Adjusting Atrial Size Parameters for Body Surface Area: Does it Affect the Association with Pulmonary Embolism-related Adverse Events?

PURPOSE: Small left atrial (LA) volume was recently reported to be one of the best predictors of acute pulmonary embolism (PE)-related adverse events (AE). There is currently no data available regarding the impact that body surface area (BSA)-indexing of atrial measurements has on the association with PE-related adverse events. Our aim is to assess the impact of indexing atrial measurements to BSA on the association between computed tomography (CT) atrial measurements and AE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study (IRB: 2015P000425). A database of hospitalized patients with acute PE diagnosed on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) between May 2007 and December 2014 was reviewed. Right and left atrial volume, largest axial area, and axial diameters were measured. Patients undergo both echocardiographies (from which the BSA was extracted) and CTPAs within 48 hours of the procedure. The patient's body weight was measured during each admission. LA measurements were correlated to AE (defined as the need for advanced therapy or PE-related mortality at 30 days) before and after indexing for BSA. The area under the ROC curve was calculated to determine the predictive value of the atrial measurements in predicting AE. RESULTS: The study included 490 acute PE patients; 62 (12.7%) had AE. There was a significant association of reduced BSA-indexed and non-indexed LA volume (both <0.001), area (<0.001 and 0.001, respectively), and short-axis diameters (both <0.001), and their respective RA/LA ratios (all <0.001) with AE. The AUC values were similar for BSA-indexed and non-indexed LA volume, diameters, and area with LA volume measurements being the best predictor of adverse outcomes (BSA-indexed AUC=0.68 and non-indexed AUC=0.66), followed by non-indexed LA short-axis diameter (indexed AUC=0.65, non-indexed AUC=0.64), and LA area (indexed AUC=0.64, non-indexed AUC=0.63). CONCLUSION: Adjusting for BSA does not substantially affect the predictive ability of atrial measurements on 30-day PE-related adverse events, and therefore, this adjustment is not necessary in clinical practice. While LA volume is the better predictor of AE, LA short-axis diameter has a similar predictive value and is more practical to perform clinically.

Highest 3-month international normalized ratio (INR): a predictor of bleeding following ultrasound-guided liver biopsy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether international normalized ratio (INR), bilirubin, and creatinine predict bleeding risk following percutaneous liver biopsy. METHODS: A total of 870 consecutive patients (age 53 ± 14 years; 53% (459/870) male) undergoing non-targeted, ultrasound-guided, percutaneous liver biopsy at a single tertiary center from 01/2016 to 12/2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression models to evaluate the relationship between individual and combined laboratory values, and post-biopsy bleeding risk. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under ROC (AUC) curves were constructed to evaluate predictive ability. RESULTS: Post-biopsy bleeding occurred in 2.0% (17/870) of patients, with 0.8% (7/870) requiring intervention. The highest INR within 3 months preceding biopsy demonstrated the best predictive ability for post-biopsy bleeding and was superior to the most recent INR (AUC = 0.79 vs 0.61, p = 0.003). Total bilirubin is an independent predictor of bleeding (AUC = 0.73) and better than the most recent INR (0.61). Multivariate regression analysis of the highest INR and total bilirubin together yielded no improvement in predictive performance compared to INR alone (0.80 vs 0.79). The MELD score calculated using the highest INR (AUC = 0.79) and most recent INR (AUC = 0.74) were similar in their predictive performance. Creatinine is a poor predictor of bleeding (AUC = 0.61). Threshold analyses demonstrate an INR of > 1.8 to have the highest predictive accuracy for bleeding. CONCLUSION: The highest INR in 3 months preceding ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy is associated with, and a better predictor for, post-procedural bleeding than the most recent INR and should be considered in patient risk stratification. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Despite correction of coagulopathic indices, the highest international normalized ratio within the 3 months preceding percutaneous liver biopsy is associated with, and a better predictor for, bleeding and should considered in clinical decision-making and determining biopsy approach. KEY POINTS: • Bleeding occurred in 2% of patients following ultrasound-guided liver biopsy, and was non-trivial in 41% of those patients who needed additional intervention and had an associated 23% 30-day mortality rate. • The highest INR within 3 months preceding biopsy (AUC = 0.79) is a better predictor of bleeding than the most recent INR (AUC = 0.61). • The MELD score is associated with post-procedural bleeding, but with variable predictive performance largely driven by its individual laboratory components.

