Intermittent Pneumatic Compression in Addition to Standard Prophylaxis of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism in Extremely High-risk Patients (IPC SUPER): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of adjunctive IPC to standard prophylaxis of postoperative VTE in patients at extremely high-risk. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The standard prophylaxis for postoperative VTE is insufficient in extremely high-risk patients. It is unclear whether an adjunctive use of IPC would result in a lower incidence of postoperative venous thrombosis. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients who underwent major surgery and had a Caprini score of ≥11 to receive either IPC in addition to standard prophylaxis with anti-embolic stockings (pressure of 18-21 mm Hg at the ankle) and low-molecular-weight heparin (IPC group) or standard prophylaxis alone (control group). The primary outcome was an asymptomatic venous thrombosis of the lower limbs, as detected by duplex ultrasound scan performed before inclusion and every 3-5 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 407 patients underwent randomization, of which 204 were assigned to the IPC group and 203 to the control group. The primary outcome occurred in 1 (0.5%) patient in the IPC group and 34 (16.7%) patients in the control group [relative risk, 0.03, 95% confidential interval (CI): 0.01-0.21]. Pulmonary embolism occurred in none of the 204 patients in the IPC group and in 5 (2.5%) patients in the control group (relative risk, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-1.63), and postoperative death occurred in 6 (2.9%) patients in the IPC group and 10 (4.9%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.50-1.60). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with a Caprini score of ≥11 who received standard prophylaxis for VTE, adjunctive IPC resulted in a significantly lower incidence of asymptomatic venous thrombosis.

Use of paracrine factors from stem cells to treat local radiation burns in rats.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cells based paracrine bioactive factors that deploy their task as an essential mechanism, but their efficiency for skin regeneration still requires clarification. METHODS: The mesenchymal stem cell-based paracrine factors were administered by subcutaneous injection of 0.5 mL peptides (general protein 8 mg/mL). These were performed after radiation on different days like the first, third, sixth, eighth, and 10th. To determine the consequences, we performed photography, planimetry, and preclinical test each week after 15 days of radiation. MSC-based peptides were injected into a rat that had radiation burns, and its observation encouraged cell-free therapeutic remedies to regenerate skin. Both control and experimental groups were exposed to 110 Gy of X-rays, which resulted in the formation of localized radiation burns on the skin (S=6 cm2) 15 days later. Thirty days after radiation, the wound stabilized (surface of the wound was S=2.2±0.2 cm2) and fluctuated throughout the course of the pathological process. RESULTS: The wounded area on the skin from the 15th to the 29th day after radiation was practically the same in both groups. The wounded area gradually reduced by 6.1±0.4 cm2 (experimental group) and 5.9±0.6 cm2 (control group) 15 days after radiation up to 2.2±0.3 cm2 (in both control and experimental groups) on the 29th day after radiation. However, starting from the 36th day, there was a constant reduction in the burn area in the experimental group up to 0.2±0.1 cm2 till the 71st day after radiation. CONCLUSION: In the control group, the area of the lesion ranged from 1.4±0.6 cm2 on the 50th day to 1.9±0.8 cm2 on the 71st day. During the 57th to the 71st day, the difference between the affected area in the experimental and control groups was 1:8. The experimental group has a significantly higher level of skin regeneration and significant decrease in the level of leukocyte infiltration, thereby reducing necrosis.

Validation of the Caprini risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism in high-risk surgical patients in the background of standard prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: We used the Caprini venous thromboembolism risk assessment score to prospectively evaluate if there was a correlation between the Caprini scores and the incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in high-risk surgical patients. A second objective was to determine whether patients at extremely high risk need a more effective prophylactic regimen. METHODS: This prospective multicenter observational study involved 140 high-risk patients who underwent abdominal (48%) or cranial and/or spinal (52%) surgery. All patients were assessed using the Caprini model and had a mean score of 9.5 ± 2.7 (range, 5-15). Our standard prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism consisted of above-knee graduated compression stockings with 18 to 21 mm Hg pressure and subcutaneous low-dose unfractionated heparin three times per day, starting on the first or second through the fifth postoperative day depending on the risk of bleeding. We performed a duplex ultrasound examination at baseline during the first 12 to 24 hours after surgery and then every 3 to 5 days until discharge to assess the lower limb venous system up to the inferior vena cava. The end point of the study was ultrasound verification of fresh DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE). Verification of PE was made in all cases of DVT using echocardiography, lung scintigraphy, combined single-photon emission computed tomography and X-ray computed tomography, or autopsy. RESULTS: Fresh postoperative DVT was found in 39 patients (28%). The incidence of DVT was 2% in patients with a Caprini score of 5 to 8, 26% in patients with scores of 9 to 11, and 65% in patients with scores of 12 to 15 (P for trend < .01). The risk for DVT was increased 18.7-fold for patients with scores of 9 to 11 and 98.4-fold for scores of 12 to 15 compared with patients with scores of 5 to 8. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.94) and a Caprini score of 11 was the cutoff point that provided the highest sensitivity combined with highest specificity. In the 77 patients with a score of <11, DVT occurred in 2 patients (3%). In contrast, in the 63 patients with a score of ≥ 11, DVT occurred in 37 patients (59%; P < .01). PE was found in 13 patients (9%) and confirmed with autopsy. In all cases, verified fresh DVT was the source of embolism. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant correlation between Caprini scores and the incidence of postoperative DVT in high-risk surgical patients. A Caprini score of ≥ 11 can identify a subgroup of patients at extremely high risk. These patients need a more effective prophylactic regimen.