Digital redesign of hypertension management with practice and patient apps for blood pressure control (PIA study): A cluster-randomised controlled trial in general practices.

Background: Long-term hypertension control prevents heart attacks and other cardiovascular diseases, yet implementation is insufficient worldwide. The redesign of hypertension management by information and communication technology (ICT) improved hypertension control, e.g., by transmission of blood pressure (BP) measurements to a central webspace. However, an easy-to-use secure patient app connected with a practice management centre is lacking. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the newly developed PIA (PC-supported case management of hypertensive patients to implement guideline-based hypertension therapy using a physician-defined and -supervised, patient-specific therapeutic algorithm) intervention with PIA-ICT and eLearning for general practices. Methods: The effectiveness of the PIA intervention was evaluated in a cluster-randomised study. Practices were randomly allocated (1:1) to the intervention or the control group (usual care). Group allocation was unmasked for participants and researchers. The primary outcome was the BP control rate (BP < 140/90 mmHg) after 6-12 months. Secondary outcomes included BP changes and satisfaction with PIA-ICT. The trial is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00012680). Findings: Starting from December 1, 2019, 64 general practices were recruited over 1 year during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, 848 patients were enrolled between April 15, 2020 and March 31, 2021. The study was completed Sept 30, 2021. At baseline, 636 patients (intervention: 331; control: 305) of 50 general practices met the inclusion criteria. The final dataset for analyses comprised 47 practices and 525 patients (intervention 265; control 260). In the adjusted hierarchical model, the PIA intervention increased the BP control rate significantly by 23.1% points (95% CI: 5.4-40.8%): intervention 59.8% (95% CI: 47.4-71.0%) compared to 36.7% (95% CI: 24.9-50.3%) in the control group. Systolic BP decreased by 21.1 mmHg in the intervention and 15.5 mmHg in the control group. Interpretation: The PIA redesign of care processes improved BP in an outcome-relevant way. Prospectively, it may constitute an important model for hypertension care in Germany. Funding: This study is funded by the German Innovation Fund (Grant number: 01NVF17002).

Clinical and economic outcomes of a collaborative cardiology care program.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated a collaborative care program aimed at improving cooperation among general practitioners (GPs) and cardiologists in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. The program focused on improving care for patients with chronic cardiac conditions. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. The observation period was 2 years. METHODS: The study was based on claims data and compared groups of patients who participated in the collaborative care program (GP-centered care and the cardiology contract) with patients receiving usual care. The evaluation focused on care coordination, quality, health service utilization, and costs in patients with heart failure, coronary heart disease, heart rhythm disorders, and/or valvular heart disease (disease cohorts). Multivariable regression models were used to adjust for differences in patient characteristics between the groups. RESULTS: Across all disease cohorts, participation in the collaborative care program was associated with better care coordination and improved quality in a broad range of indicators (pharmacotherapy and vaccination). Results showed lower emergency service utilization and hospitalizations, lower consultation frequencies with GPs and specialists, and a shift from inpatient to outpatient procedures. Program participation resulted in higher costs for outpatient cardiologist treatment, but disease-specific costs were lower overall. CONCLUSIONS: The results underline evidence that health care service programs that strengthen collaboration between GPs and cardiologists can substantially improve the care of patients with chronic cardiac conditions while simultaneously reducing costs.

Intensified ambulatory cardiology care: effects on mortality and hospitalisation-a comparative observational study.

Since 2010, an intensified ambulatory cardiology care programme has been implemented in southern Germany. To improve patient management, the structure of cardiac disease management was improved, guideline-recommended care was supported, new ambulatory medical services and a morbidity-adapted reimbursement system were set up. Our aim was to determine the effects of this programme on the mortality and hospitalisation of enrolled patients with cardiac disorders. We conducted a comparative observational study in 2015 and 2016, based on insurance claims data. Overall, 13,404 enrolled patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and 19,537 with coronary artery disease (CAD) were compared, respectively, to 8,776 and 16,696 patients that were receiving usual ambulatory cardiology care. Compared to the control group, patients enrolled in the programme had lower mortality (Hazard Ratio: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77-0.91) and fewer all-cause hospitalisations (Rate Ratio: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.90-0.97). CHF-related hospitalisations in patients with CHF were also reduced (Rate Ratio: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.69-0.84). CAD patients showed a similar reduction in mortality rates (Hazard Ratio: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.76-0.88) and all-cause hospitalisation (Rate Ratio: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.97), but there was no effect on CAD-related hospitalisation. We conclude that intensified ambulatory care reduced mortality and hospitalisation in cardiology patients.

