Comparison of rectal swabs and fecal samples for the detection of Clostridioides difficile infections with a new in-house PCR assay.

The detection of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) relies on testing the stool of patients by toxin antigen detection or PCR methods. Although PCR and antigenic methods have significantly reduced the time to results, delays in stool collection can significantly add to the turnaround time. The use of rectal swabs to detect C. difficile could considerably reduce the time to diagnosis of CDI. We developed a new rapid PCR assay for the detection of C. difficile and evaluated this PCR assay on both stool and rectal swab specimens. We recruited a total of 623 patients suspected of C. difficile infection. Stool samples and rectal swabs were collected from each patient and tested by our PCR assay. Stool samples were also tested by the cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA) as a reference. The PCR assay detected C. difficile in 60 stool specimens and 61 rectal swabs for the 64 patients whose stool samples were positive for C. difficile by CCNA. The PCR assay detected an additional 35 and 36 stool and rectal swab specimens positive for C. difficile, respectively, for sensitivity with stools and rectal swabs of 93.8% and 95.3%, specificity of 93.7% and 93.6%, positive predictive values of 63.2% and 62.9%, and negative predictive values of 99.2% and 99.4%. Detection of C. difficile using PCR on stools or rectal swabs yielded reliable and similar results. The use of PCR tests on rectal swabs could reduce turnaround time for CDI detection, thus improving CDI management and control of C. difficile transmission. IMPORTANCE: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea, resulting in high morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. In clinical laboratories, CDI testing is currently performed on stool samples collected from patients with diarrhea. However, the diagnosis of CDI can be delayed by the time required to collect stool samples. Barriers to sample collection could be overcome by using a rectal swab instead of a stool sample. Our study showed that CDI can be identified rapidly and reliably by a new PCR assay developed in our laboratory on both stool and rectal swab specimens. The use of PCR tests on rectal swabs could reduce the time for the detection of CDI and improve the management of this infection. It should also provide a useful alternative for infection-control practitioners to better control the spread of C. difficile.

Characterization of vancomycin-resistance vanD gene clusters in the human intestinal microbiota by metagenomics and culture-enriched metagenomics.

Objectives: To characterize vancomycin-resistance vanD gene clusters and potential vanD-carrying bacteria in the intestinal microbiota of healthy volunteers exposed or not to ß-lactam antibiotics. Methods: Stool samples were collected before and after 7 days of cefprozil ß-lactam antibiotic exposure of 18 participants and six control participants who were not exposed to the antibiotic at the same time points. Metagenomic sequencing and culture-enriched metagenomic sequencing (with and without ß-lactam selection) were used to characterize vanD gene clusters and determine potential vanD-carrying bacteria. Alteration by antimicrobials was also examined. Results: Culture enrichment allowed detection of vanD genes in a large number of participants (11/24; 46%) compared to direct metagenomics (2/24; 8%). vanD genes were detected in stool cultures only following ß-lactam exposure, either after ß-lactam treatment of participants or after culture of stools with ß-lactam selection. Six types of vanD gene clusters were identified. Two types of vanD cluster highly similar to those of enterococci were found in two participants. Other vanD genes or vanD clusters were nearly identical to those identified in commensal anaerobic bacteria of the families Lachnospiraceae and Oscillospiraceae and/or bordered by genomic sequences similar or related to these anaerobes, suggesting that they are the origin or carriers of vanD. Conclusions: This study showed that culture-enriched metagenomics allowed detection of vanD genes not detected by direct metagenomics and revealed collateral enrichment of bacteria containing vancomycin-resistance vanD genes following exposure to ß-lactams, with a higher prevalence of the most likely gut commensal anaerobes carrying vanD. These commensal anaerobes could be the reservoir of vanD genes carried by enterococci.