Bronchodilator effect of an inhaled combination therapy with salmeterol + fluticasone and formoterol + budesonide in patients with COPD.

In the present trial, we compared the broncholytic efficacy of the combination therapy with 50 microg salmeterol + 250 microg fluticasone and 12 microg formoterol + 400 microg budesonide, both in a single inhaler device, in 16 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. The study was performed using a single-blind crossover randomized study. Lung function, pulse oximetry (SpO2) and heart rate were monitored before and 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 480, 600, and 720 min after bronchodilator inhalation. Both combinations were effective in reducing airflow obstruction. FEV1 AUC(0-12 h) was 2.83 l (95% CI: 2.13-3.54) after salmeterol/fluticasone and 2.57 l (95% CI: 1.97-3.2) after formoterol/budesonide. Formoterol/budesonide elicited the mean maximum improvement in FEV1 above baseline after 120 min (0.29 l; 95% CI: 0.21-0.37) and salmeterol/fluticasone after 300 min (0.32 l; 95% CI: 0.23-0.41). At 720 min, the increase in FEV1 over baseline values was 0.10 l (95% CI: 0.07-0.12) after salmeterol/fluticasone and 0.10 l (95% CI: 0.07-0.13) after formoterol/budesonide. The mean peak increase in heart rate occurred 300 min after formoterol/budesonide (1.5 b/min; 95% CI--2.3 to 5.3) and 360 min after salmeterol/fluticasone (2.6 b/min; 95% CI--1.9 to 7.0). SpO2 did not change. All differences between salmeterol/fluticasone and formoterol/budesonide were not significant (P > 0.05) except those in FEV1 at 120 and 360 min. The results indicate that an inhaled combination therapy with a long-acting beta2-agonist and an inhaled corticosteroid appears to be effective in improving airway limitation after acute administration in patients suffering from COPD.

Bronchodilation test in COPD: effect of inspiratory manoeuvre preceding forced expiration.

The effects of an inspiratory manoeuvre preceding forced expiration on functional tests performed under routine conditions before and after inhalation of a bronchodilator drug (salbutamol) were assessed on 150 consecutive chronic obstructive pulmonary disease outpatients. The patients performed forced vital capacity manoeuvres either immediately after a rapid inspiration (manoeuvre no. 1) or after a slow inspiration with a 4-6 s pause (manoeuvre no. 2). Under baseline conditions, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) values were 8% (% control) larger with manoeuvre no. 1 than no. 2. FEV1 values increased with salbutamol administration by approximately 8% and were, on average, still 7% larger with manoeuvre no. 1 than no. 2. The incidence of reversibility, assessed according to American Thoracic Society criteria, was 76% when manoeuvre no. 2 was selected to represent baseline conditions and manoeuvre no. 1 was chosen to represent the effects of bronchodilator administration, whereas the lowest incidence (2%) was found when manoeuvre no. 1 was selected to represent baseline conditions and manoeuvre no. 2 was chosen to represent the effects of bronchodilator administration. These results indicate that the time dependence of the forced vital capacity manoeuvre has an important impact on the assessment of routine lung function in a clinical setting and supports the notion that the time course of the inspiration preceding the forced vital capacity manoeuvre should be standardised.

Effect of inhaled bronchodilators on inspiratory capacity and dyspnoea at rest in COPD.

It has been shown that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) develop dynamic hyperinflation (DH), which contributes to dyspnoea and exercise intolerance. Formoterol, salmeterol and oxitropium have been recommended for maintenance therapy in COPD patients, but their effect on DH has only been assessed for salmeterol. The aim of the present study was to compare the acute effect of four inhaled bronchodilators (salbutamol, formoterol, salmeterol and oxitropium) and placebo on forced expiratory volume in one second, inspiratory capacity, forced vital capacity and dyspnoea in COPD patients. A cross-over, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out on 20 COPD patients. Patients underwent pulmonary function testing and dyspnoea evaluation, in basal condition and 5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 min after bronchodilator or placebo administration. The results indicate that in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with decreased baseline inspiratory capacity, there was a much greater increase of inspiratory capacity after bronchodilator administration, which correlated closely with the improvement of dyspnoea sensation at rest. For all bronchodilators used, inspiratory capacity reversibility should be tested at 30 min following the bronchodilator. On average, formoterol elicited the greatest increase in inspiratory capacity than the other bronchodilators used, though the difference was significant only with salmeterol and oxitropium. The potential advantage of formoterol needs to be tested in a larger patient population.

