Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 163
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(3): e242076, 2024 Mar 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38477919

RESUMEN

Importance: Further research is needed to understand factors associated with well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic among adolescents who have experienced adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Objective: To explore factors associated with improved mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic among adolescents who have experienced ACEs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the baseline (2016-2018) and sixth (March 2021) COVID Rapid Response Research (RRR) surveys of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study, which includes 21 sites across the US. Adolescents aged 11 to 15 years who completed the COVID RRR mental health measures were included. Data analyses were conducted from June to August 2023. Exposures: School-based factors (eg, in-person school) and 8 coping behaviors (eg, exercise). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were adolescent-reported positive affect (PA) and perceived stress (PS). Adolescents were stratified by no ACEs, low-to-intermediate ACEs (1-3), and high ACEs (≥4). Linear regressions estimated associations between factors and mental health, adjusting for potential confounders. Unstandardized beta coefficients (B) were compared with equality of coefficients tests. Results: The 4515 adolescents in this study (mean [SD] age, 13.3 [0.88] years; 51% [95% CI, 50% to 53%] female) were racially and ethnically diverse (American Indian/Alaska Native, 2% [95% CI, 2% to 3%]; Asian, 8% [95% CI, 7% to 9%]; Black, 11% [95% CI, 10% to 12%]; Latino or Hispanic, 17% [95% CI, 15% to 18%]; White, 61% [95% CI, 60% to 63%]; other, 1% [95% CI, 0% to 2%]). For youths with high ACEs, caring for one's body (PA B = 4.02 [95% CI, 1.39 to 6.66]; PS B = -0.92 [95% CI, -1.84 to 0.00]), exercising (PA B = 3.19 [95% CI, 0.46 to 5.92]; PS B = -1.41 [95% CI, -2.40 to -0.43]), and engaging in healthy behaviors (PA B = 4.07 [95% CI, 1.28 to 6.84]; PS B = -1.01 [95% CI, -1.98 to -0.05]) were associated with higher PA and lower PS scores. In-person schooling had a greater impact on PA scores for youths with high ACEs (B = 5.55 [95% CI, 2.08 to 9.01]) than youths with low-to-intermediate ACEs (B = 1.27 [95% CI, 0.27 to 2.27]). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that in-person schooling and several coping behaviors (caring for one's body, exercising, and engaging in healthy behaviors) were associated with significantly higher PA and lower PS during the COVID-19 pandemic among adolescents with high ACEs. Adolescents with high ACEs demonstrated especially greater mental health scores when they reported in-person schooling. Future studies should build on these findings to identify clinical and school-based mental health protective factors for adolescents with high ACE risk.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Salud Mental , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , Escolaridad
3.
J Clin Transl Sci ; 8(1): e28, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38384922

RESUMEN

Introduction: Traditionally, research institutions have valued individual achievements such as principal investigator and lead authorship status as primary indicators in the academic promotions process. However, the scientific process increasingly requires collaboration by teams of researchers across multiple disciplines, sometimes including experts outside academia, often referred to as "team science." We sought to determine whether there is agreement about what constitutes team science at our academic institution and whether current promotion processes sufficiently incentivize faculty participation in team science. Methods: We conducted 20 qualitative interviews with academic leaders (N = 24) at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) who supervise faculty promotions processes. Participants were asked to share their definitions of team science and the extent to which faculty receive credit for engaging in these activities during the promotions process. A subset of participants also completed a brief survey in which they ranked the importance of participation in team science relative to other factors that are traditionally valued in the promotions process. Interview data were examined by two analysts using structural coding. Descriptive analyses were conducted of survey responses. Results: Though team science is valued at UCSF, definitions of team science and the approach to assigning credit for team science in academic promotions processes varied widely. Participants suggested opportunities to bolster support for team science. Conclusions: Efforts to define and provide transparent faculty incentives for team science should be prioritized at institutions, like UCSF, seeking to advance faculty engagement in collaborative research.

