Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 217(5): 1232-1238, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34106755

RESUMEN

Depositions are critical components of any medical malpractice lawsuit and seek to help uncover the facts of the case to allow justice to be served. Depositions often create considerable anxiety for physician-defendants, including radiologists. Defendants unfamiliar with the rules of questioning or interviewing techniques used by plaintiffs' attorneys may fail to appreciate important and nuanced details of questions from the plaintiff's attorney, which in turn could impact the outcome of the case. Thorough and informed deposition preparation is thus essential. Highlighting issues relevant to radiologist-defendants, we discuss the role and structure of medical malpractice depositions as well as common scenarios, lines of questioning, and attorney strategies.


Asunto(s)
Mala Praxis/legislación & jurisprudencia , Radiólogos/psicología , Radiología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Decepción , Humanos , Distrés Psicológico , Terminología como Asunto , Revelación de la Verdad , Estados Unidos
2.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 30(4): 601-606, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30824307

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report types and outcomes of a small subset of malpractice lawsuits filed against physicians performing image-guided interventions in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 1,312 cases involving common image-guided procedures were reviewed from the Westlaw and LexisNexis databases in the United States from 1963 to 2018. Social Security, disability, employment contract, product liability, criminal, and government employment claims were excluded. The final legal cohort comprised 184 (14.0%) cases. They were categorized into vascular (113/184; 61.4%), inferior vena cava filter (n = 22; 12.0%), neurointerventional (n = 13; 7.1%), gastrointestinal and genitourinary (n = 17; 9.2%), foreign body (n = 7; 3.8%), biopsy related (n = 9; 4.9%), and oncologic (n = 3; 1.6%) interventions. Claims were also organized by defendant type and by specialty, complication stage, verdict, and year. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2018, 58.7% of claims (n = 108) were reported. Procedural complications related to arteriography were most commonly litigated (63/113; 55.8%). Claims arising from intra-procedural and early post-procedural complications were common (84/184; 45.7%). Community hospitals were most often named as defendants (61/184; 33.2%). In reported outcomes, courts sided with defendants in 81.9% (104/127) of the cases, similar to national malpractice trends. Unreported outcomes comprised 31% (57/184) of the data. CONCLUSIONS: For the small subset of claims published within national legal databases, intra-procedural and early post-procedural complications after diagnostic arteriography were most commonly litigated. Most (81.9%) claims with reported outcomes sided with the defendant physician.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Responsabilidad Legal , Mala Praxis/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguridad del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Radiólogos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...