RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Patients with advanced melanoma refractory to first-line treatment have a need for effective second-line treatment options. A recent phase 3 trial showed promising results for adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as second-line therapy in patients with advanced melanoma. However, it remains unknown how patients and their partners experience TIL therapy, which is key to evaluate and improve the quality of care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews about the experience of TIL therapy were conducted with patients with advanced melanoma and their partners 2-4 weeks post-treatment (short term) and >6 months after treatment (long term). RESULTS: In total, 25 interviews were conducted with advanced melanoma patients treated with TIL (n=13) and their partners (n=12), with the majority being short-term interviews (n=17). Overall, patients and partners experienced TIL therapy as intense (uncertainty of successful TIL culture, multiple treatment-related toxicities, and extensive hospitalization). Patients and partners with young children or other caregiving responsibilities encountered the most challenges during TIL therapy. All patients, however, reported a recovery of all treatment-related toxicities within 2-4 weeks (except fatigue). CONCLUSION: Clinical data justify the role of TIL therapy in the treatment of advanced melanoma. With the distinct nature of TIL therapy compared to the current standard of care, we have provided patient-centered recommendations that will further enhance the quality of TIL therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: As more patients with advanced melanoma are expected to receive TIL therapy in the future, our findings could be incorporated into survivorship care plans for this novel group of advanced melanoma survivors treated with TIL.
RESUMEN
Background: Almost half of the patients with metastatic melanoma obtain only short-term or no benefit at all from checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy. In this study, we investigated whether the immune system of patients progressing following CPI treatment was able to generate functional tumor-specific immune responses. Materials and methods: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were isolated and expanded from metastatic melanoma lesions which progressed during or after anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD)-1 and anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) treatment. Tumor-specific immune responses were assessed with co-culture assays of TILs and autologous tumor cells. Results: TILs from 23 metastases of individual patients could be assessed for T cells recognition of autologous tumor cells. All metastases were progressive on or following anti-PD-1 (23/23, 100%), and the majority also after anti-CTLA-4 (17/23, 74%). Functional antitumor immune responses were detected in 19/23 patients (83%). Both CD8+ (in 18/23 patients, 78%) and CD4+ (in 16/23 patients, 70%) TILs were able to recognize autologous tumors. A large fraction of CD8+ TILs (median 23%, range 1.0%-84%) recognized tumor cells. This is similar to the cohorts of unselected patient populations with metastatic melanoma presented in previous studies. The localization of intratumoral immune infiltrates was heterogeneous among samples. In a phase I/II clinical trial, TILs were administered with lymphodepleting chemotherapy, pegIFNα2b and interleukin-2 to 12 patients with CPI-resistant melanoma. Out of 12 patients who previously failed CPI therapy, treatment with TILs resulted in two partial responses, of which one is ongoing. Conclusions: Tumor-reactive T cells appear to heavily infiltrate the tumor microenvironment of patients who failed previous CPI treatment. These patients can still respond to an infusion of unselected autologous TILs. Our results warrant further testing of novel immune re-activation strategies in melanoma patients who failed multiple CPI therapy.