4.
BMC Public Health ; 23(1): 2039, 2023 10 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37853363

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Growing recognition of racism perpetuated within academic institutions has given rise to anti-racism efforts in these settings. In June 2020, the university-based California Preterm Birth Initiative (PTBi) committed to an Anti-Racism Action Plan outlining an approach to address anti-Blackness. This case study assessed perspectives on PTBi's anti-racism efforts to support continued growth toward racial equity within the initiative. METHODS: This mixed methods case study included an online survey with multiple choice and open-ended survey items (n = 27) and key informant interviews (n = 8) of leadership, faculty, staff, and trainees working within the initiative. Survey and interview questions focused on perspectives about individual and organizational anti-racism competencies, perceived areas of initiative success, and opportunities for improvement. Qualitative interview and survey data were coded and organized into common themes within assessment domains. RESULTS: Most survey respondents reported they felt competent in all the assessed anti-racism skills, including foundational knowledge and responding to workplace racism. They also felt confident in PTBi's commitment to address anti-Blackness. Fewer respondents were clear on strategic plans, resources allocated, and how the anti-racism agenda was being implemented. Suggestions from both data sources included further operationalizing and communicating commitments, integrating an anti-racism lens across all activities, ensuring accountability including staffing and funding consistent with anti-racist approaches, persistence in hiring Black faculty, providing professional development and support for Black staff, and addressing unintentional interpersonal harms to Black individuals. CONCLUSIONS: This case study contributes key lessons which move beyond individual-level and theoretical approaches towards transparency and accountability in academic institutions aiming to address anti-Black racism. Even with PTBi's strong commitment and efforts towards racial equity, these case study findings illustrate that actions must have sustained support by the broader institution and include leadership commitment, capacity-building via ongoing coaching and training, broad incorporation of anti-racism practices and procedures, continuous learning, and ongoing accountability for both short- and longer-term sustainable impact.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Antiracismo , Negro o Afroamericano , Equidad en Salud , Nacimiento Prematuro , Racismo Sistemático , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Nacimiento Prematuro/etnología , Nacimiento Prematuro/prevención & control , Racismo/etnología , Racismo/prevención & control , Embarazo , Racismo Sistemático/etnología , Racismo Sistemático/prevención & control , Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Centros Médicos Académicos/normas , Internet , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Liderazgo , Responsabilidad Social , Creación de Capacidad
5.
Pediatrics ; 152(3)2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37545466

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Drinking water promotion and access shows promise for preventing weight gain. This study evaluated the impact of Water First, a school-based water promotion and access intervention on changes in overweight. METHODS: Low-income, ethnically diverse elementary schools in California's Bay Area were cluster-randomized to intervention and control groups. Water First includes classroom lessons, water stations, and schoolwide water promotion over 1 school year. The primary outcome was overweight prevalence (BMI-for-age-and-sex ≥85th percentile). Students (n = 1249) in 56 fourth-grade classes in 18 schools (9 intervention, 9 control) from 2016 to 2019 participated in evaluation at baseline, 7, and 15 months. Data collection was interrupted in 8 additional recruited schools because of coronavirus disease 2019. RESULTS: Of 1262 students from 18 schools, 1249 (47.4% girls; mean [SD] age, 9.6 [0.4] years; 63.4% Hispanic) were recruited. From baseline to 7 months, there was no significant difference in changes in overweight prevalence in intervention schools (-0.2%) compared to control schools (-0.4%) (adjusted ratio of odds ratios [ORs]: 0.7 [confidence interval (CI): 0.2-2.9] P = 0.68). From baseline to 15-months, increases in overweight prevalence were significantly greater in control schools (3.7%) compared to intervention schools (0.5%). At 15 months, intervention students had a significantly lower change in overweight prevalence (adjusted ratio of ORs: 0.1 [CI: 0.03-0.7] P = .017) compared to control students. There were no intervention effects for obesity prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Water First prevented increases in the prevalence of overweight, but not obesity, in elementary school students.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Agua Potable , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Masculino , Sobrepeso/epidemiología , Sobrepeso/prevención & control , Promoción de la Salud , Obesidad/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Escolar
6.
Prog Community Health Partnersh ; 17(2): 319-327, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462560

