Nivolumab Combination Therapy in Advanced Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: First-line chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma results in poor outcomes. The monoclonal antibody nivolumab has shown an overall survival benefit over chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. METHODS: In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nivolumab plus chemotherapy, nivolumab plus the monoclonal antibody ipilimumab, or chemotherapy. The primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival, as determined by blinded independent central review. Hierarchical testing was performed first in patients with tumor-cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of 1% or greater and then in the overall population (all randomly assigned patients). RESULTS: A total of 970 patients underwent randomization. At a 13-month minimum follow-up, overall survival was significantly longer with nivolumab plus chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone, both among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater (median, 15.4 vs. 9.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.54; 99.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.80; P<0.001) and in the overall population (median, 13.2 vs. 10.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.74; 99.1% CI, 0.58 to 0.96; P = 0.002). Overall survival was also significantly longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater (median, 13.7 vs. 9.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.64; 98.6% CI, 0.46 to 0.90; P = 0.001) and in the overall population (median, 12.7 vs. 10.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.78; 98.2% CI, 0.62 to 0.98; P = 0.01). Among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater, a significant progression-free survival benefit was also seen with nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.65; 98.5% CI, 0.46 to 0.92; P = 0.002) but not with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with chemotherapy. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was 47% with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, 32% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and 36% with chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Both first-line treatment with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and first-line treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma, with no new safety signals identified. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 648 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03143153.).

Real-world Data for High-risk Stage II Colorectal Cancer - The Role of Tumor Side in the Adjuvant Setting.

BACKGROUND: The impact of sidedness in the high-risk stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) setting is uncertain. Although controversial, available data suggest a possible modest benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in the adjuvant scenario. The aim of this study is to analyze the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) according to the tumor side. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-center retrospective cohort, we analyzed patients treated between January 2011 and December 2018. We evaluated OS and RFS of high-risk patients according to the tumor side and considering adjuvant CT exposure and clinical and molecular features. RESULTS: A total of 1047 patients with stage II CRC were evaluated. Of these, 540 had high-risk criteria and microsatellite stability (MSS) or unknown status. One hundred fifty-seven (29%) patients had right-sided tumors, and 352 (65.2%) had left-sided tumors. Most patients received adjuvant CT, and the majority of them had T3 stage tumors, ≥ 12 lymph node resection, left tumor, MSS, and moderate differentiation. OS did not differ according to tumor side (5-year OS rates: 81.9% for right-sided tumors vs. 83% for left-sided tumors; hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.53; P = .744). Adjuvant CT was associated with a superior RFS and OS, with 5-year OS rates of 87.7% versus 76.1% in the no-adjuvant group (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.73; P = .001). CONCLUSION: The tumor side did not influence the outcomes in this study. Adjuvant CT was associated with improved RFS and OS in patients with high-risk stage II CRC, with a total gain of 11.6% in 5-year OS.

Regorafenib in Patients with Antiangiogenic-Naïve and Chemotherapy-Refractory Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Results from a Phase IIb Trial.

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic effects that improves overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after failure of standard therapies. We investigated the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in antiangiogenic therapy-naïve chemotherapy-refractory advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center, single-arm, phase IIb study (NCT02465502) enrolled adults with mCRC whose disease had progressed on, or who were intolerant to, standard therapy, but who were antiangiogenic therapy-naïve. Patients received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for 3 weeks per 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at week 8. RESULTS: Of 59 treated patients, almost half had received at least four prior lines of therapy. Patients received a median of 86% of the planned dose. The week 8 PFS rate was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.1-64.3); median PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.8-3.6). Median OS was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.3-8.9). Tumor response (RECIST version 1.1) was 2%, and metabolic response rate (criteria from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) was 41%. The most frequently reported regorafenib-related grade ≥3 adverse events were hypertension (36%), hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR, 25%), and hypophosphatemia (24%). There were no regorafenib-related deaths. An exploratory analysis showed that patients with grade ≥2 HFSR had longer OS (10.2 months) with regorafenib treatment versus those with grades 0-1 (5.4 months). CONCLUSION: These findings support the antitumor activity of regorafenib in antiangiogenic-naïve patients with chemotherapy-refractory mCRC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The multikinase inhibitor regorafenib improved overall survival in the phase III CORRECT and CONCUR trials in heavily pretreated patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Exploratory subgroup analysis from CONCUR suggested that regorafenib treatment prior to targeted therapy (including bevacizumab) may improve outcomes. In this single-center, single-arm phase IIb study, regorafenib demonstrated antitumor activity in 59 antiangiogenic-naïve patients with chemotherapy-refractory mCRC. Further studies should assess the efficacy of regorafenib in this patient population, as well as explore the reasons behind improved outcomes among patients who had a metabolic response and those who developed hand-foot skin reaction.

Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET-CT as a prognostic marker in advanced biliary tract cancer.

BACKGROUND: Advanced biliary tract cancers have a dismal prognosis. Treatment with gemcitabine plus cisplatin has resulted in a significant improvement in survival; however, early assessment of outcomes poses a challenge. OBJECTIVE: We carried out a prospective study to evaluate the prognostic role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET-CT scans in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer starting first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin underwent F-FDG PET-CT studies at baseline and after two cycles of therapy. The total lesion glycolysis (TLG) measured at baseline as well as the variation in TLG between the two studies were analyzed as prognostic indicators of overall survival. The survival analyses were carried out using Kaplan-Meier curves and the comparison of survival curves was performed using the Breslow test. RESULTS: Of the 42 patients included, 37 had the first F-FDG PET-CT and 27 had the second F-FDG PET-CT. Patients with lower TLG values at baseline or after two cycles of therapy presented a higher median survival than patients with higher baseline TLG values. Patients with a higher decrease in the TLG values between the two studies also had a higher median survival time. However, these results only trended for statistical significance (P values ranging between 0.05 and 0.16). CONCLUSION: Lower baseline TLG measured by F-FDG PET-CT as well as a decrease in metabolic uptake after chemotherapy were associated with a trend toward longer median survival among patients with advanced biliary cancers.