Cytomorphology of monomorphic spindle epithelial tumor with thymus-like elements: A case with local recurrence after subtotal resection.

Spindle epithelial tumor with thymus-like elements (SETTLE) is a rare biphasic thyroid tumor with low malignant potential that has a distinct morphology. Despite fine needle aspiration (FNA) being a common method for evaluating thyroid nodules and lymph nodes, there are limited cytologic descriptions of SETTLE in the literature due to its rarity. As a result, SETTLE is frequently underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed as medullary carcinoma, thymoma, teratoma, synovial sarcoma, or solitary fibrous tumor, among others. We present a case of a 28-year-old man with a history of a hemithyroidectomy diagnosed as SETTLE found to have a neck nodule along the strap muscle suspicious for recurrence 5 years post-surgery. The ultrasound-guided FNA cytology specimen of the neck nodule showed loosely cohesive, monomorphous ovoid to spindled cells with scant cytoplasm and nuclei with fine to granular chromatin. In addition, there were occasional clusters of cells with a papillary configuration. The tumor cells were associated with magenta, amorphous extracellular material. Immunocytochemical staining of the cell block material revealed that tumor cells were positive for p63, cytokeratin AE1/3, and CK8/18 and negative for TTF-1 and thyroglobulin. Overall, the morphological and immunocytochemical findings were consistent with a local recurrence of SETTLE. The subsequent left anterior strap mass excision revealed a 4 cm encapsulated tumor consistent with SETTLE. Because ofits rarity and low level of awareness, SETTLE poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We herein present the cytologic findings of monomorphic SETTLE and highlight the potential cytomorphologic and immunophenotypic pitfalls. We also highlight how tumors with high-risk features can be a therapeutic challenge.

Navigating Practice Issues Related to the Unsatisfactory Cervicovaginal Papanicolaou Test: Survey Results of Laboratories Participating in the 2020 College of American Pathologists PAP Education Program.

CONTEXT.­: Unsatisfactory Papanicolaou (Pap) tests pose a unique set of challenges to the laboratory with regard to their processing, review, reporting, and performance of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. There are no standardized guidelines for the review process and handling of unsatisfactory Pap tests. OBJECTIVE.­: To assess the current practice patterns regarding various aspects of the unsatisfactory Pap test, from processing to reporting, across laboratories worldwide. DESIGN.­: A supplemental questionnaire was mailed to laboratories participating in the 2020 College of American Pathologists (CAP) Gynecologic Cytopathology (PAP Education) Program, requesting data regarding the unsatisfactory Pap test. RESULTS.­: Of 1520 participating laboratories, 619 (40.7%) responded, and the responses of 577 laboratories were included for further analysis. Only 64.6% (373 of 577) laboratories used the unsatisfactory Pap test criteria as specified by the 2014 Bethesda System. About three-quarters of the respondents (433 of 576; 75.2%) routinely rescreened unsatisfactory Pap tests. Routine repreparation of such Pap tests was performed by 54.9% (316 of 576) of laboratories, and 52.0% (293 of 563) used glacial acetic acid for repreparing excessively bloody specimens. HPV test results were reported for unsatisfactory Pap tests, always or sometimes, by 62.4% (353 of 566) of respondents. CONCLUSIONS.­: This CAP survey reveals important information regarding the practice patterns pertaining to several aspects of the unsatisfactory Pap test. It also provides valuable insight into the quality assurance measures that can be implemented for such tests. Future studies can further aid in the standardization of all components of the handling of unsatisfactory Pap tests for overall quality improvement.

Cytologic-Histologic Correlation Practices for Nongynecologic Cytology Specimens: A Survey by the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee.