Bronchodilating effect of oxitropium bromide in heart disease patients with exacerbations of COPD: double-blind, randomized, controlled study.

Anti-cholinergic agents are considered the bronchodilator therapy of first-choice in the treatment of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) associated with heart disease since they may be as effective or more effective than inhaled beta2-agonists and, moreover, they do not interact with cardiac beta-adrenoceptors. The aim of our study was to evaluate the bronchodilator activity of oxitropium bromide in outpatients suffering from exacerbations of COPD associated with heart diseases (ischaemic heart disease and/or arrhythmias). We recruited 50 consecutive outpatients (33 males and 17 females, mean age 68.6 years, 15 current smokers and 35 ex-smokers). Each patient performed body plethismography in basal condition and 30 min after inhalation of 200 microg metered dose inhaler (MDI) oxitropium bromide administered by a device (Fluspacer). FEV1, FVC, MMEF25-75, sRaw and tRaw were evaluated. Thirty minutes after 200 microg oxitropium bromide administration, we observed a significant improvement in FEV1 11.6% +/- 1 (mean +/- SEM) (P<0.01); FVC, MMEF25-75 sRaw variation was respectively: 9.2% +/- 0.6, 31.4 +/- 2.9, -19.9 +/- 1.1. Placebo did not significantly change pulmonary function. Our data suggest that oxitropium bromide bronchodilator activity is effective in exacerbations of COPD.

Comparison of the bronchodilating effect of salmeterol and zafirlukast in combination with that of their use as single treatments in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the effect of a beta2-agonist is additive with that of a cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptor antagonist. OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to answer the question of whether combined administration of inhaled salmeterol and oral zafirlukast at the standard doses would result in greater bronchodilation in patients with chronic airway obstruction than the use of either drug alone. METHODS: The study was performed using a double-blind, double-dummy, crossover, randomised design, and was conducted on 4 non-consecutive days. Sixteen patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 10 non-smoker asthmatic patients received 40 mg of oral zafirlukast, 50 microg of inhaled salmeterol, 50 microg of inhaled salmeterol plus 40 mg of oral zafirlukast of placebo. Lung function was assessed before drug administration and 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min thereafter. At the end of the 4-hour period, each patient received 400 microg of inhaled salbutamol and spirometric testing was performed 30 min later. RESULTS: In both asthmatic and COPD patients, the overall effect of salmeterol and zafirlukast on the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was considered extremely significant (p < 0.0001), with a maximum bronchodilation above baseline after 180 min (20.7 and 11.0%, respectively) in asthmatics and after 2 h (21.7 and 11.2%, respectively) in COPD subjects. Zafirlukast did not produce any further significant acute bronchodilation in addition to that achieved with salmeterol alone in either asthmatic or COPD patients. Nevertheless, 7 out of 16 COPD patients and 7 out of 10 asthmatic patients had a further improvement after the combination of salmeterol and zafirlukast. The mean difference in pre- and post-salbutamol FEV1 values in both asthmatic and COPD patients after zafirlukast was significant (p < 0.05), but that after salmeterol and the combination of the two drugs was not significant (p > 0.05). The difference between placebo and zafirlukast was not significant following inhaled salbutamol given 4 h after each treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both salmeterol and zafirlukast induced a significant increase in FEV1, although salmeterol elicited a greater improvement in both asthmatic and COPD patients. Apparently, zafirlukast at the clinically recommended dose did not produce any further significant acute bronchodilation in addition to that achieved with salmeterol alone, either in asthma or COPD. In any case, evaluation of the effect of the combination over a 12-hour period is mandatory.

Onset of action of single doses of formoterol administered via Turbuhaler in patients with stable COPD.

