Rituximab for Multiple Sclerosis: Hiding in Plain Sight

In February 2023, following extensive discussions with stakeholders and data review, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review issued final policy recommendations for treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS)1: "All stakeholders have a responsibility and an important role to play in ensuring that all effective treatment options for patients with RMS, including off-label use of rituximab, are utilized in ways to help improve affordability and access and reduce health inequities." The report calls on payers to remove barriers to rituximab coverage, the American Academy of Neurology and the National MS Society to publicly endorse rituximab for RMS, and clinicians to advocate for coverage of rituximab and its biosimilars. In July 2023, the World Health Organization listed rituximab as an essential medicine for MS.2 Yet not much has changed. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved MS disease-modifying therapies continue to generate enormous profits for pharma, and rituximab remains hidden in plain sight.

Polypharmacy in Multiple Sclerosis: Prevalence, Risks, and Mitigation Strategies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Polypharmacy, the use of ≥ 5 medications, is common in people with multiple sclerosis and is associated with negative outcomes. The use of multiple medications is common for symptom management in people with multiple sclerosis, but risks drug-drug interactions and additive side effects. Multiple sclerosis providers should therefore focus on the appropriateness and risks versus benefits of pharmacotherapy in each patient. This review describes the prevalence and risks associated with polypharmacy in people with multiple sclerosis and offers strategies to identify and mitigate inappropriate polypharmacy. RECENT FINDINGS: Research in people with multiple sclerosis has identified risk factors and negative outcomes associated with polypharmacy. Medication class-specific investigations highlight their contribution to potentially inappropriate polypharmacy in people with multiple sclerosis. People with multiple sclerosis are at risk for inappropriate polypharmacy. Multiple sclerosis providers should review medications and consider their appropriateness and potential for deprescribing within the context of each patient.

Protocol for an exploratory, randomised, single-blind clinical trial of aerobic exercise to promote remyelination in multiple sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: There is an urgent need for remyelinating therapies that restore function in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Aerobic exercise is a promising remyelinating strategy because it promotes remyelination in animal models both independently and synergistically with medications. Here, in this study, we present an innovative, randomised, single-blind, clinical trial designed to explore: the relationship between demyelination and mobility (part 1), and if 24 weeks of aerobic exercise promotes remyelination in pwMS (part 2). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sedentary participants (n=60; aged 18-64 years) with stable MS will undergo a baseline visit with the following outcomes to assess associations between demyelination and mobility (part 1): spinal cord demyelination (somatosensory-evoked potentials, SSEPs), mobility (6-Minute Timed Walk, Timed 25-Foot Walk, Timed Up and Go, 9-Hole Peg Test) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). After baseline testing, participants with significantly prolonged SSEP latency will advance to the clinical exercise trial (part 2) and will be randomised 1:1 to active or control conditions for 24 weeks. The active condition will be aerobic stationary cycling three times per week with graded virtual supervision. The control condition will be monthly virtual MS symptom education groups (six sessions). SSEP latency (remyelination endpoint), mobility outcomes and PROs will be measured at 12 and 24 weeks in all clinical trial participants. A subset of 11 active and 11 control participants will undergo a brain MRI with quantitative T1 myelin water fraction at baseline and 24 weeks (exploratory remyelination endpoint). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Review Board (#21045). Dissemination of findings will include peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and media releases. The proposed study will inform the feasibility, study design and sample size for a fully powered clinical trial of aerobic exercise to promote remyelination in pwMS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04539002.

Association Between Pharmacy Benefit Restrictions and Disease-Modifying Therapy Use in the Medicare Part D Program.

