RESUMEN
Background: Deinstitutionalisation refers to the process of transferring most of the psychiatric care provision from inpatient state-run institutions to community-based care. However, it has proven difficult to implement and failed to reach its desired targets. New Beginnings (NB) is a transitional care facility that facilitates the transition from in- to outpatient care. To date, no data exist as to whether the intervention provided at NB is effective in reducing psychiatric readmissions. Aim: To determine if completing a psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) programme reduces acute inpatient service utilisation and if this is influenced by sociodemographic or clinic factors. Setting: New Beginnings transitional care facility in South Africa. Methods: A record review of all NB admissions between January 2011 and December 2015. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including readmissions and days-in-hospital (DIH), 36 months pre- and postindex admission. Patients were divided into a completer group (CG) and a noncompleter group (NCG) for the eight-week PSR programme, and comparative statistical analysis was performed. Results: Completion of the 8-week voluntary inpatient PSR programme led to a significant decrease (p = 0.017) (CG vs. NCG) in DIH during the 36-month period postindex admission. In addition, both groups showed significantly decreased (p < 0.001) DIH postindex in comparison to pre-index admission. Conclusions: This study's findings support that transitional care facilities offering an inpatient PSR programme may reduce inpatient service utilisation for all attendees but especially for those who complete the program. This highlights the need for such facilities that offer interventions tailored for patients with mental illness. Contribution: This is the first local study highlighting the potentially important role transitional care facilities could play in reducing readmissions.
RESUMEN
Background: Assertive community treatment (ACT) is an intervention implemented to manage the effects of deinstitutionalisation. South African studies have reported decreased admissions at 12 and 36 months when a modified ACT intervention is compared with standard care. However, costs associated with the intervention have raised the question of its feasibility in developing countries. Aim: This study aimed to describe the long-term demographic and clinical outcomes of a group of psychiatric high-frequency users (HFUs) included in the first South African ACT study. Setting: Stikland Psychiatric Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Methods: Data from 55 HFUs participating in the first South African ACT trial, including both the intervention and control groups, were retrospectively reviewed 10 years after the patients' inclusion. Results: Of the 55 HFUs initially included, nine remained in the formal ACT programme whilst 16 received standard care over the full 10 years. Five patients died and two were admitted to long-term wards. The mean number of admissions was 3.73 and the mean number of admission days was 261.11 over the 10 years. Twelve patients were never re-admitted; of these, nine came from the original study intervention group. Conclusions: This was the first study looking at the long-term outcomes of a group of psychiatric HFUs in an under-resourced setting receiving either a modified ACT intervention or standard outpatient care. Reflecting broadly on the group, there were a larger number of patients in the original ACT group who had no re-admissions and a comparatively higher utilisation of available services during the 10-year follow-up period.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization's action plan for 2020 has identified the need for service-based data to motivate for more appropriate community-based services. To date, there is no published data from step-up or step-down facilities in South Africa. AIM: To describe the demographic and clinical profile of all patients admitted to New Beginnings between 01 January 2011 and 31 December 2015. SETTING: New Beginnings is an intermediary care facility focused on psychosocial rehabilitation and accommodates 40 patients in a step-up or step-down setting. METHODS: In this retrospective audit, we reviewed the medical records of all patients (N = 730) admitted to New Beginnings between 01 January 2011 and 31 December 2015. RESULTS: Most admissions were male (n = 600; 82.2%), unmarried (92.1%) and unemployed (92.7%) patients with a mean age of 28 years. Only 20.7% had completed their schooling and 37.9% were receiving a disability grant. Most patients lived in the Cape Town Metro area (89%) with their families (94.7%), and 75.6% had no children. Schizophrenia (53.7%) was the most common primary psychiatric diagnosis, and most patients were on a combination of oral and depot treatment (46.8%). Illicit substances were used by 75.9% of patients with 30% using both cannabis and methamphetamine. Most patients (74.9%) had only one admission to New Beginnings. CONCLUSIONS: These baseline data could inform improved service delivery. Further research is needed to evaluate the success of New Beginnings and highlight the need for more of these facilities in the Western Cape and across South Africa.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stigmatising attitudes of health care professionals towards mental illness can impede treatment provided for psychiatric patients. Many studies have reported undergraduate training to be a critical period for changing the attitudes of medical students, and one particularly valuable intervention strategy involves time spent in a clinical psychiatric rotation. In South Africa, medical students are exposed to a clinical rotation in psychiatry but there is no evidence to show whether this has an effect on attitudes toward mental illness. METHODS: This prospective cohort study involved a convenience sample of 112 South African medical students in their 5th or 6th year of undergraduate training. This sample attended a 7-week psychiatry rotation. The Attitudes to Mental Illness Questionnaire (AMIQ) was used to assess students' attitudes toward mental illness before and after the clinical rotation which includes exposure to a number of psychiatric sub-divisions and limited didactic inputs. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement (p < 0.01, t-test) in the students' attitude toward mental illness following the psychiatric rotation. Females displayed a more positive attitude towards mental illness at the end of the rotation compared to males. The participants' attitude significantly deteriorated for the non-psychiatric vignette describing diabetes (< 0.01, t-test). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that clinical training and exposure to a psychiatric setting impacts positively on medical students' attitude towards mental illness, even when this training does not include any focused, didactic anti-stigma input.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Trastornos Mentales , Prejuicio/psicología , Psiquiatría/educación , Estigma Social , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Adulto , Selección de Profesión , Prácticas Clínicas , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Sudáfrica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine whether attendance at an occupational therapy-led day treatment centre for mental health care users affects the use of inpatient services in South Africa. Methods: A retrospective pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental study design was used to compare admissions and days spent in hospital during the 24 months before and after attendance at the centre, using the hospital's electronic records. Total population sampling yielded data for 44 mental health care users who made first contact with the service between July 2009 and June 2010. Data were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: There was a significant decrease in the number of admissions (z = -4.093, p = 0.00) and the number of days spent in hospital (z = -4.730, p = 0.00). Participants were admitted to psychiatric care 33 times less in the 24 months' post-intervention, indicating a medium effect (r = 0.436). They also spend 2569 days less in hospital, indicating a large effect (r = 0.504). Conclusion: The findings suggest that an occupational therapy-led day treatment centre could be effective in reducing the use of inpatient mental health services in South Africa. Implications for Rehabilitation Attendance at an occupational therapy-led community day treatment centre decreases the number of admissions and number of days spent in hospital and is therefore beneficial to mental health care users and service providers. The study indicates that the successful implementation of a community day treatment centre for mental health care users on the grounds of a tertiary hospital by utilising existing resources is possible.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Centros de Día , Trastornos Mentales/rehabilitación , Terapia Ocupacional , Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica/métodos , Centros de Rehabilitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/métodos , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Día/métodos , Centros de Día/psicología , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Terapia Ocupacional/métodos , Terapia Ocupacional/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sudáfrica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Pressure on inpatient beds often results in premature discharges, which may precipitate early readmission. This has prompted an increased interest in transitional care interventions to bridge the gap between in- and outpatient care to reduce such readmissions. Our study aimed to assess the effect of a Transitional Care Service (TCS) on readmission rates in a high pressure inpatient service which utilizes a premature discharge policy to address bed pressures. METHODS: Sixty male patients identified for crisis discharge were offered a TCS for the first ninety days after discharge. Patients received a structured intervention consisting of four phone calls and one home visit, focusing on maintaining adherence, appointment reminders and psychoeducation. The TCS patients were retrospectively compared to a matched control group in terms of readmission after 90days. Data was collected on adherence to medication, attendance of appointments and incidence of substance use. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in readmission rates. Prevalence of substance use was very high (90%), especially methamphetamine use (48%). Adherence dropped from 45% (n=27) at one week post-discharge to 25% (n=15) at 90days. CONCLUSION: Structured telephone-based transitional interventions have no effect on readmission rates in this setting. Prematurely discharged patients require more comprehensive support with focus on comorbid substance use.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales Psiquiátricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado de Transición/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sudáfrica , Trastornos Relacionados con SustanciasRESUMEN
Here, we assessed for the first time the frequency of religious delusions and the effect of treatment on religiosity and the phenomena of religious delusions in a Xhosa schizophrenia population. Religious delusions were present in 42 (70%) participants, and treatment significantly reduced religiosity (p = 0.02) as well as mean scores for certain phenomena associated with the delusions including changes in both thinking (p = 0.0001) and behaviour (p = 0.0001), as well as affective response to the delusion (p = 0.0001) The high frequency of religious delusions may indicate a higher tolerance for religious delusions in this community. It is therefore important to educate spiritual leaders on mental illness.