Last neurologic event is associated with risk of in-hospital stroke or death after carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: Secondary data analysis of the German statutory quality assurance database.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to analyze the association between last neurologic event and the risk of stroke or death among patients treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) under routine conditions in Germany. METHODS: Secondary data analysis was performed based on the German statutory quality assurance database for carotid procedures. A total of 144,347 patients treated by CEA and 14,794 patients treated by CAS were included in the analysis. Primary outcome was any in-hospital stroke or death. To analyze the association between the last neurologic event and outcome, multilevel multivariable regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: In patients treated by CEA, raw risk for any in-hospital stroke or death was 2.0% (2923/144,347), with a risk of 1.4% in asymptomatic and 3.0% in symptomatic patients. In patients treated by CAS, raw risk for any in-hospital stroke or death was 3.6% (538/14,794), with a risk of 1.7% in asymptomatic and 6.1% in symptomatic patients. Regression analysis revealed that increasing severity of last neurologic event was significantly associated with an increasing risk of any in-hospital stroke or death in patients treated by both CEA and CAS (P < .004). However, the risk of any stroke or death did not significantly differ between asymptomatic patients and patients with amaurosis fugax before CEA or CAS (P = .219 for CEA, P = .124 for CAS). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing severity of last neurologic event is associated with an increasing risk of any in-hospital stroke or death in patients treated by CEA and CAS. The risk of any stroke or death did not differ between asymptomatic patients and patients with amaurosis fugax.

Age but not sex is associated with higher risk of in-hospital stroke or death after carotid artery stenting in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation of age and sex with the outcome after carotid artery stenting (CAS). We used the statutory nationwide quality assurance database in Germany, in which, among others, all endovascular procedures on the extracranial carotid artery are filed. METHODS: We performed a secondary data analysis of all CAS procedures (N = 13,086) between 2012 and 2014 in Germany. The primary outcome was defined as any in-hospital stroke or death; the secondary outcomes were defined as in-hospital stroke (alone) and in-hospital death (alone). Descriptive analyses as well as multilevel multivariable analyses were applied. RESULTS: About 70% of the patients were male, and the mean age of all patients was 69.7 ± 9.3 years. Carotid stenosis was symptomatic in 36% of all patients. The primary outcome occurred in 2.4% (n = 317) of patients (2.5% of women, 2.4% in men, 1.7% of asymptomatic patients, and 3.7% of symptomatic patients). Multivariable regression analysis indicated that age (linear effect per 10-year increase) was significantly correlated with a higher risk of in-hospital stroke or death after CAS (risk ratio [RR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.75). The risks of stroke alone (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.26-1.72) and death alone (RR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.01-2.58) were also significantly associated with age in CAS patients. Sex did not significantly alter the age effect and was not associated with the primary outcome rate (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.78-1.26). CONCLUSIONS: Age but not sex is correlated with a higher risk of in-hospital stroke or death in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients after CAS under routine conditions. The primary outcome rate was fueled to a comparable magnitude by both components of the composite outcome.

[Measuring, assessing, acting: A practice test of quality indicators for coronary heart disease]. / Messen, Bewerten, Handeln: Qualitätsindikatoren zur Koronaren Herzkrankheit im Praxistest.

