Discrepancies between dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase phenotyping and genotyping: What are the explanatory factors?

AIM: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency can be detected by phenotyping (measurement of plasma uracil [U], with U ≥ 16 µg/L defining a partial deficiency) and/or by genotyping (screening for the four most frequent DPYD variants). We aimed to determine the proportion of discrepancies between phenotypic and genotypic approaches and to identify possible explanatory factors. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent both phenotyping and genotyping were retrospectively collected. Complementary genetic analyses (genotyping of the variant c.557A>G and DPYD sequencing) were performed for patients with U ≥ 16 µg/L without any common variants. The characteristics of patients classified according to the congruence of the phenotyping and genotyping approaches were compared (Kruskal-Wallis test), and determinants of U levels were studied in the whole cohort (linear model). RESULTS: Among the 712 included patients, phenotyping and genotyping were discordant for 12.5%, with 63 (8.8%) having U ≥ 16 µg/L in the absence of a common variant. Complementary genetic investigations marginally reduced the percentage of discrepancies to 12.1%: Among the nine additional identified variants, only the c.557A>G variant, carried by three patients, had been previously reported to be associated with DPD deficiency. Liver dysfunction could explain certain discordances, as ASAT, ALP, GGT and bilirubin levels were significantly elevated, with more frequent liver metastases in patients with U ≥ 16 µg/L and the absence of a DPYD variant. The impact of cytolysis was confirmed, as ASAT levels were independently associated with increased U (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The frequent discordances between DPD phenotyping and genotyping approaches highlight the need to perform these two approaches to screen for all DPD deficiencies.

Severe toxicity of capecitabine in a patient with DPD deficiency after a safe FEC-100 experience: why we should test DPD deficiency in all patients before high-dose fluoropyrimidines.

We report the case of a 44-year-old patient who experienced severe toxicity while being treated with capecitabine at standard dose for metastatic breast cancer. As the patient had already received 5-FU within the FEC protocol (5-FU 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) 10 years ago without experiencing any severe adverse event, no DPD deficiency testing was performed before capecitabine treatment. Nevertheless, she experienced severe diarrhea and grade 2 hand-foot syndrome from the first cycle, forcing her to stop the treatment. Phenotypic and genotypic investigation of DPD activity revealed that the patient had a partial deficiency and had therefore been exposed to a higher risk of developing severe toxicities on fluoropyrimidines. This case proves that tolerance to low-dose fluoropyrimidines does not preclude DPD deficiency and the occurrence of severe toxicities if higher doses of fluoropyrimidines are used as a second-line treatment. It emphasizes the role of DPD phenotyping testing based on uracilemia in patients scheduled for fluoropyrimidine drugs, even if previous courses with low-dose 5-FU were safely administered.

Body Surface Area Dosing of High-Dose Methotrexate Should Be Reconsidered, Particularly in Overweight, Adult Patients.

BACKGROUND: High-dose methotrexate is used for treating several types of cancer. However, it is associated with a high risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), especially in patients with high MTX concentrations. Although therapeutic drug monitoring is performed to monitor MTX concentrations, it is unclear what concentration should be considered critical, thus requiring rescue protocols to prevent nephrotoxicity. METHODS: Patients treated with high-dose methotrexate for lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic leukemia and those benefited from therapeutic drug monitoring were included. The relationship between MTX concentrations and the presence or absence of AKI was assessed. MTX concentrations were analyzed using a population pharmacokinetic approach. Specific attention was given to morphological covariates because MTX doses are individualized according to body surface area (BSA). RESULTS: In total, 328 patients and 657 cycles of treatment were analyzed. Higher MTX concentrations were observed in the AKI+ group. For cycle 1, all patients showing an MTX concentration >6 µM at 36 hours or >2 µM at 48 hours after infusion developed nephrotoxicity. The final pharmacokinetic model had 2 compartments and included the effect of age on clearance (CL) and of body weight on peripheral distribution volume. None of the morphological covariates tested on CL led to significant improvement in the model. Higher MTX concentrations were observed in patients with extreme BSA values (≥2 m2) or body mass index (≥25 kg/m2). Patients with AKI who received at least 1 cycle had higher BSA and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study provide additional information on the relationship between MTX concentration and nephrotoxicity. Patients with a plasma MTX concentration >6 µM at 36 hours were more likely to manifest AKI. In addition, the results suggest that overweight patients have a high AKI risk and that BSA-based adjustment of MTX dose is not appropriate.