CONTEXT.­: Cytologic-histologic correlation (CHC) is a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-mandated requirement for gynecologic cytology, but no similar requirement exists for nongynecologic cytology. This study presents the findings from a College of American Pathologists' survey of nongynecologic cytology practice patterns. OBJECTIVE.­: To survey the current CHC practices for nongynecologic cytology. DESIGN.­: Data were analyzed from a survey developed by the committee and distributed to participants in the Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program mailing. RESULTS.­: Adoption of CHC for nongynecologic cytology cases is worldwide, with 88.5% of institutions performing CHC on these specimens, a substantial increase from previous years. Performance of CHC varied by institution type, with clinic or regional/local independent laboratories and national/corporate laboratories performing CHC significantly less frequently than hospitals, university hospitals/academic medical centers, and Veterans Administration/Department of Defense hospital institutions. Most CHC was performed concurrently in real time, when the corresponding surgical specimen was reviewed. Selection for real-time concurrent CHC was by the interpreting pathologist, the pathologist diagnosing the surgical biopsy sample or cytopathology case, or both. Sampling was by far the most common reason for discordance. A 2-step difference was the most frequent threshold for discordance between cytology and surgical specimens, but this criterion varied among institutions, with no majority definition. The positive predictive value of a positive cytology finding was calculated rarely in North American institutions but was calculated more frequently in international institutions. CONCLUSIONS.­: CHC practices for nongynecologic cytopathology mirror those found for CHC of gynecologic cytopathology.

Current State of Cytologic-Histologic Correlation Implementation for North American and International Laboratories: Results of the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee Laboratory Practices in Gynecologic Cytology Survey.

CONTEXT.­: The College of American Pathologists (CAP) updated the Laboratory Accreditation Program Cytopathology Checklist to assist laboratories in meeting and exceeding the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments standards for gynecologic cytologic-histologic correlation (CHC). OBJECTIVE.­: To survey the current CHC practices. DESIGN.­: Data were analyzed from a survey developed by the committee and distributed to participants in the CAP Gynecologic Cytopathology PAP Education Program mailing. RESULTS.­: Worldwide, CHC practice is nearly universally adopted, with an overall rate of 87.0% (568 of 653). CHC material was highly accessible. CHC was commonly performed real time/concurrently at the time the corresponding surgical pathology was reviewed. Investigation of CHC discordances varied with North American laboratories usually having a single pathologist review all discrepant histology and cytology slides to determine the reason for discordance, while international laboratories have a second pathologist review histology slides to determine the reason for discordance. The cause of CHC discordance was primarily sampling issues. The more common statistical metrics for CHC monitoring were the total percentage of cases that correlated with subsequent biopsies, screening error rate by cytotechnologist, and interpretative error rate by cytotechnologist. CONCLUSIONS.­: Many laboratories have adopted and implemented the CHC guidelines with identifiable differences in practices between North American and international laboratories. We identify the commonalities and differences between North American and international institutional practices including where CHC is performed, how CHC cases are identified and their accessibility, when CHC is performed, who investigates discordances, what discordances are identified, and how the findings affect quality improvement.

Using American Type Culture Collection Cell Lines to Evaluate Interlaboratory Variables for Estrogen Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunostaining.

CONTEXT.­: Most laboratories currently use patient tissues for validating immunohistochemical stains. OBJECTIVE.­: To explore advantages of using cell lines with known antigenicity as a validation method. DESIGN.­: Five American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) cell lines with known negative, low positive, and moderate to strong estrogen receptor (ER) expression as well as negative, equivocal, and positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression were cultured and made into cell blocks. One block from each cell line was fixed in formalin and another in ethanol before cell block preparation. Two sets of paired unstained slides from each block were sent to 10 different laboratories for HER2 and ER staining to be stained on runs from different days according to each laboratory's defined protocol. RESULTS.­: The 10 study participants evaluated 40 slides in a blinded fashion. For ER expression, all 80 interpretations for the ER strong and moderate positive cell lines had the target ER-positive result, and 74 of 80 ER-negative cell lines (92.5%) had agreement with the intended negative result. The ER low positive cell line showed varied but positive expression among all observers. The HER2 (3+)-positive cell lines yielded a target interpretation of 3+ in 65 of 80 interpretations (81.2%). For the HER2-negative cell line 69 of 78 interpretations (88.5%) were consistent with the target response (0 or 1+). No significant variation was observed between the ethanol- and non-ethanol-exposed cell lines, or between runs by the same laboratory. Variation from target results clustered within laboratories. CONCLUSIONS.­: This study indicates that variability between laboratories can be identified by using cell lines for quantitative or semiquantitative immunohistochemistry when using cultured cell lines of known antigenicity. These cell lines could potentially play a role in aiding anatomic pathology laboratories in validating immunohistochemistry tests for formalin- and ethanol-fixed tissues.

