Dental caries and associated factors in 7-, 12- and 15-year-old schoolchildren in the canton of Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland: Changes in caries experience from 1992 to 2021.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological surveys in schoolchildren are used to assess the current status of oral health. AIM: To investigate the changes in caries experience among schoolchildren in the canton of Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland, over a period of three decades. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the impact of various personal and demographic factors such as age group, place of residence or dental hygiene awareness on caries prevalence as well as the history of orthodontic treatment in the year 2021. DESIGN: A random sampling of school classes from first, sixth and ninth grades, that is schoolchildren aged 7, 12 and 15 years, was performed. Children's dmft and DMFT scores were determined according to the WHO methodology while information on oral hygiene habits and dental prophylaxis awareness was collected by means of a questionnaire directed to the legal guardians of the children. Individual logistic regressions were performed to identify possible influencing factors for caries. RESULTS: A total of 1357 schoolchildren could be included in the study. In the year 2021, the youngest age group had an average of 0.68 primary teeth that needed treatment, whereas the 12- and 15-year-olds each had approximately 0.3 permanent teeth requiring treatment. While these numbers remained constant over the examination period of three decades, most of the other caries indices improved. Younger children (p = .001) and children with a migrant background (p < .001) were found to be risk groups. Orthodontic treatment was more frequent in females, schoolchildren of Swiss nationality and children attending higher secondary schools at ninth grade. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that even in a country with a low prevalence of caries experience, untreated carious lesions remain a problem as their prevalence remained unchanged over the examination period of three decades.

Assessment of the prevalence and length of the anterior and caudal loops of the mental nerve as anatomical variants of exiting the mandible at the mental foramen using cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to identify the studies that performed cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the prevalence and length of the anterior loop (AL) and caudal loop (CL) of the mental nerve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic database search was performed across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane library, and Google Scholar. Original studies reporting the frequency and length of the AL and CL were selected. Qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis were then conducted to assess the prevalence and length of the AL and CL and their associations with age, gender, sides, and dentition status. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were included in this review. The pooled prevalence of the AL (95% confidence interval) of the mental nerve at the patient and side level was 51% (31-71%) and 53% (37-69%) while the mean anterior loop length was 2.08 (1.46-2.70) mm. The pooled prevalence of the CL and mean caudal loop length were 100% and 4.73 (3.44-6.01) mm. No significant associations were found between the prevalence and length of the AL and CL and age, gender, sides, and dentition status. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the pooled prevalence and mean length of AL of the mental nerve varied among different populations while CL seems to be a constant anatomical landmark with a longer CL than AL. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons performing inter-foraminal oral surgeries like dental implant placement and genioplasty should be aware of the possible distance of the AL and CL to avoid iatrogenic mental nerve injury.

Linear and angular measurement using cone-beam computed tomography to enhance safety in Le Fort I osteotomy with tuberosity cut.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate surgical angles for tuberosity cut and linear and angular measurements for all horizontal cuts in Le Fort I osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 189 CBCT scans to assess the surgical angles on 3 different sites distal to maxillary second molars relative to the midsagittal plane (MSP) and the buccal cortical plane (BCP) in relation to the descending palatine foramen for tuberosity cut. The linear and angular measurements for all horizontal cuts in Le Fort I osteotomy were also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean surgical angles for tuberosity cut varied from 58.90 to 95.28° and 74.85 to 100.93° according to the MSP and the BCP, respectively. For the horizontal cuts, mean lengths (angles) for posterior buccal and lateral nasal wall osteotomies were 27.44 mm (13.62°) and 33.20 mm (9.60°), respectively, and a mean length of 47.12 mm was measured for nasal septum osteotomy. Additionally, the presence of impacted third molar resulted in significantly higher mean surgical angles than those with fully erupted or without third molars (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, angles running through the buccal midpoint of the third molars relative to the MSP (76.56°) or the BCP (92.31°) might be the most appropriate in clinical practice. Furthermore, some caution seems warranted when performing tuberosity cuts with the impacted third molars. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To avoid potential damage to the descending palatine artery for tuberosity cut in Le Fort I osteotomy.

Evaluation of the relationship between malar projection and lower facial convexity in terms of perceived attractiveness in 3-dimensional reconstructed images.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate dental student's perception of facial attractiveness with regard to different combinations of anteroposterior malar-jaw positions using 3-dimensional (3-D) reconstructed images of subjects. METHODS: Two Chinese young adults (1 male and 1 female) with straight profiles and average malar projections were selected for the study. 3-D facial images and cone-beam computed tomography images of these two subjects were superimposed using 3-D imaging software. Lateral and oblique views of nine different images were created by moving the maxillomandibular complex and/or zygomatic bone by 4 mm either forward or backward along the sagittal plane. One hundred three undergraduate dental students (n = 24, 33, and 46 students from the Year 3, 4, and 5, respectively) then scored lateral and 45° oblique view images of the newly reconstructed faces. RESULTS: In the present study, images with a neutral malar and retruded jaws were found to be the most attractive in both male and female subjects. In addition, the Protruded malar (PM) group (p < 0.001), and the Retruded Jaws (RJ) group were rated more attractive (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the Relatively Prominent malar (RP) group was rated more attractive (p < 0.001) when malar-jaw relative positions were compared. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a neutral or a protruded malar favours facial attractiveness in both Chinese male and female subjects. Therefore, an appropriate relationship between malar projection and lower facial convexity should be taken into consideration while designing the orthodontic/orthognathic treatment plans for enhanced aesthetic outcomes.

Facial attractiveness of cleft patients: a direct comparison between artificial-intelligence-based scoring and conventional rater groups.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate facial attractiveness of treated cleft patients and controls by artificial intelligence (AI) and to compare these results with panel ratings performed by laypeople, orthodontists, and oral surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Frontal and profile images of 20 treated left-sided cleft patients (10 males, mean age: 20.5 years) and 10 controls (5 males, mean age: 22.1 years) were evaluated for facial attractiveness with dedicated convolutional neural networks trained on >17 million ratings for attractiveness and compared to the assessments of 15 laypeople, 14 orthodontists, and 10 oral surgeons performed on a visual analogue scale (n = 2323 scorings). RESULTS: AI evaluation of cleft patients (mean score: 4.75 ± 1.27) was comparable to human ratings (laypeople: 4.24 ± 0.81, orthodontists: 4.82 ± 0.94, oral surgeons: 4.74 ± 0.83) and was not statistically different (all Ps ≥ 0.19). Facial attractiveness of controls was rated significantly higher by humans than AI (all Ps ≤ 0.02), which yielded lower scores than in cleft subjects. Variance was considerably large in all human rating groups when considering cases separately, and especially accentuated in the assessment of cleft patients (coefficient of variance-laypeople: 38.73 ± 9.64, orthodontists: 32.56 ± 8.21, oral surgeons: 42.19 ± 9.80). CONCLUSIONS: AI-based results were comparable with the average scores of cleft patients seen in all three rating groups (with especially strong agreement to both professional panels) but overall lower for control cases. The variance observed in panel ratings revealed a large imprecision based on a problematic absence of unity. IMPLICATION: Current panel-based evaluations of facial attractiveness suffer from dispersion-related issues and remain practically unavailable for patients. AI could become a helpful tool to describe facial attractiveness, but the present results indicate that important adjustments are needed on AI models, to improve the interpretation of the impact of cleft features on facial attractiveness.