Bacterial adhesion to unworn and worn silicone hydrogel lenses.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the bacterial adhesion to various silicone hydrogel lens materials and to determine whether lens wear modulated adhesion. METHODS: Bacterial adhesion (total and viable cells) of Staphylococcus aureus (31, 38, and ATCC 6538) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6294, 6206, and GSU-3) to 10 commercially available different unworn and worn silicone hydrogel lenses was measured. Results of adhesion were correlated to polymer and surface properties of contact lenses. RESULTS: S. aureus adhesion to unworn lenses ranged from 2.8 × 10 to 4.4 × 10 colony forming units per lens. The highest adhesion was to lotrafilcon A lenses, and the lowest adhesion was to asmofilcon A lenses. P. aeruginosa adhesion to unworn lenses ranged from 8.9 × 10 to 3.2 × 10 colony forming units per lens. The highest adhesion was to comfilcon A lenses, and the lowest adhesion was to asmofilcon A and balafilcon A lenses. Lens wear altered bacterial adhesion, but the effect was specific to lens and strain type. Adhesion of bacteria, regardless of genera/species or lens wear, was generally correlated with the hydrophobicity of the lens; the less hydrophobic the lens surface, the greater the adhesion. CONCLUSIONS: P. aeruginosa adhered in higher numbers to lenses in comparison with S. aureus strains, regardless of the lens type or lens wear. The effect of lens wear was specific to strain and lens. Hydrophobicity of the silicone hydrogel lens surface influenced the adhesion of bacterial cells.

In vitro deposition of lysozyme on etafilcon A and balafilcon A hydrogel contact lenses: effects on adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.

PURPOSE: To compare lysozyme adsorption and absorption and bacterial adhesion interactions on conventional (etafilcon A) and silicone (balafilcon A) hydrogel contact lenses. METHOD: Lysozyme concentrations and activities associated with the lenses were determined after solvent extraction (trifluoroacetic acid/acetonitrile) and directly on the lenses without extraction with micrococcal- and micro-bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assays. Cells of bacteria with radiolabeled leucine and a cell recovery procedure were used in determinations of bacterial adhesion to lenses. RESULTS: Lysozyme was adsorbed and absorbed to the conventional etafilcon A lens at about a 10-fold greater concentration than to the balafilcon A silicone hydrogel lens. Enzyme activities on the surfaces of both lenses were similar but replenished after saline extraction only with the etafilcon A lens. Lysozyme on the lens surface showed significant lysis of Micrococcus luteus but had a negligible effect on the adhesion and survival of Staphylococcus aureus. Lysozyme did not appear to affect the survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on lenses. CONCLUSION: In vitro experiments show that concentrations of active lysozyme on the surface of the etafilcon A lens, unlike the balafilcon A lens which showed negligible absorption, may be sustained from the lens matrix. Lysozyme deposited on hydrogel lenses had marked activity against M. luteus but relatively minor effects on the primary adhesion of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus.

Effect of a multipurpose contact lens solution on the survival and binding of Acanthamoeba species on contact lenses examined with a no-rub regimen.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of a multipurpose contact lens solution (ReNu MultiPlus Multi-Purpose Solution [RMP]) on the relative survival and binding of trophozoites and cysts of Acanthamoeba on hydrogel lenses with a no-rub regimen. METHODS: A stand-alone test procedure with RMP was conducted with and without the presence of organic soil (1 x 10(7) colony-forming units/mL heat-killed cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum). Survival of amoebae on hydrogel contact lenses exposed to RMP was determined with a no-rub care regimen. RESULTS: ReNu MultiPlus Multi-Purpose Solution reduced the number of recoverable amoebae by more than 95% within 4 hours of inocula of 10(5) trophozoites and cysts, regardless of the presence or absence of an organic soil. Amoebae, particularly cysts, were readily rinsed from contact lenses, including silicone hydrogels, without rubbing after exposure to RMP. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of RMP for Acanthamoeba was not appreciably altered in the presence of organic soil in a no-rub protocol. The antimicrobial activity, in part, appeared to be a combination of reducing the capacity for binding of representative Acanthamoeba to the lens by alteration of morphology, often followed by lysis of the amoebae.

Relative primary adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens and Staphylococcus aureus to HEMA-type contact lenses and an extended wear silicone hydrogel contact lens of high oxygen permeability.

PURPOSE: To compare multiple strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and representative isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Serratia marcescens for their relative primary adhesion to a high Dk silicone hydrogel lens (36% H2O) with that of a HEMA-type lens (58% H2O). METHODS: A radiolabeled cell procedure with a 2-h cell exposure was employed for enumerating bacteria on unworn and worn silicone hydrogel (balafilcon A) and HEMA-type (etafilcon A) hydrogel lenses. RESULTS: The degree of primary adhesion of P. aeruginosa to 7-day worn balafilcon A lens was similar to the degree of adhesion to unworn balafilcon A lenses. The degree of primary adhesion by clinical strains to unworn balafilcon A lenses and etafilcon lenses was strain variable, but did not differ markedly for the two lenses with a given strain of P. aeruginosa. Relative to most of the pseudomonad strains, adhesion to the hydrogel lenses by S. aureus and S. marcescens was non-significant. CONCLUSION: Adhesion of strains of P. aeruginosa to a hydrogel contact lens does not appear to differ appreciably between the HEMA-type etafilcon A and the high Dk silicone hydrogel balafilcon A lens.

Validation of the Scan RDI for routine microbiological analysis of process water.

In this report, we review the validation methods and criteria specified in the PDA Technical Report No. 33 "Evaluation, Validation, and Implementation of New Microbiological Testing Methods" against data generated on the Chemunex Scan RDI. For each parameter, we have either reported data obtained in-house or reviewed information and documentation available from the manufacturer of the system. For all specified requirements, the Scan RDI produced data that was within the specifications suggested in the PDA Technical Report or suitable information was obtained from the manufacturer. The results of the study indicate that the Scan RDI can be validated for routine use in a pharmaceutical environment and provide results equivalent to current methods, but in a much shorter time frame.