Consensus for the use of flash glucose monitoring in the Colombian adult population with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus / Consenso para el uso de monitoreo de glucosa flash en la población adulta colombiana con diabetes mellitus tipo 1 y 2

Abstract Introduction: in Colombia, the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the treatment of patients with type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2) diabetes do not mention the use of flash glucose monitoring, as this system was not available. The objective of this study was to establish a set of recommendations for the use of intermittent flash monitoring in Colombia. Methods: the group of experts consisted of eight Colombian physicians from different cities within Colombia, with expertise in the management of patients with DM1 and DM2; a certified diabetes nurse educator; a patient with DM1; and a methodological expert. Using the Zoom Enterprise video conferencing application (Zoom Video Communications, San Jose, California), the group generated questions through the Metaplan method, then carried out a systematic literature search and evidence review. The recommendations were made according to the degree of evidence and strength of the recommendation, following the GRADE method. Results: clinical recommendations were made for: a) patients with DM1 and hypoglycemia; b) patients with DM1 and poor metabolic control; c) patients with insulin-treated DM2; d) pregestational diabetes; e) quality of life; and f) inpatient use. Conclusions: this consensus's clinical recommendations guide clinical decision making with regard to the use of intermittent flash monitoring in patients with diabetes in various clinical settings. (Acta Med Colomb 2022; 47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2022.2239).

Resumen Introducción: en Colombia las Guías de Práctica Clínica para el manejo del paciente con diabetes tipo 1 (DM1) y tipo 2 (DM2) no mencionan el uso del monitoreo de glucosa flash dado que dicho sistema no estaba disponible. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue establecer un grupo de recomendaciones sobre el uso del monitoreo intermitente flash en Colombia. Métodos: el grupo de expertos estuvo conformado por ocho médicos colombianos expertos en el manejo de pacientes con DM1 y DM2 de diversas ciudades de Colombia, una enfermera licenciada educadora en diabetes, una paciente con diagnóstico de DM1 y un experto metodológico. A través de Zoom Enterprise versión de la aplicación de videoconferencia Zoom (Zoom Video Communications, San Jose, California) el grupo generó las preguntas con metodología Metaplan. Posteriormente, se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura y análisis de la evidencia. Las recomendaciones se generaron mediante grupo nominal según el grado de evidencia y la formaleza de la recomendación siguiendo la metodología GRADE. Resultados: se generaron recomendaciones clínicas enfocadas a: a) paciente con diagnóstico de DM1 e hipoglucemia; b) paciente con diagnóstico de DM1 y mal control metabólico, c) paciente con diagnóstico de DM tipo 2 tratado con insulina, d) diabetes pregestacional, e) calidad de vida y f) uso intrahospitalario. Conclusiones: las recomendaciones clínicas del presente consenso orientan la toma de decisiones clínicas con respecto al uso de monitoreo intermitente flash en el paciente con diagnóstico de diabetes en diferentes escenarios clínicos. (Acta Med Colomb 2022; 47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2022.2239).

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and real time continuous glucose monitoring in two specialized centers in Medellin, Colombia.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes, treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and real time continuous glucose monitoring. METHODS: This is a retrospective study, analyzing the basal characteristics, glycemic control, maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes, who were on an insulin pump with continuous glucose monitoring between 2011 and 2015. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included. The median age was 33 and disease duration 12 years. Indications for therapy were mainly poor glycemic control and severe hypoglycemia. The median A1c decrease was 1.02% between the first and third trimester. Pregnancies were associated with complications: 7.1% of the patients had diabetic ketoacidosis, 7.1% had an abortion, 28.5% gestational hypertension and 12.2% preeclampsia. The median gestational age at birth was 37 weeks and four days; the frequency of preterm birth was 7.1% and macrosomia 21.4%. There were no congenital malformations or perinatal death. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline characteristics and results of patients in this study were similar to those reported in the previous literature. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with continuous glucose monitoring is an alternative treatment option for pregnant women with type 1 diabetes before or during pregnancy.

Bombas de insulina en diabetes tipo 2, del fundamento a la práctica / Pumps in Type 2 diabetes, from basics to practice

Resumen Las bombas de insulina han sido usadas por más de 35 años, principalmente en pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 y en menor medida en diabetes tipo 2. En esta última población hay una liberación más funcional de insulina, se puede prevenir el fenómeno de alba y mantener por más tiempo los niveles adecuados de glucemia. Las indicaciones de bomba en diabetes tipo 2 son poco claras, pero los que tal vez más se benefician son aquellos con historia de mal control metabólico, hipoglucemias severas o asintomáticas. El uso de esta tecnología durante la hospitalización ha sido difícil, principalmente por el desconocimiento del personal de salud en su uso; no obstante, se ha demostrado que es factible mantener a los pacientes en esta terapia mientras están hospitalizados, siempre y cuando se tenga un adecuado protocolo, disposición del personal y educación del paciente. El costo ha sido una de las cuestiones más controversiales con el uso de estos sistemas. Los análisis de costo-efectividad han encontrado una disminución del número de hipoglucemiantes orales, las visitas a urgencias y las dosis de insulina, llegando algunos a aseverar que en tres años podrían compensarse los costos.

Abstract Insulin pumps have been used for over 35 years, mostly in patients with type 1 diabetes and to a lesser extent in type 2 diabetes. The use of pumps in this population is supported by a more physiological release of insulin, prevention of the dawn phenomenon and enabling patients to achieve better glucose targets. Pump indications in type 2 diabetes are less clear than in patients with type 1, but perhaps those who benefit most, are patients with a history of significant glycemic excursions, severe or asymptomatic hypoglycemia. Pump management as inpatient has been limited by lack of personal knowledge, however it has been reported that it is feasible to keep patients who are using this technology to continue it while they are in the hospital provided that a suitable protocol has been standardized and the patient has enough knowledge. Costs have been one of the most controversial issues with the use of these technology, cost-effectiveness analysis have found that there is a decrease in the number of oral agents, emergency room visits and insulin doses, reaching some studies to conclude that three years could offset the pump cost.