Comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial pocket-irrigation protocols in an in vivo breast implant infection model.

BACKGROUND: Breast implant infection and biofilm formation are major concerns in reconstructive and esthetic breast surgery, with significant medical and economic consequences. Staphylococcus is the common pathogen, with rapidly increasing rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). There is no consensus on prevention practices. This study compares the effect of several pocket irrigation and antibiotic prophylaxis regimens on implant colonization and biofilm formation in an established rat model of MRSA-infected silicone breast implants. METHODS: Silicone discs were inserted in a sub-pectoral pocket in 57 rats (114 implants). Implant infection was induced by injection of free planktonic MRSA into the surgical pocket. Rats were allocated to study groups treated by different antimicrobial protocols: pocket irrigation with vancomycin, povidone-iodine, or saline. Each group was divided into subgroups treated with or without additional peri-operative systemic vancomycin. Implant colonization or overt infection was assessed at post-operative day 14 both clinically and by cultures. RESULTS: Pocket irrigation with vancomycin prevented contamination in 87% of implants. Irrigation and systemic vancomycin prevented contamination in 100% of implants with no difference between a single preoperative dose and a 48-h regimen. Systemic vancomycin alone or irrigation with povidone-iodine alone resulted in 100% contamination rates. CONCLUSIONS: In this in vivo model, combination of systemic vancomycin with vancomycin pocket irrigation was the most effective regimen, preventing contamination in 100% of implants. Continuation of post-operative antibiotic treatment showed no added advantage.

Postirradiation Capsular Contracture in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Management and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction is commonly avoided in the setting of radiation therapy, mainly because of risks of capsular contracture. Nevertheless, as breast reconstruction is becoming more available, more patients undergo both implant-based breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. The dilemma is how to manage capsular contracture if it does occur. The goal of this study was to examine the outcome of patients with implant-based breast reconstruction who developed postirradiation capsular contracture and were treated with capsulotomy or capsulectomy, with or without fat grafting. METHODS: The authors reviewed charts of patients who developed capsular contracture following alloplastic breast reconstruction followed by radiation therapy, between 2008 and 2018. The surgical treatment methods for capsular contracture were evaluated along with their outcomes. A follow-up of at least 1 year was required. RESULTS: Forty-eight breasts with postirradiation capsular contracture underwent surgical implant exchange with capsular release, of which 15 had combined fat grafting and 33 did not. Overall, 35 breasts (72.9 percent) showed long-term resolution of capsular contracture; 24 underwent a single procedure and 11 required an additional fat grafting procedure. Some patients [six breasts (12.5 percent)] were offered a consecutive round of fat grafting, and some [seven breasts (14.5 percent)] were offered autologous reconstruction because of lack of improvement. Fat grafting increased the success rate by more than 30 percent when it was initially and consecutively used. CONCLUSIONS: Postirradiation capsular contracture may be treated successfully by secondary procedures, sustaining implant-based breast reconstruction in over 70 percent of breasts. Fat grafting may elevate resolution rates even further, to 86 percent. Larger prospective studies are required to validate these findings. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Superiomedial Pedicle Breast Reduction for Gigantic Breast Hypertrophy: Experience in 341 Breasts and Suggested Safety Modifications.

BACKGROUND: Reduction mammoplasty in patients with gigantic breast hypertrophy runs a high risk of complication. Traditionally, inferior pedicle reductions or free nipple grafting techniques have been recommended for gigantic breasts on the basis of measurements and expected resection weights. The superiomedial pedicle (SMP) technique has been less commonly used, due to concerns of vascular inadequacy. This study examines the outcomes of SMP in large reductions and outlines suggested modifications for enhanced safety. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent SMP breast reduction in our institution between 2005 and 2016. Included are cases with resection weights greater than 800 g. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients with 341 breasts were included. Mean sternal notch to nipple (SNN) distance was mean 35.0 ± 6.6 cm (range 23-44.5) on the left and 34.9 ± 6.6 cm (range 18-46) on the right. Mean resection weight was 1152.2 ± 368.6 g (range 810-2926) on the left and 1159.4 ± 326.6 g (range 800-2528) on the right. The total complication rate was 22.7%. Minor complications occurred in 63 (18.6%) breasts. Major complications occurred in 12 (4.1%) breasts. NAC congestion and partial necrosis occurred in 1.8% and total NAC necrosis in 0.9%. CONCLUSION: The SMP reduction technique is a safe option for gigantic breast reduction with comparable complication rates to other techniques. Preoperative measurements or resection weights are not reliable risk factors alone. High tissue density may be a significant risk factor. High-risk breasts mandate surgical planning and should be tailored to include technical modifications as described. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The Evolution of the Free Fibula Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction: 21 Years of Experience with 128 Flaps.

BACKGROUND: The free fibula flap is commonly referred to as a "workhorse" for head and neck reconstruction. During our 21-year experience with this flap, we have performed several changes in preoperative planning, operative technique, and postoperative follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study designed to analyze the cohort of patients who underwent free fibula transfer for head and neck reconstruction. Demographics, medical background, operative data, and postoperative outcome were collected. The changes we performed in preoperative planning, operative technique, and postoperative follow-up were assessed and their impact on outcome discussed. RESULTS: During 1998 to 2019 a total of 128 free fibula flaps were transferred for head and neck reconstruction. When comparing the patients treated in the early years to those who were treated in recent years we found no statistically significant difference in minor or major nonmicrosurgical complications in the recipient and donor site and in the rate of take backs due to microsurgical reasons. However total flap failure rate improved from 28% in early years to 8% in recent years (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: During this 21-year period, we performed several changes in our practice. This included the use of a three-dimensional (3D) prefabricated model of the mandible, a shift toward side-table osteotomies, increasing the rate of osteofascial flaps in contrast to osteocutaneous flaps and the use of an implantable Doppler. These changes, together with a learning curve of the surgical team, significantly improved our overall success rates.

Breast Reduction and Mastopexy for Repair of Asymmetry After Breast Conservation Therapy: Lessons Learned.

BACKGROUND: Breast conservation therapy (BCT) can cause breast distortion and asymmetry. Repair of this asymmetry by means of breast reduction or mastopexy procedures can be challenging and harbor considerably high rates of complications. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we describe our experience in repairing post-BCT breast asymmetry by performing breast reduction or mastopexy. The surgical protocol we followed consisted of stringent patient selection, thorough surgical planning, basic surgical refinements, and patient education for enhancing the likelihood of achieving a good outcome with minimal surgical complications. RESULTS: Our search of the departmental database identified 25 patients with breast asymmetry who had undergone breast reduction or mastopexy between 2009 and 2017. Corrective surgery was performed 4 years on average after the completion of radiotherapy, and those patients included eleven who had undergone breast reduction and fourteen who had undergone mastopexy on the radiated side. Two patients (8%) had major complications that required further surgery (major fat necrosis, wound infection, and breast deformation), and five patients (20%) had minor complications (infection, minor fat necrosis, wound dehiscence, and nipple congestion). All complications developed on the radiated breast. There was no correlation between the occurrence of complications and patients' demographics, tumor type, tumor location, and breast tissue resection (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Only two of our 25 patients had major complications following breast reduction and mastopexy for the repair of asymmetry post-BCT. Following our four-step protocol was instrumental in leading to the successful performance of these procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .