RESUMEN
Spasticity is a prevalent symptom of upper motor neuron syndrome, becoming debilitating when hindering voluntary movement and motor function and causing contractures and pain. Functional neurosurgery plays a crucial role in treating severe spasticity. Despite extensive literature on SDR for lower limb spasticity, there is a scarcity of papers regarding the procedure in the cervical region to alleviate upper limb spasticity. This case report details a cervical dorsal rhizotomy (CDR) performed for upper limb spasticity, resulting in significant improvement in spasticity with sustained outcomes and low complication rates. Neuroablative procedures like CDR become an option to treat spasticity.
Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral , Rizotomía , Humanos , Rizotomía/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Espasticidad Muscular/cirugía , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Extremidad Superior/cirugía , Parálisis Cerebral/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is evidence that Chiari malformation (CM) and basilar invagination (BI) are largely due to disproportion between the content and volume of the posterior fossa. A recent study identified an increased association between brachycephaly and BI. In several types of craniosynostosis, the posterior fossa volume is smaller than normal, and this is more pronounced in coronal synostosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between CM and BI. METHODS: The cephalic index (CI) measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from a sample of patients with craniocervical malformation was compared with that of normal subjects. RESULTS: The average CI in the craniovertebral junction malformation (CVJM) group was significantly higher in BI patients than in normal subjects. The BI patients also had the highest CI among the whole sample of patients (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, BI patients had the highest CI among patients with CVJM and a significantly higher CI than those in the control group. Our data confirm the association between BI and brachycephaly.
Asunto(s)
Malformación de Arnold-Chiari , Craneosinostosis , Platibasia , Humanos , Platibasia/complicaciones , Platibasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Platibasia/patología , Malformación de Arnold-Chiari/complicaciones , Malformación de Arnold-Chiari/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Craneosinostosis/complicaciones , Craneosinostosis/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Objective: Postoperative readmission rates can be used to assess hospital care quality. The rates of unplanned readmission within 30 days after spine surgery are variable in the literature, and no studies have evaluated such rates in a single Latin American center. This study aimed to assess the rate of unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days after a spine surgery at a single Brazilian institution and to identify possible risk factors. Methods: Patients who underwent spine surgery at a single private hospital between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and those with unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge were identified. Risk factors were determined, and the reoperation rate was assessed. Results: 650 patients were included in the analysis, and 74 (11.28%) were readmitted within 30 days after surgery. Higher readmission rates were observed after vertebroplasty and surgeries involving spinal or bone tumors. The risk factors found in the series were older age, longer hospital stays, higher ASA scores, instrumented surgeries, diabetes mellitus, and surgeries involving primary or secondary spinal tumors. The most common causes of unplanned readmission were infection and pain. Of the readmissions, 28.37% required a return to the operating room. Conclusions: This study suggests infection and pain management were the most common causes of unplanned readmission after spine surgery. Strategies to improve perioperative and postoperative care are required to reduce unplanned readmissions. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective Comparative Study.
RESUMO: Objetivo: As taxas de readmissão pós-operatórias podem ser usadas para avaliação da qualidade assistencial hospitalar. As taxas de readmissão não planejada em 30 dias após cirurgias de coluna são variáveis na literatura, e não há estudos avaliando tais taxas em centros únicos da América Latina. Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar as taxas de readmissões não planejadas em 30 dias após cirurgias de coluna em uma única instituição brasileira e identificar possíveis fatores de risco. Métodos: Pacientes submetidos a cirurgias de coluna em um único hospital privado entre janeiro de 2018 e dezembro de 2020 foram avaliados retrospectivamente, e aqueles readmitidos dentro de 30 dias foram identificados. Fatores de risco foram determinados e a taxa de reoperação foi avaliada. Resultados: 650 pacientes foram incluídos na análise, e 74 (11,28%) foram readmitidos dentro de 30 dias após a cirurgia. Maiores taxas de readmissão foram observadas após vertebroplastia e cirurgias envolvendo tumores espinhais ou tumores ósseos. Os fatores de risco encontrados em nossa série foram idade mais elevada, maior tempo de hospitalização, maior escore ASA, cirurgias com instrumentação, diabetes mellitus e cirurgias envolvendo tumores vertebrais primários ou secundários. As causas mais comuns de readmissão não planejada foram infecção e dor. Dentre os pacientes reinternados, 28,37% necessitaram de reoperação. Conclusões: Este estudo sugere que infecção e manejo de dor foram as causas mais comuns de readmissão não planejada após cirurgias de coluna. Estratégias para melhorar os cuidados pre e pós-operatórios são necessárias para reduzir readmissões não planejadas. Nível de Evidência III; Estudo Retrospectivo Comparativo.