BACKGROUND: There are only limited possibilities for doctors in outpatient services to establish quality management that is based on data-driven feedback regarding the quality of health care. However, transparency about one's own activities is a prerequisite for refining this quality. The aim of this project was to make the quality of care for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) more transparent, use this as a basis to initiate improvement processes, and explore the framework conditions and factors promoting or inhibiting the intended improvement of health care quality. METHOD: 48 general practitioners (GPs) in 32 GP practices from a Bavarian doctors' network (Qualität und Effizienz, QuE) participated in the project. On the basis of claims data from the AOK-Bayern (a statutory health insurance in Bavaria), data from disease management programs (DMP) and medically documented data, 11 quality indicators for patients with CHD were calculated. The indicator scores were individually presented in feedback reports for each doctor's practice. These were the basis for two quality circles. The indicators were measured again after 12 months, and changes against the baseline measurement were registered. GPs from Bavaria formed the control group. Focus groups with the quality circle moderators and two participant surveys were used to identify promoting and inhibiting factors. RESULTS: The baseline values showed a good level of care. Potential for improvement became apparent for pharmacotherapy with beta blockers and statins. After conducting the quality circles four of the eleven indicators showed an increase as intended ("beta blockers for CHD and cardiac insufficiency", "beta blockers after myocardial infarction", "statins", "successful blood pressure control"). For three of these indicators the increase rates were higher than those in the Bavarian control group. One indicator ("statins") was striking because of the wide variation of practice values suggesting differences in care within the network. The majority of participating doctors regarded the database as valid. Quality circles were highly appreciated as an opportunity for professional exchange among colleagues. The data-based feedback reports helped to make deficits in health care transparent and to identify actions that need to be taken. Barriers to implementing quality improvement measures in clinical practice became apparent. DISCUSSION: Reflecting quality indicators in quality circles can effectively trigger quality improvement processes. Barriers would appear to exist, in particular, to the implementation of measures into daily practice routine. Additional organizational support offered by higher-level quality management structures, IT solutions for patient-related data processing as well as a system of financial compensation, which rewards professional concern for quality, may help to overcome the existing barriers.

Different perioperative antiplatelet therapies for patients treated with carotid endarterectomy in routine practice.

OBJECTIVE: There is currently no clear consensus regarding the optimal perioperative antiplatelet therapy regimen for carotid surgery. Therefore, associations between different antiplatelet therapies and the risk of stroke or death and perioperative complications after carotid endarterectomy on a national level in Germany were analyzed. METHODS: Overall, 117,973 elective carotid endarterectomies for asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid artery stenosis between 2010 and 2014 were included. Data were extracted from the statutory nationwide quality assurance database. The primary outcome was any in-hospital stroke or death until discharge from the hospital. Secondary outcomes were any major stroke or death, death alone, stroke, myocardial infarction, local bleeding, and any local complications (cranial nerve palsy, severe bleeding, acute occlusion). Descriptive statistics and multilevel multivariable regression analyses were applied. Single-agent therapy with aspirin was used as reference. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly male (68%), with a mean age of 71 years. Carotid stenosis was symptomatic in 40%. Of all patients, 82.8% were treated perioperatively by monotherapy with aspirin alone, 2.7% received other platelet inhibitors, and 4.8% of the patients were operated on under dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome occurred in 1.8% of all patients. Multilevel multivariable regression analysis revealed that the combined stroke and death rate of patients with no perioperative antiplatelet therapy was significantly higher (risk ratio [RR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.42) compared with the group of patients receiving monotherapy. The same was true for the major stroke and death rate (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.48). In contrast, dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a lower risk of death alone (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.88) but with a significantly higher rate of secondary bleeding requiring reoperation (RR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.88-2.50). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the risk of stroke or death was significantly higher in patients without any perioperative antiplatelet therapy. In contrast, dual antiplatelet therapy vs aspirin monotherapy was associated with a lower risk only of perioperative death but with a higher risk of neck bleeding until discharge. Perioperative antiplatelet therapy was significantly associated with a decreased in-hospital stroke and death risk. Further studies are needed to evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of single vs dual antiplatelet therapy.

Risk of Stroke or Death Is Associated With the Timing of Carotid Artery Stenting for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Secondary Data Analysis of the German Statutory Quality Assurance Database.

