Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
BJU Int ; 128(6): 667-677, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33811741

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To look at best evidence and expert opinion to provide advice in the form of a consensus statement lead by Female, Neurological and Urodynamic Urology (FNUU) section of the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) in conjunction with the British Association of Urological Nurses (BAUN). METHODS: Initially a literature search was performed with incorporation of aspects of the existing guidance and further informed by UK best practice by core members of the group. The document then underwent reviews by the FNUU Executive Committee members, the BAUN executive committee, a separate experienced urologist and presented at the BAUS annual meeting 2020 to ensure wider feedback was incorporated in the document. RESULTS: Complications of long-term indwelling catheters include catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), purple urine bag syndrome, catheter blockages, bladder spasms (causing pain and urinary leakage), loss of bladder capacity, urethral erosion ("catheter hypospadias")/dilatation of bladder outlet and chronic inflammation (metaplasia and cancer risk). CONCLUSIONS: We have provided a list of recommendations and a troubleshooting table to help with the management of the complications of long term catheters.


Asunto(s)
Obstrucción del Catéter/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/terapia , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Consenso , Humanos , Metaplasia/etiología , Necrosis/etiología , Necrosis/prevención & control , Espasmo/etiología , Irrigación Terapéutica , Factores de Tiempo , Uretra/patología , Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Enfermedades de la Vejiga Urinaria/etiología , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología
2.
Br J Nurs ; 29(18): S3, 2020 Oct 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33035096
5.
Br J Nurs ; 28(9): S3, 2019 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31070970
7.
Clin Nurse Spec ; 31(4): 210-218, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28594672

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: United Kingdom prostate cancer nursing care is provided by a variety of urology and uro-oncology nurses. The experience of working in multidisciplinary teams (MDT) was investigated in a national study. DESIGN: The study consisted of a national survey with descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a data subset from a UK whole population survey was undertaken (n = 285) of the specialist nursing workforce and the services they provide. Data were collected on the experience of working in the MDT. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of the respondents felt that they worked in a functional MDT, 12% felt that they worked in a dysfunctional MDT, and 3.5% found the MDT meeting intimidating. Furthermore, 34% of the nurses felt that they could constructively challenge all members of the MDT in meetings. Themes emerging from open-ended questions were lack of interest in nonmedical concerns by other team members, ability to constructively challenge decisions or views within the meeting, and little opportunity for patients' wishes to be expressed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite expertise and experience, nurses had a variable, often negative, experience of the MDT. It is necessary to ensure that all participants can contribute and are heard and valued. More emphasis should be given to patients' nonmedical needs.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Procesos de Grupo , Enfermeras Clínicas/psicología , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/enfermería , Reino Unido
8.
Br J Nurs ; 22(18): S23-4, S26-8, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24121770

RESUMEN

The use of technology is transforming society-underpinning communication, information gathering and collaboration. Indeed, 2013 may prove to be the tipping point for healthcare delivery. No longer are policies and guidance documents being produced solely on the basis of cautions and negatives. We are entering a new era. Documents are now being produced that are constructive, focusing equally on positives and collaboration. Digital engagement within nursing and healthcare communities can be a tremendously positive experience; with the help of online resources, we can be part of the tipping point. From micro blogging to content communities, from collaborative projects to social networking, Web2.0 technology is providing 21st-century practitioners with opportunities we have not yet fully realised the potential of-for ourselves, our patients or our institutions. In this article, I share my personal journey, aiming to show my fellow healthcare practitioners how these technologies might be used to inform and improve nursing practice, within urology and beyond.


Asunto(s)
Tecnología Biomédica , Enfermería en Nefrología , Personal de Enfermería/psicología , Humanos , Internet , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Medicina Estatal , Reino Unido , Recursos Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...