What constitutes the 'Minimal Care' interventions of the nurse, physiotherapist, dietician and psychologist in Cardiovascular Rehabilitation and secondary prevention: A position paper from the Italian Association for Cardiovascular Prevention, Rehabilitation and Epidemiology.

BACKGROUND: In cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation, care activities are carried out by different professionals in coordination, each with their own specific competence. This GICR-IACPR position paper has analysed the interventions performed by the nurse, physiotherapist, dietician and psychologist in order to identify what constitutes minimal care, and it lists the activities that are fundamental and indispensable for each team member to perform in clinical practice. RESULTS: In analysing each type of intervention, the following dimensions were considered: the level of clinical care complexity, determined both by the disease and by environmental factors; the 'area' complexity, i.e. the specific level of competence required of the professional in each professional section; organisational factors, i.e. whether the care is performed in an inpatient or outpatient setting; duration of the rehabilitation intervention. The specific contents of minimal care have been identified for each professional area together with the specific goals, the assessment tools and the main essential interventions. For the assessments, only a few validated tools have been indicated, leaving the choice of which instrument to use to the individual professional based on experience and usual practice. CONCLUSION: For the interventions, attention has been focused on conditions of major complexity requiring special care, taking into account the different care settings, the clinical conditions secondary to the disease event, and the distinct tasks of each area according to the operator's specific role. The final report performed by each professional has also been included.

[First definition of minimal care model: the role of nurses, physiotherapists, dietitians and psychologists in preventive and rehabilitative cardiology]. / Documento preliminare alla definizione degli interventi Minimal Care infermieristici, fisioterapici, dietistici e psicologici attuabili nell'ambito della Cardiologia Riabilitativa e Preventiva.

Rehabilitative and preventive cardiology (CRP) is configured as intervention prevention to "gain health" through a process of multifactorial care that reduces disability and the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events. It makes use of an interdisciplinary team in which every professional needs to have multiple intervention paths because of the different levels of clinical and functional complexity of cardiac patients who currently have access to the rehabilitation. The document refers to the use of interventions by nurses, physiotherapists, dietitians and psychologists that are part of the rehabilitation team of CRP. Interventions of which have been documented, on scientific bases and clinical practice, empirical effectiveness and organizational efficiency. The methodological approach of this paper is a first attempt to define, through the model of consensus, the minimum standards for a CRP evidence based characterized by clearly defined criteria that can be used by operators of CRP. The document describes the activities to be carried out in each of the phases included in the pathways of care by nurses, physiotherapists, dietitians and psychologists. The routes identified were divided, according to the type of patients who have access to the CRP and to the phases of care, including the initial assessment, intervention, evaluation and final reporting, in high medium and low complexity. Examples of models of reporting, used by the operators of the team according to the principles of good clinical practice, are provided. This is made to allow traceability of operations, encourage communication inside the working group and within the patient and the caregiver. Also to give any possible indication for the post-rehabilitation.

[Major epidemiological changes and clinical variables in patients undergoing a program of heart rehabilitation after cardiac surgery - MEPHISTOPHELES]. / Major epidemiological changes and clinical variables in patients undergoing a program of heart rehabilitation after cardiac surgery - MEPHISTOPHELES.

BACKGROUND: Recent observational studies show an increase of more complex and critically ill patients referred to Italian cardiac rehabilitation (CR) departments; the exact mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, however, have not been clearly identified. The aim of our study was to evaluate the epidemiological and clinical changes that occurred over the last decade in patients hospitalized in CR departments with high admittance rates. METHODS: We have retrospectively evaluated all patients admitted between 2002 and 2009 to our division of CR (n = 3340, 1155 female, mean age 66.4 ± 11 years) after recent cardiac surgery. The study population was divided into two homogeneous groups: the four-year period 2002-2005, group A (n = 1614, 540 female, mean age 66.1 ± 10 years) and the four-year period 2006-2009, group B (n = 1726, 615 female, mean age 67.4 ± 11 years). Data were compared using specific indicators of clinical complexity. RESULTS: Patients aged >75 years were more in group B compared to A (26.3 vs 19.8%, p<0.0001), as well as patients with recent complex surgical interventions, such as combined coronary artery bypass grafting and heart valve surgery (16.4 vs 10.2%, p<0.0001). An increased incidence of cardiovascular death (1.4 vs 0.6%, p=0.02), acute coronary syndrome (1.5 vs 0.7%, p=0.02) and persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter (13.5 vs 7.1%, p<0.0001) was observed in group B, as well as an increased prevalence of systolic heart failure (18.3 vs 9.0%, p<0.0001). Similarly, the incidence of acute respiratory failure episodes (1.0 vs 0.4%, p=0.05), the prevalence of patients admitted with a tracheostomy tube (2.6 vs 0.2%, p<0.0001) and the incidence of acute renal failure (1.1 vs 0.5%, p=0.05) were significantly increased in group B. Postoperative infections and surgical wound complications were 4-fold higher in group B (13.9 vs 3.1%, p<0.0001, and 12.8 vs 2.3%, p<0.0001, respectively). Compared to group A, patients of group B showed a significantly lower physical performance, as expressed by the Rivermead motility index (3.8 ± 1.1 vs 5.2 ± 0.8, p<0.001); moreover, the number of subjects able to perform an incremental training program was significantly lower in group B than group A (14.8 vs 60.6%, p<0.0001). Mean hospital stay was longer in group B than group A (25.4 ± 13 vs 22.1 ± 9 days, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study, by collecting data from a CR division in northern Italy with high admittance rates, demonstrates a dramatic increase in clinical complexity over the last few years. This points to the need for new expertise and major resources to be allocated to CR departments.

A case of Guillain-Barrè syndrome following Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.

Guillain-Barrè syndrome (GBS) is the most important cause of acute neuromuscular paralysis in western countries and it is preceded in almost all cases by an infectious disease such as Campylobacter Jejuni or Cytomegalovirus. However, GBS associated with previous bacterial endocarditis is very rare. We report the case of a 74-year-old man with GBS following Staphylococcus Aureus endocarditis affecting aortic valve. Although the absolute incidence of GBS is low, the present case stresses the need to consider GBS in patients developing neurological symptoms following any infectious illness, such as endocarditis, and highlights the challenging problem of rehabilitation and surgical management in these patients.