A Multicenter Study of Needle Size and Safety for Splenic Biopsy.

Background Splenic biopsy is rarely performed because of the perceived risk of hemorrhagic complications. Purpose To evaluate the safety of large bore (≥18 gauge) image-guided splenic biopsy. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive adult patients who underwent US- or CT-guided splenic biopsy between March 2001 and March 2022 at eight academic institutions in the United States. Biopsies were performed with needles that were 18 gauge or larger, with a comparison group of biopsies with needles smaller than 18 gauge. The primary outcome was significant bleeding after the procedure, defined by the presence of bleeding at CT performed within 30 days or angiography and/or surgery performed to manage the bleeding. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test and medians were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Results A total of 239 patients (median age, 63 years; IQR, 50-71 years; 116 of 239 [48.5%] female patients) underwent splenic biopsy with an 18-gauge or smaller needle and 139 patients (median age, 58 years [IQR, 49-69 years]; 66 of 139 [47.5%] female patients) underwent biopsy with a needle larger than 18 gauge. Bleeding was detected in 20 of 239 (8.4%) patients in the 18-gauge or smaller group and 11 of 139 (7.9%) in the larger than 18-gauge group. Bleeding was treated in five of 239 (2.1%) patients in the 18-gauge or smaller group and one of 139 (1%) in the larger than 18-gauge group. No deaths related to the biopsy procedure were recorded during the study period. Patients with bleeding after biopsy had smaller lesions compared with patients without bleeding (median, 2.1 cm [IQR, 1.6-5.4 cm] vs 3.5 cm [IQR, 2-6.8 cm], respectively; P = .03). Patients with a history of lymphoma or leukemia showed a lower incidence of bleeding than patients without this history (three of 90 [3%] vs 28 of 288 [9.7%], respectively; P = .05). Conclusion Bleeding after splenic biopsy with a needle 18 gauge or larger was similar to biopsy with a needle smaller than 18 gauge and seen in 8% of procedures overall, with 2% overall requiring treatment. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Grant in this issue.

Safety profile and technical success of narrow window CT-guided percutaneous biopsy with blunt needle approach in the abdomen and pelvis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess success and safety of CT-guided procedures with narrow window access for biopsy. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-six consecutive patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic CT-guided biopsy or fiducial placement between 01/2015 and 12/2018 were included (183 women, mean age 63 ±â€¯14 years). Procedures were classified into "wide window" (width of the needle path between structures > 15 mm) and "narrow window" (≤ 15 mm) based on intraprocedural images. Clinical information, complications, technical and clinical success, and outcomes were collected. The blunt needle approach is preferred by our interventional radiology team for narrow window access. RESULTS: There were 323 (81.5%) wide window procedures and 73 (18.5%) narrow window procedures with blunt needle approach. The median depth for the narrow window group was greater (97 mm, interquartile range (IQR) 82-113 mm) compared to the wide window group (84 mm, IQR 60-106 mm); p = 0.0017. Technical success was reached in 100% (73/73) of the narrow window and 99.7% (322/323) of the wide window procedures. There was no difference in clinical success rate between the two groups (narrow: 86.4%, 57/66; wide: 89.5%, 265/296; p = 0.46). There was no difference in immediate complication rate (narrow: 1.3%, 1/73; wide: 1.2%, 4/323; p = 0.73) or delayed complication rate (narrow: 1.3%, 1/73; wide: 0.6%, 1/323; p = 0.50). CONCLUSION: Narrow window (< 15 mm) access biopsy and fiducial placement with blunt needle approach under CT guidance is safe and successful. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CT-guided biopsy and fiducial placement can be performed through narrow window access of less than 15 mm utilizing the blunt-tip technique. KEY POINTS: • A narrow window for CT-guided abdominal and pelvic biopsies and fiducial placements was considered when width of the needle path between vital structures was ≤ 15 mm. • Seventy-three biopsies and fiducial placements performed through a narrow window with blunt needle approach had a similar rate of technical and clinical success and complications compared to 323 procedures performed through a wide window approach, with traditional approach (> 15 mm). • This study confirmed the safety of the CT-guided percutaneous procedures through < 15 mm window with blunt-tip technique.