BACKGROUND: Subgroup analyses from randomized trials indicate that the time interval between the neurologic index event and carotid artery stenting is associated with periprocedural stroke and death rates in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. The aim of this article is to analyze whether this observation holds true under routine conditions in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: Secondary data analysis was done on 4717 elective carotid artery stenting procedures that were performed for symptomatic carotid stenosis. The patient cohort was divided into 4 groups according to the time interval between the index event and intervention (group I 0-2, II 3-7, III 8-14, and IV 15-180 days). Primary outcome was any in-hospital stroke or death. For risk-adjusted analyses, a multilevel multivariable regression model was used. The in-hospital stroke or death rate was 3.7% in total and 6.0%, 4.4%, 2.4%, and 3.0% in groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Adjusted analysis showed a decreased risk for any stroke or death in group III, a decreased risk for any major stroke or death in groups III and IV, and a decreased risk for any death in groups II and III compared to the reference group I. CONCLUSIONS: A short time interval between the neurologic index event and carotid artery stenting of up to 7 days is associated with an increased risk for stroke or death under routine conditions in Germany. Although results cannot prove causal relationships, carotid artery stenting may be accompanied by an increased risk of stroke or death during the early period after the index event.

Patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of emergency carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting after stroke in evolution.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) for stroke in evolution (SIE) under routine conditions in Germany. METHODS: This secondary data analysis is based on the German statutory quality assurance database for carotid revascularization procedures. Patients with SIE who had undergone CEA or CAS were included. The primary outcome was any new stroke or all-cause death until hospital discharge. Descriptive statistics were calculated using statistical standard methods. To identify factors that are associated with the primary or secondary outcomes, a multilevel multivariable regression analysis was performed (exploratory approach). RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2014, a total of 5058 patients (mean age, 70 ± 11 years; 68% male) with SIE were treated with CEA (n = 3176) or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/CAS (n = 1882). The primary outcome occurred in 9.0% and 11.7% after CEA and CAS, respectively. The multivariable regression analysis revealed that age (per 10-year increase: risk ratio [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.50), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (ASA class 4 and 5 vs ASA class 3: RR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.65-3.32), ipsilateral degree of stenosis (occlusion vs severe stenosis: RR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.29-2.79; low grade vs severe stenosis: RR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.55-6.02), and neurologic deficit on admission (modified Rankin scale score of 3-5 vs 0-2: RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.04-2.10) are significantly associated with the risk of stroke or death after emergency CEA for SIE. In patients treated with CAS, only age (per 10-year increase: RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.37-1.82), ASA class (ASA class 1 and 2 vs ASA class 3: RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95; ASA class 4 and class 5 vs ASA class 3: RR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.31-2.78), and ipsilateral degree of stenosis (moderate vs severe stenosis: RR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.77; occlusion vs severe stenosis: RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.18-2.25) were significantly associated with the primary outcome rate. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency carotid revascularization is associated with a combined stroke or death rate of about 10% under routine conditions in Germany. Lower age, lower ASA class, moderate to high-grade stenosis, and less severe neurologic deficit preceding CEA potentially serve as protective factors.

Surgical and Endovascular Treatment of Extracranial Carotid Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) can be used to prevent stroke due to arteriosclerotic lesions of the carotid artery. In Germany, legally mandated quality assurance (QA) enables the evaluation of outcome quality after CEA and CAS performed under routine conditions. METHODS: We analyzed data on all elective CEA and CAS procedures performed over the periods 2009-2014 and 2012-2014, respectively. The endpoints of the study were the combined in-hospital stroke and death rate, stroke rate and mortality separately, local complications, and other complications. We analyzed the raw data with descriptive statistics and carried out a risk-adjusted analysis of the association of clinically unalterable variables with the risk of stroke and death. All analyses were performed separately for CEA and CAS. RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 142 074 CEA procedures (67.8% of them in men) and 13 086 CAS procedures (69.7% in men). The median age was 72 years (CEA) and 71 years (CAS). The periprocedural rate of stroke and death after CEA was 1.4% for asymptomatic and 2.5% for symptomatic stenoses; the corresponding rates for CAS were 1.7% and 3.7%. Variables associated with increased risk included older age, higher ASA class (ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists), symptomatic vs. asymptomatic stenosis, 50-69% stenosis, and contralateral carotid occlusion (for CEA only). CONCLUSION: These data reveal a low periprocedural rate of stroke or death for both CEA and CAS. This study does however not permit any conclusions as to the superiority or inferiority of CEA and CAS.