We studied 16 patients with stable COPD in a double blind, double dummy, placebo-controlled, within patient study to see if formoterol could be used as a rescue drug. We compared the of onset of bronchodilation obtained with formoterol 12 microg (metered dose corresponding to 9 microg delivered dose) and formoterol 24 microg (metered dose corresponding to 18 microg delivered dose), both delivered via Turbuhaler, with that of salbutamol 400 microg and salbutamol 800 microg delivered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). Patients inhaled single doses of placebo, formoterol and salbutamol on five separate days. FEV1 was measured in baseline condition and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min after inhalation of each treatment. We examined two separate criteria for deciding if a response was greater than that expected by a random variation of the measurement: (1) a rise in FEV1 of at least 15% from the baseline value; (2) an absolute increase in FEV1 of at least 200 ml. Formoterol 12 microg (15.2 min; 95% CI 9.5-21.0) and formoterol 24 microg (15.1 min; 95% CI 8.9-21.2) caused a rise in FEV1 of at least 15% from the baseline value almost rapidly as salbutamol 400 microg (13.6 min; 95% CI 7.1-20.1) and salbutamol 800 microg (14.5 min; 95% CI 7.1-21.9). No significant difference (P=0.982) in onset of action was seen between the four active treatments. According to Criterion 2, the mean time to 200 ml increase in FEV1 was 11.1 min (95% CI: 7.0-15.2) after salbutamol 400 microg, 13.0 min (95% CI: 7.9-18.1) after salbutamol 800 microg, 14.7 min (95% CI: 7.1-22.4) after formoterol 12 microg, and 12.7 min (95% CI: 7.4-18.0) after formoterol 24 microg. Again, there was no significant difference (P= 0.817) between the four active treatments. Formoterol Turbuhaler 12 microg and 24 microg caused bronchodilation as rapidly as salbutamol 400 microg and 800 microg given via pMDI.

Lung function improvement in smokers suffering from COPD with zafirlukast, a CysLT(1)-receptor antagonist.

The present study was designed to evaluate the bronchodilating role of zafirlukast, a CysLT(1)receptor antagonist, at the standard dosage currently recommended in the marketing of this agent in smokers with COPD. The study was performed using a double-blind, cross-over, randomized design and was conducted on 2 non-consecutive days. Sixteen outpatients suffering from stable COPD received 40 mg oral zafirlukast, or placebo. Lung function was controlled before drug administration and 30, 60, 120, 180, 240 min thereafter. At the end of the 4-h period, each patient received 400 microg inhaled salbutamol and spirometric testing was performed 30 min later. Zafirlukast, but not placebo, produced a significant (P<0.05) bronchodilation between 30 min and 4 h following administration, with a maximum mean increase in FEV(1)of 0.134 l (11.2%) above baseline after 2 h. Nine of 16 patients showed an increase in FEV(1)of at least 15% above baseline after zafirlukast. The maximum mean increase in FEV(1)after zafirlukast in these subjects, who were considered responders, observed after 2 h, was 0.221 (19.4%). The mean difference of post-salbutamol FEV(1)values after zafirlukast and placebo (-0.036 l) was not significant (P<0.05). In responders, the mean of differences in pre- and post-salbutamol FEV(1)values after zafirlukast was 0.077 l, whereas the mean of differences between post-salbutamol values after zafirlukast and those after placebo was -0.064 l. The mean AUC(0-4 h)for all patients was 0.121 l for placebo and 0.385 l for zafirlukast. The difference between the placebo and zafirlukast AUC(0-4 h)was significant (P<0.05). The individual FEV(1)AUC(0-4 h)after zafirlukast were higher than those after placebo in 12 out of 16 patients. These findings suggest that cysteinyl leukotrienes might be one of the causes of persistent bronchoconstriction in COPD, at least in several smokers, but do not confirm the hypothesis that the effects of zafirlukast and salbutamol are independent and additive.

Psychological issues in the treatment of asthmatic patients.