Oil Red O Staining of Pulmonary Macrophages in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimens Is Not Specific for Vaping-Associated Lung Injury.

OBJECTIVES: Oil Red O (ORO) positivity in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid macrophages in the setting of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated acute lung injury (EVALI) has been frequently requested by clinicians based on rare reports and subsequent US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. The aim of this study was to determine the specificity of ORO staining in BAL specimens with disease states other than EVALI. METHODS: Consecutive BAL specimens (October-December 2019) were stained with ORO. The lipid-laden macrophage index (LLMI) was calculated for each case. RESULTS: We studied BAL samples from 50 patients. Indications for BAL were surveillance bronchoscopy for lung transplantation (27/50), suspected infection (12/50), sarcoidosis/suspected sarcoidosis (3/50), nodules or ground-glass opacities (3/50), hemoptysis (2/50), asthma or eosinophilic pneumonia (2/50), and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (1/50). ORO staining was seen in BAL fluid macrophages in 45 of 50 cases (focal in 18, moderate in 23, diffuse in 4); LLMI ranged from 0 to 218. Using a threshold of LLMI of 85 or higher as positive, ORO was positive in 7 of 50 (14%) cases (range, 85-218). CONCLUSIONS: ORO staining in BAL fluid macrophages is not specific for EVALI. Even when an LLMI of 85 or higher is used as a threshold for positivity, ORO positivity occurs in a significant subset of non-vaping-related cases.

Molecular testing of cytology specimens: overview of assay selection with focus on lung, salivary gland, and thyroid testing.

Ancillary and molecular testing of cytopathology specimens has emerged as a reliable and useful tool to provide diagnostic information and treatment-related biomarker status for the management of cancer patients. The cytology specimens obtained through minimally invasive means have proven suitable testing substrates for a variety of ancillary tests, including immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, as well as polymerase chain reaction and next generation sequencing molecular techniques. By focusing specifically on the cytology specimen, this review provides an overview of basic testing considerations and assay selection in addition to updates on the ancillary testing of cytologic tumor specimens from the lung, salivary gland, and thyroid.

Focal Adhesion Kinase Provides a Collateral Vulnerability That Can Be Leveraged to Improve mTORC1 Inhibitor Efficacy.

The PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 pathway is a major therapeutic target for many cancers, particularly breast cancer. Everolimus is an mTORC1 inhibitor used in metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. However, mTORC1 inhibitors have limited efficacy in other breast cancer subtypes. We sought to discover collateral sensitivities to mTORC1 inhibition that could be exploited to improve therapeutic response. Using a mouse model of breast cancer that is intrinsically resistant to mTORC1 inhibition, we found that rapamycin alters the expression of numerous extracellular matrix genes, suggesting a potential role for integrins/FAK in controlling mTORC1-inhibitor efficacy. FAK activation was also inversely correlated with rapamycin response in breast cancer cell lines. Supporting its potential utility in patients, FAK activation was observed in >50% of human breast cancers. While blocking FAK in mouse models of breast cancer that are highly responsive to rapamycin had no impact on tumor growth, FAK inhibition sensitized rapamycin-resistant tumors to mTORC1 inhibition. These data reveal an innate dependency on FAK when mTORC1 signaling is lost in tumors that are resistant to mTORC1 inhibitors. They also suggest a precision medicine approach to improving mTORC1 inhibitor efficacy in resistant cancers by suppressing FAK signaling.

Rescreening Practices of Negative Papanicolaou Tests With Positive Human Papillomavirus Test Result.