The Use of Embolic Protection Devices Is Associated With a Lower Stroke and Death Rate After Carotid Stenting.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the association between intraprocedural and periprocedural variables and in-hospital stroke or death rate after carotid artery stenting. BACKGROUND: In Germany, all open surgical and endovascular procedures on the extracranial carotid artery must be documented in a statutory nationwide quality assurance database. METHODS: A total of 13,086 carotid artery stenting procedures for asymptomatic (63.9%) or symptomatic carotid stenosis (mean age 69.7 years, 69.7% men) between 2009 and 2014 were recorded. The following variables were analyzed: stent design, stent material, neurophysiological monitoring, periprocedural antiplatelet medication, and use of an embolic protection device. The primary outcome was in-hospital stroke or death. Major stroke or death, any stroke, and death, all until discharge, were secondary outcomes. Adjusted relative risks (RRs) were assessed using multilevel multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 2.4% of the population (1.7% in asymptomatic and 3.7% in symptomatic patients). The multivariable analysis showed an independent association between the use of an embolic protection device and lower in-hospital rates of stroke or death (adjusted RR: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50 to 0.85), major stroke or death (adjusted RR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.84), and stroke (adjusted RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.77). Regarding the occurrence of in-hospital death, there was no significant association (adjusted RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.35). None of the outcomes was associated with stent design, stent material, neurophysiological monitoring, or antiplatelet medication. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an embolic protection device was independently associated with lower in-hospital risk for stroke or death, major stroke or death, and stroke.

Risk of Inhospital Stroke or Death Is Associated With Age But Not Sex in Patients Treated With Carotid Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic or Symptomatic Stenosis in Routine Practice: Secondary Data Analysis of the Nationwide German Statutory Quality Assurance Database From 2009 to 2014.

BACKGROUND: Guideline recommendations on carotid endarterectomy are based predominantly on randomized, controlled trials, in which women or elderly patients are often under-represented. This study analyzed the association of age and sex with the risk of in-hospital stroke or death following carotid endarterectomy under routine conditions in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: Secondary data analysis using the Statutory German Quality Assurance Database on all carotid endarterectomy procedures (n=142 074) performed between 2009 and 2014. Primary outcome was any stroke or death until discharge; secondary outcomes were any in-hospital stroke (alone), and death (alone). Descriptive statistics and multilevel multivariable regression analyses were applied. Patients were predominately male (68%), with mean age 71 years. Carotid stenosis was symptomatic in 40%. Primary outcome occurred in 1.8% of women and 1.9% of men. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that more-advanced age was associated with a higher primary outcome rate (relative risk [RR] per 10-year increase: 1.19; 95% CI, 1.14-1.24). Risk of death (alone) was associated with age (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.54-1.84). Age was associated with the risk of stroke (alone; RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.11). Sex was not associated with primary outcome rate (1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.10), nor did it significantly modify the age effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that increasing age, but not sex, is associated with a higher risk of in-hospital stroke or death following carotid endarterectomy under everyday conditions in Germany. Whereas the risk of death (alone) is significantly associated with age, the association between age and the risk of stroke (alone) can be considered of minor importance.