Background and Objectives: To determine the association between Medicare Part D plan disease-modifying therapy (DMT) restrictiveness and adherence and outcomes among people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: We used Medicare claims data from 2010 to 2014 to identify individuals with a full year enrollment (Parts A, B, and D), an MS diagnosis, and 1 or more self-administered DMT prescription. Plans were considered restrictive if all available DMTs required a prior authorization or step therapy restriction; otherwise they were considered permissive. We compared DMT adherence, defined as a medication possession ratio ≥80%, MS-related emergency department or inpatient admissions, and outpatient visits by Part D plan restrictiveness. We used multivariate regression models to control for patient demographics and comorbidities. Results: There were 37,713 Medicare beneficiaries with MS who were enrolled in either restrictive (n = 29,901) or permissive (n = 7812) Part D plans during the study period. Patients enrolled in restrictive plans were older (60 vs 58 years; p < 0.001), more likely to live in the south (38% vs 23%; p < 0.001), eligible through disability (67% vs 60%; p < 0.001), and more likely to have several chronic comorbid conditions. Patients enrolled in restrictive plans were less likely to be adherent to their DMT (54% vs 57%; p < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.98) and had a higher rate of MS-related outpatient visits (1.7 vs 1.4 per year; p < 0.001; aRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.23-1.31). Discussion: Medicare beneficiaries with MS enrolled in restrictive Part D plans were less adherent to their DMT and had higher rates of MS-related outpatient visits.

Characteristics of Prescription Drug Use Among Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis in the US Medicare Population.

Background: Few studies have characterized the full spectrum of prescription drug use for individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this study was to describe patterns and expenditures for disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and other prescription drugs among Medicare beneficiaries with MS. Methods: Using Medicare claims data in 2014, we identified a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries with 12 months of continuous eligibility and 3 or more MS-related inpatient, outpatient, or prescription claims. We quantified the number, type, and costs of prescribed DMTs and other medications for MS-related symptoms. Medication costs were calculated according to whether beneficiaries received additional subsidies, which eliminate most out-of-pocket costs. Results: Of 43,283 Medicare beneficiaries identified with MS, 70% were DMT users. Most used self-administered DMTs (67%), and 3% used natalizumab; 93% received a supportive care medication. Among the 82% of individuals without subsidies, the annual median total and out-of-pocket DMT costs were $56,794 (interquartile range [IQR], $44,837-$62,038) and $4566 (IQR, $849-$5270), respectively. The most commonly used supportive care drugs were antidepressants (62%), opioid analgesics (50%), antispasticity drugs (47%), and anticonvulsants (46%). Annual median total and out-of-pocket costs for these drugs were $15,134 (IQR, $6571-$19,620) and $255 (IQR, $56-$877), respectively. Conclusions: Most Medicare beneficiaries with MS using DMTs face considerable out-of-pocket costs. Beneficiaries also used a significant number of medications potentially used for MS-related symptoms, although total and out-of-pocket costs were modest.

TREM2 is thyroid hormone regulated making the TREM2 pathway druggable with ligands for thyroid hormone receptor.

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2) is a cell surface receptor on macrophages and microglia that senses and responds to disease-associated signals to regulate the phenotype of these innate immune cells. The TREM2 signaling pathway has been implicated in a variety of diseases ranging from neurodegeneration in the central nervous system to metabolic disease in the periphery. Here, we report that TREM2 is a thyroid hormone-regulated gene and its expression in macrophages and microglia is stimulated by thyroid hormone and synthetic thyroid hormone agonists (thyromimetics). Our findings report the endocrine regulation of TREM2 by thyroid hormone, and provide a unique opportunity to drug the TREM2 signaling pathway with orally active small-molecule therapeutic agents.

