slow continuous tension, with complete resolution of the patient's new radicular symptoms. LIMITATIONS: This report describes a single case report. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that any existing loops in the intrathecal catheter during initial implantation should be immediately re-addressed, as they can precipitate nerve root entrapment and irritation. Reduction of the loop or extrication of the catheter should be attempted under continuous fluoroscopic guidance to prevent further neurosurgical morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/diagnóstico por imagen , Raíces Nerviosas Espinales/diagnóstico por imagen , Nervios Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Analgésicos , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Síndrome de Fracaso de la Cirugía Espinal Lumbar/diagnóstico por imagen , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/cirugía , Humanos , Bombas de Infusión Implantables , Masculino , Raíces Nerviosas Espinales/cirugía , Nervios Torácicos/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies suggest that opioids may promote tumor growth. Genetic polymorphisms have been shown to affect opioid receptor function and to modify the clinical effects of morphine. In this study we assessed the association between six common polymorphisms in the µ-opioid receptor gene, including the well known A118G polymorphism, and breast cancer survival. METHODS: A total of 2,039 women ages 23-74 yr (38% African-American, 62% European-American, 55% postmenopausal) diagnosed with breast cancer between 1993-2001 were followed through 2006. Genotyping was performed using the TaqMan platform (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA). Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association between each genotype and survival. RESULTS: After Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, patient genotype at A118G was associated with breast cancer-specific mortality at 10 yr. Women with one or more copies of the G allele had decreased breast cancer-specific mortality (P < 0.001). This association was limited to invasive cases only; effect size appeared to increase with clinical stage. Cox regression model adjusted for age and ethnicity also showed decreased mortality in A/G and G/G genotypes compared with A/A genotype (hazard ratio = 0.57 [0.38, 0.85] and 0.32 [0.22, 0.49], respectively; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that opioid pathways may be involved in tumor growth. Further studies examining the association between genetic variants influencing opioid system function and cancer survival are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Sustitución de Aminoácidos/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Receptores Opioides mu/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Dosificación de Gen/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Bombas de Infusión Implantables/microbiología , Médula Espinal/microbiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Humanos , Inyecciones Espinales , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Médula Espinal/efectos de los fármacos , Médula Espinal/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Implantable intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDSs) have been used to manage refractory cancer pain, but there are no randomized clinical trial (RCT) data comparing them with comprehensive medical management (CMM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 202 patients on an RCT of CMM versus IDDS plus CMM. Entry criteria included unrelieved pain (visual analog scale [VAS] pain scores >/= 5 on a 0 to 10 scale). Clinical success was defined as >/= 20% reduction in VAS scores, or equal scores with >/= 20% reduction in toxicity. The main outcome measure was pain control combined with change of toxicity, as measured by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, 4 weeks after randomization. RESULTS: Sixty of 71 IDDS patients (84.5%) achieved clinical success compared with 51 of 72 CMM patients (70.8%, P =.05). IDDS patients more often achieved >/= 20% reduction in both pain VAS and toxicity (57.7% [41 of 71] v 37.5% [27 of 72], P =.02). The mean CMM VAS score fell from 7.81 to 4.76 (39% reduction); for the IDDS group, the scores fell from 7.57 to 3.67 (52% reduction, P =.055). The mean CMM toxicity scores fell from 6.36 to 5.27 (17% reduction); for the IDDS group, the toxicity scores fell from 7.22 to 3.59 (50% reduction, P =.004). The IDDS group had significant reductions in fatigue and depressed level of consciousness (P <.05). IDDS patients had improved survival, with 53.9% alive at 6 months compared with 37.2% of the CMM group (P =.06). CONCLUSION: IDDSs improved clinical success in pain control, reduced pain, significantly relieved common drug toxicities, and improved survival in patients with refractory cancer pain.