Intraoperative Completion Studies, Local Anesthesia, and Antiplatelet Medication Are Associated With Lower Risk in Carotid Endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In Germany, all surgical and endovascular procedures on the carotid bifurcation must be documented in a statutory nationwide quality assurance database. We aimed to analyze the association between procedural and perioperative variables and in-hospital stroke or death rates after carotid endarterectomy. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2014, overall 142 074 elective carotid endarterectomy procedures for asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid artery stenosis were documented in the database. The primary outcome of this secondary data analysis was in-hospital stroke or death. Major stroke or death, stroke, and death, each until discharge were secondary outcomes. Adjusted relative risks (RRs) were assessed by multivariable multilevel regression analyses. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 1.8% of patients, with a rate of 1.4% in asymptomatic and 2.5% in symptomatic patients, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, lower risks of stroke or death were independently associated with local anesthesia (versus general anesthesia: RR, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.95), carotid endarterectomy with patch plasty compared with primary closure (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.97), intraoperative completion studies by duplex ultrasound (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.88) or angiography (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90), and perioperative antiplatelet medication (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.97). No shunting and a short cross-clamp time were also associated with lower risks; however, these are suspected to be confounded. CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthesia, patch plasty compared with primary closure, intraoperative completion studies by duplex ultrasound or angiography, and perioperative antiplatelet medication were independently associated with lower in-hospital stroke or death rates after carotid endarterectomy.

Significant Association of Annual Hospital Volume With the Risk of Inhospital Stroke or Death Following Carotid Endarterectomy but Likely Not After Carotid Stenting: Secondary Data Analysis of the Statutory German Carotid Quality Assurance Database.

BACKGROUND: Associations between hospital volume and the risk of stroke or death following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) on a national level in Germany were analyzed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Secondary data analysis using microdata from the nationwide statutory German quality assurance database on all surgical or endovascular carotid interventions on the extracranial carotid artery between 2009 and 2014. Hospitals were categorized into empirically determined quintiles according to the annual case volume. The resulting volume thresholds were 10, 25, 46, and 79 for CEA and 2, 6, 12, and 26 for CAS procedures. The primary outcome was any stroke or death before hospital discharge. For risk-adjusted analyses, a multilevel regression model was applied. The analysis included 161 448 CEA and 17 575 CAS procedures. In CEA patients, the crude risk of stroke or death decreased monotonically from 4.2% (95% confidence interval, 3.6%-4.9%) in low-volume hospitals (first quintile 1-10 CEA per year) to 2.1% (2.0%-2.2%) in hospitals providing ≥80 CEA per year (fifth quintile; P<0.001 for trend). The overall risk of any stroke or death in CAS patients was 3.7% (3.5%-4.0%), but no trend on annual volume was seen (P=0.304). Risk-adjusted analyses confirmed a significant inverse relationship between hospital volume (categorized or continuous) and the risk of stroke or death after CEA but not CAS procedures. CONCLUSIONS: An inverse volume-outcome relationship in CEA-treated patients was demonstrated. No significant association between hospital volume and the risk of stroke or death was found for CAS.

Short Time Interval Between Neurologic Event and Carotid Surgery Is Not Associated With an Increased Procedural Risk.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend that carotid endarterectomy should be performed within 2 weeks in patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis. Because a Swedish register study indicated that patients treated within the first days after a stroke or transient ischemic attack might have an increased perioperative stroke and mortality risk, this study aimed to find out whether these findings are also true under everyday conditions in Germany. METHODS: Secondary data analysis including 56 336 elective carotid endarterectomy procedures performed for symptomatic carotid stenosis under everyday conditions between 2009 and 2014. The patient cohort was divided into 4 groups according to time interval between index event and surgery (I: 0-2, II: 3-7, III: 8-14, and IV: 14-180 days). Primary outcome was any in-hospital stroke or death. For risk-adjusted analyses, a multilevel multivariable regression model was used. RESULTS: Mean patients' age was 71.1±9.6 years; 67.5% were men. Overall rate of any stroke or death was 2.5% (n=1434). Risk of any in-hospital stroke or death was 3.0% in group I, 2.5% in group II, 2.6% in group III, and 2.3% in group IV. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that the time interval was not significantly associated with the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The time interval between the index event and carotid endarterectomy was not associated with the risk of any in-hospital stroke or death in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis in Germany. In clinically stable patients, carotid endarterectomy might, therefore, be performed safely as soon as possible after the neurological index event.