Implications of Oxybate Dosing Regimen for Sleep, Sleep Architecture, and Disrupted Nighttime Sleep in Patients with Narcolepsy: A Commentary.

Narcolepsy is associated with disrupted nighttime sleep (DNS). Sodium oxybate (SXB; Xyrem®), administered twice nightly, is indicated for the treatment of cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness in patients 7 years or older with narcolepsy. Recently, low-sodium oxybate (LXB, Xywav®; for people 7 years of age and older), which contains 92% less sodium than SXB and is dosed twice nightly, and sodium oxybate for extended release (SXB-ER; Lumryz™; for adults), which contains equal sodium to SXB and is dosed once nightly, have also been approved to treat cataplexy or excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy. This paper reviews the evidence regarding the overall impact of oxybate administration, and impact of different oxybate dosing regimens (once nightly, SXB-ER; twice nightly, SXB), on DNS in narcolepsy utilizing polysomnographic data from five clinical trials (three assessing SXB in adults [referred to here as SXB trials 1, 2, and 3], one assessing SXB in children [referred to as the pediatric SXB trial], and one assessing SXB-ER in adults [REST-ON]). Both once-nightly and twice-nightly oxybate regimens similarly improved symptoms of DNS. Regardless of dosing regimen, people with narcolepsy treated with oxybate experience roughly 42-53 arousals and 9-38 awakenings each night, with one of these awakenings on twice-nightly oxybate being due to the second dosing requirement in studies of SXB. Additionally, for SXB, but not SXB-ER, polysomnographic data has been analyzed by half of the night, demonstrating a greater positive impact on sleep architecture in the second half of the night, which might be related to its nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile. We conclude that while once-nightly and twice-nightly oxybate dosing regimens differ in their pharmacokinetic profiles, both improve DNS in patients with narcolepsy to a similar degree.

Narcolepsy causes daytime sleepiness and difficulty sleeping (commonly called disrupted nighttime sleep). Sodium oxybate (Xyrem^®) and low-sodium oxybate (Xywav^®, which contains 92% less sodium than sodium oxybate), are taken twice nightly in patients with narcolepsy. Sodium oxybate for extended release (Lumryz™), which contains as much sodium as sodium oxybate, is taken once per night. All three medications improve narcolepsy symptoms and have the same active ingredient. It is important to understand how well they improve nighttime sleep.This review examined results of five clinical studies looking at disrupted nighttime sleep in people with narcolepsy: three of twice-nightly sodium oxybate in adults (called SXB trials 1, 2, and 3 here), one of twice-nightly sodium oxybate in children (called the pediatric SXB trial here), and one of once-nightly sodium oxybate for extended release in adults (called REST-ON here). No studies specifically investigated disrupted nighttime sleep with twice-nightly low-sodium oxybate in people with narcolepsy. Although the trial designs for these studies were different, both twice-nightly and once-nightly oxybate medications improved sleep similarly, and neither eliminated arousals or awakenings. Certain aspects of sleep improved more during the second half of the night in SXB trials 1 and 3 compared with the first half of the night. Both once-nightly and twice-nightly oxybate medications similarly improve nighttime sleep in people with narcolepsy. Twice-nightly oxybate may be particularly helpful in improving sleep in the second half of the night.

Coordinating Cardiology clinics randomized trial of interventions to improve outcomes (COORDINATE) - Diabetes: rationale and design.

Several medications that are proven to reduce cardiovascular events exist for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, however they are substantially underused in clinical practice. Clinician, patient, and system-level barriers all contribute to these gaps in care; yet, there is a paucity of high quality, rigorous studies evaluating the role of interventions to increase utilization. The COORDINATE-Diabetes trial randomized 42 cardiology clinics across the United States to either a multifaceted, site-specific intervention focused on evidence-based care for patients with T2DM or standard of care. The multifaceted intervention comprised the development of an interdisciplinary care pathway for each clinic, audit-and-feedback tools and educational outreach, in addition to patient-facing tools. The primary outcome is the proportion of individuals with T2DM prescribed three key classes of evidence-based medications (high-intensity statin, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, and either a sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) and will be assessed at least 6 months after participant enrollment. COORDINATE-Diabetes aims to identify strategies that improve the implementation and adoption of evidence-based therapies.

Dronedarone for the treatment of atrial fibrillation with concomitant heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction: a post-hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial.

