The Incremental Cost of Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A National Cohort Analysis.

Incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) has been established as an effective option for end-stage renal disease patients with willing but HLA-incompatible living donors, reducing mortality and improving quality of life. Depending on antibody titer, ILDKT can require highly resource-intensive procedures, including intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and/or cell-depleting antibody treatment, as well as protocol biopsies and donor-specific antibody testing. This study sought to compare the cost and Medicare reimbursement, exclusive of organ acquisition payment, for ILDKT (n = 926) with varying antibody titers to matched compatible transplants (n = 2762) performed between 2002 and 2011. Data were assembled from a national cohort study of ILDKT and a unique data set linking hospital cost accounting data and Medicare claims. ILDKT was more expensive than matched compatible transplantation, ranging from 20% higher adjusted costs for positive on Luminex assay but negative flow cytometric crossmatch, 26% higher for positive flow cytometric crossmatch but negative cytotoxic crossmatch, and 39% higher for positive cytotoxic crossmatch (p < 0.0001 for all). ILDKT was associated with longer median length of stay (12.9 vs. 7.8 days), higher Medicare payments ($91 330 vs. $63 782 p < 0.0001), and greater outlier payments. In conclusion, ILDKT increases the cost of and payments for kidney transplantation.

Acute Appendicitis after Liver Transplantation: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common etiologies for acute abdomen. However, fewer than 30 cases of acute appendicitis after liver transplantation have so far been reported in the literature. Previous case studies have concluded that acute appendicitis after liver transplantation may present differently than in non-immunosuppressed patients and thus may lead to more complications. Herein, we describe the fourth case of laparoscopic appendectomy in a 40-year-old female presenting with an acute abdomen, 10 years after orthotopic liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis. Additionally, we review the literature, and emphasize the importance for laparoscopic, rather than open appendectomy after liver transplantation. Overall, despite the small number of reported cases of appendicitis after orthotopic liver transplantation, we found the incidence and clinical presentation are similar to patients without liver transplantation. The etiologies for appendicitis in patients after liver transplantation may be different than in those not chronically immunosuppressed, with significantly less lymphoid hyperplasia and increased fecalith and cytomegaloviral infections. Preliminary results showed that laparoscopic appendectomy after liver transplantation results in decreased hospital stays and fewer complications.

Quantifying the risk of incompatible kidney transplantation: a multicenter study.

Incompatible live donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) offers a survival advantage over dialysis to patients with anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA). Program-specific reports (PSRs) fail to account for ILDKT, placing this practice at regulatory risk. We collected DSA data, categorized as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF) (n = 185), positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC) (n = 536) or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC) (n = 304), from 22 centers. We tested associations between DSA, graft loss and mortality after adjusting for PSR model factors, using 9669 compatible patients as a comparison. PLNF patients had similar graft loss; however, PFNC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-2.23, p = 0.007) and PCC (aHR = 5.01, 95% CI: 3.71-6.77, p < 0.001) were associated with increased graft loss in the first year. PLNF patients had similar mortality; however, PFNC (aHR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.28-3.26; p = 0.003) and PCC (aHR = 4.59; 95% CI: 2.98-7.07; p < 0.001) were associated with increased mortality. We simulated Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services flagging to examine ILDKT's effect on the risk of being flagged. Compared to equal-quality centers performing no ILDKT, centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PFNC had a 1.19-, 1.33- and 1.73-fold higher odds of being flagged. Centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PCC had a 2.22-, 4.09- and 10.72-fold higher odds. Failure to account for ILDKT's increased risk places centers providing this life-saving treatment in jeopardy of regulatory intervention.

Liver transplantation from hepatitis B surface antigen-positive donors.

One possibility to increase the organ pool is to use grafts from hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive donors, but few data are currently available in this setting. Herein, we reviewed the outcome of 92 liver transplantations using allografts from HBsAg-positive donors in the United States (1990-2009). They had experienced HBV-related (n = 68) or HBV-unrelated disease (n = 24). There was no difference between patients who received HBsAg-positive versus HBsAg-negative allografts based on age, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, length of stay, wait time, and donor risk index. HBsAg-positive allografts were more likely to be imported and used in MELD exceptional cases. Allograft and patient survival were comparable between the two groups. HBsAg-positive allografts deserve consideration when no other organ is available in a suitable waiting time in the present era of highly effective antiviral therapy.

Improving Outcomes of Liver Transplantation for Polycystic Disease in MELD Era.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) for polycystic liver disease (PLD) has evolved to be an option for treating these patients. Patients with PLD suffer from incapacitating symptoms because of very large liver volumes but liver function is preserved until a late stage. OBJECTIVE/METHODS: Herein, we reviewed the outcome of adult patients with PLD who underwent LT in the US comparing pre-MELD (1990-2001) to MELD era (2002-2009). RESULTS: During this period, only 309 patients underwent LT for PLD. The number of LT for PLD is very low comparing the two eras. The percentage of patients who had combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) for this disease has not changed during MELD era (42.8% vs 38.6%). The waiting time for LT (337 vs 272 days) and CLKT (289 vs 220) has increased in MELD era (p<0.001). In MELD era, 53.4% of LT and 31.2% of CLKT were done as MELD exceptional cases. The allograft and patent survival have significantly improved in MELD era. CONCLUSION: Patients with PLD had marked improvement of their outcomes after LT in MELD era.

Liver transplantation from a donor with multiple biliary hamartomata.

Biliary hamartomata are rare benign lesions. Herein, we report on a 48-year-old man with a history of end-stage liver disease secondary to alcoholic liver disease. The patient received an orthotropic liver transplant from a brain-death woman. At the time of recovery, there were multiple lesions in the transplanted liver measuring 7-10 mm. Pathology revealed multiple biliary hamartomata. The postoperative course of the recipient was uncomplicated and he was discharged home 10 days after the transplantation.

Liver Transplantation in Patients with Portal Vein Thrombosis: Comparing Pre-MELD and MELD era.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) used to be a relative contraindication for liver transplantation (LT). This obstacle has been dealt with following the improvement of LT-related techniques. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of adult patients with PVT who underwent LT before and after adopting MELD. METHODS: We retrospectively searched our database for deceased donor LT recipients who had PVT, were operated between 1990 and 2009, and were 18 years old or more. The outcome of patients operated in pre-MELD era (1990-2001) was then compared with that of those operated in MELD era (2002-2009). RESULTS: The incidence of patients undergoing LT with PVT has increased from 1.2% (491/40,730) in pre-MELD era to 6% (2540/42,601) in MELD era (p<0.01). Patients with PVT in MELD era were older (53.6 vs 50.5), had higher calculated MELD (21.3 vs 18.9), shorter length of hospital stay after LT (25 vs 21.7 days), more likely to develop HCC (14.8% vs 0), and more likely to receive DCD allograft (3.9% vs 0.8%). Donor risk indices were comparable in both groups (1.9 vs 1.9). The median waiting time before transplantation decreased during MELD era (71 vs 99 days). Allograft and patients survival was comparable between the two eras. However, allograft and patients survival rates were lower in patients with PVT compared to those without. In Cox regression analysis, PVT was associated with worse allograft (HR=1.3, 95% CI: 1.2-1.4, p<0.001) and patient survival (HR=1.3, 95% CI: 1.2-1.5, p<0.001) compared to non-PVT patients. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of patients with PVT has increased in MELD era without improvement in outcomes. Donor and recipients characteristics changed in MELD era. PVT is still associated with poor outcomes compared to patients without PVT.

A psychosocial evaluation process for living liver donors: the University of Rochester model.

OBJECTIVE: The donation of livers by living donors entails complex processes, both surgically and psychosocially, potentially involving risks in both domains. Thorough psychosocial evaluation is necessary to minimize those risks, yet little has been written about the donor assessment process. This article describes one such process, utilized by a transplant program in upstate New York. METHOD: Donor candidates undergo multiple psychosocial interviews early in the overall transplant evaluation process. Evaluators subsequently meet as a group, along with an independent ethicist, to determine psychosocial candidacy prior to final medical/surgical clearance. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2007, 416 donor candidates initiated and/or underwent full evaluation, resulting in a 17.5% surgery and 55.5% exclusion rate among those individuals. Of those ruled out, 20.8% were for (medical or psychosocial) reasons associated with the recipient, and 8.7% were for donor-related psychosocial issues. CONCLUSION: Given the primacy ofpsychosocial and ethical issues in living liver donor candidate evaluation, the multiple interview process, followed by team discussion and overseen by an ethicist removed from other transplant program functions, has advantages as a donor assessment model.