CONTEXT.­: The yield of the prospective rescreening process for "negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy" (NILM) Papanicolaou (Pap) tests is higher with the inclusion of a greater proportion of high-risk cases. One of the suggested criteria for classifying a Pap test finding as high risk is recent or concurrent high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate how the results of HPV testing have been incorporated in the prospective rescreening of NILM Pap tests across a wide range of laboratories. DESIGN.­: A questionnaire survey was sent to laboratories participating in the 2019 College of American Pathologists (CAP) Gynecologic Cytology (PAP Education) Program. RESULTS.­: Of the 1507 participating laboratories, 667 (44%) responded to the survey. Most laboratories (59.4%; 396 of 667) had not incorporated HPV test/genotyping results to select NILM Pap tests for rescreening. Amongst the remaining laboratories, for NILM HPV-positive Pap test results, 112 (16.8%) had a policy to rescreen by a cytotechnologist only, 51 (7.6%) by a pathologist only, and 86 (12.9%) by both. Of 264 laboratories, 181 (68.6%) reported the cytology upon availability of the HPV test result and completion of the secondary review. Of 661 laboratories, 145 (21.9%) included consensus-type recommendations in the cytology report for such Pap tests. CONCLUSIONS.­: This CAP survey provides significant information regarding the current trends in the use of HPV test results in prospective rescreening of NILM Pap tests. Future studies on quality improvement can further assist in the standardization of this process across different laboratories.

Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Practice in 2019: Results of a College of American Pathologists National Survey.

CONTEXT.­: The College of American Pathologists surveys provide national benchmarks of pathology practice for laboratories. OBJECTIVE.­: To investigate breast fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy practice in domestic and international laboratories in 2019. DESIGN.­: We analyzed data from the College of American Pathologists Breast FNA Practice Supplemental Questionnaire that was distributed to laboratories participating in the 2019 College of American Pathologists Non-Gynecologic Cytopathology Education Program. RESULTS.­: Sixty-one percent (499 of 816) of respondent laboratories routinely evaluated breast FNAs. Cystic lesions were the most common indication, and radiologists primarily performed FNAs in most settings. Forty-five percent (220 of 491) of laboratories performed ancillary studies on breast FNA samples, but 33.8% (70 of 207) did not report fixation time for breast biomarker studies. Only 54.5% (271 of 497) of laboratories had a standardized reporting system and only 16.8% (82 of 488) were aware of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama Breast FNA Biopsy Cytology Reporting System. There were significant differences among different types of institutions in several aspects of breast FNA practice, including frequency of concurrent FNA and core needle biopsy for the same lesion, primary personnel who performed the FNA, etc. Significant differences existed between domestic and international laboratories in slide preparation, ancillary studies, fixation time reporting, standardized/descriptive diagnosis, and International Academy of Cytology Yokohama Reporting System awareness. CONCLUSIONS.­: This is the first survey from the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee to investigate breast FNA practices. The data reveal significant differences in breast FNA practice among different types of institutions and between domestic and international laboratories, and provide a baseline for future breast FNA studies in a variety of practice settings.

Cytopathology milestones: can you get to level 5?

INTRODUCTION: ACGME Milestones describe 6 areas of proficiency, indicating readiness for practice. Each is divided into 5 levels of mastery; Level 1 (new trainees) through Levels 4 (graduation) and 5 (aspirational). Milestones reporting began Spring 2016. We used Milestones to assess graduated fellows. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted phone interviews with previous fellows and collected demographic information including practice setting. We asked graduates if they fulfilled each example of mastery and recorded their answers. RESULTS: A total of 22 fellows graduated from 2010 to 2017; 15 responded (10 academic, 5 private). Milestones in which nearly all respondents performed well (Level 4+) were: PC1, MK1, SBP2, SBP4, PROF1-4, ICS1-3. Some were more challenging (PC2, MK2, SBP1/3/5, PBL1). For PC2, 2 respondents achieved Level 1 (did not perform fine-needle aspirations). For MK2, 2 respondents achieved Level 1 (did not evaluate Papanicolaou). For SBP1, 80% in private practice achieved Level 5; 50% in academics achieved Level 3. For SBP3, 80% in private practice achieved Level 4+; 100% in academics achieved maximum Level 2. For SBP5, 60% of all respondents achieved maximum Level 3; only 1 achieved Level 5. CONCLUSIONS: Many Milestones are attainable. Eleven of 18 yielded Level 4+ from most respondents. Three (PC2, MK1, MK2) yielded rare Level 1 due to scope of practice. Others (SBP1, SBP3) reflect more of an all-or-nothing phenomenon. For SBP5, most respondents achieved Level 3; only 1 achieved Level 5. Some Milestones are highly dependent on practice setting, and others remain aspirational.

Mammary Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman Disease With and Without Associated Axillary Lymphadenopathy: Insights for Practitioners of Breast Pathology.