RESUMEN: Objetivo: Las tasas de reingreso después de la cirugía de columna son variables y ningún estudio ha evaluado tales tasas en un solo centro latinoamericano. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la tasa de reingreso hospitalario no planificado dentro de los 30 días posteriores a la cirugía de columna en una sola institución brasileña e identificar posibles factores de riesgo. Métodos: Se analizaron retrospectivamente los pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía de columna en un solo hospital entre enero de 2018 y diciembre de 2020, y se identificaron aquellos con reingresos no planificados dentro de los 30 días posteriores al alta. Se determinaron los factores de riesgo y se evaluó la tasa de reoperación. Resultados: En el análisis se incluyeron un total de 650 pacientes, y 74 (11,28%) reingresaron dentro de los 30 días posteriores a la cirugía. Se observaron tasas de reingreso más altas después de la vertebroplastia y las cirugías que involucraron tumores espinales u óseos. Los factores de riesgo encontrados en nuestra serie fueron la edad avanzada, la estancia hospitalaria más prolongada, las puntuaciones ASA más altas, las cirugías instrumentadas, la diabetes mellitus y las cirugías de tumores espinales. Las causas más frecuentes de reingreso fueron la infección y el dolor. De los reingresos, el 28,37% requirieron volver al quirófano. Conclusiones: Este estudio sugiere que la infección y el manejo del dolor fueron las causas más comunes de reingreso. Se requieren estrategias para mejorar la atención perioperatoria y posoperatoria y así reducir las readmisiones no planificadas. Nivel de Evidencia III; Estudio comparativo retrospectivo.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Ortopedia , Readmisión del Paciente , Procedimientos OrtopédicosRESUMEN
Background: Hemangioblastomas (HBs) typically present with benign behavior and are most commonly found in the posterior fossa. Multiple central nervous system (CNS) HBs are usually associated with von Hippel-Lindau disease, and leptomeningeal dissemination of sporadic HBs is extremely rare. A review of the literature identified 30 cases of leptomeningeal dissemination of sporadic HBs previously published in the literature. Case Description: We report the case of a patient who was diagnosed with multiple CNS HBs with aggressive progression 6 years after resection of a posterior fossa HB. He underwent multiple surgeries and died 4 years after the diagnosis of the first spinal dissemination. Conclusion: Dissemination of sporadic HBs is rare and aggressive disease evolution is usually observed. Further studies are necessary to determine the optimal therapeutic options.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Traumatic facet dislocations in the subaxial cervical spine, also known as locked facets, are commonly associated with neurological deficits. The fear of the presence of an associated traumatic disc herniation and consequent neurological worsening usually causes a delay in the spinal realignment. This study's aim is an analysis of safety and efficacy when treating acute cervical traumatic facet dislocations using cranial-cervical traction or posterior open reduction and fixation in the presence of disc herniations. METHODS: Inclusion criteria addressed the following patient groups: (1) MRI diagnosis of traumatic cervical facet dislocations with disc herniation, (2) intervention: either cranial-cervical traction or posterior open reduction and fixation, (4) neurological outcomes after treatment, (5) adult 18 plus years of age, (6) sample sizes greater than 20 patients, (7) English language publication. The following databases and search tools were analyzed: MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, and the clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov), October 2021. RESULTS: Six studies were found, 2 with posterior open reduction and fixation and 4 with cranial-cervical traction, totalizing 197 patients. Neurological worsening was reported only in 1 case (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic disc herniation in cervical facet dislocations is not an absolute contraindication of cranial-cervical traction or posterior open reduction. Early realignment of the spine could bring more neurological benefits than waiting for an MRI or surgical discectomy. However, caution is needed in this review's data interpretation until prospective and well-designed studies are performed.
