Can Early Post-Operative Scoring of Non-Traumatic Amputees Decrease Rates of Revision Surgery?

Background and Objectives: Medical registries evolved from a basic epidemiological data set to further applications allowing deriving decision making. Revision rates after non-traumatic amputation are high and dramatically impact the following rehabilitation of the amputee. Risk scores for revision surgery after non-traumatic lower limb amputation are still missing. The main objective was to create an amputation registry allowing us to determine risk factors for revision surgery after non-traumatic lower-limb amputation and to develop a score for an early detection and decision-making tool for the therapeutic course of patients at risk for non-traumatic lower limb amputation and/or revision surgery. Materials and Methods: Retrospective data analysis was of patients with major amputations lower limbs in a four-year interval at a University Hospital of maximum care. Medical records of 164 patients analysed demographics, comorbidities, and amputation-related factors. Descriptive statistics analysed demographics, prevalence of amputation level and comorbidities of non-traumatic lower limb amputees with and without revision surgery. Correlation analysis identified parameters determining revision surgery. Results: In 4 years, 199 major amputations were performed; 88% were amputated for non-traumatic reasons. A total of 27% of the non-traumatic cohort needed revision surgery. Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (72%), atherosclerosis (69%), diabetes (42%), arterial hypertension (38%), overweight (BMI > 25), initial gangrene (47%), sepsis (19%), age > 68.2 years and nicotine abuse (17%) were set as relevant within this study and given a non-traumatic amputation score. Correlation analysis revealed delayed wound healing (confidence interval: 64.1% (47.18%; 78.8%)), a hospital length of stay before amputation of longer than 32 days (confidence interval: 32.3 (23.2; 41.3)), and a BKA amputation level (confidence interval: 74.4% (58%; 87%)) as risk factors for revision surgery after non-traumatic amputation. A combined score including all parameters was drafted to identify non-traumatic amputees at risk for revision surgery. Conclusions: Our results describe novel scoring systems for risk assessment for non-traumatic amputations and for revision surgery at non-traumatic amputations. It may be used after further prospective evaluation as an early-warning system for amputated limbs at risk of revision.

Quality of lower limb preoperative skin preparation using colorless versus colored disinfectants-results of an experimental, randomized study in a close to reality setting.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate preoperative skin cleansing is important to control surgical site infections. Both colored and colorless skin disinfectants are available, however certain types of skin preparation, such as octenidine-dihydrochloride with alcohol have a long residual antimicrobial effect but are available only in colorless form. We hypothesized that colorless skin disinfectants lead to more incomplete skin preparation of lower limbs compared to colored agents. METHODS: We randomly assigned healthy volunteers to undergo a determined skin cleansing protocol for total hip arthroplasty in the supine position to either a colored or colorless skin cleansing protocol. The adequacy of skin preparation was compared between orthopedic consultants and residents. The colorless disinfectant was mixed with a fluorescent dye and missed skin areas were visualized using UV lamps. Both preparations were photo-documented following standardized protocols. The primary outcome of interest was the number of legs with an incomplete scrubbed area. The secondary outcome was the cumulative skin area not disinfected. RESULTS: Fifty-two healthy volunteers (104 legs; 52 colored and 52 colorless) underwent surgical skin preparation. The number of legs incompletely disinfected was significantly higher in colorless compared to colored disinfectant group (38.5% (n = 20) vs. 13.5% (n = 7); p = 0.007). Regardless of the disinfectant, consultants performed better than the residents. When using colored disinfectant, residents incompletely prepared the site in 23.1% (n = 6) compared with 57.7% (n = 15) with a colorless disinfectant (p = 0.023). Conversely consultants using colored disinfectant incompletely prepared the site in 3.8% (n = 1) compared with 19.2% (n = 5) for colorless disinfectant (p = 0.191). The total amount of uncleansed skin was significantly higher using colorless skin disinfectant (mean ± standard deviation: 8.78 cm2± 35.07 vs. 0.65 cm2 ± 2.66, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Application of colorless skin disinfectants for hip arthroplasty cleansing protocol led to decreased skin coverage among consultants and residents compared to colored preparations. Colored disinfectants remain the gold standard in hip surgery, however we should be aiming to develop newer colored disinfectants with long residual antimicrobial effects to enable visual control during the scrubbing process.