Rosai-Dorfman disease is a rare proliferative histiocytic disorder of lymph nodes that is descriptively known as sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. Extranodal involvement of the parenchyma of the breast is uncommonly reported, with fewer than 50 cases of mammary extranodal disease detailed in the English-language literature. We characterize a retrospective series of adult female patients from a single institution with Rosai-Dorfman disease of the breast and axillary lymph nodes. Because Rosai-Dorfman disease of the breast and axillary lymph nodes may clinically, radiographically, and histologically mimic breast carcinoma and other conditions, we present an illustrated review of the disease and its relevant differential diagnoses in hopes of raising awareness and allowing for accurate management of affected patients.

Significance of atypical endometrial cells in women younger than 40 years of age.

INTRODUCTION: The presence of atypical endometrial cells in the Papanicolaou (Pap) test has been associated with an increased rate of endometrial malignancy, with reported rates ranging from 14% to 47%. However, most reported studies have focused on patients who were aged >40 years. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the clinical significance of identifying atypical endometrial cells in Pap test samples in women aged <40 years of age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of the cytology Pap test database was performed from 2000 to 2014 using the keywords "atypical endometrial cells" or "atypical glandular cells favor endometrial origin" in women aged <40 years. The available ThinPrep slides were reviewed. The patients' clinical presentation, follow-up endometrial biopsy findings, treatment, and clinical follow-up data were recorded. Endometrial carcinoma tissue sections were screened for Lynch syndrome. RESULTS: The database search yielded 63 study cases. Of these 63 patients, 52 had subsequently undergone endometrial biopsy. Of the 52 patients with follow-up biopsy findings available, 9 (17.3%) had premalignant (5 with atypical hyperplasia) or malignant (4 with endometrioid adenocarcinoma) lesions. In addition, 16 patients (30.8%) had other endometrial pathologic features. The 9 patients with premalignant or malignant endometrial lesions (8 white, 1 black) were overweight or obese; 3 of the patients did not have any clinical symptoms. All 4 patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma had negative Lynch syndrome screening findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that it is important to recognize the presence of atypical endometrial cells in the Pap tests from young patients, given its association with the finding of premalignant and malignant pathologic features in subsequent endometrial biopsies.

Mammary mesenchymal and fibroepithelial lesions: An illustrated cytomorphologic update with differential diagnoses.

The Uniform Approach to Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy was put forward by a learned group of breast physicians in 1997. This landmark manuscript focused predominantly on diagnosis and reporting of mammary epithelial lesions. Today, most American practitioners turn initially to core biopsy rather than aspiration biopsy for the first line diagnosis of solid breast lesions; however, recent efforts from the International Academy of Cytology have produced a system called the Standardized Reporting of Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytology (colloquially labeled in 2017 as the "Yokohama System"), suggesting a new interest in breast fine needle aspiration (FNA), especially in resource limited settings or clinical practice settings with experienced breast cytopathologists. Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast comprise a heterogeneous group of biphasic tumors with epithelial and stromal elements. Mesenchymal lesions of the breast include a variety of neoplasms of fibroblastic, myofibroblastic, endothelial, neural, adipocytic, muscular, and osteo-cartilaginous derivations. The cytology of mesenchymal breast lesions is infrequently described in the literature and is mainly limited to case reports and small series. This illustrated review highlights the cytologic features of fibroepithelial and mesenchymal mammary proliferations and discusses differential diagnoses and histomorphologic correlates.

Self-collected Papanicolaou tests in the United States market: more questions than answers.

The United States Food and Drug Administration held a public hearing in January 2018 to consider how it should evaluate a self-collection device for cervical cytology. Although no such device has been approved for use in the US market, the implications for patients and cytologists could be both sweeping and complex. Herein, the existing literature basis for self-collected Papanicolaou testing is reviewed, and some questions raised by this testing are considered. Questions include: what would be the value to patients; how effective could self-collected Papanicolaou tests be; how might ordering and collection work; what are the unique pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic challenges of self-collected Papanicolaou testing; and what effect might self-collection have on cervical cancer rates?

Role of ThinPrep liquid-based cytology in evaluation of the endocervical canal in patients with abnormal cervical screening.