Treating hepatocellular carcinoma with sorafenib in liver transplant patients: an initial experience.

Sorafenib has been approved for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there are no data reported on its use in HCC patients with localized disease who have undergone orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Herein, we have reviewed our initial experience with 7 HCC patients who were candidates for OLT and were treated with sorafenib. Treating liver transplant patients with sorafenib appeared to be safe based upon our limited experience. There is a strong need for clinical trials to comprehensively study the safety of sorafenib before OLT.

Living-donor liver transplantation in the United States: identifying donors at risk for perioperative complications.

Donor safety has been scrutinized by both the medical community and the media. Variability exists in reported donor complications and associated risk factors are ill defined. Use of administrative data can overcome the bias of single-center studies and explore variables associated with untoward events. A retrospective cohort study identifying living liver donors in two large healthcare registries yielded 433 right and left lobe donors from 13 centers between 2001 and 2005. Perioperative complications were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) coding data and classified according to the Clavien system. Logistic regression models identified factors associated with complications. There was one perioperative death (0.23%). The overall complication rate was 29.1% and major complication rate defined by a Clavien grade >or=3 was 3.5%. Center living-donor volume (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99) and the ratio of living-donors to all donors (living and deceased) (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.92-0.96) were associated with a lower risk of all complications. Donor age >50 years (OR = 4.25, 95% CI = 1.22-14.87) was associated with a higher risk of major complications. Living liver donation is currently performed with a low risk of major morbidity. Use of administrative data represents an important tool to facilitate a better understanding of donor risk factors.

The activation state of human intrahepatic lymphocytes.

The immune tolerance induced by the liver as an allograft is difficult to reconcile with the evidence that the liver selectively accumulates activated T cells from the circulation. However, much of this information is based on murine liver lymphocytes that were isolated using enzymatic digestion. In the present study we made use of a novel resource, the lymphocytes isolated during the perfusion of living donor liver lobe prior to transplantation. These healthy human liver lymphocytes displayed surface markers indicating a high degree of activation of natural killer cells, CD56(+) T cells, CD4(+) T cells and CD8(+) T cells. These properties were independent of enzymatic treatment or the details of cell isolation. We conclude that the healthy human liver is a site of intense immunological activity.

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis among liver transplant recipients: a single institution experience and topic update.

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is a recently characterized systemic fibrosing disorder developing in the setting of renal insufficiency. NSF's rapidly progressive nature resulting in disability within weeks of onset makes early diagnosis important. Two reports of NSF after liver transplantation are known of. We present three cases of NSF developing within a few months after liver transplantation and review the current literature. Loss of regulatory control of the circulating fibrocyte, its aberrant recruitment, in a milieu of renal failure and a recent vascular procedure appear important in its development. Known current therapies lack consistent efficacy. Only an improvement in renal function has the greatest likelihood of NSF's resolution. Delayed recognition may pose a significant barrier to functional recovery in the ubiquitously deconditioned liver transplant patient. Early recognition and implementation of aggressive physical therapy appear to have the greatest impact on halting its progression.

Survival outcome after hepatic retransplantation for hepatitis C virus-positive and -negative recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States. Recurrence of HCV infection in these recipients is almost uniform. The currently available antiviral treatment is known to cause significant side effects, and the rate of sustained viral response is low. There is still controversy about whether such patients should undergo subsequent transplantations for HCV disease. This study compared outcomes for hepatic retransplantation performed in HCV(+) and HCV(-) recipients at a single center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1994 through November 2003, 68 patients at our institution received a second liver allograft. Nineteen of the recipients were HCV(+) (group A) and 49 were HCV(-) (group B). All patients were followed until January 2004. The mean follow-up time after initial retransplantation was 37 +/- 29 months. Patient and graft survival for the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Seven recipients in group A (36.8%) and 22 recipients in group B (44.9%) died during follow-up. The actuarial 3-year patient survival after initial retransplantation for groups A and B were 61.7% and 51.6%, respectively. Nine patients required a second retransplantation, 3 (15.8%) in group A and 6 (12.2%) in group B. The actuarial 3-year graft survival from initial retransplantation for groups A and B were 56.3% and 45.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We observed slightly better patient and graft survivals at 3 years from initial retransplantation in HCV(+) recipients compared to HCV(-) recipients. This may be due to younger donor age and better selection of HCV(+) recipients in this series.