Asunto(s)
Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral , Luxaciones Articulares , Adulto , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Discectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/complicaciones , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Luxaciones Articulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Luxaciones Articulares/cirugía , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Adult cervical spine traumatic facet joint dislocations occur when excessive traumatic forces displace the vertebrae's facets, leading to loss of joint congruence. Reduction requires either cranial traction or open surgical procedures. This study aims to appraise the effects of different surgical techniques in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine acute traumatic facet blocks in adults. This study was based on a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, registered in Prospero (CRD42021279249). The PICO question was composed of adults with acute cervical spine traumatic facet dislocations submitted to anterior or posterior surgical approaches, associated or not with cranial traction for reduction. Each surgical technique was compared to the other. The primary clinical outcomes included neurological improvement or worsening and surgical success/failure rates. The anterior approach without cranial traction was efficient in reducing facet displacements. Skull traction was an efficient and immediate method to achieve spine dislocation reductions. Differences were not present among techniques regarding neurological improvement. There were no surgical failures in patients operated on via the posterior approach. The need to decompress and stabilize the cervical spine can be achieved by anterior or posterior surgical approaches, and there is no clear answer as to which initial approach is superior to the other.
Asunto(s)
Luxaciones Articulares , Fusión Vertebral , Traumatismos Vertebrales , Articulación Cigapofisaria , Adulto , Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Humanos , Luxaciones Articulares/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Traumatismos Vertebrales/cirugía , Articulación Cigapofisaria/lesiones , Articulación Cigapofisaria/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis is a relatively common pathology, and surgical treatment is an option in selected cases. The common use of anterior column support by interbody fusion (IBF) has not been adequately studied. PURPOSE: The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the functional and surgical outcomes after posterolateral fusion (PLF) and IBF for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to identify studies analyzing the effects of IBF compared to those of instrumented PLF on degenerative spondylolisthesis. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 1,063 patients were included in the analysis. Of them, 470 patients were treated with PLF and 593 with IBF. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes analyzed were the visual analog scale and numerical rating scale scores for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (physical and mental components) score, blood loss amount, surgical time, hospital stay duration, fusion rate, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, and postoperative complications. METHODS: A search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases for studies published between January 1985 and February 2021. Both retrospective and prospective studies that compared between IBF and PLF were included. RESULTS: A total of 2,819 articles were screened, and 38 full-text articles were selected for a detailed investigation, of which 12 articles were found to match all the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There was an improvement in the sacral slope (mean difference [MD] = 3 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 0.83-5.17]) and fusion rate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.47 [95% CI = 0.26-0.86]) in the IBF group. The incidence of neural injury was higher in the IBF group (OR = 0.28 [95% CI = 0.13-0.60]) than in the PLF group. There were no differences in the back pain scores, ODI, SF-36 score, blood loss amount, surgical time, hospital stay duration, lumbar lordosis, infection, and durotomy between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: IBF for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis showed better results in terms of the fusion rate and sacral slope, but which did not translate into better clinical outcomes. Further randomized and prospective studies are necessary to elucidate the optimal therapeutic options.