Moderators of Improvements in Fatigue Impact After a Self-management Intervention in Multiple Sclerosis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT: Fatigue is one of the most common and disabling symptoms of multiple sclerosis. A recent randomized controlled trial comparing a fatigue self-management program and a general multiple sclerosis education program found that both programs improved fatigue in participants with multiple sclerosis. Participants were randomized to a self-management program (fatigue: take control, n = 109) or a multiple sclerosis education program (multiple sclerosis: take control, n = 109). This secondary analysis of that trial used multilevel moderation analysis to examine moderators of treatment-related effects on fatigue (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale) from baseline through the 6-mo follow-up. The following potential treatment moderators were examined: age, sex, cohabitation/marital status, and baseline levels of self-efficacy, depression symptoms, and sleep quality. Cohabitation status (living with or without a spouse/partner) interacted with intervention group and time to predict fatigue impact (P = 0.04). Fatigue: take control participants who lived with a spouse/partner showed a marginal effect in greater rate of improvement in fatigue compared with those who lived alone (P = 0.08). However, rates of improvement in fatigue in multiple sclerosis: take control participants were similar in those living with or without a spouse/partner. These findings suggest that living with a spouse or partner may facilitate benefit from self-management interventions for multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. Future research should investigate the contribution of supportive others in self-management of fatigue in multiple sclerosis.

Characterization of the Clinical Evidence Supporting Repository Corticotropin Injection for FDA-Approved Indications: A Scoping Review.

IMPORTANCE: Repository corticotropin injection is an expensive medication that was approved in 1952 for the treatment of many inflammatory conditions. The clinical evidence supporting the use of repository corticotropin (hereinafter referred to as corticotropin) has been weak, perhaps because its approval predated the modern review standards of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical evidence supporting the use of corticotropin for its FDA-approved indications. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Studies were identified via electronic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from database inception to May 12, 2021 (the MEDLINE search was updated on June 8, 2021). Bibliographies of retrieved articles were also reviewed through ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA documents, and the manufacturer's website. Search terms included HP Acthar, ACTH gel, repository corticotropin, and terms for specific diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, nephrotic syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and West syndrome (or spasms, infantile). The review included randomized clinical trials (RCTs), nonrandomized and single-arm clinical trials, and prospective cohort studies that compared corticotropin with an active comparator, placebo, or no treatment. Data were extracted by 1 reviewer and verified by a second. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. Studies were qualitatively synthesized by indication to summarize important design features and results. FINDINGS: Of 1059 records screened, 203 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 41 studies involving 2235 participants met inclusion criteria; of those, 11 involved infantile spasms, 10 involved multiple sclerosis (MS), 11 involved rheumatological conditions, 7 involved nephrotic syndrome, 1 involved ocular conditions, and 1 involved sarcoidosis. Overall, 19 studies either included a single arm or exclusively compared different corticotropin dosing strategies. The evidence was most robust for the treatment of infantile spasms and MS. The largest number of studies comparing corticotropin with an active agent (n = 4) or placebo (n = 5) pertained to MS, with almost all studies finding that corticotropin performed better than placebo but no different than corticosteroids. For the treatment of infantile spasms, 8 controlled studies were identified (6 were randomized); of those, only 1 small RCT found corticotropin to be significantly superior to corticosteroids. Studies of patients with other conditions (n = 20) frequently lacked a control group (n = 12), were placebo-controlled (n = 5), or exclusively examined different corticotropin dosing strategies (n = 2). Placebo-controlled RCTs of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, optic neuritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and nephrotic syndrome were generally small and did not consistently demonstrate that corticotropin was superior to placebo. Blinded RCTs showed a similar or greater number of adverse effects with corticotropin relative to corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this scoping review, few RCTs supported the clinical benefit of corticotropin for most FDA-approved indications. Most RCTs found that corticotropin was not superior to corticosteroids for treating relapses of MS or infantile spasms.

