RESUMEN
PURPOSE: There is a lack of prospective studies evaluating the effects of body composition on postoperative complications after gastrectomy in a Western population with predominantly advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: This is a prospective side study of the LOGICA trial, a multicenter randomized trial on laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Trial patients who received preoperative chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy with an available preoperative restaging abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan were included. The CT scan was used to calculate the mass (M) and radiation attenuation (RA) of skeletal muscle (SM), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). These variables were expressed as Z-scores, depicting how many standard deviations each patient's CT value differs from the sex-specific study sample mean. Primary outcome was the association of each Z-score with the occurrence of a major postoperative complication (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3b). RESULTS: From 2015 to 2018, a total of 112 patients were included. A major postoperative complication occurred in 9 patients (8%). A high SM-M Z-score was associated with a lower risk of major postoperative complications (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.78, p = 0.004). Furthermore, high VAT-RA Z-scores and SAT-RA Z-scores were associated with a higher risk of major postoperative complications (RR 2.82, 95% CI 1.52-5.23, p = 0.001 and RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.14-3.34, p = 0.015, respectively). VAT-M, SAT-M, and SM-RA Z-scores showed no significant associations. CONCLUSION: Preoperative low skeletal muscle mass and high visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue radiation attenuation (indicating fat depleted of triglycerides) were associated with a higher risk of developing a major postoperative complication in patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas , Composición Corporal , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugíaRESUMEN
In the last 2 decades, multiple robotic camera holders have been developed to improve camera steering during laparoscopic surgery. A new image-based steering method has been developed for more intuitive camera control. In this article, the efficiency and user experience of image-based steering were compared to conventional steering methods. Four participants (two senior surgical registrars, one junior surgical registrar and a technical medicine student) were enrolled in this study. All participants performed multiple camera steering exercises with three different steering modalities in randomized order: image-based, joystick and manual camera steering. Steering of the laparoscope was evaluated by execution time and with the SMEQ and NASA-TLX questionnaires to analyze user experience. A total of 267 camera steering exercises were performed. The analyzed data showed a significantly shorter execution time for manual camera steering compared to image-based robotic steering (p = 0.001) and joystick robotic steering (p = 0.001). The participants reported the lowest user experience with joystick camera steering. The results of the questionnaires showed no significant difference in all subscales of user experience for image-based and manual camera steering. Manual camera steering resulted in significantly higher perceived physiological workload scores (M = 30.0, IQR = 27.5) compared to image-based (M = 10, IQR = 5.0) and joystick camera steering (M = 15.0, IQR = 10.0). Manual control of the laparoscope remains the fastest steering method at the expense of a high physical workload. Using image-based camera steering is a viable alternative to the current joystick control of robotic camera holders, as it improves speed and user experience. The study results suggest that optimisation of robotic camera steering with algorithms based on image analysis is a promising technology.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Humanos , Laparoscopios , Laparoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The current standard treatment for external rectal prolapse and symptomatic high-grade internal rectal prolapse is surgical correction with minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy using either laparoscopy or robotic assistance. This study examines the number of procedures needed to complete the learning curve for robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy (RVMR) and reach adequate performance. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all primary RVMR from 2011 to 2019 performed in a tertiary pelvic floor clinic by two colorectal surgeons (A and B) was performed. Both surgeons had previous experience with laparoscopic rectopexy, but no robotic experience. Skin-to-skin operating times (OT) were assessed using LC-CUSUM analyses. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed using CUSUM analyses. RESULTS: A total of 182 (surgeon A) and 91 (surgeon B) RVMRs were performed in total. There were no relevant differences in patient characteristics between the two surgeons. Median OT was 75 min (range 46-155; surgeon A) and 90 min (range 63-139; surgeon B). The learning curve regarding OT was completed after 36 procedures for surgeon A and 55 procedures for surgeon B. Both before and after completion of the learning curve, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates remained below a predefined acceptable level of performance. CONCLUSIONS: 36 to 55 procedures are required to complete the learning curve for RVMR. The implementation of robotic surgery does not inflict any additional risks on patients at the beginning of a surgeon's learning curve.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Prolapso Rectal , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Prolapso Rectal/complicaciones , Prolapso Rectal/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has high recurrence rates. Long-term anatomical and patient-reported outcomes after pelvic floor repair are therefore required. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted in a teaching hospital with tertiary referral function for patients with POP. Patients with symptomatic vaginal vault or uterine prolapse (simplified POP Quantification [sPOPQ] stage ≥2), who underwent robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) or supracervical hysterectomy with sacrocervicopexy (RSHS), were included. Follow-up visits with sPOPQ evaluations were planned 4 years after surgery. Patients received pre- and postoperative questionnaires reporting symptoms of vaginal bulge, Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7). Primary outcome was patient self-reported symptoms. Secondary outcome was anatomical cure (sPOPQ stage 1) for all vaginal compartments. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were included. Sixty-one patients (79%) were evaluated after 50 months (physical examination n = 51). Symptoms of bulge (95% vs 15% p Ë 0.0005), median UDI-6 scores (26.7 vs 22.2, p = 0.048), median PFIQ-7 scores (60.0 vs 0, p = 0.008), and median sPOPQ stages in all landmarks improved significantly from the pre- to the postoperative visit. Thirty patients (59%) were completely recurrence free and 96% of patients had no apical recurrence. Most recurrences were asymptomatic cystoceles (20%). There was one surgical re-intervention for recurrent prolapse (1.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy and RSHS show sustainable results in the treatment of prolapse. Symptoms of bulge, urinary symptoms, and quality of life improved substantially 50 months postoperatively. Patients should be counseled about the risk of anterior wall recurrence and the small chance of recurrent symptoms that need treatment.
Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Robótica , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Humanos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Sentinel lymph node harvesting is an essential step in the surgical treatment of a growing number of malignancies. Various techniques are available to facilitate this purpose. The present study reports a new laparoscopic technique for lymph node harvesting using magnetic nanoparticles containing a superparamagnetic iron-oxide core and dextran coating. This study assesses the clinical relevance of the prototype and provides input for further technological development on the way to clinical implementation. METHODS: A laparoscopic differential magnetometer prototype was built, utilizing a nonlinear detection principle (differential magnetometry) for magnetic identification of lymph nodes. The iron content sensitivity, depth & spatial sensitivity, and angular sensitivity were analyzed to investigate clinical options. RESULTS: The minimum detectable amount of iron was 9.8 µg at a distance of 1 mm. The detection depth was 5, 8, and 10 mm for samples containing 126, 252, and 504 µg iron, respectively. The maximum lateral detection distance was 5, 7, and 8 mm for samples containing 126, 252, and 504 µg iron, respectively. A sample containing 504 µg iron was detectable at all angulations assessed (0°, 30°, 60° and 90°). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic differential magnetometer demonstrates promising results for further investigation and development towards laparoscopic lymph node harvesting using magnetic nanoparticles. SIGNIFICANCE: The laparoscopic differential magnetometer facilitates a novel method for sentinel lymph node harvesting, which helps to determine prognosis and treatment of cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Nanopartículas de Magnetita , Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Magnetometría , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/diagnóstico por imagen , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/cirugía , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático CentinelaRESUMEN