Breast Imaging Fellowship Training in the United States: A National Survey of Fellowship Program Directors.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated characterization of breast imaging fellowship programs in the United States to identify opportunities for improvement and standardization. METHODS: An anonymous survey was e-mailed to program directors of breast imaging fellowship programs listed on the Society of Breast Imaging website. The survey was open from April 23, 2021, through May 27, 2021. The survey was deemed exempt by the IRB. RESULTS: Forty-seven of 80 (59%) program directors responded, of which 36/47 (77%) represented programs dedicated 100% to breast imaging, and 11/47 (23%) represented programs dedicated 50%-75% to breast imaging. Common elements to most programs include tumor boards (47/47, 100%), journal clubs (39/47, 83%), case-based teaching sessions (35/47, 74%), didactic lectures (40/47, 85%), and participation in radiology-pathology conferences (29/47, 62%). Mammography Quality and Standards Act audit training (22/47, 47%), mammography quality control training (22/47, 47%), and formal communication training (19/47, 40%) were less common. Most programs provide exposure to wire (42/47, 89%) and wire-free localization procedures (45/47, 96%), but exposure to contrast-enhanced mammography (13/47, 28%) and molecular breast imaging (4/47, 9%) was limited. A small majority of programs (25/47, 53%) do not require weekday call; however, more (31/47, 66%) have weekend call responsibilities. Many programs (29/47, 62%) offer at least 3 weeks of elective time, which may be clinical or nonclinical. CONCLUSION: Breast imaging fellowship programs vary in curricula, modality exposure, and academic policies. The results of this survey can help guide further efforts to standardize and optimize fellowship training.

Routine radiology-pathology concordance evaluation of CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsies increases the number of cancers identified.

BACKGROUND: Routine concordance evaluation between pathology and imaging findings was introduced for CT-guided biopsies. PURPOSE: To analyze malignancy rate in concordant, discordant, and indeterminate non-malignant results of CT-guided lung biopsies. METHODS: Concordance between pathology results and imaging findings of consecutive patients undergoing CT-guided lung biopsy between 7/1/2016 and 9/30/2021 was assessed during routine meetings by procedural radiologists. Concordant was defined as pathology consistent with imaging findings; discordant was used when pathology could not explain imaging findings; indeterminate when pathology could explain imaging findings but there was concern for malignancy. Recommendations for discordant and indeterminate were provided. All the malignant results were concordant. Pathology of repeated biopsy, surgical sample, or follow-up was considered reference standard. RESULTS: Consecutive 828 CT-guided lung biopsies were performed on 795 patients (median age 70 years, IQR 61-77), 423/828 (51%) women. On pathology, 224/828 (27%) were non-malignant. Among the non-malignant, radiology-pathology concordance determined 138/224 (62%) to be concordant with imaging findings, 54/224 (24%) discordant, and 32/224 (14%) indeterminate. When compared to the reference standard, 33/54 (61%) discordant results, 6/30 (20%) indeterminate, and 3/133 (2%) concordant were malignant. The prevalence of malignancy in the three groups was significantly different (p < 0.001). Time to diagnosis was significantly different between patients who reached the diagnosis with imaging follow-up (median 114 days, IQR 69-206) compared to repeat biopsy (33 days, IQR 18-133) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Routine radiology-pathology concordance evaluation of CT-guided lung biopsy correctly identifies patients at high risk for missed diagnosis of malignancy. Repeat biopsy is the fastest method to reach diagnosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A routine radiology-pathology concordance assessment identifies patients with non-malignant CT-guided lung biopsy result who are at greater risk of missed diagnosis of malignancy. KEY POINTS: • A routine radiology-pathology concordance evaluation of CT-guided lung biopsies classified 224 non-malignant results as concordant, discordant, or indeterminate. • The percentage of malignancy on follow-up was significantly different in concordant (2%), discordant (61%), and indeterminate (20%) (p < 0.001). • Time to definitive diagnosis was significantly shorter with repeat biopsy (33 days), compared to imaging follow-up (114 days), p = 0.01.