Closing the Part D Coverage Gap and Out-of-Pocket Costs for Multiple Sclerosis Drugs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether closing the Part D coverage gap (donut hole) between 2010 and 2019 lowered patients' out-of-pocket costs for disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Using nationwide Medicare Formulary and Drug Pricing Files, we analyzed Part D drug benefit design and DMT prices in 2010, 2016, and 2019. We calculated average monthly list prices for DMTs available in each year (4 DMTs in 2010, 11 DMTs in 2016, and 14 DMTs in 2019). We projected patients' annual out-of-pocket cost for each DMT alone under a standard Part D plan in that year. We estimated potential savings attributable to closing the coverage gap between 2010 and 2019 (beneficiaries' cost sharing dropped from 100% to 25%) under 3 scenarios: no increase in price, an inflation-indexed price increase (3% annually), and the observed price increase. RESULTS: Median monthly DMT prices rose from $2,804 to $5,987 to $7,009 over the years 2010, 2016, and 2019, respectively. Median projected annual out-of-pocket costs rose from $5,916 to $6,229 to $6,618. With unchanged or inflation-indexed DMT price changes, closing the coverage gap would have reduced annual out-of-pocket costs by $2,260 (38% reduction) and $1,744 (29% reduction), respectively. Despite having the lowest monthly price, generic glatiramer acetate had among the highest out-of-pocket costs ($6,731 to $6,939 a year) in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare Part D beneficiaries can pay thousands of dollars yearly out of pocket for DMTs. Closing the Part D coverage gap did not reduce out-of-pocket costs for patients because of simultaneous increases in DMT prices.

Gray matter blood-brain barrier water exchange dynamics are reduced in progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare transcapillary wall water exchange, a putative marker of cerebral metabolic health, in brain T2 white matter (WM) lesions and normal appearing white and gray matter (NAWM and NAGM, respectively) in individuals with progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Dynamic-contrast-enhanced 7T MRI data were obtained from 19 HC and 23 PMS participants. High-resolution pharmacokinetic parametric maps representing tissue microvascular and microstructural properties were created by shutter-speed (SS) paradigm modeling to obtain estimates of blood volume fraction (vb ), water molecule capillary efflux rate constant (kpo ), and the water capillary wall permeability surface area product (Pw S ≡ vb *kpo ). Linear regression models were used to investigate differences in (i) kpo and Pw S between groups in NAWM and NAGM, and (ii) between WM lesions and NAWM in PMS. RESULTS: High-resolution parametric maps were produced to visualize tissue classes and resolve individual WM lesions. Normal-appearing gray matter kpo and Pw S were significantly decreased in PMS compared to HC (p ≤ .01). Twenty-one T2 WM lesions were analyzed in 10 participants with PMS. kpo was significantly decreased in WM lesions compared to PMS NAWM (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Transcapillary water exchange is reduced in PMS NAGM compared to HC and is further reduced in PMS WM lesions, suggesting pathologically impaired brain metabolism. kpo provides a sensitive measure of cerebral metabolic activity and/or coupling, and can be mapped at higher spatial resolution than conventional imaging techniques assessing metabolic activity.

A cross-sectional survey of cannabis use by people with MS in Oregon and Southwest Washington.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports that cannabinoids reduce self-reported spasticity and neuropathic pain in people with MS (PwMS), and legal access to cannabis for medical and recreational use continues to rise. However, there are limited data regarding patterns of cannabis use and perceived benefits of cannabis among PwMS in the US. This study describes the prevalence of cannabis use, routes of administration, perceived benefit of cannabis for MS, and characteristics associated with cannabis use and perception of benefit among a population of PwMS living in two states where cannabis is legal for both medical and recreational use. METHODS: A survey about treatments used by PwMS, focusing on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), was sent to PwMS living in Oregon and Southwest Washington. This survey included questions about current and past cannabis use, route of cannabis administration, and perceived benefits, as well as personal demographics. RESULTS: Of the 1188 returned surveys, 1000 had at least 75% complete survey responses and also completed the questions about current and past cannabis use. Thirty percent (n=303) of respondents reported currently using cannabis, 21% (n=210) used in the past but not currently, and 49% (n=487) had never used cannabis. Among current users, rates of use by smoking, vaping, topicals, tinctures and oils, or edibles were similar (35-46%), and most (59%) reported using multiple routes of administration. Most (64-78%, varying by route) current and past users reported cannabis being very or somewhat beneficial for their MS. The odds of current cannabis use were higher in PwMS who: 1) were younger (OR 2.24 [95% CI 1.39-3.61] for those age 18-40 compared with age >60]; 2) had lower household income (OR 3.94 [95% CI 2.55-6.09] with annual income <$25k compared with those with >$100k); 3) had secondary progressive MS (OR 1.77 [95% CI 1.07-2.92]); and 4) had more than minimal MS disability (OR 2.05 [95% CI 1.03-4.10] for those using a walker compared to those with none/minimal disability). The odds of perceiving cannabis as beneficial for MS were higher in: 1) younger individuals (OR 5.61 [95% CI 2.62-11.98] for those age 18-40 compared with age >60); 2) those with lower household income (OR 3.35 [95% CI 1.65-6.80] with annual income <$25k compared with those with >$100k), 3) those not currently using disease modifying therapies (OR 2.32 [95% CI 1.30-4.13]), and 4) those with the greatest disability (OR 17.96; [95% CI 2.00-161.22]). CONCLUSION: In this survey, 30% of PwMS reported currently using cannabis for their MS, mostly by multiple routes of administration, and most of these people report this being helpful for their MS. People who were younger, had lower household income, had progressive disease, and had more than minimal disability were more likely to use cannabis and report it was beneficial for their MS. People who were not using disease modifying therapies were also more likely to report benefit from cannabis use.

