Impact of a hospital policy to redistribute admission flow across clinical services for capacity relief during COVID-19 surges.

BACKGROUND: Increased hospital admissions due to COVID-19 place a disproportionate strain on inpatient general medicine service (GMS) capacity compared to other services. OBJECTIVE: To study the impact on capacity and safety of a hospital-wide policy to redistribute admissions from GMS to non-GMS based on admitting diagnosis during surge periods. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective case-controlled study at a large teaching hospital. The intervention included adult patients admitted to general care wards during two surge periods (January-February 2021 and 2022) whose admission diagnosis was impacted by the policy. The control cohort included admissions during a matched number of days preceding the intervention. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Capacity measures included average daily admissions and hospital census occupied on GMS. Safety measures included length of stay (LOS) and adverse outcomes (death, rapid response, floor-to-intensive care unit transfer, and 30-day readmission). RESULTS: In the control cohort, there were 365 encounters with 299 (81.9%) GMS admissions and 66 (18.1%) non-GMS versus the intervention with 384 encounters, including 94 (24.5%) GMS admissions and 290 (75.5%) non-GMS (p < .001). The average GMS census decreased from 17.9 and 21.5 during control periods to 5.5 and 8.5 during intervention periods. An interrupted time series analysis confirmed a decrease in GMS daily admissions (p < .001) and average daily hospital census (p = .014; p < .001). There were no significant differences in LOS (5.9 vs. 5.9 days, p = .059) or adverse outcomes (53, 14.5% vs. 63, 16.4%; p = .482). CONCLUSION: Admission redistribution based on diagnosis is a safe lever to reduce capacity strain on GMS during COVID-19 surges.

The Gap Between Daily Hospital Bed Supply and Demand: Design, Implementation, and Impact of Data-Driven Pre-Noon Discharge Targets.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals have sought to increase pre-noon discharges to improve capacity, although evidence is mixed on the impact of these initiatives. Past interventions have not quantified the daily gap between morning bed supply and demand. The authors quantified this gap and applied the pre-noon data to target a pre-noon discharge initiative. METHODS: The study was conducted at a large hospital and included adult and pediatric medical/surgical wards. The researchers calculated the difference between the average cumulative bed requests and transfers in for each hour of the day in 2018, the year prior to the intervention. In 2019 an intervention on six adult general medical and two surgical wards was implemented. Eight intervention and 14 nonintervention wards were compared to determine the change in average cumulative pre-noon discharges. The change in average hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmissions was also calculated. RESULTS: The average daily cumulative gap by noon between bed supply and demand across all general care wards was 32.1 beds (per ward average, 1.3 beds). On intervention wards, mean pre-noon discharges increased from 4.7 to 6.7 (p < 0.0000) compared with the nonintervention wards 14.0 vs. 14.6 (p = 0.19877). On intervention wards, average LOS decreased from 6.9 to 6.4 days (p < 0.001) and readmission rates were 14.3% vs 13.9% (p = 0.3490). CONCLUSION: The gap between daily hospital bed supply and demand can be quantified and applied to create pre-noon discharge targets. In an intervention using these targets, researchers observed an increase in morning discharges, a decrease in LOS, and no significant change in readmissions.