AIM: With increasing follow-up of patients treated with minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) more redo surgery can be expected for recurrent rectal prolapse, mesh erosion and pelvic pain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the 90-day morbidity of robot-assisted redo interventions. METHOD: All robot-assisted redo interventions after primary transabdominal repair of rectal prolapse between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed and compared with the results for patients after primary robot-assisted VMR during the same period. The redo interventions were divided into groups based on the indication for surgery (recurrent prolapse, mesh erosion, pelvic pain). Intraoperative complications and 90-day postoperative morbidity were evaluated. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty nine patients were treated with primary VMR, with 73 for recurrent rectal prolapse, 12 for mesh erosion and 14 for pelvic pain. Complications of recurrent prolapse surgeries were comparable to those of primary VMR (p > 0.05). More intraoperative complications, minor and major complications were seen in redo surgery for erosion compared with primary VMR (23% vs. 3%, p = 0.01; 31% vs. 11%, p = 0.055; and 38% vs. 1%, p < 0.01 respectively). The frequency of intraoperative complications after redo surgery for pelvic pain was 7% with minor and major morbidity rates of 14% and 7% (p > 0.05). Half of the patients with pelvic pain experienced relief of their symptoms. CONCLUSION: Redo surgery for management of recurrent rectal prolapse is safe. Redo surgery for mesh erosion is associated with high morbidity rates. Redo surgery for pelvic pain can have major complications and is only effective in half of the cases.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Prolapso Rectal , Robótica , Humanos , Morbilidad , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Dolor Pélvico/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Prolapso Rectal/cirugía , Recto , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-term data on robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy for the treatment of multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse are scarce. With the rising prevalence of prolapse and increasing surgical repair, it is essential to evaluate long-term results. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate long-term functional and anatomic outcomes after sacrocolporectopexy. DESIGN: This is a prospective, observational cohort study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a teaching hospital with tertiary referral function for patients with gynecological/rectal prolapse. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy from 2011 to 2012 were included. INTERVENTION: Robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the anatomic cure rate after 1 and 4 years, defined as simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage 1 vaginal apical prolapse and no external rectal prolapse or internal rectal prolapse present. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for determination of recurrence-free intervals. Secondary outcomes were functional pelvic floor symptoms (symptoms of bulge, obstructed defecation, fecal incontinence, urogenital distress inventory) and quality of life (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire). RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included. After 12 and 48 months, the recurrence-free intervals based on Kaplan-Meier estimates were 100% and 90%. In total, there were 10 recurrences: 2 apical and 8 internal rectal prolapses. Symptoms of bulge (94%-12%; p < 0.0005), fecal incontinence (62%-32%; p < 0.0005), obstructed defecation (59%-24%; p = 0.008), and median Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire scores (124-5; p = 0.022) improved significantly at final follow-up. Median urogenital distress inventory scores showed improvement after 1 year (30-13; p = 0.021). LIMITATIONS: This was an observational, single-center study with selective postoperative imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Ninety percent of patients were recurrence free 48 months after robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy. Symptoms of vaginal bulge, quality of life, constipation, and fecal incontinence improved significantly. However, a subgroup of patients showed persistent bowel complaints that underlie the complexity of multicompartment prolapse. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B265. RESULTADOS ANATÓMICOS Y FUNCIONALES A LARGO PLAZO DE LA CIRUGÍA DE PISO PÉLVICO ASISTIDA POR ROBOT EN EL TRATAMIENTO DEL PROLAPSO MULTICOMPARTIMENTAL: UN ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO: Los datos a largo plazo sobre la sacrocolporectopexia asistida por robot para el tratamiento del prolapso multicompartimental de órganos pélvicos son escasos. Con el aumento de la prevalencia del prolapso y el aumento de la reparación quirúrgica, es esencial evaluar los resultados a largo plazo.Evaluar los resultados funcionales y anatómicos a largo plazo después de la sacrocolporectopexia.Estudio prospectivo observacional de cohorte.Hospital de enseñanza con función de referencia terciaria para pacientes con prolapso ginecológico/rectal.Todos los pacientes sometidos a sacrocolporectopexia asistida por robot en 2011-2012.Sacrocolporectopexia asistida por robot.El resultado primario fue la tasa de curación anatómica a uno y cuatro años, definida como etapa 1 de prolapso apical vaginal en la cuantificación del prolapso de órganos pélvicos simplificado, y sin prolapso rectal externo o prolapso rectal interno presentes. Se utilizaron curvas de Kaplan Meier para determinar los intervalos libres de recurrencia. Los resultados secundarios fueron síntomas funcionales del piso pélvico (síntomas de abultamiento, obstrucción defecatoria, incontinencia fecal, inventario de molestias urogenitales) y calidad de vida (cuestionario de impacto del piso pélvico).Se incluyeron 53 pacientes. Después de 12 y 48 meses, el intervalo libre de recurrencia basado en las estimaciones con método Kaplan Meier fue del 100% y 90%, respectivamente. En total hubo diez recurrencias: dos apicales y ocho prolapsos rectales internos. Los síntomas de abultamiento (94% a 12%; p <0.0005), incontinencia fecal (62% a 32%; p <0.0005), obstrucción defecatoria (59% a 24%; p = 0.008) y puntajes promedio del cuestionario de impacto del piso pélvico (124 a 5; p = 0.022) mejoraron significativamente en el seguimiento final. Las puntuaciones medias del inventario de molestias urogenitales mostraron una mejoría después de un año (30 a 13; p = 0.021).Estudio observacional de centro único con imagenología postoperatoria selectiva.Noventa por ciento de los pacientes estaban libres de recurrencia 48 meses después de la sacrocolporectopexia asistida por robot. Los síntomas de abultamiento vaginal, la calidad de vida, el estreñimiento y la incontinencia fecal mejoraron significativamente. Sin embargo, un subgrupo de pacientes mostró molestias intestinales persistentes que subrayan a la complejidad del prolapso multicompartimental. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B265.
Asunto(s)
Diafragma Pélvico/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Prolapso Rectal/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Prolapso Uterino/cirugía , Anciano , Defecación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Incontinencia Fecal/fisiopatología , Incontinencia Fecal/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/fisiopatología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/psicología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Distrés Psicológico , Calidad de Vida , Prolapso Rectal/complicaciones , Prolapso Rectal/fisiopatología , Prolapso Rectal/psicología , Recto/cirugía , Recurrencia , Sacro/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Prolapso Uterino/complicaciones , Prolapso Uterino/fisiopatología , Prolapso Uterino/psicología , Vagina/cirugíaRESUMEN
Transhiatal herniation of the pancreas is rare with only 17 cases reported in 25 years. Presentation of pancreatic herniation is diverse. In the majority of cases, the pancreatic herniation is found incidentally on CT-scans made for evaluating complaints related to a large or giant hiatal hernia. We present a literature review and case series of three patients with symptomatic type IV hiatal hernia with incidental, asymptomatic pancreatic herniation. All cases were managed laparoscopically with robotic assistance.
RESUMEN
Robot-assisted surgery is assumed to be time consuming partially due to extra time needed in preparing the robot. The objective of this study was to give realistic times in Da Vinci Xi draping and docking and to analyse the learning curve in the transition from the Si to the Xi in an experienced team. This prospective study was held in a hospital with a high volume of robot-assisted surgery in general surgery, urology and gynaecology. Times from the moment patients entered the operating room until the surgeon took place behind console were precisely recorded during the first 6 weeks after the implementation of the Xi. In total, 65 procedures were performed and documented. The learning curve for the process of draping and docking the robot was reached after 21 and 18 cases, respectively. Mean times after completion of the learning curve were 5 min for draping and 7 min for docking and were statistically different from mean times before completion of the learning curve (p values < 0.01). In dedicated teams netto extra time needed for preparing the Xi can even be reduced to just the time needed for docking. Thus, setting up the robot should have limited impact on overall time spent in the operation room.
Asunto(s)
Curva de Aprendizaje , Tempo Operativo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/instrumentación , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of synthetic mesh in transvaginal pelvic floor surgery has been subject to debate internationally. Although mesh erosion appears to be less associated with an abdominal approach, the long-term outcome has not been studied intensively. This study was set up to determine the long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal pelvic reconstructive surgery. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care setting. All consecutive female patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and sacrocolporectopexy in 2011 and 2012 were included. Primary outcome was mesh erosion. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation (6 weeks, 1 year, 5 years) with a clinical examination and questionnaire regarding pelvic floor symptoms was performed. Mesh-related complications were assessed using a transparent vaginal speculum, proctoscopy, and digital vaginal and rectal examination. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for mesh erosion. A review of the literature on mesh exposure after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was performed (≥12 months' follow-up). RESULTS: Ninety-six of the 130 patients included (73.8%) were clinically examined. Median follow-up time was 48.1 months (range 36.0-62.1). Three mesh erosions were diagnosed (3.1%; Kaplan-Meier 4.9%, 95% confidence interval 0-11.0): one bladder erosion for which mesh resection and an omental patch interposition were performed, and two asymptomatic vaginal erosions (at 42.7 and 42.3 months) treated with estrogen cream in one. Additionally, 22 patients responded solely by questionnaire and/or telephone; none reported mesh-related complaints. The literature, mostly based on retrospective studies, described a median mesh erosion rate of 1.9% (range 0-13.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term rate of mesh erosion following an abdominally placed synthetic graft is low.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Diafragma Pélvico/cirugía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: One of the most commonly observed injuries in cycling is fracture of the clavicle. Nevertheless, there is limited literature available on clinical outcomes after plate fixation of clavicle fractures in cyclists, rehabilitation protocols, and the time to return to sports. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome, complications, and return to athletic activity at short-term follow-up after surgical repair. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: Between January 2008 and October 2014, all professional and recreational cyclists presenting with a new clavicle fracture at the emergency department were prospectively recorded. All patients had an anteroinferior plate fixation, variable angle locking compression plate (DePuySynthes). Patients were seen at 2, 6, and 24 weeks at the outpatient clinic to gather Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Constant shoulder questionnaires and radiographs were made. Cyclists were allowed to resume outside training 1 week after surgery. RESULTS: Ten professional cyclists and 15 recreational cyclists were included. All (25/25) patients returned to cycling after plate fixation. Mean Constant scores and mean DASH scores of 96.8 ± 4.1 and 5.1 ± 5.5 at 6 weeks and 99.1 ± 1.5 and 2.9 ± 4.6 at 24 weeks were measured. There were 3 complications: 1 patient developed a nonunion, there was 1 wound infection requiring antibiotics, and in 1 patient, a refracture occurred. CONCLUSION: Plate fixation for cyclists with displaced clavicle fractures was successful in terms of fast return to previous level of athletic activity. It is a valuable and safe option for athletes in cycling.
Asunto(s)
Ciclismo/lesiones , Placas Óseas , Clavícula/lesiones , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/rehabilitación , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas no Consolidadas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Recurrencia , Volver al Deporte , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
This comment reflects the author's opinion on the outcomes of the first 100 robot-assisted Whipple procedures. Results were comparable to outcomes of open surgery in high-volume centres. The researchers state that learning curve effects are, in fact, not acceptable. They intended to avoid these effects by high-volume experience, thorough preparation, support during surgery, and the ability of robotic systems to carry out precise work in laparoscopic settings. Their results are in contrast with the results of the Leopard-2 trial in the Netherlands. In this trial, laparoscopic Whipple procedures were associated with higher mortality. Robot surgery may be helpful in complex laparoscopic procedures, but it may also support further learning by providing virtual reality training and dual console setups which allow for step-by-step learning. Future developments in big data analysis may enable benchmarking for a variety of parameters on surgical performance. This may provide additional support in avoiding learning curve effects for patients.