Chronic Demyelination and Axonal Degeneration in Multiple Sclerosis: Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Implications.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Inflammatory attacks in MS lead to both demyelination and axonal damage. However, due to incomplete remyelination most MS lesions remain chronically demyelinated. In parallel, there is axonal degeneration in the CNS of MS patients, contributing to progressive disability. There are currently no approved therapies that adequately restore myelin or protect axons from degeneration. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiology of axonal loss and chronic demyelination in MS and how understanding this pathophysiology is leading to the development of new MS therapeutics. RECENT FINDINGS: Ongoing research into the function of oligodendrocytes and myelin has revealed the importance of their relationship with neuronal health. Demyelination in MS leads to a number of pathophysiologic changes contributing to axonal generation. Among these are mitochondrial dysfunction, persistent neuroinflammation, and the effects of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. With this information, we review currently approved and investigational therapies designed to restore lost or damaged myelin and protect against neuronal degeneration. The development of therapies to restore lost myelin and protect neurons is a promising avenue of investigation for the benefit of patients with MS.

MRI characteristics of Japanese macaque encephalomyelitis: Comparison to human diseases.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To describe MRI findings in Japanese macaque encephalomyelitis (JME) with emphasis on lesion characteristics, lesion evolution, normal-appearing brain tissue, and similarities to human demyelinating disease. METHODS: MRI data were obtained from 114 Japanese macaques, 30 presenting neurological signs of JME. All animals were screened for presence of T2 -weighted white matter signal hyperintensities; animals with behavioral signs of JME were additionally screened for contrast-enhancing lesions. Whole-brain quantitative T1 maps were collected, and histogram analysis was performed with regression across age to evaluate microstructural changes in normal appearing brain tissue in JME and neurologically normal animals. Quantitative estimates of blood-brain-barrier (BBB) permeability to gadolinium-based-contrast agent (GBCA) were obtained in acute, GBCA-enhancing lesions. Longitudinal imaging data were acquired for 15 JME animals. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-three focal GBCA-enhancing lesions were identified in 30 animals demonstrating behavioral signs of neurological dysfunction. JME GBCA-enhancing lesions were typically focal and ovoid, demonstrating highest BBB GBCA permeability in the lesion core, similar to acute, focal multiple sclerosis lesions. New GBCA-enhancing lesions arose rapidly from normal-appearing tissue, and BBB permeability remained elevated for weeks. T1 values in normal-appearing tissue were significantly associated with age, but not with sex or disease. CONCLUSIONS: Intense, focal neuroinflammation is a key MRI finding in JME. Several features of JME compare directly to human inflammatory demyelinating diseases. Investigation of JME combined with the development and validation of noninvasive imaging biomarkers offers substantial potential to improve diagnostic specificity and contribute to the understanding of human demyelinating diseases.