Transplantation of liver grafts from older donors: impact on recipients with hepatitis C virus infection.

INTRODUCTION: Older donor allografts are being accepted for liver transplantation (LTx) due to shortage of organs. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection-related disease is presently the most common indication of LT in the United States. We studied the impact of donor age on patient and graft survivals in patients with HCV infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty four consecutive HCV(+) LTx recipients (117 men, 37 women) were studied. The mean follow-up period was 41.0 +/- 30.2 months. The population was divided into four groups according to donor age: group I (< or =20 years); group II (21 to 40 years); group III (41 to 60 years); group IV (>60 years). RESULTS: Thirty-two (20.8%) patients died during follow-up and 16 patients (10.4%) required retransplantation. The actuarial 7-year patient survivals for groups I, II, III, and IV were 87.1%, 73.7%, 69.3%, and 68.5%, respectively (P = .4). Patient survivals for donor age groups III + IV (n = 95) and groups I + II (n = 59) were 68.9% and 77.2%, respectively (P = .19). The 7-year graft survivals for groups I, II, III, and IV were 82.7%, 71.8%, 65.8%, and 62.5%, respectively (P = .17). Graft survivals for groups III + IV and groups I + II were 58.4% and 76.2%, respectively (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Patient and graft survivals for HCV-positive liver transplant recipients in this study decreased progressively as the donor age increased. Patient and graft survivals were best for group I recipients. There were significant differences in graft survivals when recipients were grouped with a cutoff donor age of 40 years.

Change in oral absorption of tacrolimus in a liver transplant recipient after reversal of jejunoileal bypass: case report.

INTRODUCTION: Jejunoileal bypass (JIB) was, at one time, a popular surgical technique for the treatment of morbid obesity. However, this operation was also associated with major complications. Consequently, many such procedures were eventually reversed. One of the most serious of these complications was liver failure. For those patients who developed cirrhosis, liver transplantation was one therapeutic alternative. Tacrolimus is one of the primary immunosuppressive agents used in liver transplantation. It is effective to prevent acute rejection episodes, but shows a narrow therapeutic index and can cause nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. This report describes the change in tacrolimus absorption that was observed after JIB reversal in a 57-year-old female liver transplant recipient. RESULTS: Prior to JIB reversal, the mean tacrolimus dose was 7 mg twice daily with a whole-blood tacrolimus concentration ranging from 5.2 to 6.4 ng/mL. There was no appreciable peak in tacrolimus concentration, and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was 10.9 ng/mL/h. After reversal, the daily tacrolimus dose was decreased to 5 mg twice daily, with a now-discernable peak concentration at 3 hours postdose. Furthermore, the AUC increased 90% to 20.7 ng/mL/h. CONCLUSION: After JIB reversal, the patient showed higher systemic levels of tacrolimus and required lower steady-state doses. It is therefore imperative that such patients be monitored closely to avoid tacrolimus-related toxicity.

Does valganciclovir hydrochloride (valcyte) provide effective prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients?

INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after solid organ transplantation is one of the most common viral infections, causing significant morbidity and mortality if not treated promptly. Ganciclovir has proven to be effective for the prophylaxis and treatment of CMV. However, oral absorption of ganciclovir is poor. Recently, oral administration of valganciclovir hydrochloride (Valcyte) has been observed to display 10-fold better absorption than oral ganciclovir. Valganciclovir has increasingly been used as prophylaxis against CMV after solid organ transplantation. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of valganciclovir prophylaxis therapy after primary liver transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2001 and May 2003, 203 consecutive liver transplant recipients, including 129 men and 74 women of overall mean age 53 +/- 11 years, received valganciclovir (900 mg/d or 450 mg every other day depending on renal function) for 3 to 6 months after primary liver transplantation. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Mean follow-up was 19 +/- 5.8 months. CMV DNA in peripheral blood was tested using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Symptomatic CMV was stratified according to the CMV immunoglobulin (Ig)G status of the donor and recipient at the time of liver transplantation. Donors and recipients were classified preoperatively into groups according to the presence or absence of CMV as follows: group 1 (n = 73; donor CMV+, recipient CMV+); group 2 (n = 41; donor CMV-, recipient CMV+); group 3 (n = 54; donor CMV+, recipient CMV-; high-risk group); and group 4 (n = 35; donor CMV-, recipient CMV-). RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (14.3%) developed symptomatic CMV disease at 169 +/- 117 days after liver transplantation: group 1, 16.4% versus group 2, 7.3% versus group 3, 25.9% versus group 4, 0%. Of these patients, 5 also had invasive CMV on liver biopsy, which was performed owing to abnormal liver functions. All 29 patients were treated with intravenous ganciclovir. One patient died owing to disseminated CMV, whereas the remaining 28 patients responded to treatment. Interestingly, 8 patients, including 1 who had invasive CMV hepatitis, developed symptomatic CMV within 90 days of liver transplantation even while on prophylactic valganciclovir. CONCLUSION: Valganciclovir failed to provide adequate prophylaxis following liver transplantation in our patients. The overall rate of CMV in seropositive donors and/or recipients was 17%, and in the high-risk group was 26%. Further prospective studies with measurement of ganciclovir concentrations are needed to elucidate the reasons for this unexpected failure.

