Weight loss before gastric bypass: feasibility and effect on postoperative weight loss and weight loss maintenance.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed at a tertiary care university hospital. We hypothesized that weight loss before laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is feasible, does not diminish the expected postoperative weight loss, and might enhance overall weight loss and maintenance. METHODS: A population of 351 consecutive patients, who had undergone LRYGB, was divided into 4 groups depending on the percentage of body weight loss achieved before surgery (group 1, none or gain; group 2, <5%; group 3, 5-10%; and group 4, >10%). Data were collected regarding the demographics, body mass index (BMI) change, and excess weight loss and analyzed by analysis of variance and Fisher's exact test at the alpha = 0.05 level. RESULTS: All groups were demographically similar in age and were predominantly women. The maximal follow-up was 36 months. Groups 3 and 4 had significantly greater initial excess weight and BMI (P <.05) but these became similar after the preoperative weight loss. Most patients (74%) were able to lose weight before surgery, with 36% losing >5% body weight. Preoperative weight loss did not decrease the magnitude of the expected postoperative weight loss. Patients who lost weight preoperatively demonstrated more excess weight loss and BMI change (from their initial weight) that was sustained far into the postoperative period and reached statistical significance at several points (P <.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study have demonstrated that obese patients are capable of losing weight before LRYGB and that this weight loss does not negatively affect their expected postoperative weight loss. Furthermore, preoperative weight loss combined with LRYGB might result in better long-term excess weight loss and BMI change than surgery alone.

Hospitalization for acute diverticulitis does not mandate routine elective colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that elective colectomy is often required after an episode of acute diverticulitis. HYPOTHESIS: Acute diverticulitis initially treated nonoperatively does not require elective colectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Twelve Kaiser Permanente hospitals in Southern California. PATIENTS: Three thousand one hundred sixty-five patients with acute diverticulitis. INTERVENTIONS: Colectomy or nonoperative treatment with or without percutaneous abscess drainage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recurrent diverticulitis. RESULTS: Emergency colectomy was performed in 614 patients (19.4%). Nonoperative treatment was initially used in 2551 patients (80.6%). Of these, 185 patients (7.3%) had an elective colectomy and the remaining 2366 patients (92.7%) did not. Factors associated with undergoing elective colectomy compared with nonoperative treatment were younger age of the patient, fewer comorbidities, and percutaneous abscess drainage. Mean follow-up was 8.9 years, with a maximum of 12 years. After nonoperative treatment, 314 patients (13.3%) recurred-222 patients had a single recurrence and 92 patients had a rerecurrence. After adjusting for other variables, older age (hazard ratio, >/=50 years vs <50 years = 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.87) was associated with a lower recurrence, whereas higher comorbidity was associated with higher recurrence. Gender and percutaneous abscess drainage had no influence on recurrence. All 92 rerecurrences were treated nonoperatively. The risk of a rerecurrence (29.3%) was significantly higher than a first recurrence (P<.001). Age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, and percutaneous abscess drainage did not predict rerecurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Very few patients with acute diverticulitis treated nonoperatively have recurrence. Younger age was associated with recurrence. A first recurrence was the only factor that predicted rerecurrences. The low recurrence rate argues against routine elective colectomy after successful nonoperative management of acute diverticulitis.

Adverse drug reactions during lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy for solid neoplasms.

Currently, 1 per cent isosulfan blue dye and technetium-99-labeled sulfur colloid (SC) are used in lymphatic mapping (LM). Several reports have suggested that the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) during LM is high. We report our experience with LM for solid neoplasms in order to determine the incidence and risk factors for development of ADRs. Seven hundred fifty-three patients (90% women, mean age 57) underwent LM with blue dye alone or in combination with SC from 1998 to 2004. The most common malignancy was breast cancer (83%). One hundred ten patients (14%) had injection of both mapping agents. Most patients (87%) underwent intraparenchymal injection of LM agent. Eight patients (1.1%) had an ADR during LM; none had prior exposure to LM. Of these, 7 had limited reactions (mostly blue hives) that quickly resolved. One patient (0.1%) developed anaphylaxis. The ADR incidence in patients with a sulfa allergy was not significantly different than that in patients without a sulfa allergy (3.4 vs 1%, P = 0.12). No risk factors for development of ADR were identified. Overall, the incidence of ADR during LM is low. Patients with sulfa allergies and prior exposure to LM did not demonstrate an increased incidence of ADR. Anaphylaxis, though rare, can occur during LM.

Ex vivo lymphatic mapping: a technique to improve pathologic staging in colorectal cancer.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is widely used for solid tumors and has been proposed for use in staging colorectal cancer (CRC). Few studies have examined the ex vivo lymphatic mapping (EVLM) technique for staging CRC. We hypothesized that EVLM is technically feasible, sensitive, accurate, and improves the staging of CRC. After standard resection for colorectal cancer, 1 mL of isosulfan blue dye was injected circumferentially around the tumor. Blue-stained nodes were dissected separately and examined by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical (IHC) stains. Routine pathologic evaluation was performed on all other harvested lymph nodes. Forty patients underwent 43 cancer resections with EVLM from July 2000 to December 2003. SLN were identified in 39 of 43 (91%) specimens. The mean number of SLN obtained was 1.9 (range, 0-5). Pathologic evaluation demonstrated nodal metastasis in 16 of 39 (39%) specimens. The SLN was tumor-positive in 9 of these 16 (56%) patients. The overall accuracy of EVLM was 82%. Two patients (9%) with H&E node negative disease were upstaged when found to have micrometastases by IHC staining. In conclusion, EVLM is technically possible in 90 per cent of patients with CRC. Although overall accuracy was high, the SLN status correlated poorly with the true nodal status of the CRC. However, EVLM improves pathologic staging in 9 per cent of patients and therefore may be of value in CRC.

Does reoperation predispose to postoperative wound infection in women undergoing operation for breast cancer?

Reoperations for breast cancer predispose to a higher risk of postoperative wound infections than primary procedures. We accomplished a retrospective chart review of 320 women who underwent multiple breast cancer procedures between 10/97 and 8/02. The mean number of procedures was 2.4 (range, 2-5). The overall incidence of wound infection was 6.1 per cent. Wound infections developed, on average, 12 days after surgery (range, 2-30). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of wound infection comparing the initial procedure versus the subsequent operation (1.6% vs. 9.4%, P < 0.001). This was also seen with reoperation after an operative biopsy compared to operation after a core biopsy (11.1% vs. 9.7%, P < 0.01). The incidence was increased to 22.0 per cent when the initial operation involved lymph node dissection (sentinel lymph node biopsy or complete axillary lymph node dissection). Wire localization did not increase the incidence of postoperative wound infections, and prophylactic antibiotics were associated with a decreased incidence of wound infection in the reoperative setting. The incidence of wound infection is increased with reoperation after operative biopsy compared to operation after core biopsy and is further increased when the initial biopsy involved lymph node dissection.