Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Breathe (Sheff) ; 19(4): 230156, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38351948

RESUMEN

Can you diagnose this case of a 27-year-old female who presented 1-week post-partum with an incidental finding of intrathoracic masses and probable hilar lymphadenopathy? https://bit.ly/3S3ejVK.

2.
J Med Screen ; 29(3): 172-177, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35341364

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the grade distribution of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed in Ireland, in the context of the clinical trials currently underway to determine if active surveillance is a feasible management option for low-risk DCIS. SETTING: BreastCheck is the national breast screening programme in Ireland, offering screening to women aged 50 to 69 every two years. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of data collected by BreastCheck on all screen-detected DCIS diagnosed in the 12 years of nationwide screening. Incidence and detection rates were calculated. Descriptive analysis of the cases was performed and, for comparative analysis, grade of DCIS was analysed as a binary variable (high vs. low/intermediate) in keeping with the inclusion criteria for active surveillance trials. Analysis was performed in IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 26. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2020, 2240 women were diagnosed with DCIS through BreastCheck; 876 (39.1%) were low/intermediate-grade. The overall incidence rate has remained relatively stable during this period. Women with low/intermediate-grade DCIS were younger than women with high-grade DCIS (56 (interquartile range: 56-61) years v 57 (interquartile range: 53-61) years; p < 0.001). They were also more likely to have been diagnosed at an initial screening episode compared with those who had high-grade lesions (42.5% v 29.0%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: If current clinical trials recommend active surveillance as a feasible option for DCIS, up to 40% of women with screen-detected DCIS may be eligible. These women are younger and often diagnosed on initial screening episode, so may require longer active follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante , Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/epidemiología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Tamizaje Masivo
4.
Breast J ; 19(3): 319-24, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23600490

RESUMEN

Mammographic calcification is an important radiologic feature of early breast carcinoma whose index of suspicion for malignancy may be reported by a five-tier R-category system. This study aims to describe the histologic diagnoses underlying screen-detected mammographic calcifications using both digital and screen-film mammography, and to correlate these findings with radiologic R-categories. Patients attending the Merrion Breast Screening Unit in Dublin between 2000 and 2011 were identified, who underwent needle-core biopsy for assessment of mammographic calcifications without associated mass or architectural distortion. Radiologic R-category was correlated with biopsy and excision histology reports. A total of 776 cases of calcification were identified, involving 769 individual patients. The radiologic R-categories were as follows: R3 513 (66.1%), R4 192 (24.7%), R5 71 (9.1%). The positive predictive values for malignancy were R3 32.6%, R4 69.8%, R5 95.8%. Several histologic features of DCIS were associated with R5 rather than R3 radiology: high nuclear grade, solid or cribriform architecture, necrosis, periductal inflammation or fibrosis, and associated microinvasive or invasive carcinoma. Mammographic lesions and histologic whole and invasive tumors increased in size from R3 to R5. Radiologic size of calcifications correlated with whole (but not invasive) tumor size, although it tended to underestimate it by several millimeters. Digital-detected calcifications were more likely than screen-film detected to be categorized as R3 and less likely R4 or R5, and there was no significant difference in positive predictive value between the two imaging techniques in any R-category. In conclusion, histologic features of DCIS, in particular those associated with high grade, are associated with R5 radiology. There is no significant difference in positive predictive value for malignancy in any R-category between digital and screen-film mammography.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Calcinosis/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Mamografía , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcinosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA