Impact of radiotherapy schedule on survival of patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors for advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Preclinical and clinical data suggest a potential benefit in the addition of radiotherapy (RT) to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) during the treatment of advanced cancers. Nevertheless, the ideal patients for this approach and the optimal RT regimen is still debated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to determine the effect RT schedule has on survival for advanced non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma patients (pts) treated with ICI (anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4) and concomitant RT. RESULTS: A total of 58 pts were identified, of which 26 received RT concomitantly with ICI while the remaining 32 pts were treated with RT at the time of progression under ICI. The RT parameters associated with outcome include dose per fraction, biological effective dose, RT to all targets and lung irradiation. Independent predictors of improved progression-free survival were lung irradiation, melanoma histology, oligometastatic status (<6 metastasis), presence of liver metastasis, PNN<7000/mm3 and normal LDH. Independent predictors of improved overall survival were melanoma histology and normal LDH. Among pts who were irradiated at progression, 68.7% had an overall clinical benefit and had a median extension of ICI use by 2.3 months (range: 0-29.1), among which 2 presented with an abscopal effect. CONCLUSIONS: The irradiation of lung metastases may increase survival in patients under ICI. RT at progression could prolong the use of ICI, and neutrophilia and LDH should be considered during patient selection of this combined RT/ICI approach.

Comparative study of the PD-L1 status between surgically resected specimens and matched biopsies of NSCLC patients reveal major discordances: a potential issue for anti-PD-L1 therapeutic strategies.

BACKGROUND: High expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells (TC) and/or on tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) is associated with a high response rate in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-L1 inhibitors. The use of a PD-L1 immunohistochemical (IHC) test in determining the responsiveness to immunotherapy has raised the question of the reliability and reproducibility of its evaluation in lung biopsies compared with corresponding resected surgical specimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PD-L1 expression in TC and IC was assessed in 160 patients with operable NSCLC on both whole surgical tissue sections and matched lung biopsies, by using a highly sensitive SP142 IHC assay. The specimens were scored as TC 0-3 and IC 0-3 based on increasing PD-L1 expression. RESULTS: PD-L1 expression was frequently discordant between surgical resected and matched biopsy specimens (the overall discordance rate = 48%; 95% confidence interval 4.64-13.24) and κ value was equal to 0.218 (poor agreement). In all cases, the biopsy specimens underestimated the PD-L1 status observed on the whole tissue sample. PD-L1-positive IC tumors were more common than PD-L1-positive TC tumors on resected specimens. The discrepancies were mainly related to the lack of a PD-L1-positive IC component in matched biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate relatively poor association of the PD-L1 expression in TC and IC between lung biopsies and corresponding resected tumors. Although these results need to be further validated in larger cohorts, they indicate that the daily routine evaluation of the PD-L1 expression in diagnostic biopsies can be misleading in defining the sensitivity to treatment with PD-L1 targeted therapy.

KRAS Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Molecular and Epidemiological Characteristics, Methods for Detection, and Therapeutic Strategy Perspectives.

KRAS mutations are detected in over one third of lung adenocarcinomas, most frequently in Caucasian and smoker patients. The impact of KRAS mutations on lung adenocarcinoma prognosis is currently subject to debate, as is their impact on the response to chemotherapy and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The different methods for KRAS status assessment, based on histological and cytological samples or biological fluids, offer varying sensitivities. Since no treatments are available in clinical routine for KRAS-mutated lung cancer patients, one of the current major challenges in thoracic oncology is developing new dedicated strategic therapies. Different molecules can be developed that act on a post-transcriptional KRAS protein level, blocking its cytoplasmic membrane recruitment. The efficacy of these molecules' targeting of the different signaling pathways activated by the KRAS mutation (such as the MEK and BRAF pathways) is related to the particular KRAS mutation subtype. New therapeutic strategies are currently focused on certain genes linked with KRAS inducing a synthetic lethal interaction. The purpose of this work is to provide an overview of i) the recent epidemiological and molecular findings concerning KRASmutated lung adenocarcinoma, ii) the prognostic impact of KRAS mutations, in particular during response to treatment, iii) the available methods for detecting this mutation, and iv) the current molecules under development for new therapeutic strategies and the clinical trials targeting this genomic alteration.

Discrepancies between FISH and immunohistochemistry for assessment of the ALK status are associated with ALK 'borderline'-positive rearrangements or a high copy number: a potential major issue for anti-ALK therapeutic strategies.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas expressing ALK rearrangements are highly responsive to crizotinib, a dual ALK/c-MET inhibitor. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an easy clinically and routinely applicable cost-effective assay for ALK, c-MET and ROS1 protein expression for potential treatment with crizotinib. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the percentage and the pattern of ALK-rearranged cells, the variation in the native ALK copy number, as well as ALK, c-MET and ROS1 protein expression, and their significance on outcome of crizotinib-treated lung adenocarcinoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive lung adenocarcinoma specimens (n = 176) 'double-negative' (wild-type EGFR and KRAS) were tested for ALK rearrangements/copy number alterations and for ALK, c-MET and ROS1 protein expression using automated standardized protocols. Preliminary data on the outcome of crizotinib-treated patients were recorded. RESULTS: FISH analysis identified 26/176 (15%) cases with ALK rearrangements. Seven cases had discordant results between the ALK FISH and IHC. Five cases with discordant FISH-positive/IHC-negative revealed FISH 'borderline' positivity (15%-20%). Three cases overexpressed c-MET and responded to crizotinib, and two cases with ALK-'borderline' rearranged cells only, not associated with c-MET expression, progressed under crizotinib. Two cases with discordant FISH-negative/IHC-positive revealed ALK gene amplification without associated c-MET or ROS1 protein expression. CONCLUSIONS: The discrepancies observed between the IHC and FISH data revealed unexpected biological events, rather than technical issues, which potentially can have a strong impact on the therapeutic strategy with crizotinib.