Persisting chemosensory dysfunction in COVID-19 - a cross-sectional population-based survey.

BACKGROUND: Chemosensory dysfunction (CD) has been reported as a common symptom of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but it is not well understood whether and for how long changes of smell, taste and chemesthesis persist in infected individuals. METHODOLOGY: Unselected adult residents of the German federal state of Schleswig-Holstein with Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-test-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were invited to participate in this large cross-sectional study. Data on the medical history and subjective chemosensory function of participants were obtained through questionnaires and visual analogue scales (VAS). Olfactory function (OF) was objectified with the Sniffin Sticks test (SST), including threshold (T), discrimination (D) and identification (I) test as well as summarized TDI score, and compared to that in healthy controls. Gustatory function (GF) was evaluated with the suprathreshold taste strips (TS) test, and trigeminal function was tested with an ampoule containing ammonia. RESULTS: Between November 2020 and June 2021, 667 infected individuals (mean age: 48.2 years) were examined 9.1 months, on average, after positive PCR testing. Of these, 45.6% had persisting subjective olfactory dysfunction (OD), 36.2% had subjective gustatory dysfunction (GD). Tested OD, tested GD and impaired trigeminal function were observed in 34.6%, 7.3% and 1.8% of participants, respectively. The mean TDI score of participants was significantly lower compared to healthy subjects. Significant associations were observed between subjective OD and GD, and between tested OD and GD. CONCLUSION: Nine months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, OD prevalence is significantly increased among infected members of the general population. Therefore, OD should be included in the list of symptoms collectively defining Long-COVID.

A mechanism-based group-psychotherapy approach to aggressive behaviour in borderline personality disorder: findings from a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Aggressive behaviour is a prevalent and harmful phenomenon in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, no short-term, low-cost programme exists that specifically focuses on aggression. AIMS: Attuning therapy modules to pathogenetic mechanisms that underlie reactive aggression in BPD, we composed a 6 week mechanism-based anti-aggression psychotherapy (MAAP) approach for the group setting, which we tested against a non-specific supportive psychotherapy (NSSP). METHOD: A cluster-randomised two-arm parallel-group phase II trial of N = 59 patients with BPD and overt aggressive behaviour was performed (German Registry for Clinical Trials, DRKS00009445). The primary outcome was the externally directed overt aggression score of the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (M-OAS) post-treatment (adjusted for pre-treatment overt aggression). Secondary outcomes were M-OAS irritability, M-OAS response rate and ecological momentary assessment of anger post-treatment and at 6 month follow-up, as well as M-OAS overt aggression score at follow-up. RESULTS: Although no significant difference in M-OAS overt aggression between treatments was found post-treatment (adjusted difference in mean 3.49 (95% CI -5.32 to 12.31, P = 0.22), the MAAP group showed a clinically relevant decrease in aggressive behaviour of 65% on average (versus 33% in the NSSP group), with particularly strong improvement among those with the highest baseline aggression. Most notably, significant differences in reduction in overt aggression between MAAP and NSSP were found at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BPD and aggressive behaviour benefited from a short group psychotherapy, with improvements particularly visible at 6 month follow-up. Further studies are required to show whether these effects are specific to MAAP.

[Study protocol to improve the quality of delirium management in intensive care]. / Protokoll einer Studie zur Qualitätsverbesserung des Delirmanagements auf der Intensivstation.

BACKGROUND: Delirium in cardiac surgery patients is common and is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and hospital stay as well as higher mortality. Protocols may improve outcome. In our cardiac surgery intensive care unit (ICU), patients with delirium have not received standardized treatment so far. HYPOTHESIS: In cardiac surgery ICU patients, standardized delirium management will lead after a 4­week introduction, compared to nonstandardized treatment, to a reduction of delirium duration. METHODS: Prospective before/after study to evaluate a quality improvement project for delirium management over 12 weeks including 140 patients. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (a) ≥18 years, (b) consent for research with their data. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: (a) palliative status, (b) present during both the before/after phase, (c) pregnancy, (d) included in a competitive study, or (e) delirium not assessable. The implementation includes the introduction of a protocol with interprofessional training, bedside-teaching, pocket cards, posters, and reminders. The primary outcome is the duration of delirium, assessed four times a day with validated instruments. Secondary outcome measures include delirium incidence, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in ICU and hospital, mortality, nursing/therapeutic interventions, cumulative doses of delirium-related drugs, and complications of delirium for a follow-up of 28 days. Empirical data will be analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study is a reduction of the duration and frequency of delirium in cardiac ICU patients and will provide evidence of the effect size of the introduction of a delirium management.

Analysis of the Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation Algorithm: How Should We Balance Utility and Equity?

BACKGROUND: Since 2014, expected graft and recipient survival are matched by the U.S. kidney allocation system to improve organ utility. This mechanism is based on the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) and the estimated posttransplant survival score (EPTS). Here we analyzed 1. the transferability of these scores into the Eurotransplant (ET) region and 2. the extent to which the ET kidney allocation algorithm promotes utility. METHODS: We studied data of 262 kidney transplantations performed at the University Hospital Kiel between 2000 and 2009 (median follow-up, 9.94 years). RESULTS: Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that only the variables donor age of the KDPI and recipient's age of the EPTS have a significant value as predictors of posttransplant graft and recipient survival. The other variables showed no additional predictive value. Analyzing all kidneys allocated in the ET kidney allocation system and the European Senior Program, we found that donor and recipient's age and KDPI and EPTS were weakly correlated (rage-age = 0.5, P < .001; rKDPI-EPTS = 0.4, P < .01). If both programs were analyzed separately, no correlation between donor and recipient's age and between KDPI and EPTS was detected. CONCLUSION: The ET kidney allocation algorithm poorly matched predicted graft and recipient survival at our center. A better age-matching may improve organ utility.