Use of hepatitis B core antibody-positive liver allograft in hepatitis C virus-positive and -negative recipients with use of short course of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and Lamivudine.

INTRODUCTION: With the shortage of donor organs, increasing number of hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive [HBcAb(+)] liver allografts are being used for liver transplantation (LTx) in patients who are HBcab-negative [HBsAb(-)]. This study was aimed at assessing outcomes for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive [HCV(+)] and HCV-negative [HCV(-)] patients who received HBcAb(+) liver grafts from deceased donors and also received a short course of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) with long-term lamivudine therapy after LTx. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 1995 through February 2003, 28 patients (mean age 53.8 +/- 10.2 years, 19 men and nine women, 16 HCV[-]; 12 HCV[+]) received HbcAb(+) liver allografts. All recipients received a short course of HBIg prophylaxis (10,000 units/day for 4 days) and long-term lamivudine 100 mg/d after LTx in addition to a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. RESULTS: Seven (25%) of the 28 recipients died during follow-up and three recipients required retransplantation. Three recipients (10.7%) developed HBV infection during follow-up, one of whom died 36 months after LTx and the other two had YMDD mutant HBV. The overall 6-year actuarial patient survival after transplantation was 74.4% and those for HCV(-) and HCV(+) recipients were 81.3% and 66.6%, respectively (P = .46). The overall 6-year actuarial graft survival was 63.9% and those for HCV(+) and HCV(-) recipients were 68.8% and 57.1%, respectively (P = .6). CONCLUSION: We conclude that HBcAb(+) liver grafts can be used for both HCV(+) patients and HCV(-) patients who are critically ill, have early hepatocellular carcinoma, or have been exposed to HBV in the past. A short course of HBIg-lamivudine combination therapy provides effective prophylaxis against HBV infection in 89% of recipients of HBcAb(+) grafts.

Prolactin response to the severity of surgical insult.

Prolactin levels are elevated significantly during the recovery process from surgical insult, implying a role for prolactin in the neuroendocrine immune network. This study examined the importance of severity of surgical insult to the prolactin response. Two groups of surgical patients were chosen consecutively and studied prospectively. Seven patients scheduled for "clean" elective surgery, i.e., herniorrhaphy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were compared with seven patients scheduled for prolonged abdominal exploration. Blood was drawn for prolactin and cortisol at 8:00 AM on the day of surgery and on postoperative days one, three, and five. Using a two-tailed test, preoperative prolactin levels and levels on postoperative days three and five were significantly different in the prolonged surgery group (.012 and .002, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative and postoperative prolactin levels in the clean surgery group. Cortisol levels were not significantly elevated in either group. These results indicate that the prolactin response to surgery is related to the severity of the surgical insult.