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/normas , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Países Bajos , Realidad VirtualRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery potentially increases the physical burden to operating theater personnel and can cause physical discomfort. This study aims to evaluate if a robotic camera holder (AutoLap™ system) can improve ergonomics for the surgeon and the camera assistant during laparoscopic procedures. METHODS: A total of thirty cases were included and randomized (15 AutoLap™, 15 control). Five types of surgery were included: right hemicolectomy, fundoplication, sigmoid resection, rectopexy, and low anterior resection. The posture of the surgeon and assistant was photographed during predefined steps of the procedure. MATLAB was used to calculate angles relevant for the RULA score. The RULA score is a validated method to evaluate body posture, force and repetition of the upper extremities. Two investigators assessed the RULA score independently. Three subjective questionnaires (SMEQ, NASA TLX, and LED) were used to assess mental and physical discomfort. RESULTS: No differences in patient characteristics were observed. Sixteen fundoplications, seven right hemicolectomies, five sigmoid resections, one rectopexy, and one low anterior resection were included. The mean RULA score of the surgeon was comparable in both groups, 2.58 (AutoLap™) versus 2.72 (control). The mean RULA score of the assistant was significantly different in both groups, with 2.55 (AutoLap™) versus 3.70 (control) (p = 0.001). The inter-observer variability (ICC) was excellent with 0.93 (surgeon) and 0.97 (assistant). The questionnaires showed a significant difference in physical discomfort for the assistant. The LED and SMEQ score were significantly lower in the robotic group. The NASA TLX demonstrated a significant reduction in scores in all domains when using robotics with the exception of the mental domain. CONCLUSION: Use of the AutoLap™ system shows improvement in ergonomics and posture of the first assistant, and ergonomics of the surgeon are not affected. Furthermore, the subjective work load is significantly reduced by using a robotic camera holder. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT0339960, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT03339960?term=autolap&rank=5 .
Asunto(s)
Ergonomía , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Postura , Estudios Prospectivos , CirujanosRESUMEN
The use of the da Vinci robot in minimal invasive surgery comes with numerous advantages. Recent papers describe improvements in the ergonomic environment and benefits for the surgeon's posture in the console. Ergonomics for first assistants or scrub nurses at the OR table during robot-assisted procedures, however, have gained minor attention. The aim of this study, therefore, is to analyse the ergonomic environment specifically for first assistants during robot-assisted surgery. Three techniques were used to evaluate body posture and ergonomics during three discriminated actions. First of all, a questionnaire was conducted. Second, sagittal and dorsal photographs of all first assistants were shot. From these photographs, joint angles of the trunk, neck, shoulder, elbow, pelvic girdle and spine were calculated and rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) scores were determined. In addition, intra-observer variability was assessed to determine the robustness of the results. Lastly, the number of obstructions during the surgery was registered by an observer present at the operation theatre. The questionnaires displayed that 73% of the first assistants were in uncomfortable working positions for longer periods of time. Twenty percent of the participants even report pain or visible bruising due to hinderance of the robot arm. Furthermore, an average of 2.8 obstructions per surgical procedure was registered, mainly affecting the lower arm (60%). The photographs demonstrated that all joint angles, except for the elbow joint, are potentially harmful when assisting during robot-assisted surgery. RULA scores revealed high-risk ergonomic risk scores for all measured actions. Tissue traction was recognized as the action with the highest physical workload. During robot-assisted surgery, first assistants experience non-ergonomic trunk, neck and shoulder angles. These recordings are supported by posture analysis. Tissue traction is reported as the most intensive action by the nurses. Tacking, however, can lead to the most unfavourable RULA score. The surgeon's awareness of the position of the robot arms could reduce the number of obstructive moments for the first assistant. Lowering the number of instrument replacements is plausible to lead to better ergonomic postures for first assistant.