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The California Preterm Birth Initiative is a community-engaged research effort focused on addressing racial disparities in birth outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To highlight three community-academic partnership strategies and identify partners' lessons learned and recommendations. METHODS: We conducted interviews (n = 38), four focus groups (n = 23), a document review (n = 174), and meeting/event observations (n = 36). We performed content analysis and structural and emerging coding of the data, which involved extracting and sorting information into themes. LESSONS LEARNED: Five themes emerged across the strategies as essential for successful partnerships addressing racial disparities: 1) incorporate a racial equity approach; 2) value community knowledge; 3) ensure accountability to community priorities; 4) build relationships and trust; and 5) address structural barriers to community-academic partnerships. CONCLUSIONS: Community-academic partnerships addressing racial health disparities should confront internal and structural power dynamics early on and support affected communities to lead the efforts, including committing to funding and capacity-building activities to ensure research justice.


Asunto(s)
Nacimiento Prematuro , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Grupos Raciales , Justicia Social , Embarazo
7.
Sex Reprod Health Matters ; 31(1): 2216527, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37335382

RESUMEN

Access to comprehensive contraceptive services for youth is essential to improving sexual and reproductive health. However, youth in many countries still face substantial obstacles to contraceptive access and use. The purpose of this study is to compare the contraceptive access experiences and perspectives of pregnant and parenting Mexican-origin youth in Guanajuato, Mexico, and Fresno County, California. Focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted in Spanish and English among female youth in Mexico (n = 49) and California (n = 25). Participants also completed a brief sociodemographic survey. Using a modified grounded theory approach, qualitative data were coded and thematically analysed based on Penchansky and Thomas's Theory of Access, and results were compared by location. Although knowledge of a service provider was high among youth in both locations, access was affected by social, cultural, and institutional dynamics and contraceptive use was mixed. Across locations, participants described obstacles to accessing their preferred method. Participants worried about parental and peer opinions about their use of contraception (acceptability), and about perceived side effects including infertility and pain (adequacy). Contextual differences included lack of contraceptive choice in Guanajuato (availability) and incomplete knowledge about options in Fresno County (awareness). The power to request and receive their method of choice (agency) emerged as an important dimension that was not part of the original theory. Latina youth living in Mexico and the United States face multiple challenges accessing needed contraceptive options and services. Recognising and reducing these barriers can strengthen the contraceptive care landscape and promote the reproductive health and agency of young people. DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2216527Plain language summary: Although sexually active youth need access to comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services, youth in many countries face substantial barriers to care. This study compares the experiences of pregnant and parenting youth in accessing contraceptive services in Mexico and the United States. We conducted interviews and focus groups with 74 Mexican-origin young women and found that contraceptive use and access was affected by their concerns about parental and peer opinions as well as by provider attitudes. In Mexico, several participants reported being denied their preferred method by their provider. Identifying and addressing barriers to services can improve the quality of care and the reproductive health of young people.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Estados Unidos , México , Anticonceptivos , Conducta Anticonceptiva
8.
J Adolesc Health ; 73(4): 790-794, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37367704

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Despite long-term emphasis on the medical home for children, little research focuses on adolescents. This study examines adolescent past-year attainment of medical home, its components, and subgroup differences among demographic and mental/physical health condition categories. METHODS: Utilizing the 2020-21 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH), ages 10-17 (N = 42,930), we determined medical home attainment and its 5 components and subgroup differences utilizing multivariable logistic regression: sex; race/ethnicity; income; caregiver education; insurance; language spoken at home; region; and health conditions: physical, mental, both, or none. RESULTS: Forty-five percent had a medical home with lower rates among those who were as follows: not White non-Hispanic; lower income; uninsured; in non-English-speaking households; adolescents whose caregivers lacked a college degree; and adolescents with mental health conditions (p range = .01-<.0001). Differences for medical home components were similar. DISCUSSION: Given low medical home rates, ongoing differences and high mental illness rates, efforts are needed to improve adolescent medical home access.


