PRMT5-mediated arginine methylation of FXR1 is essential for RNA binding in cancer cells.

Emerging evidence indicates that arginine methylation promotes the stability of arginine-glycine-rich (RGG) motif-containing RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and regulates gene expression. Here, we report that post-translational modification of FXR1 enhances the binding with mRNAs and is involved in cancer cell growth and proliferation. Independent point mutations in arginine residues of FXR1's nuclear export signal (R386 and R388) and RGG (R453, R455 and R459) domains prevent it from binding to RNAs that form G-quadruplex (G4) RNA structures. Disruption of G4-RNA structures by lithium chloride failed to bind with FXR1, indicating its preference for G4-RNA structure containing mRNAs. Furthermore, loss-of-function of PRMT5 inhibited FXR1 methylation both in vivo and in vitro, affecting FXR1 protein stability, inhibiting RNA-binding activity and cancer cell growth and proliferation. Finally, the enhanced crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (eCLIP) analyses reveal that FXR1 binds with the G4-enriched mRNA targets such as AHNAK, MAP1B, AHNAK2, HUWE1, DYNC1H1 and UBR4 and controls its mRNA expression in cancer cells. Our findings suggest that PRMT5-mediated FXR1 methylation is required for RNA/G4-RNA binding, which promotes gene expression in cancer cells. Thus, FXR1's structural characteristics and affinity for RNAs preferentially G4 regions provide new insights into the molecular mechanism of FXR1 in oral cancer cells.

Autophagy dictates sensitivity to PRMT5 inhibitor in breast cancer.

Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) catalyzes mono-methylation and symmetric di-methylation on arginine residues and has emerged as a potential antitumor target with inhibitors being tested in clinical trials. However, it remains unknown how the efficacy of PRMT5 inhibitors is regulated. Here we report that autophagy blockage enhances cellular sensitivity to PRMT5 inhibitor in triple negative breast cancer cells. Genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of PRMT5 triggers cytoprotective autophagy. Mechanistically, PRMT5 catalyzes monomethylation of ULK1 at R532 to suppress ULK1 activation, leading to attenuation of autophagy. As a result, ULK1 inhibition blocks PRMT5 deficiency-induced autophagy and sensitizes cells to PRMT5 inhibitor. Our study not only identifies autophagy as an inducible factor that dictates cellular sensitivity to PRMT5 inhibitor, but also unearths a critical molecular mechanism by which PRMT5 regulates autophagy through methylating ULK1, providing a rationale for the combination of PRMT5 and autophagy inhibitors in cancer therapy.

The Role of Protein Arginine Methyltransferases in DNA Damage Response.

In response to DNA damage, cells have developed a sophisticated signaling pathway, consisting of DNA damage sensors, transducers, and effectors, to ensure efficient and proper repair of damaged DNA. During this process, posttranslational modifications (PTMs) are central events that modulate the recruitment, dissociation, and activation of DNA repair proteins at damage sites. Emerging evidence reveals that protein arginine methylation is one of the common PTMs and plays critical roles in DNA damage response. Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) either directly methylate DNA repair proteins or deposit methylation marks on histones to regulate their transcription, RNA splicing, protein stability, interaction with partners, enzymatic activities, and localization. In this review, we summarize the substrates and roles of each PRMTs in DNA damage response and discuss the synergistic anticancer effects of PRMTs and DNA damage pathway inhibitors, providing insight into the significance of arginine methylation in the maintenance of genome integrity and cancer therapies.

PRMT5-mediated arginine methylation activates AKT kinase to govern tumorigenesis.

AKT is involved in a number of key cellular processes including cell proliferation, apoptosis and metabolism. Hyperactivation of AKT is associated with many pathological conditions, particularly cancers. Emerging evidence indicates that arginine methylation is involved in modulating AKT signaling pathway. However, whether and how arginine methylation directly regulates AKT kinase activity remain unknown. Here we report that protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5), but not other PRMTs, promotes AKT activation by catalyzing symmetric dimethylation of AKT1 at arginine 391 (R391). Mechanistically, AKT1-R391 methylation cooperates with phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5 trisphosphate (PIP3) to relieve the pleckstrin homology (PH)-in conformation, leading to AKT1 membrane translocation and subsequent activation by phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 (PDK1) and the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2). As a result, deficiency in AKT1-R391 methylation significantly suppresses AKT1 kinase activity and tumorigenesis. Lastly, we show that PRMT5 inhibitor synergizes with AKT inhibitor or chemotherapeutic drugs to enhance cell death. Altogether, our study suggests that R391 methylation is an important step for AKT activation and its oncogenic function.

Temporary Anosmia in Mice Following Nasal Lavage With Dilute Detergent Solution.

Olfactory sensory deprivation induces anosmia and reduces tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine levels in the olfactory bulb. The behavioral consequences specific to the loss of olfactory bulb dopamine are difficult to determine because sensory deprivation protocols are either confounded by side effects or leave the animal anosmic. A new method to both induce sensory deprivation and to measure the behavioral and circuit consequences is needed. We developed a novel, recoverable anosmia protocol using nasal lavage with a dilute detergent solution. Detergent treatment did not damage the olfactory epithelium as measured by scanning electron microscopy, alcian blue histology, and acetylated tubulin immunohistochemistry. One treatment-induced anosmia that lasted 24 to 48 h. Three treatments over 5 days reduced olfactory bulb tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine levels indicating that anosmia persists between treatments. Importantly, even with multiple treatments, olfactory ability recovered within 48 h. This is the first report of a sensory deprivation protocol that induces recoverable anosmia and can be paired with biochemical, histological, and behavioral investigations of olfaction.