Asunto(s)
Lordosis , Fusión Vertebral , Espondilolistesis , Humanos , Lordosis/etiología , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Espondilolistesis/etiología , Espondilolistesis/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease is incurable, idiopathic, degenerative, and progressive, and affects about 1% of the elderly population. Multidisciplinary clinical treatment is the best and most adopted therapeutic option, while surgical treatment is used in less than 15% of those affected. In practice, there is a lack of reliable and validated scales for measuring motor impairment, and monitoring and screening for surgical indications. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an instrument for measuring parkinsonian motor impairment in candidates for neurosurgical treatment. METHOD: The development and validation methods followed published guidelines. The first part was the choice of domains that would make up the construct: cardinal signs of disease (tremor, rigidity (stiffness), posture/balance/gait, hypokinesia/akinesia, and speech), along with pain and dyskinesia. A multi-professional working group prepared an initial pilot instrument. Ten renowned specialists evaluated, judged, and suggested modifications to the instrument. The second phase was the evaluation of the content of each domain and the respective ability to classify commitment intensity. The third phase was the correction of the main flaws detected and new submission to the board. The instrument was applied to 41 candidates for neurosurgical treatment in two situations: with and without medication RESULTS: The final form received 100% agreement from the judges. Its average time for application was 8 min. It was very responsive (p = 0.001, Wilcoxon) in different situations (On-Off). CONCLUSION: TRASP-D is a valid instrument for measuring motor impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease who are candidates for neurosurgical treatment. It allows measurement in multiple domains with reliability and sensitivity.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Motores , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Anciano , Humanos , Hipocinesia/diagnóstico , Hipocinesia/etiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , TemblorRESUMEN
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of the telemedicine care model implemented to treat and guide patients with COVID-19 related symptoms and indicators during the pandemic. METHODS: This is a retrospective study with data collected from the electronic records of standardized forms for assistance. As a way of evaluating the work performed, the number of consultations, types of referrals, efficiency of care, and patient satisfaction were observed. RESULTS: Between April 2 and October 15, 2020, 92 professionals attended 3,660 patients by telemedicine; out of them, 523 (14.3%) were referred to a COVID-19 attending room, 128 (3.5%) to other specialties, 123 (3.4%) to a general emergency department, and 2,886 (78.9%) were monitored via home care. Of the total number of patients, 81 (2.2%) were hospitalized, and 13 (0.35%) died. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine offered useful tools for the care, treatment, and monitoring of patients with COVID-19 during the pandemic. The service was considered by most respondents as satisfactory, resolutive, or safe.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Telemedicina , COVID-19 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Background and study aims Regardless of size, duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (dNETs) should be considered potentially malignant. A complete resection without complications is essential to increase safety procedures. The aim of this review was to describe effectiveness and possible complications of endoscopic techniques resection for resectioning dNETs in patients with tumors ≤â20âmm in diameter. Methods An electronic bibliographic search was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar virtual databases. The types of intervention were endoscopic mucosal resection alone (EMR) or with cap (EMR-C), with a ligation device (EMR-L), with previous elevation of the tumor (EMR-I) or with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); argon plasm coagulation (APC), and polypectomy. The outcome measures adopted were presence of free margin associated with tumor resection, tumor recurrence, complications (bleeding and perforation), and length of the procedure. Results Ten publications were included with the result of 224 dNET resections. EMR alone and polypectomy resulted in the most significantly compromised margin. The most frequent complication was bleeding (nâ=â21), followed by perforation (nâ=â8). Recurrence occurred in 13 cases, the majority of those under EMR or EMR-I. Conclusions EMR-C or EMR-I should be preferred for resectioning of dNETs. Polypectomy should not be indicated for resection of dNETs due to the high occurrence of incomplete resections. EMR alone must be avoided due a higher frequency of compromised margin and recurrent surgery. ESD was associated with no recurrence, however, but an increased occurrence of bleeding and perforation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Improved thoracolumbar spine trauma classification (TLSTC) systems can better help diagnose and treat thoracolumbar spine trauma (TLT). Here, we identified the types of injury (rationale and description), instability criteria, and treatment guidelines of TLSTC. METHODS: We used the PubMed/MEDLINE database to assess TLSTC according to the following variables: injury morphology, injury mechanism, spinal instability criteria, neurological status, and treatment guidelines. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies, 18 case series and three reviews were included in the study. Treatment guidelines were proposed in 16 studies. The following three major parameters were identified in TLSTC studies: injury morphology (19/21 studies), posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) disruption alone as the main spinal instability criterion (15 studies), and neurological damage (12 studies). Most classification systems neglected the severity of vertebral body comminution. CONCLUSION: We identified here the 3 main parameters for the evaluation of diagnosis and treatment of TLT: injury morphology, PLC disruption, and neurological damage. Based on our review, we may conclude that further clinical validation studies of TLSTC are warranted.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of withdrawal of the antiparkinsonian drug regimen administration on patients with PD and its relation to pain. METHODS: The sample included 22 men and 12 women who were candidates for neurosurgery to control motor signs and symptoms treated with L-dopa as a drug, alone or in combination with others (Cholinergic Antagonists; Dopamine Agents). All of them were examined at two different moments, with and without medication, and analyzed for painful symptoms. The Hoehn and Yahr scale was used for functional staging of the disease. Pain intensity was assessed by using the numerical verbal scale. RESULTS: The mean pain intensity among those on medication {2.17±0.39 (SE)} was significantly lower than in the abstinence group {4.2±0.59 (SE), p=0.006, Wilcoxon}, which corresponded to the increase in the total functional staging score from 93 to 111, respectively. CONCLUSION: The interruption of the administration of specific medications in patients with Parkinson's disease caused, or increased the intensity of, painful discomfort correlated with the intensity of functional impairment. This effect was also observed in women, but it was statistically relevant only for men. The results suggest that pain may be a "red flag" that points to the need for a therapeutic drug review when its presence or worsening is detected.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Masculino , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/etiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
SUMMARY OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of withdrawal of the antiparkinsonian drug regimen administration on patients with PD and its relation to pain. METHODS: The sample included 22 men and 12 women who were candidates for neurosurgery to control motor signs and symptoms treated with L-dopa as a drug, alone or in combination with others (Cholinergic Antagonists; Dopamine Agents). All of them were examined at two different moments, with and without medication, and analyzed for painful symptoms. The Hoehn and Yahr scale was used for functional staging of the disease. Pain intensity was assessed by using the numerical verbal scale. RESULTS: The mean pain intensity among those on medication {2.17±0.39 (SE)} was significantly lower than in the abstinence group {4.2±0.59 (SE), p=0.006, Wilcoxon}, which corresponded to the increase in the total functional staging score from 93 to 111, respectively. CONCLUSION: The interruption of the administration of specific medications in patients with Parkinson's disease caused, or increased the intensity of, painful discomfort correlated with the intensity of functional impairment. This effect was also observed in women, but it was statistically relevant only for men. The results suggest that pain may be a "red flag" that points to the need for a therapeutic drug review when its presence or worsening is detected.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of the telemedicine care model implemented to treat and guide patients with COVID-19 related symptoms and indicators during the pandemic. METHODS: This is a retrospective study with data collected from the electronic records of standardized forms for assistance. As a way of evaluating the work performed, the number of consultations, types of referrals, efficiency of care, and patient satisfaction were observed. RESULTS: Between April 2 and October 15, 2020, 92 professionals attended 3,660 patients by telemedicine; out of them, 523 (14.3%) were referred to a COVID-19 attending room, 128 (3.5%) to other specialties, 123 (3.4%) to a general emergency department, and 2,886 (78.9%) were monitored via home care. Of the total number of patients, 81 (2.2%) were hospitalized, and 13 (0.35%) died. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine offered useful tools for the care, treatment, and monitoring of patients with COVID-19 during the pandemic. The service was considered by most respondents as satisfactory, resolutive, or safe.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHLS) is a rare, autosomal dominant genetic disease with high penetrance and variable phenotypic expression caused by variants in the VHL gene. VHLS is associated with the presence of vascular tumors, often hemangioblastoma of the central nervous system, retina, or spinal cord and, less frequently, pancreatic cystic neoplasm, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, clear cell carcinoma of the kidney, endolymphatic sac tumor, pheochromocytoma, and paraganglioma. The authors report a case of a patient with VHLS with a rare pathogenic variant in the VHL gene and with an optic nerve hemangioblastoma, a rare phenotypic expression. Case report: A 49-year-old woman was diagnosed with cystic neoplasm of the pancreas, renal cell carcinoma of the right kidney, and hemangioblastoma of the left optic nerve. The patient's family history revealed siblings with VHLS manifestations. The index case was her mother who died at age 63 of clear cell renal carcinoma. The information was obtained by consulting the patient's medical register and by interviews with the patient and her relatives. The presence of left optic nerve hemangioblastoma was suggested by CT scan of the skull and orbit. The sequencing of the VHL gene was performed in the peripheral blood