Predicting successful ultrasound-guided biopsy of liver lesions.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors that affect successful ultrasound-guided biopsy of liver lesions and build a model predicting feasibility of US-guided liver biopsy. METHODS: This is IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant retrospective review of consecutive ultrasound-guided targeted liver biopsies performed or attempted between 1/2018 and 9/2020 at a single tertiary academic institution with a total of 501 patients included. Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Logistic regression model was built to predict feasibility of successful ultrasound-guided biopsy. RESULTS: Liver lesion biopsy was successfully performed with US guidance in 429/501 (86%) patients. Lesions not amenable for US biopsy were smaller (median size 1.6 cm vs 3.3 cm, p < 0.0001) and deeper within the liver (median depth 9.0 cm vs 5.8 cm, p < 0.0001). The technical success rate was lowest for lesions in segment II (40/53, 75%), while lesions in segment IVb (87/91, 96%) had highest success rate (p < 0.003). US targeting in patients with 1 or 2 lesions was less feasible than in patients with 3 or more lesions, 126/180 (70%) vs. 303/321 (94%), (p < 0.0001). Model including lesion size, depth, location, and number of lesions predicts feasibility of US-guided biopsy with Area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.92. CONCLUSIONS: Linear logistic regression model that includes lesion size, depth and location, and number of lesions is highly successful in predicting feasibility of ultrasound-guided biopsy for liver lesions. Smaller lesions, deeper lesions, and lesions in segment II and VIII in patients with less than 3 lesions were less feasible for ultrasound-guided biopsy of liver lesions.

Impact of imaging nurse navigation on breast interventions: Direct and closed-loop patient communication and documentation.

OBJECTIVE: A breast imaging nurse navigator (NN) was established with the goals to enhance the patient experience after biopsy, improve care timeliness, accuracy, and coordination, facilitate direct communication to patients, and increase care retention within our system. Our aim was to determine the impact of NN on patient care time metrics, communication, documentation, compliance, and care retention at our institution after breast biopsy. METHODS: Retrospective review of a six-month period before (5/1/17-10/31/17) and after (5/1/19-10/31/19) establishment of a nurse navigator in our breast imaging department was performed, including 498 patients in the pre-navigation (pre-NN) group and 526 patients in the post-navigation (post-NN) group. Data was gathered from the electronic medical record and collected using REDCap. RESULTS: Biopsy pathology results were communicated directly to the patient more often post-NN (71%, 374/526) compared to pre-NN (4%, 21/498) (p < 0.0001), without change in overall time of result communication (p = 0.08). Due to factors outside of imaging, most care time metrics were longer post-NN, including days from biopsy to pathology report (p < 0.001), result communication to initiation of care (p < 0.001), and biopsy to surgery (p < 0.001). There was no difference and high compliance (p = 1) and care retention (p = 0.015) in both groups. There was improved documentation of pathology results, recommendations, and communication post-NN (0/526 vs 10/498, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Imaging nurse navigation added greatest value by communicating breast biopsy results and recommendations directly to patients and ensuring documentation. Compliance and retention were high in both groups. Factors outside of Radiology influenced time metrics, requiring further investigation of multidisciplinary collaboration.

Quality Improvement Report: Adherence to Follow-up Recommendations for Incidental Abdominal Aneurysms.

The use of national guidelines for the management of incidental radiologic findings remains low. Therefore, improving adherence to and consistency with follow-up recommendations for incidental findings was undertaken in a large academic practice. A gap analysis was performed, and incidental findings of abdominal aneurysms for which reporting management recommendations could be improved were identified. The Kotter change management framework was used, and institution-specific dictation macros were developed and implemented in February 2021 for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), renal artery aneurysms (RAAs), and splenic artery aneurysms (SAAs). A retrospective medical record review was conducted for February through April in 2019, 2020, and 2021 to assess reporting adherence and imaging and clinical follow-up. Personal feedback was provided to radiologists in July 2021 with repeat data collection in September 2021. A significant increase in the number of correct follow-up recommendations was reported for incidental AAAs and SAAs after implementation of the macro (P < .001). However, there was no significant change for RAAs. Providing personal feedback to radiologists further improved adherence with standard recommendation macros for common findings and dramatically increased adherence for rare findings such as RAAs. New macros resulted in an increase in AAA and SAA imaging follow-up (P < .001). Institution-specific dictation macros were found to improve adherence to reporting recommendations for incidental abdominal aneurysms, with further improvement seen after feedback, which can have a significant effect on clinical follow-up. © RSNA, 2023.

Factors Affecting Adherence to Outpatient Radiology Report Recommendations.