Asunto(s)
Medicina del Adolescente , Servicios de Salud del Niño , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Servicios de Salud del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos , Renta , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina del Adolescente/normas , Medicina del Adolescente/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
J Adolesc Health ; 72(6): 993-996, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36894464

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Emergency contraception (EC), the 'last chance' contraceptive method, has gained significance post-Roe, but most young people do not know their options. METHODS: We conducted an educational intervention on EC among 1,053 students aged 18-25 years. We assessed changes in knowledge of key aspects of EC using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: At baseline, virtually no one was aware of the intrauterine device for EC (4%), but postintervention, 89% correctly identified intrauterine devices as the most effective EC (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 116.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 62.4, 217.8). Knowledge that levonorgestrel pills could be accessed without a prescription grew (60%-90%; aOR = 9.7, 95% CI 6.7-14.0), as did knowledge that pills work best when taken as soon as possible (75%-95%; aOR = 9.6, 95% CI 6.1-14.9). Multivariate results showed adolescent and young adult participants absorbed these key concepts across age, gender, and sexual orientation. DISCUSSION: Timely interventions are needed to empower youth with knowledge of EC options.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción Postcoital , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre , Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Adolescente , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Masculino , Adulto , Anticoncepción , Levonorgestrel/uso terapéutico , Concienciación , Oportunidad Relativa
10.
Acad Pediatr ; 23(7): 1417-1425, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36958531

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Infant well-child visits are increasingly being explored as opportunities to address parental postpartum health needs, including those related to reproductive health. To inform potential pediatric clinic-based interventions, this study assessed postpartum contraceptive needs and health services preferences. METHODS: We surveyed postpartum individuals attending 2 to 6-month well-child visits at three Northern California pediatric clinics (2019-20). We examined unmet contraceptive needs; the acceptability of contraceptive education, counseling, and provision at well-child visits; and sociodemographic and clinical correlates. We conducted univariate and multivariable regression modeling to assess associations between sociodemographic and clinical variables, the status of contraceptive needs, and acceptability measures. RESULTS: Study participants (n = 263) were diverse in terms of race and ethnicity (13% Asian, 9% Black, 37% Latinx, 12% Multi-racial or Other, 29% White), and socioeconomic status. Overall, 25% had unmet contraceptive needs. Unmet need was more common among participants who had delivered more recently, were multiparous, or reported ≥ 1 barrier to obtaining contraception; postpartum visit attendance, education, race, and ethnicity were not associated with unmet need. Most participants deemed the following acceptable in the pediatric clinic: receiving contraceptive information (85%), discussing contraception (86%), and obtaining a contraceptive method (81%). Acceptability of these services was greater among participants with unmet contraceptive needs, better self-rated health, and private insurance (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: A quarter of participants had unmet contraceptive needs beyond the early postpartum period. Most considered the pediatric clinic an acceptable place to address contraception, suggesting the pediatric clinic may be a suitable setting for interventions aiming to prevent undesired pregnancies and their sequelae.

