Defining the role of surgery for patients with multiple brain metastases.

PURPOSE: To better define the role of surgery, we investigated survival and functional outcomes in patients with multiple brain metastases. METHODS: Pertinent clinical and radiological data of 131 consecutive patients (156 surgeries) were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Surgical indications included mass effect (84.6%) and need for tissue acquisition (44.9%, for molecularly informed treatment: 10 patients). Major (i.e. CTCAE grade 3-5) neurological, surgical and medical complication were observed in 6 (3.8%), 12 (7.7%), and 12 (7.7%) surgical cases. Median preoperative and discharge KPS were 80% (IQF: 60-90%). Median overall survival (mOS) was 7.4 months. However, estimated 1 and 2 year overall survival rates were 35.6% and 25.1%, respectively. Survival was dismal (i.e. mOS ≤ 2.5 months) in patients who had no postoperative radio- and systemic therapy, or who incurred major complications. Multivariate analysis with all parameters significantly correlated with survival as univariate parameters revealed female sex, oligometastases, no major new/worsened neurological deficits, and postoperative radio- and systemic therapy as independent positive prognostic parameters. Univariate positive prognostic parameters also included histology (best survival in breast cancer patients) and less than median (0.28 cm3) residual tumor load. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is a reasonable therapeutic option in many patients with multiple brain metastases. Operations should primarily aim at reducing mass effect thereby preserving the patients' functional health status which will allow for further local (radiation) and systemic therapy. Surgery for the acquisition of metastatic tissue (more recently for molecularly informed treatment) is another important surgical indication. Cytoreductive surgery may also carry a survival benefit by itself.

The role of cytoreductive surgery in multifocal/multicentric glioblastomas.

PURPOSE: Multifocal/multicentric glioblastomas (mGBM) account for up to 20% of all newly diagnosed glioblastomas. The present study investigates the impact of cytoreductive surgery on survival and functional outcomes in patients with mGBM. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and imaging data of 71 patients with newly diagnosed primary (IDH1 wildtype) mGBM who underwent operative treatment in 2015-2020 at the authors' institution. Multicentric/multifocal growth was defined by the presence of ≥ 2 contrast enhancing lesions ≥ 1 cm apart from each other. RESULTS: 36 (50.7%) patients had a resection and 35 (49.3%) a biopsy procedure. MGMT status, age, preoperative KPI and NANO scores as well as the postoperative KPI and NANO scores did not differ significantly between resected and biopsied cases. Median overall survival was 6.4 months and varied significantly with the extent of resection (complete resection of contrast enhancing tumor: 13.6, STR: 6.4, biopsy: 3.4 months; P = 0.043). 21 (58.3%) of resected vs. only 12 (34.3%) of biopsied cases had radiochemotherapy (p = 0.022). Multivariate analysis revealed chemo- and radiotherapy and also (albeit with smaller hazard ratios) extent of resection (resection vs. biopsy) and multicentric growth as independent predictors of patient survival. Involvement of eleoquent brain regions, as well as neurodeficit rates and functional outcomes did not vary significantly between the biopsy and the resection cohorts. CONCLUSION: Resective surgery in mGBM is associated with better survival. This benefit seems to relate prominently to an increased number of patients being able to tolerate effective adjuvant therapies after tumor resections. In addition, cytoreductive surgery may have a survival impact per se.

Surgical Treatment of Cerebellar Metastases: Survival Benefits, Complications and Timing Issues.

We retrospectively studied 73 consecutive patients who underwent surgery 2015-2020 for removal of cerebellar metastases (CM). Median overall survival (medOS) varied widely between patients and compared favorably with the more recent literature (9.2, 25-75% IQR: 3.2-21.7 months vs. 5-8 months). Prognostic factors included clinical (but not radiological) hydrocephalus (medOS 11.3 vs. 5.2 months, p = 0.0374). Of note, a third of the patients with a KPI <70% or multiple metastases survived >12 months. Chemotherapy played a prominent prognostic role (medOS 15.5 vs. 2.3, p < 0.0001) possibly reflecting advances in treating systemic vis-à-vis controlled CNS disease. Major neurological (≥30 days), surgical and medical complications (CTCAE III-V) were observed in 8.2%, 13.7%, and 9.6%, respectively. The occurrence of a major complication markedly reduced survival (10.7 vs. 2.5 months, p = 0.020). The presence of extracerebral metastases did not significantly influence OS. Postponing staging was not associated with more complications or shorter survival. Together these data argue for individualized decision making which includes offering surgery in selected cases with a presumably adverse prognosis and also occasional urgent operations in cases without a preoperative oncological work-up. Complication avoidance is of utmost importance.