Asunto(s)
Ergonomía/métodos , Dolor Musculoesquelético/etiología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Postura/fisiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Comunicación , Humanos , Dolor Musculoesquelético/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/instrumentación , Cirujanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Published data regarding robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair are mainly limited to small cohorts. This study aimed to provide information on the morbidity and mortality of robot-assisted complex hiatal hernia repair and redo anti-reflux surgery in a high-volume center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients that underwent robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair, redo hiatal hernia repair, and anti-reflux surgery between 2011 and 2017 at the Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands were evaluated. Primary endpoints were 30-day morbidity and mortality. Major complications were defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb. RESULTS: Primary surgery 211 primary surgeries were performed by two surgeons. The median age was 67 (IQR 58-73) years. 84.4% of patients had a type III or IV hernia (10.9% Type I; 1.4% Type II; 45.5% Type III; 38.9% Type IV, 1.4% no herniation). In 3.3% of procedures, conversion was required. 17.1% of patients experienced complications. The incidence of major complications was 5.2%. Ten patients (4.7%) were readmitted within 30 days. Symptomatic early recurrence occurred in two patients (0.9%). The 30-day mortality was 0.9%. Redo surgery 151 redo procedures were performed by two surgeons. The median age was 60 (IQR 51-68) years. In 2.0%, the procedure was converted. The overall incidence of complications was 10.6%, while the incidence of major complications was 2.6%. Three patients (2.0%) were readmitted within 30 days. One patient (0.7%) experienced symptomatic early recurrence. No patients died in the 30-day postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable information on robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of primary or recurrent hiatal hernia and anti-reflux surgery for both patient and surgeon. Serious morbidity of 5.2% in primary surgery and 2.6% in redo surgery, in this large series with a high surgeon caseload, has to be outweighed by the gain in quality of life or relief of serious medical implications of hiatal hernia when counseling for surgical intervention.
Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Femenino , Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/etiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Hernia Hiatal/fisiopatología , Hernia Hiatal/psicología , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/mortalidad , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Recurrencia , Reoperación/métodos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish whether surgical or conservative treatment leads to a higher quality of life (QoL) in patients with recurring diverticulitis and/or ongoing complaints. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The 6 months' results of the DIRECT trial, a randomized trial comparing elective sigmoidectomy with conservative management in patients with recurring diverticulitis (>2 episodes within 2 years) and/or ongoing complaints (>3 months) after an episode of diverticulitis, demonstrated a significantly higher QoL after elective sigmoidectomy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate QoL at 5-year follow-up. METHODS: From January 2010 to June 2014, 109 patients were randomized to either elective sigmoidectomy (N = 53) or conservative management (N = 56). In the present study, the primary outcome was QoL measured by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) at 5-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were SF-36 score, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) pain score, EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) score, morbidity, mortality, perioperative complications, and long-term operative outcome. RESULTS: At 5-year follow-up, mean GIQLI score was significantly higher in the operative group [118.2 (SD 21.0)] than the conservative group [108.5 (SD 20.0)] with a mean difference of 9.7 (95% confidence interval 1.7-17.7). All secondary QoL outcome measures showed significantly better results in the operative group, with a higher SF-36 physical (P = 0.030) and mental score (P = 0.010), higher EQ5D score (P = 0.016), and a lower VAS pain score (P = 0.011). Twenty-six (46%) patients in the conservative group ultimately required surgery due to severe ongoing complaints. Of the operatively treated patients, 8 (11%) patients had anastomotic leakage and reinterventions were required in 11 (15%) patients. CONCLUSION: Consistent with the short-term results of the DIRECT trial, elective sigmoidectomy resulted in a significantly increased QoL at 5-year follow-up compared with conservative management in patients with recurring diverticulitis and/or ongoing complaints. Surgeons should counsel these patients for elective sigmoidectomy weighing superior QoL, less pain, and lower risk of new recurrences against the complication risk of surgery.
