Budesonide quantification by HPLC coupled to atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) tandem mass spectrometry. Application to a comparative systemic bioavailability of two budesonide formulations in healthy volunteers.

In the present study, a novel, fast, sensitive and robust method to quantify budesonide in human plasma using 3-keto-desogestrel as the internal standard (IS) is described. The analyte and the IS were extracted from human plasma by liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) using ether. Extracted samples were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to Atmospheric pressure photoionization tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-APPI-MS/MS). Chromatography was performed isocratically on a C18, 5 µm analytical column. The temperature of the autosampler was kept at 6 °C and the run time was 4.00 min. A linear calibration curve over the range 7.5-1000 pg ml⁻¹ was obtained and the lowest concentration quantified was 7.5 pg ml⁻¹, demonstrating acceptable accuracy and precision. This analytical method was applied in a relative bioavailability study in order to compare a test budesonide 64 µg/dose nasal spray formulation vs. a reference 64 µg/dose nasal spray formulation (Budecort Aqua) in 48 volunteers of both sexes. The study was conducted in an open randomized two-period crossover design and with a one-week washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 14 h interval. Since the 90% CI for both C(max), AUC(last) and AUC(0-inf) were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration and ANVISA, it was concluded that budesonide 64 µg/dose nasal spray was bioequivalent to Budecort Acqua® 64 µg/dose nasal spray, according to both the rate and extent of absorption.

[Comparison study of two glimepiride formulations bioavailability in healthy volunteers of both sexes after a single dose administration]. / Estudo comparativo da biodisponibilidade relativa de duas formulações de glimepirida em voluntários sadios de ambos os sexos após administração de uma dose única de um comprimido de 4 mg.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bioavailability of two glimepiride 4-mg tablet formulation in 26 healthy volunteers of both sexes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted open with randomized two-period crossover design and a 14-day washout period. Samples were obtained over a 48-hour interval. Glimepiride concentrations were analyzed by LC-MS-MS. From the glimepiride plasma concentration versus time curves the following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained: AUC(0-last), AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Ke, T1/2, Cmax, and Tmax. RESULTS: Geometric mean of Glimepirida/Amaryl 4 mg was 102.35% for AUC(0-t), 102.35% for AUC(0-infinity) and 99.31% for Cmax. The 90% CI was 92.62-109.55%; 95.62-109.55% e 88.60-111.32%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Since the 90% CI for both Cmax, AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) were within the interval of 80-125%, it was concluded that both formulations were bioequivalent, according to both the rate and extent of absorption.

Estudo comparativo da biodisponibilidade relativa de duas formulações de glimepirida em voluntários sadios de ambos os sexos após administração de uma dose única de um comprimido de 4 mg / Comparison study of two glimepiride formulations bioavailability in healthy volunteers of both sexes after a single dose administration

OBJETIVO: Comparar a biodisponibilidade de duas formulações de glimepirida em 26 voluntários sadios de ambos os sexos. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: O estudo foi aberto, cruzado e randomizado com dois períodos e wash out de 14 dias. As amostras foram obtidas em um intervalo de 48 horas. As concentrações de glimepirida foram analisadas por HPLC MS/MS. Das curvas de concentração de glimepirida no plasma versus tempo, foram obtidos os seguintes parâmetros farmacocinéticos: ASC(0-t), ASC(0-∞), Cmax, Ke, Tmax e T1/2. RESULTADOS: A razão entre as média geométricas de Glimepirida/Amaryl® 4 mg foi de 102,35 por cento para ASC(0-t); 102,35 por cento para ASC(0-∞) e 99,31 por cento para Cmax. Os intervalos de confiança de 90 por cento (IC 90 por cento) foram de 92,62-109,55 por cento; 95,62-109,55 por cento e 88,60-111,32 por cento, respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: Como o IC 90 por cento para Cmax, ASC(0-t) e ASC(0-∞) estava dentro do intervalo de 80-125 por cento, concluiu-se que ambas as formulações foram bioequivalentes de acordo com o grau e a extensão de sua absorção.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bioavailability of two glimepiride 4-mg tablet formulation in 26 healthy volunteers of both sexes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted open with randomized two-period crossover design and a 14-day washout period. Samples were obtained over a 48-hour interval. Glimepiride concentrations were analyzed by LC-MS-MS. From the glimepiride plasma concentration versus time curves the following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained: AUC(0-last), AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), Ke, T1/2, Cmax, and Tmax. RESULTS: Geometric mean of Glimepirida/Amaryl® 4 mg was 102.35 percent for AUC(0-t), 102.35 percent for AUC(0-∞) and 99.31 percent for Cmax. The 90 percent CI was 92.62-109.55 percent; 95.62-109.55 percent e 88.60-111.32 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: Since the 90 percent CI for both Cmax, AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-∞) were within the interval of 80-125 percent, it was concluded that both formulations were bioequivalent, according to both the rate and extent of absorption.

Ticlopidine quantification in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Application to bioequivalence study.

A rapid, sensitive and specific method to quantify ticlopidine in human plasma using clopidogrel as the internal standard (IS) is described. The analyte and the IS were extracted from acidified plasma by liquid-liquid extraction using diethyl ether-hexane (80 : 20, v/v). The extracts were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS). Chromatography was performed isocratically on a Jones Genesis C(8) 4 microm analytical column (150 x 4.1 mm i.d.). The method had a chromatographic run time of 3.0 min and a linear calibration curve over the range 1.0-1000 ng ml(-1) (r(2) > 0.999427). The limit of quantification was 1.0 ng ml(-1). This HPLC/MS/MS procedure was used to assess the bioequivalence of two ticlopidine 250 mg tablet formulations (ticlopidine test formulation from Apotex do Brasil, Brazil, and Ticlid from Sanofi-Synthelabo, standard reference formulation). A single 250 mg dose of each formulation was administered to healthy volunteers. The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with a 2 week washout interval. Since the 90% confidence interval for C(max) and area under the curve ratios were all inside the 80-125% interval proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration, it was concluded that ticlopidine formulation from Apotex do Brasil is bioequivalent to Ticlid formulation with respect to both the rate and the extent of absorption.