11.
Matern Child Health J ; 27(4): 621-631, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36840786

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Recognition of the importance of adolescents' environments in influencing their sexual and reproductive health (SRH) decision-making necessitates a deeper understanding of the role that community stakeholders play in shaping Adolescent and Young Adults (AYA) access to SRH education and care. We describe community stakeholders' knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes about AYA's SRH needs in three rural Latino communities in Kansas. METHODS: Key stakeholders completed a written survey incorporating the theory of Planned Behavior to assess attitudes, norms, and intentions to support AYA's SRH education and access to care. RESULTS: Across three rural immigrant community settings, respondents (N = 55) included 8 community health workers, 9 health care providers, 7 public health officials, 19 school health officials, and 12 community members. More than half self-identified as Latino (55%). Six (11%) participants, half of whom were in the health sector, thought SRH education would increase the likelihood that teens would engage in sexual activities. In contrast, other stakeholders thought that providing condoms (17, 30.9%), contraception other than condoms (14, 25.5%), and providing HPV immunization (5, 9.6%) would increase the likelihood of engaging in sexual activity. Ambivalence regarding support for SRH education and service provision prevailed across sectors, reflected even in the endorsement of the distribution of less effective contraceptive methods. Obstacles to care include immigration status, discrimination, lack of confidential services, and transportation. CONCLUSION: Key stakeholders living in rural communities revealed misconceptions, negative attitudes, and ambivalent beliefs related to the delivery of SRH education and services, potentially creating barriers to AYA's successful access to care.


Little is known about the knowledge, beliefs and attitudes held by key stakeholders in rural immigrant Latino communities regarding their level of support for AYA's SRH needs. Key stakeholders may harbor influential and ambivalent opinions regarding AYA's sexuality considering existing cultural norms, therefore, stigmatizing access to SRH education and care. We examined key community stakeholders' attitudes and norms as measures of intentions to support AYA's SRH education and care. We identify actionable steps needed to eliminate existing barriers to AYA's access to SRH education and care among at-risk immigrant Latino communities in the rural Midwest.


Asunto(s)
Embarazo en Adolescencia , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva , Embarazo , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Población Rural , Anticoncepción , Educación Sexual , Conducta Sexual , Salud Reproductiva , Hispánicos o Latinos
12.
Acad Pediatr ; 23(4): 782-789, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36288750

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe adolescent and young adult (AYA) perspectives on defining quality and value in health care and to gain understanding of their knowledge of value-based payment. METHODS: A text message-based survey was sent to a convenience sample of AYAs aged 14 to 24 in 2019. Participants were asked 4 open-ended questions: 1) how they would define "good health care," 2) what factors to consider in rating doctors, 3) whose opinions should matter most when rating doctors, and 4) the best ways to collect AYA opinions on doctors, and one yes/no question on their awareness of value-based payment. Analyses included descriptive demographic statistics and an inductive thematic approach with multivariable models comparing adolescent (14-18) and young adult (19-24) responses. RESULTS: Response rate was 61.0% (782/1283). Most participants were White (63.3%), female (53.3%), and adolescents (55.6%). Common themes from the first 2 questions included accessibility (specifically affordability), coverage benefits, and care experience (including compassion, respect, and clinical competence). Young adults more commonly mentioned affordability than adolescents (54.4% vs 43.3%, P = .001) and more commonly felt their opinion should matter more than their parents when rating doctors (80.6% vs 62.0%, P < .001). Only 21.0% of AYAs were familiar with the potential value-based link between physician payment and care quality. CONCLUSIONS: When considering quality and value in health care, AYAs expressed their desired agency in rating the quality of their care and clinicians. AYAs' perspectives on health care quality, including the importance of care accessibility and affordability, should be considered when designing youth-centered care delivery and value-based payment models.


Asunto(s)
Emociones , Neoplasias , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Femenino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Empatía , Atención a la Salud
13.
Matern Child Health J ; 26(12): 2517-2525, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36348213