Asunto(s)
Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Tratamiento Conservador , Diverticulitis/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Diverticulitis/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the mesh exposure rate after robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic floor surgery for the treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in a large cohort. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Two large teaching hospitals with a tertiary referral function for pelvic floor disorders. PATIENTS: Patients with symptomatic POP and simplified POP quantification (S-POP) stage ≥2. Patients with a history of mesh repair or concomitant insertion of a tension-free vaginal tape were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or robot-assisted laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with a sacrocervicopexy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A blinded vaginal examination with the aid of a transparent speculum was performed to look for mesh-related complications. Mesh exposures were described following the International Urogynecological Association/International Continence Society classification system. One hundred and ninety-two patients were included, of whom 166 (86.5%) were seen for follow-up examination. The median duration of follow-up was 15.7 months (range, 8.2-44.4 months). Two vaginal mesh exposures (1.2%) were detected, both of which were treated in the outpatient clinic. One patient without any complaints had a suture exposure, which was removed in the outpatient clinic. CONCLUSION: The safety of the use of mesh in pelvic floor surgery is a matter of debate owing to the occurrence of mesh-related complications. Based on the current literature, mesh-related complications seem to be lower in transabdominal mesh surgery than in transvaginal mesh surgery. In this study, a low mesh exposure rate was observed in robot-assisted abdominal pelvic floor surgery for POP.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Diafragma Pélvico/cirugía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Histerectomía , Laparoscopía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Robótica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Most diverticulitis patients (80%) who are referred to secondary care have uncomplicated diverticulitis (UD) which is a self-limiting disease and can be treated at home. The aim of this study is to develop a diagnostic model that can safely rule out complicated diverticulitis (CD) based on clinical and laboratory parameters to reduce unnecessary referrals. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed including all patients who presented at the emergency department with CT-proven diverticulitis. Patient characteristics, clinical signs and laboratory parameters were collected. CD was defined as > Hinchey 1A. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to quantify which (combination of) variables were independently related to the presence or absence of CD. A diagnostic prediction model was developed and validated to rule out CD. RESULTS: A total of 943 patients were included of whom 172 (18%) had CD. The dataset was randomly split into a derivation and validation set. The derivation dataset contained 475 patients of whom 82 (18%) patients had CD. Age, vomiting, generalized abdominal pain, change in bowel habit, abdominal guarding, C-reactive protein and leucocytosis were univariably related to CD. The final validated diagnostic model included abdominal guarding, C-reactive protein and leucocytosis (AUC 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.84)). At a CD risk threshold of ≤7.5% this model had a negative predictive value of 96%. CONCLUSION: This proposed prediction model can safely rule out complicated diverticulitis. Clinical practitioners could cautiously use this model to aid them in the decision whether or not to subject patients to further secondary care diagnostics or treatment.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Diverticulitis/diagnóstico , Diverticulitis/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Anciano , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Países Bajos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can severely influence sexual function. Robot-assisted surgery is increasingly used to treat POP, but studies describing its effect on sexual function are limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate sexual function after robot-assisted POP surgery. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included all patients who underwent a robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) or supracervical hysterectomy with sacrocervicopexy (RSHS). Exclusion criteria were unknown preoperative sexual activity status or concomitant surgery. In sexually active women, sexual function was measured with the translated validated version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Changes in sexual activity were scored. Prolapse stages were described using the simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (S-POP) system. RESULTS: A total of 107 women were included (median follow-up 15.3 months). No difference was found in the total number of sexually active women before and after surgery [63 (58.9%) vs. 61 (63.5%), p = 0.999]. Significantly fewer women avoided sexual intercourse postoperatively compared with preoperatively. Preoperatively, sexual intercourse was avoided due to vaginal bulging (2% vs. 24%, respectively, p = 0.021). Total mean PISQ-12 scores improved significantly 1 year after prolapse correction (33.5 vs. 37.1; p = 0.004), mainly due to improved scores on the physical and behavioral-emotive domain. No significant difference in pre- and postoperative complains of dyspareunia was found. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted middle-compartment surgery improved sexual function 1 year after surgery according to enhanced physical and emotional scores. The total number of sexually active women and complains of dyspareunia before and after surgery did not differ.