Applicant Perceptions of Postinterview Communication During the 2022 to 2023 Neurosurgery Recruitment Cycle: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and describe neurosurgery applicant perceptions of the postinterview communication (PIC) process during the US residency match. METHODS: A voluntary and anonymous postmatch web-based survey was developed and sent to 209 candidates who applied to 1 academic neurosurgery practice during the 2022-2023 recruitment cycle, approximately 1 week following match day. Survey questions focused on their perceptions of and participation behaviors with PIC and how this impacted their final rank list. RESULTS: Seventy-eight (37.3%) of the 209 candidates responded to the survey. Sixty-four (84.2%) respondents reported submitting a letter of intent (LOI) to their number 1 ranked program. Sixty-one (82%) felt pressured to send a LOI to improve their rank status, fearing that it may harm them if they did not. Fifty-four (73.0%) respondents felt pressured to send an early LOI despite not seeing the program in person to communicate interest before programs certified their rank lists. Fourteen (18.9%) respondents agreed that a second look experience impacted their rank list enough to where they regretted an early LOI. Fifty-five (76.4%) respondents disagreed that second-look attendance had no impact on their rank status with a program. Fifty (71.4%) respondents agreed that PIC causes undue stress during the match process. Sixty-one (84.7%) respondents agreed that aspects of PIC require universal guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe the perceptions of PIC and behaviors of neurosurgery applicants during the US residency match process. Standardized PIC practices may help to ensure transparency and relieve stress for applicants during the match process.

Neurosurgery Applicant Perspective of Neurosurgery Residency Websites.

OBJECTIVE: Applicants rely heavily on virtual information in the form of neurosurgery residency websites (NRWs) to better understand a program's culture, faculty, and opportunities. There is a paucity of information regarding the value of NRW on applicant decision making. The advent of the supplemental ERAS application and continuation of virtual interviews may increase the propensity of which applicants use NRW. The objective of our study was to distribute a survey to further understand applicants' perceptions and opinions of NRW, as well as provide future direction for NRW optimization. METHODS: The current study is a single-institution, retrospective survey design. A survey was designed via Qualtrics software to evaluate applicant demographics, resident education, resident recruitment, and future directions. The survey includes the most frequently used variables on NRW. The survey was distributed to neurosurgery applicants who received an interview at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: Among the 293 applicants who received a link to the survey, 87/293 (29.7%) completed it. Respondents elected that useful website variables were "resident rotation schedules and hospital locations," "faculty listings and biographies," and "neurosurgery residency websites served as a first impression of a neurosurgery residency program." More than half of the respondents agreed that their rank list would not be the same without an NRW. The most strongly received statement for future directions was "Neurosurgery residency programs will benefit from renovating their residency website." CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest NRWs play a vital role in resident recruitment and decision making. Residency programs will benefit from this data and may use it to restructure their virtual recruitment tools and discover innovative virtual recruitment strategies. Our team elucidated the most important variables found on NRWs and proposed future directions for their improvement and the virtual application and recruitment process.

Evaluation of the accessibility and content of urology residency websites.

Introduction: Students applying for urology residency often have limited resources for obtaining information on prospective programs. Applicants commonly rely on institutional websites to compare program elements. The information on these websites can attract or deter applicants and can have a major impact on application costs, rank lists, and career goals. The objective of this study was to determine the accessibility and content of urology residency program websites. Materials and Methods: A list of accredited urology residency programs was obtained from the American Urological Association residency directory in 2020. A total of 141 program websites were evaluated for the presence of 53 criteria, which were categorized into five groups: Personnel information, applicant information, program information, training/research, and resident benefits. Residencies lacking an available website or functional links were excluded from the study. Results: Of the 53 criteria analyzed, only 24 were featured on more than 50% of the websites. Less than 10% of the programs had available information regarding resident contact information (5.67%), alumni contact information (2.84%), frequently asked questions (9.22%), electives (9.93%), night float (5.67%), and board pass rates (5.67%). The three factors most commonly available included program description (100%), coordinator contact information (88.65%), and clinical sites (87.94%). None of the 141 programs had all 53 criteria available on their website. Conclusions: The majority of current urology residency websites may lack the accessibility and content necessary for candidates to make application decisions for desired programs. Residency programs should consider revising their websites to enhance resident recruitment and facilitate applicants' decision-making process.

Management of Cerebral Herniation Secondary to Lead Encephalopathy: A Case Report.

Background: Adult lead encephalopathy is a rare but critical condition to recognize in modern healthcare settings. Few reports have described the medical and neurosurgical management of severe adult lead encephalopathy. Case Presentation: A 22 year old woman presented with severe headache, anemia, vomiting, 40-lb weight loss, and constipation. At the time of presentation, she had extensive colonic radiopaque material and a serum lead concentration of 87 mcg/dl (normal <10). She rapidly developed anisocoria requiring emergent ventriculostomy insertion. Following CSF diversion, ICP mitigation, and lead chelation, she considerably improved in <2 weeks. Conclusion: We report one of the few instances of successful surgical and medical management of adult lead encephalopathy. Dedicated neurocritical care and neurosurgical teams are necessary in conjunction with toxicology in order to manage the advanced sequalae of severe lead poisoning.