Asunto(s)
Deluciones/complicaciones , Deluciones/terapia , Religión y Psicología , Esquizofrenia/complicaciones , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Deluciones/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , SudáfricaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many countries have over the last few years incorporated mental health assertive interventions in an attempt to address the repercussions of deinstitutionalization. Recent publications have failed to duplicate the positive outcomes reported initially which has cast doubt on the future of these interventions. We previously reported on 29 patients from a developing country who completed 12 months in an assertive intervention which was a modified version of the international assertive community treatment model. We demonstrated reduction in readmission rates as well as improvements in social functioning compared to patients from the control group. The obvious question was, however, if these outcomes could be sustained for longer periods of time. This study aims to determine if modified assertive interventions in an under-resourced setting can successfully maintain reductions in hospitalizations. METHODS: Patients suffering from schizophrenia who met a modified version of Weidens' high frequency criteria were randomized into two groups. One group received a modified assertive intervention based on the international assertive community treatment model. The other group received standard care according to the model of service delivery in this region. Data was collected after 36 months, comparing readmissions and days spent in hospital. RESULTS: The results demonstrated significant differences between the groups. Patients in the intervention group had significantly less readmissions (p = 0.007) and spent less days in hospital compared to the patients in the control group (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Modified assertive interventions may be successful in reducing readmissions and days spent in hospital in developing countries where standard care services are less comprehensive. These interventions can be tailored in such a way to meet service needs and still remain affordable and feasible within the context of an under-resourced setting.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Desinstitucionalización , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sudáfrica , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A number of recently published randomized controlled trials conducted in developed countries have reported no advantage for assertive interventions over standard care models. One possible explanation could be that so-called "standard care" has become more comprehensive in recent years, incorporating some of the salient aspects of assertive models in its modus operandi. Our study represents the first randomised controlled trial assessing the effect of a modified assertive treatment service on readmission rates and other measures of outcome in a developing country. METHODS: High frequency service users were randomized into an intervention (n = 34) and a control (n = 26) group. The control group received standard community care and the active group an assertive intervention based on a modified version of the international model of assertive community treatment. Study visits were conducted at baseline and 12 months with demographic and illness information collected at visit 1 and readmission rates documented at study end. Symptomatology and functioning were measured at both visits using the PANSS, CDSS, ESRS, WHO-QOL and SOFAS. RESULTS: At 12 month follow-up subjects receiving the assertive intervention had significantly lower total PANSS (p = 0.02) as well as positive (p < 0.01) and general psychopathology (p = 0.01) subscales' scores. The mean SOFAS score was also significantly higher (p = 0.02) and the mean number of psychiatric admissions significantly lower (p < 0.01) in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that assertive interventions in a developing setting where standard community mental services are often under resourced can produce significant outcomes. Furthermore, these interventions need not be as expensive and comprehensive as international, first-world models in order to reduce inpatient days, improve psychopathology and overall levels of functioning in patients with severe mental illness.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/métodos , Países en Desarrollo/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Hospitales Psiquiátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Sudáfrica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study examined service utilization patterns and pathways to specialist mental health services among individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders in the Western Cape, South Africa, an area that has undergone deinstitutionalization since the mid-1990s. METHODS: Individuals who were consecutively admitted to any of the three psychiatric hospitals in the Western Cape from February 2007 to January 2008 were interviewed. Data on demographic characteristics, psychiatric history, service utilization, and pathways to care were gathered from service users, their relatives