by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, and the duplication and deletion research was performed using the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MPLA) technique. The presence of a rare pathogenic variant c.263G> A (p.Trp88Ter) was observed in heterozygosity in the VHL gene that determined a premature stop codon. CT scan of the skull and orbits suggested the presence of HB in the optic nerve of the left eye. The results of the CT scan of the skull and orbits show thickening with tortuosity of the left optic nerve, with a small area of nodular enhancement. The right optic nerve had a conserved aspect. Conclusion: This is the fourth case described of this rare pathogenic variant of the VHL gene, according to the Human Gene Mutation Database and VHLdb database records and with an optic nerve hemangioblastoma of the optic nerve, a very rare phenotypic expression of the VHLS.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In pituitary tumors, the presence of residual tumor after transsphenoidal surgery and recurrence of the tumor after resection are frequent, and the best treatment is not well established. The effects and complications of stereotactic radiosurgery have not been extensively studied. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to reveal the effect of stereotactic radiosurgery on residual and recurrent adenomas. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature in the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Database, and Google Scholar was conducted using the criteria of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The search was structured according to the PICOT (i.e., Participants, types of Interventions, Comparator between the treatments, types of Outcome measures, and Follow-up [Time of duration]) strategy. The methodologic quality assessment (risk of bias) was performed according to the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies scale. The studies were grouped and analyzed after data extraction using the software "R". RESULTS: Twenty-six articles including 2315 patients were analyzed, with an average follow-up duration of 57.8 months and mean radiation marginal dose of 19.6 Gy. The overall tumor control rate was 95%, tumor reduction rate was 46%, and hormonal control rate was 67%. The side effects were evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic radiosurgery was efficient in residual or recurrence tumor control, with few side effects, and is recommended for treating residual or recurrent tumors, both secreting and nonsecreting tumors. A limitation of this study is that there were no randomized trials included in the synthesis.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Radiocirugia/métodos , Adenoma/patología , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Neoplasia Residual/cirugía , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Symptomatic Chiari type I malformation (CM) is treated with posterior fossa decompression with/ without duroplasty. Few authors suggested cerebellar tonsil caudal migration due to a supposed "caudal traction" of cranial nerve structures in a so-called occult tethered cord syndrome. For these authors, filum terminale (FT) sectioning may improve CM symptoms. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect of FT sectioning on the treatment of CM. METHODS: Using the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, we reviewed studies to evaluate patient's outcomes with CM who underwent FT sectioning. The MINORS instrument was used for methodological quality assessment. The included studies' levels of evidence (LOE) were classified according to the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine. RESULTS: Two studies from the same group of authors were included. We cannot assure if the cited cases in the first study were also included in their latter published study. The described results suggest that outcomes were not collected in a standardized fashion. Outcomes are described vaguely as a percentage of improvement. Case series samples were small and included not only patients with CM but also patients with scoliosis and syringomyelia. The MINORS score reported that both studies had low methodological quality. Both included studies were classified as level 4 of evidence. CONCLUSION: There is no scientific support for filum terminale sectioning in patients with CM without evidence of tethered cord. This procedure may be considered experimental and should be validated in a strict criterion of inclusion clinical trial comparing outcomes in posterior fossa decompression.
Asunto(s)
Malformación de Arnold-Chiari/cirugía , Cauda Equina/cirugía , Defectos del Tubo Neural/cirugía , Siringomielia/cirugía , Humanos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Escoliosis/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hemangioma is the most common benign tumor of the spine. Most patients are asymptomatic, but some lesions can become aggressive, leading to spinal compression. Here, we reviewed the natural history and treatment of aggressive hemangiomas in asymptomatic patients. METHODS: An electronic review of the literature was performed regarding the diagnosis/treatment modalities for asymptomatic aggressive hemangiomas of the spine utilizing the Medline (PubMed) and Google Scholar databases. RESULTS: We selected four articles describing the diagnosis/management of four cases of aggressive, asymptomatic hemangiomas in patients averaging 11.25 ± 2.36 years of age. Three of the four patients were females, and all were followed an average of 36.5 ± 25 months. Notably, two of four patients required emergency surgery. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of the literature regarding the diagnosis and optimal therapeutic management of aggressive hemangiomas in asymptomatic patients, half of whom may present with acute neurological deterioration warranting emergency surgery.