AIMS: Limited therapeutic options are available for the management of atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL) with concomitant heart failure (HF) with preserved (HFpEF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Dronedarone reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with AF, but sparse data are available examining its role in patients with AF complicated by HFpEF and HFmrEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: ATHENA was an international, multicentre trial that randomized 4628 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF/AFL and cardiovascular risk factors to dronedarone 400 mg twice daily versus placebo. We evaluated patients with (i) symptomatic HFpEF and HFmrEF (defined as left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] >40%, evidence of structural heart disease, and New York Heart Association class II/III or diuretic use), (ii) HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF ≤40%), and (iii) those without HF. We assessed effects of dronedarone versus placebo on death or cardiovascular hospitalization (primary endpoint), other key efficacy endpoints, and safety. Overall, 534 (12%) had HFpEF or HFmrEF, 422 (9%) had HFrEF or left ventricular dysfunction, and 3672 (79%) did not have HF. Patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF had a mean age of 73 ± 9 years, 37% were women, and had a mean LVEF of 57 ± 9%. Over a mean follow-up of 21 ± 5 months, dronedarone consistently reduced risk of death or cardiovascular hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.84) without heterogeneity based on HF status (pinteraction >0.10). This risk reduction in the primary endpoint was consistent across the range of LVEF (as a continuous function) in HF without heterogeneity (pinteraction  = 0.71). Rates of death, cardiovascular hospitalization, and HF hospitalization each directionally favoured dronedarone versus placebo in HFpEF and HFmrEF, but these treatment effects were not statistically significant in this subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Dronedarone is associated with reduced cardiovascular events in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF/AFL and HF across the spectrum of LVEF, including among those with HFpEF and HFmrEF. These data support a rationale for a future dedicated and powered clinical trial to affirm the net clinical benefit of dronedarone in this population.

Genomic and biochemical approaches in the discovery of mechanisms for selective neuronal vulnerability to oxidative stress.

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress (OS) is an important factor in brain aging and neurodegenerative diseases. Certain neurons in different brain regions exhibit selective vulnerability to OS. Currently little is known about the underlying mechanisms of this selective neuronal vulnerability. The purpose of this study was to identify endogenous factors that predispose vulnerable neurons to OS by employing genomic and biochemical approaches. RESULTS: In this report, using in vitro neuronal cultures, ex vivo organotypic brain slice cultures and acute brain slice preparations, we established that cerebellar granule (CbG) and hippocampal CA1 neurons were significantly more sensitive to OS (induced by paraquat) than cerebral cortical and hippocampal CA3 neurons. To probe for intrinsic differences between in vivo vulnerable (CA1 and CbG) and resistant (CA3 and cerebral cortex) neurons under basal conditions, these neurons were collected by laser capture microdissection from freshly excised brain sections (no OS treatment), and then subjected to oligonucleotide microarray analysis. GeneChip-based transcriptomic analyses revealed that vulnerable neurons had higher expression of genes related to stress and immune response, and lower expression of energy generation and signal transduction genes in comparison with resistant neurons. Subsequent targeted biochemical analyses confirmed the lower energy levels (in the form of ATP) in primary CbG neurons compared with cortical neurons. CONCLUSION: Low energy reserves and high intrinsic stress levels are two underlying factors for neuronal selective vulnerability to OS. These mechanisms can be targeted in the future for the protection of vulnerable neurons.

Repeated administration of piribedil induces less dyskinesia than L-dopa in MPTP-treated common marmosets: a behavioural and biochemical investigation.

Piribedil ([1-(3,4-methylenedioxybenzyl)-4-(2-pyrimidinyl)piperazine]; S 4200) is a dopamine agonist with equal affinity for D(2)/D(3) dopamine receptors effective in treating Parkinson's disease as monotherapy or as an adjunct to levodopa (L-dopa). However, its ability to prime basal ganglia for the appearance of dyskinesia is unknown. We now report on the ability of repeated administration of piribedil to induce dyskinesia in drug naïve 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) -lesioned common marmosets compared with L-dopa and its actions on the direct and indirect striatal outflow pathways. Administration of piribedil (4.0-5.0 mg/kg orally) or L-dopa (12.5 mg/kg orally plus carbidopa 12.5 mg/kg orally twice daily) produced equivalent increases in locomotor activity and reversal of motor deficits over a 28-day study period. Administration of L-dopa resulted in the progressive development of marked dyskinesia over the period of study. In contrast, administration of piribedil produced a significantly lower degree and intensity of dyskinesia. Surprisingly, piribedil caused an increase in vigilance and alertness compared to L-dopa, which may relate to the recently discovered alpha(2)-noradrenergic antagonist properties of piribedil. The behavioural differences between piribedil and L-dopa are reflected in the biochemical changes associated with the direct striatal output pathway. Administration of L-dopa or piribedil did not reverse the MPTP-induced up-regulation of preproenkephalin A mRNA in rostral or caudal areas of the putamen or caudate nucleus. In contrast, administration of either piribedil or L-dopa reversed the downregulation of preprotachykinin mRNA induced by MPTP in rostral and caudal striatum. L-dopa, but not Piribedil, reversed the decrease in preproenkephalin B mRNA produced by MPTP treatment.