Recently published research contends that anxiety and depression are more common in asthmatic patients than in the general population. Particular psychological profiles could even be a risk factor contributing to deaths caused by asthma. The purpose of our research was to evaluate the anxiety and depression level in a population of 80 asthmatic patients who were treated in our department, and to judge whether data collected on psychological profiles of these asthmatic patients can be of any significance when dealing with their pathology. The study consisted of 40 patients suffering from chronic viral hepatitis B or C, and 40 healthy subjects who served as a control group. Both sets of patients were homogeneous with regard to sex, age and education. All subjects were tested for anxiety and depression levels with the S.T.A.I. and Zung questionnaires. A structured questionnaire was employed to assess the daily approach to living with the disease only in asthmatic patients. The anxiety and depression levels were noticeably higher in asthmatic patients than in patients with chronic liver disease and healthy subjects. In particular, 34 asthmatic patients scored higher than the S.T.A.I. cut-off (40/80) and 27 attained the same results in the Zung questionnaire. Results from the asthmatic population and healthy subjects illustrated that women had a higher incidence of anxiety and depression compared to men, although no statistically significant relationship between sex and questionnaire results was apparent in patients with liver disease. In the year before assessment, hospitalization and emergency treatment due to asthmatic exacerbation was correlated in females with a high incidence of anxiety. Additionally, the asthmatic population's level of education is significantly related to the incidence of anxiety and depression. With higher education, incidence of depression and anxiety decreased. This result was not apparent in control groups. The results of our study were: (1) we confirmed that asthmatic pathology is associated with an increase in incidence of anxiety and depression, whose presence and seriousness should be taken into consideration in therapeutic programmes when dealing with a patient; (2) we indicated that a specific approach towards therapy is crucial when dealing with an asthmatic patient; (3) we suggested how important it is to identify categories of patients that require more care because of their psychological profile. These findings should provide for the optimal use of informational resources with important applications for educational programmes and the future treatment of the asthmatic population.

Interrelationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefaclor advanced formulation in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

Cefaclor advanced formulation (cefaclor AF) is an extended-release form of the oral cephalosporin cefaclor. When cefaclor AF 750 mg twice-daily and cefaclor immediate release 500 mg three-times-a-day are compared there is a skew to the right of the pharmacokinetic profile and higher levels are achieved. Based on this pharmacokinetic finding, we examined the relationship between the bacterial susceptibility to cefaclor (MIC), the achieved cefaclor AF serum and sputum concentrations, and in vivo eradication of the bacteria in 36 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The mean peak concentrations in serum and sputum 5 h after administration were 8.6 microg/ml (95% CI: 8.1 microg/ml - 9.1 microg/ml) and 1.5 microg/ml (95% CI: 1.4 microg/ml - 1.7 microg/ml), respectively. Cefaclor was always detectable 8 h after administration. At post therapy, treatment was successful in 31 (86.1%) patients. Cefaclor concentrations in serum persisted above the MIC for more than 40% of dosing interval in 31 subjects, and those in sputum in 24 patients. Treatment was successful in all subjects with percent of time above the MIC in serum of >40%, whereas the time that levels in sputum stayed above the MIC was not the pharmacodynamic parameter that correlated best with therapeutic efficacy for cefaclor. Our data demonstrate that when cefaclor AF is dosed twice-daily, the in vivo pharmacodynamic susceptibility breakpoint is 8 microg/ml. The good activity and pharmacokinetics of cefaclor AF provide serum concentrations higher than the MIC of Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Moraxella catarrhalis for more than 40% of the validated dosing interval. Therefore, it might be considered for first choice treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

Non-pulmonary effects induced by the addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy in patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma.

OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to assess the non-pulmonary effects of a 2-week treatment with the addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy in 10 patients with mild or moderate asthma. METHODS: Each patient was invited to perform a screening visit which included spirometry before and after inhalation of 12 microg formoterol with a metered dose inhaler (MDI), measurement of arterial blood pressure, baseline electrocardiography and 24-hour Holter monitoring, and a test for evaluating upper limb tremor. Patients then began bronchodilating therapy with 12 microg formoterol MDI and 400 microg budesonide Turbuhaler b.i.d. Each patient was also given a peak flowmeter and a diary in which he had to record the morning and evening values measured before taking inhaled drugs. Two weeks later, the patients repeated the same examinations; the diary card was returned 2 months after the beginning of the study. RESULTS: Adding formoterol to budesonide therapy caused a significant improvement in lung function, but neither induced any statistically significant effect on mean heart rate, nor altered the circadian rhythm of autonomic regulation nor elicited significant alterations in cardiac morphology. However, the evaluation of upper limb tremor revealed a statistically significant increase (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that adding the recommended dose of formoterol to an inhaled corticosteroid therapy does not induce significant cardiac undesirable effects, although tremor, surely due to stimulation of beta(2) receptors of the skeletal muscles, may sometimes be a limiting effect.