INTRODUCTION: Endocervical sampling is frequently used as an adjunct to colposcopy. Few studies address the role of endocervical brushing (ECB) with liquid-based cytology (LBC) for evaluation of the endocervical canal. We assessed the roles of ThinPrep (TP) LBC of ECB specimens and cell blocks (CBs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pathology archives were searched for ECB specimens from 2010-2015. Preceding Papanicolaou test interpretation, human papillomavirus status, concurrent and follow-up surgical specimens, and ECB diagnoses were recorded. CB cellularity, when available, was scored on a scale of 0 to 4. The cellularity of the TP and CBs was compared. RESULTS: Of 365 ECB cases, 6 (1.6%) were insufficient for diagnosis, compared with a 5% rate for endocervical curettings. Eleven ECB cases (3%) showed low cellularity. Of the 241 (66%) cases with concurrent biopsies, the ECB diagnosis agreed with the biopsy diagnosis (within 1 grade) in 198 (82%) cases. In 9 (2.5%) cases, ECB was the only means of diagnosis of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion / adenocarcinoma in situ confirmed on follow-up. Compared with TP LBC, the CBs (performed in 84 [23%] of cases) were of greater cellularity in 30 (42%) and of equal cellularity in 17 (24%). None of the CBs showed an additional epithelial abnormality missed in TP LBC. CONCLUSIONS: TP LBC is capable of detecting endocervical epithelial abnormalities and may be used as a substitute for endocervical curettings. Performing a CB did not lead to detection of additional abnormalities, although it complemented TP findings and facilitates the performance of ancillary studies.

Bethesda 2014 Implementation and Human Papillomavirus Primary Screening: Practices of Laboratories Participating in the College of American Pathologists PAP Education Program.

CONTEXT.­: Cervical cancer screening laboratory practices may evolve with new terminology and technologies. OBJECTIVE.­: To investigate changes in cervical cytopathology practice resulting from the 2014 Bethesda System updates and screening technologies. DESIGN.­: Questionnaires accompanied 2016 and 2017 mailings of the College of American Pathologists PAP Education program. RESULTS.­: In 2016, most laboratories surveyed had adopted or were planning to adopt 2014 Bethesda System updates, and the majority (53%; 365 of 689) used an age cutoff of 45 for reporting benign-appearing endometrial cells. However, 51.3% (354 of 690) of laboratories used the term low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, for cases with indeterminate features, and 44.9% (298 of 664) of laboratories used a 5000-cell cutoff for minimum squamous cellularity for posthysterectomy and posttherapy specimens. Reporting rates for cervical cytology metrics changed very little from 2013 to 2016, and the median ratio of atypical squamous cells to squamous intraepithelial lesion cases was 1.9 for ThinPrep and 1.8 for SurePath preparations. Most laboratories (59.4%; 389 of 655) did not offer stand-alone primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in 2017, and primary HPV testing accounted for a low proportion of HPV testing volumes. The Roche Cobas method was the most common platform for HPV primary screening. CONCLUSIONS.­: These questionnaire surveys provide data about the current status of cervical cytology screening, including changes related to the 2014 Bethesda System updates and the adoption of HPV primary screening techniques.

Sensitivity of Cerebrospinal Fluid Cytology for the Diagnosis of Cryptococcal Infections: A 21-Year Single-Institution Retrospective Review.

Objectives: Cryptococcal meningoencephalitis is the most common fungal infection of the central nervous system diagnosed by cerebrospinal fluid cytology (CSF) studies. Existing literature suggests that routine CSF cytomorphologic evaluations are exquisitely specific; however, less is known about their sensitivity. Methods: An electronic record review of the cytopathology and microbiology files was conducted for the 21-year interval from January 1, 1995, through December 31, 2015. Results: In 21 years, 12,584 CSF samples were processed in the laboratory. Of these, 24 (0.2%) were reported positive for cryptococcal organisms by light microscopy, and 129 CSF fungal cultures were positive for Cryptococcus species. All cotested specimens with positive cytology results were positive on culture (15 specimens, 100% specificity). Twenty-four samples with positive culture results were negative by CSF cytology (sensitivity 39%). Conclusions: When culture is used as a gold standard, CSF cytology is 100% specific and 39% sensitive, with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 99.8%.