A Study of the Reliability, Validity, and Physiological Changes of Sit-to-Stand Tests in People With Heart Failure.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to describe the psychometric properties and physiological response of the five times sit-to-stand (STST-5) and 60-sec sit-to-stand test (STST-60) in adults with heart failure (HF). METHODS: People with HF enrolled in a 12-wk exercise rehabilitation program completed two STST-5 and two STST-60 as part of their usual baseline and follow-up assessments. Test-retest reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the two STSTs were described. Results were correlated with the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and timed up and go test (TUGT), and rating of perceived exertion and physiological responses were compared between all tests. Feasibility was also reported according to the presence of adverse events and adherence to the protocol. RESULTS: Forty-nine adults with HF participated in this study. Intraclass correlation coefficients of the STST-5 and STST-60 were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.78-0.96) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.98), respectively. The STST-60 was strongly associated with both the 6MWT ( r = 0.76) and the TUGT ( rs =-0.77). The STST-5 was strongly associated with the TUGT ( rs = 0.79) and moderately associated with the 6MWT ( rs =-0.70). Rating of perceived exertion and lower limb fatigue were greater in the STST-60 than in the 6MWT ( P < .001) or STST-5 ( P < .001). Adverse events occurred in five participants undertaking the STST-60 and one participant undertaking the STST-5. CONCLUSIONS: The STST-5 and STST-60 are reliable and valid measures of functional exercise capacity in people with HF.

Home-based and remote functional exercise testing in cardiac conditions, during the covid-19 pandemic and beyond: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: With the change in healthcare to one that adopts a greater reliance on remote delivery, guidance regarding functional exercise testing, either in-person in the home or performed remotely, is urgently needed for people with cardiac conditions. OBJECTIVES: To identify functional exercise tests that have been conducted in the home or remotely in patients with cardiac conditions. DATA SOURCES: A search was undertaken across four electronic databases and grey literature for English language publications without time restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies of any designs were selected if they reported an exercise test conducted at home or remotely in patients with cardiac conditions. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Studies were independently screened and graded by two reviewers according to the Downs and Black checklist. A narrative synthesis of the included studies was undertaken. RESULTS: Five studies (six articles) were included, with a total of 438 patients with cardiac conditions. Tests used at home or remotely were the 6-minute walk test (6MWT, five studies) and the timed up and go test (one study). No studies reported the use of step tests in the home or remotely. The 6MWTs were administered via a smartphone application, rope, videoconferencing and accelerometer and proved to be feasible, valid and reliable. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a marked demand for home-based exercise programs, the 6MWT remains the most commonly administered functional exercise test for people with cardiac conditions. Surprisingly few studies have explored alternative tests for this patient population that may be more suitable for home or remote performance. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO: CRD42020219512.