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth, defined as birth at gestational age before 37 weeks, is a major public health concern with marked racial disparities driven by underlying structural and social determinants of health. To achieve population-level reductions in preterm birth and to reduce racial inequities, the University of California, San Francisco's California Preterm Birth Initiative catalyzed two cross-sector coalitions in San Francisco and Fresno using the Collective Impact (CI) approach. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare two preterm birth-focused CI efforts and identify common themes and lessons learned. METHODS: Researchers conducted in-depth interviews (n = 19) and three focus groups (n = 20) with stakeholders to assess factors related to collaboration. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using modified grounded theory. Findings were compared by year of data collection (first and second cycle in each location) and geographic location (Fresno and San Francisco) and discussed with CI participants for input. RESULTS: Although both communities adopted the core tenets of CI to address preterm birth and racial inequities, each employed distinct organizational structures, strategic frameworks, and interventions. Common themes emerged around the importance of authentic community engagement, transparency in the process of prioritization and decision-making, addressing racism as a root cause of disparities in birth outcomes, and candid communication among partners. CONCLUSION: Future CI efforts, particularly those catalyzed by academic institutions, should ensure community members are active partners in program development and decision-making. CI efforts focused on combatting racial health inequities should center racism as a root cause and build capacity among coalition partners.


Asunto(s)
Nacimiento Prematuro , Racismo , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Lactante , Grupos Raciales , Grupos Focales , San Francisco
14.
Health Educ Behav ; : 10901981221130734, 2022 Oct 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36314359

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most health and developmental issues affecting young people are interrelated. However, few interventions address multiple behavioral domains simultaneously or are based on theories that encompass a holistic perspective of youth development. AIM: The purpose of this scoping review was to identify and describe the range of theory-based, multibehavioral health interventions aimed at improving two or more of the following behavioral youth outcomes: (1) sexual and reproductive health; (2) education and employment; (3) violence; and (4) substance use. METHODS: Interventions conducted worldwide and published in English or Spanish between January 2000 and July 2020 were identified using four databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, LILACS, and SciELO. RESULTS: A total of 11,084 articles were identified, of which 477 were retrieved and assessed for eligibility. Twenty-three articles (evaluating 21 interventions) ultimately met the inclusion criteria. Most interventions were conducted in the United States and addressed two behavioral domains of interest, although seven interventions incorporated three domains, and one incorporated all four. Substance use was the most common domain (16 interventions) but only in the United States/Canada, followed by sexual and reproductive health (14 interventions). All produced significant improvement in at least one outcome or for at least one subgroup of youth. The most common theoretical foundations were positive youth development and social learning theory. CONCLUSION: Integrated interventions that are theory based and evidence informed can support positive development and empower youth to make healthy decisions. Further efforts are needed to address structural and policy issues that affect young people's developmental opportunities and health outcomes.

15.
Sex Health ; 19(5): 439-447, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35799331

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although rates of adolescent pregnancy have been declining for decades, rates of sexually transmissible infections (STIs) continue to increase among youth. Little is known about youth's comparative concern regarding pregnancy and STIs, particularly among marginalised populations. Therefore, this study compares concerns toward unplanned pregnancy and STIs and identifies underlying reasons for these differing concerns in youth populations with elevated rates of STIs. METHODS: Fourteen focus groups were held with 92 youth in two counties in California, USA. Youth were purposefully selected from community-based organisations and schools to represent a variety of backgrounds and populations with elevated rates of pregnancy and STIs. Qualitative coding and analysis were conducted using ATLAS.ti. 7.0. RESULTS: Almost all participants were youth of colour (86%), 27% identified as gay, lesbian or bisexual, and 21% had ever experienced homelessness. Although most youth were generally concerned about the consequences of contracting an STI, including the possible stigma associated with it, both males and females were more worried about an unplanned pregnancy. Emergent themes included varying concerns about the lasting consequences of unplanned pregnancies and STIs; greater visibility of pregnancy compared to infection; stigma; and limited STI prevention efforts compared to teen pregnancy prevention. CONCLUSIONS: By addressing the underlying concerns and varying perceptions that different groups of youth have toward STIs and pregnancy, prevention approaches and messages can be tailored, including by age, gender, sexual orientation, and for those exposed to vulnerable living situations. Additional efforts are needed to address increasing rates of STIs among young people.