or associates, and hospital files. Univariate and multivariate analyses examined differences between high- and low-frequency service users. RESULTS: Of the total sample (N=152) most were first seen at the primary care level (62%). However, very few received treatment at this level (26%), and many (22%) were admitted directly to the psychiatric hospital, bypassing other treatment options. These service utilization patterns differ from the requirements listed in the recently adopted Mental Health Care Act (2002), which states that unless a patient has been recently discharged, he or she should be admitted for 72 hours of observation before referral to psychiatric hospitals. Compared with low-frequency service users, high-frequency users were younger, had lower income, tended to rely more on disability benefits, and were more likely to bypass other levels of care and be admitted directly to the psychiatric hospital. Poor medication adherence was the most likely precipitant for the episode of illness among all users. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the inadequacy of current community mental health services in providing for the needs of people with severe mental illness. In South Africa, as in many other middle-income countries, there is an urgent need to develop community-based care.
Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas , Hospitales Psiquiátricos/organización & administración , Pacientes Internos , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Auditoría Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sudáfrica , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Deinstitutionalization has led to a dramatic reduction of inpatient beds and subsequent increase in pressure on available beds. Another consequence of deinstitutionalization has been the phenomenon of the revolving door patient; high-frequency users (HFUs) admitted to hospital repeatedly, remaining well for only short periods of time. The purpose of the study was to determine factors that contribute to HFU of inpatient psychiatric services by schizophrenia and schizo-affective disorder subjects in a developing country with a view to understanding this phenomenon better. METHODS: Subjects were divided into HFU and low-frequency user (LFUs) groups for comparison with regard to selected variables. RESULTS: HFUs had higher PANSS scores (p < 0.01), were more likely to admit to lifetime substance use (p = 0.01), be on mood stabilizers (p < 0.01) and also to have been crisis (premature) discharges (p < 0.01). LFUs were more likely to have been treated with depot medication (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed crisis discharge (p = 0.03) and depot use (p = 0.03) to be the only remaining significant predictors of HFU versus LFU status. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest HFUs' characteristics to be similar across different settings, with under-utilization of depot antipsychotics and early discharge from hospital as particular contributors to high-frequency use of services in our sample. CONCLUSION: Results seem to indicate that HFU-specific interventions are vital to addressing these issues.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Países en Desarrollo/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Psiquiátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Trastornos Relacionados con Alcohol/epidemiología , Desinstitucionalización , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Sudáfrica/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the worldwide shift towards a more community-based psychiatric service delivery approach, stigma and the issues surrounding it have received much attention. However, very little South African data exist and the aim of our study was therefore to investigate the experience of internalized stigma in a South African schizophrenia population with specific emphasis on abuse as a form of stigmatization. METHODS: A total of 100 subjects at various stages of schizophrenic illness were subjected to a the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness scale (ISMI) that was modified to include six items focusing specifically on investigating the experience of stigmatization within the South African context. RESULTS: A high overall degree of stigmatization was perceived by most subjects, but not equally so for all ISMI areas. When looking at the modified items, 29% felt media-influence to be negative, this seemed to be specifically true for those with matriculation and higher as well as a home-language other than Afrikaans. Thirty nine percent indicated that they had been victims of physical abuse due to their mental illness, with the data suggesting that especially Xhosa-speaking patients, male subjects and those with more admissions and a longer duration of illness experienced this excessively. DISCUSSION: Our study confirmed a high overall degree of perceived stigmatization as well as suggesting some evidence for cultural influences on stigma. It was the first to provide South African data and as such can be regarded as central to our efforts in restructuring psychiatric services and clinical practices in a way that would minimize the effects of stigma and ultimately benefit our clients.