RESUMEN
Advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by motor fluctuations including unpredictable oscillations remarkably impairing quality of life. Effective management and development of novel therapies for these response fluctuations largely depend on clinical rating instruments such as the widely-used PD home diary, which are associated with biases and errors. Recent advancements in digital health technologies provide user-friendly wearables that can be tailored for continuous monitoring of motor fluctuations. Their criterion validity under real-world conditions using clinical examination as the gold standard remains to be determined. We prospectively examined this validity of a wearable accelerometer-based digital Parkinson's Motor Diary (adPMD) using the Parkinson's Kinetigraph (PKG®) in an alternative application by converting its continuous data into one of the three motor categories of the PD home diary (Off, On and Dyskinetic state). Sixty-three out of 91 eligible participants with fluctuating PD (46% men, average age 66) had predefined sufficient adPMD datasets (>70% of half-hour periods) from 2 consecutive days. 92% of per-protocol assessments were completed. adPMD monitoring of daily times in motor states showed moderate validity for Off and Dyskinetic state (ICC = 0.43-0.51), while inter-rating methods agreements on half-hour-level can be characterized as poor (median Cohen's κ = 0.13-0.21). Individualization of adPMD thresholds for transferring accelerometer data into diary categories improved temporal agreements up to moderate level for Dyskinetic state detection (median Cohen's κ = 0.25-0.41). Here we report that adPMD real-world-monitoring captures daily times in Off and Dyskinetic state in advanced PD with moderate validities, while temporal agreement of adPMD and clinical observer diary data is limited.
RESUMEN
Background: The Parkinson Disease (PD) Home Diary (HD) is a commonly used clinical outcome measure, but it has not been extensively compared to direct assessments by experienced observers. Objective: Validation of patient-reported HD by investigating the agreement between motor state assessments by patients and observers. Methods: This observational study included patients with PD and motor fluctuations. Observers were physicians or research nurses. Patients completed a screening visit, one day of diary ratings at home, and then two days of ratings on-site during which patients and observers simultaneously judged the participants' motor state. Results: Observers and 40 patients completed 1,288 pairs of half-hourly blinded motor state assessments. There were significant differences between observer and patient ratings (P < 0.001) and the temporal agreement was poor (Cohen's κ = 0.358). The agreement between patient and observer ratings was 71.1% for observed "On without dyskinesia", 57.3% for observed "Off", and 49.4% for observed "On with dyskinesia". Daily times spent in the three motor states as aggregated diary data showed fair to excellent reliability with intraclass coefficient values ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 for "On" and 0.77 for "Off". Conclusion: There were significant differences between observer and patient ratings. Patients and observers generally agreed on when the patients was in the "On" state (with or without dyskinesia). Patient ratings on the hour level seem to be influenced by other aspects of the patients' experience than the observed motor state, but assessment of daily time spent in the different motor state provides reasonable reliability.
RESUMEN
The Parkinson's disease (PD) home diary is frequently used in clinical trials to measure efficacy of medical treatments for motor fluctuations in advanced PD. This prospective study in fluctuating PD patients examines the validity of the diary for quantification of motor states in comparison to direct clinical observation. 51 patients (median age: 65 years, disease duration: 11 years) completed the diary half-hourly for two consecutive days and were simultaneously rated by an experienced observer, who independently evaluated motor states half-hourly throughout daytime. Overall agreement (Cohen's kappa) between patient and observer diary entries was 59.8% (0.387). Patients documented more On without dyskinesia (52.3% vs. 38.9%, P < 0.001) and less On with dyskinesia (21.5% vs. 34.2%, P < 0.001), whereas proportions for Off intervals were not different between patient and observer diaries (26.2% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.97). Temporal agreement between diary ratings was unsatisfactory, particularly for On with dyskinesia. Taken together, our study suggests that the PD home diary only inadequately reflects actual motor states compared to direct clinical observation.