The duration of antibiotic administration in penetrating abdominal trauma.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of penetrating abdominal trauma is changing to reflect an increasing incidence of multiple injuries. Not only do multiple injuries increase the risk of infection, a very high risk of serious infection is conferred by immunosuppression from hemorrhage and transfusion and the high likelihood of intestinal injury, especially to the colon. Optimal timing and choice of presumptive antibiotic therapy has been established for penetrating trauma, but duration has not been studied extensively in such seriously injured patients. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that 24 hours of antibiotic therapy remains sufficient to reduce the incidence of infection in penetrating abdominal trauma. METHODS: Three hundred fourteen consecutive patients with penetrating abdominal trauma were prospectively randomized into two groups: Group I received 24 hours of intravenous cefoxitin (1 g q6h) and group II received 5 days of intravenous cefoxitin. The development of a deep surgical site (intra-abdominal) infection as well as any type of nosocomial infection, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (ie, surgical site infections, catheter-related infections, urinary tract, pneumonia), was recorded. Hospital length of stay was a secondary endpoint. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests for coordinate variables and two-tailed unpaired t tests for continuous variables. The independence of risk factors for the development of infection was assessed by multivariate analysis of variance. Significance was determined when P <0.05. RESULTS: Three hundred patients were evaluable. There was no postoperative mortality, and no differences in overall length of hospitalization between groups. The duration of antibiotic treatment had no influence on the development of any infection (P = 0.136) or an intraabdominal infection (P = 0.336). Only colon injury was an independent predictor of the development of an intraabdominal infection (P = 0.0031). However, the overall infection incidence was affected by preoperative shock (P = 0.003), colon (P = 0.0004), central nervous system (CNS) injuries (P = 0.031), and the number of injured organs (P = 0.026). Several factors, including intraoperative shock (P = 0.021) and injuries to the colon (P = 0.0008), CNS (P = 0.0001), and chest (P = 0.0006), were independent contributors to prolongation of the hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-four hours of presumptive intravenous cefoxitin versus 5 days of therapy made no difference in the prevention of postoperative infection or length of hospitalization. Infection was associated with shock on admission to the emergency department, the number of intra-abdominal organs injured, colon injury specifically, and injury to the central nervous system. Intra-abdominal infection was predicted only by colon injury. Prolonged hospitalization was associated with intraoperative shock and injuries to the chest, colon, or central nervous system.

Relationship between serum prolactin and surgical insult - abstract

Prolactin is now known to be essential for normal immuno-competence. Hypophysectomized rats were shown to be severly immunocompromised with depressed antibody titters to administered antigents and virtually absent delayed hypersensitivity. Immunocompetence in these animals was restored by exogenous replacement of prolactin. Prolactin receptors have been demonstrated on T and B lymphocyte. In rats, the number of prolactin receptors per cell was similar for lymphocytes and the mammary glands. As a result of these observations we evaluated the relationship between surgical insult and serum prolactin levels. Patients And Methods: Twenty-one patients scheduled for various surgical procedures were chosen consecutively and studied prospectively. Patients who were pregnant or within 12 months postpartum or being treated with any medication affecting prolactin levels were eliminated from the study. Blood was drawn at around 8 a.m. on the day of surgery prior to the surgical procedure and on postoperative day 3 and day 5. Samples were assayed for prolactin and cortisol. Prolactin was measured by a chemoluminescene assay - Ciba corning. Cortisol was measured by radioimmunoassay incstar. The collected data were analyzed for statistical significance using an advanced analysis software S.P.S.S. for windows 6.0. Results: Twelve males and 9 females, mean age 55, were studied: 6 patients had surgical procedures for non-malignant gastrointestinal disorders, 2 had carcinoma of the G.I. tract, 5 had acute cholecystitis, 4 had hernias repaired, 3 had femoral popliteal bypass and one had resection of parotid tumor. The prolactin and cortisol levels are shown as follows: PROLACTIN [0-23.0 NG/ML]: Pre-op, Post-op Day #3, Post-op Day #5 - mean 19.35, 25.0, 29.44 respectively; St. Dev.- 18..25, 20.28, 23.76 respectively; pValve: -, <0.08, <0.038 respectively. CORTISOL [5.0 -25.0 UG/DL] - Pre-op, Post-op Day #3, Post-op Day#5:- Mean 17.31, 17.66, 14.38 respectively, St, Deviation - 6.68, 5.89, 4.97 respectively; pvalve; -, <0.83, <0.09 respectively. Using the two tail test the mean prolactin level on postoperative day #5 compared to preoperative prolactin level showed a statistically significant change. p<0.038. Cortisol did not change significantly. CONCLUSION: Cortisol levels were not significantly elevated postoperatively. Thus the elevated prolactin levels cannot be attributed only to the stress of surgery. On the basis of these results we postulate that prolactin plays a significant role in the recovery process following surgical insult (AU)