Asunto(s)
Embarazo en Adolescencia , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Adolescente , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , Conducta Sexual , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control
16.
PLoS One ; 17(7): e0271523, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35849613

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic led to important indirect health and social harms in addition to deaths and morbidity due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. These indirect impacts, such as increased depression and substance abuse, can have persistent effects over the life course. Estimated health and cost outcomes of such conditions and mitigation strategies may guide public health responses. METHODS: We developed a cost-effectiveness framework to evaluate societal costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost due to six health-related indirect effects of COVID-19 in California. Short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated for the adult population. We identified one evidence-based mitigation strategy for each condition and estimated QALYs gained, intervention costs, and savings from averted health-related harms. Model data were derived from literature review, public data, and expert opinion. RESULTS: Pandemic-associated increases in prevalence across these six conditions were estimated to lead to over 192,000 QALYs lost and to approach $7 billion in societal costs per million population over the life course of adults. The greatest costs and QALYs lost per million adults were due to adult depression. All mitigation strategies assessed saved both QALYs and costs, with five strategies achieving savings within one year. The greatest net savings over 10 years would be achieved by addressing depression ($242 million) and excessive alcohol use ($107 million). DISCUSSION: The COVID-19 pandemic is leading to significant human suffering and societal costs due to its indirect effects. Policymakers have an opportunity to reduce societal costs and health harms by implementing mitigation strategies.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Sex Reprod Healthc ; 32: 100725, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35533466

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program grants young, undocumented immigrants work authorization and protections from deportation, with about 1.3 million eligible for the program. This exploratory study examines the association between DACA status and contraceptive use among undocumented young adults. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an internet-based survey between June 2017 and August 2017 among Asian and Latinx undocumented immigrants (N = 204) aged 18-31 years in California. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to examine the associations between DACA status and contraceptive use and consistency. RESULTS: Among undocumented participants who were sexually active, about 60% reported having unprotected sex (52% DACA vs. 63% non-DACA) and about 80% reported that documentation status affects how they access care for sexual/reproductive health at least a little. Overall, Asians were 81% less likely to have unprotected sex compared to Latinx individuals (aOR = 0.19, 95%CI: 0.06, 0.56). DACA recipients were more likely to report using contraception every time compared to non-recipients (42.9% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.04). DACA recipients were 63% less likely to report having unprotected sex in the past 12 months compared to those without DACA (aOR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.14, 0.99). DACA recipients were more than three times as likely to use contraception during sex every time compared to those without DACA (aOR = 3.19, 95%CI: 1.19, 8.54). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that undocumented young adults have low rates of contraceptive use; however, DACA is associated with improved reproductive health for certain undocumented immigrants. IMPLICATIONS AND CONTRIBUTION: State and federal policies that extend protections and promote immigrant integration are needed to fully achieve reproductive justice for all.


Asunto(s)
Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Inmigrantes Indocumentados , Niño , Anticonceptivos , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Políticas , Adulto Joven
18.
J Adolesc Health ; 70(6): 985-988, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35422363

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Young adult anxiety/depression (mental health) symptoms have increased from prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study assessed young adult (aged 18-25 years) anxiety/depressive symptoms, mental health care utilization (prescription drug use, counseling, and/or either), and unmet counseling/therapy needs utilizing the national Household Pulse Survey data from June to July 2021. METHODS: Young adult (n = 2,809) rates and subgroup differences in mental health symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 and/or Patient Health Questionnaire-2) were assessed, as were mental health care utilization and unmet counseling/therapy needs. RESULTS: In total, 48% of young adults had mental health symptoms. Among those, 39% received treatment and 36% reported unmet mental health counseling/therapy needs. DISCUSSION: These findings highlight young adults' ongoing mental health needs and low services receipt. Interventions and further research to reduce barriers to seeking and utilizing mental health care and to increase the capacity of providers to deliver culturally appropriate mental health care are needed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicios de Salud Mental , Adolescente , Adulto , Ansiedad/terapia , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Depresión/terapia , Humanos , Pandemias , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...