PURPOSE: To identify factors associated with adherence to radiology follow-up recommendations by the referring physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, CT, ultrasound, and MRI reports with the keyword "recommend" and synonyms between March 11, 2019, and March 29, 2019, were included. Emergency department and inpatient examinations and routine surveillance recommendations, such as lung nodules, were excluded. Performance of follow-up examinations was correlated with the strength of recommendation, conditionality of recommendation, direct communication of results to ordering provider, and history of cancer. Outcomes included adherence to recommendations and time to follow-up. Statistical comparison between groups was performed using χ2, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman correlation. RESULTS: Qualifying recommendations were provided in 255 reports (age 60.1 ± 16.5 years, female: 151 of 255, 59.22%). Imaging follow-up was performed in 166 of 255 (65%) reports: 148 of 166 (89.15%) nonconditional versus 18 of 166 (10.48%) conditional recommendations (P = .008), and more frequently in the patients with a strong follow-up recommendation (138 of 166 [83.13%], versus 28 of 166 [16.86%]) (P = .009). The median time to follow-up was 28 days versus 82 days in patients without versus with a history of cancer (P = .00057), 28 days versus 70 days with direct communication with the provider versus without (P = .0069), 82.5 versus 21 days for reports in which a specific follow-up interval was provided (86 of 255, 33.72%) versus those without (169 of 255, 66.27%) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The adherence rate for radiological nonroutine recommendations was 65%. Reports with strongly worded and nonconditional follow-up recommendations were followed more frequently. Direct communication with providers, patients without a known cancer history, and recommendations with no specified time interval identified were followed up earlier. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Strongly worded and nonconditional follow-up recommendations increase the likelihood of follow-up being performed. Direct communication of imaging follow-up recommendations to the provider and lack of specific time intervals decreases the median time to follow-up, which in turn may decrease the delay in medical care.

Moral Distress in Radiology: Frequency, Root Causes, and Countermeasures-Results of a National Survey.

BACKGROUND. A major cause of burnout is moral distress: when one knows the right course of action but institutional constraints make the right course impossible to pursue. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency and severity with which radiologists experience moral distress and to explore moral distress's root causes and countermeasures. METHODS. This study entailed a national survey that evaluated moral distress in radiology. The survey incorporated the validated Moral Distress Scale for Health Care Professionals, along with additional questions. After the scale was modified for applicability to radiology, respondents were asked to assess 16 clinical scenarios in terms of frequency and severity of moral distress. On May 10, 2022, the survey was sent by e-mail to 425 members of radiology practices included on a national radiology society's quality-and-safety LISTSERV. The Measure of Moral Distress for Health Care Professionals (MMD-HP) score was calculated for each respondent as a summary measure of distress across scenarios (maximum possible score, 256). RESULTS. After 12 surveys with incomplete data were excluded, the final analysis included 93 of 425 respondents (22%). A total of 91 of 93 respondents (98%) experienced at least some moral distress for at least one scenario. A total of 17 of 93 respondents (18%) had left a clinical position due to moral distress; 26 of 93 (28%) had considered leaving a clinical position due to moral distress but did not leave. The mean MMD-HP score was 73 ± 51 (SD) for those who had left, 89 ± 47 for those who had considered leaving but did not leave, and 39 ± 35 for those who had never considered leaving (p < .001). A total of 41 of 85 respondents (48%) thought that the COVID-19 pandemic had influenced their moral distress level. Across respondents, the three scenarios with highest moral distress were related to systemic causes (higher case volume than could be read safely, high case volume preventing teaching residents, and lack of administrative action or support). The countermeasure most commonly selected to alleviate moral distress was educating leadership about sources of moral distress (71%). CONCLUSION. Moral distress is prevalent in radiology, typically relates to systemic causes, and is a reported contributor to radiologists changing jobs. CLINICAL IMPACT. Urgent action by radiology practice leadership is required to address moral distress, as radiologists commonly practice in environments contradictory to their core values as physicians.

Unexplained Acute Distal Pancreatitis: Association With Subsequent Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND. Distal pancreatitis is an atypical imaging subtype of acute pancreatitis involving only the pancreatic body and tail, the head being spared. If no cause is identified, suspicion of a small imaging-occult cancer may be warranted. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of subsequently diagnosed pancreatic cancer in patients with unexplained acute distal pancreatitis and to compare this frequency to that found in patients with unexplained nondistal pancreatitis. METHODS. This retrospective study included patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, that showed acute pancreatitis without identifiable explanation. Studies were classified as showing distal or nondistal acute pancreatitis on the basis of consensus. The Fisher exact test was used to compare the frequency of subsequent histologic diagnosis of pancreatic cancer between groups. Negative classification required 6 or more months of imaging follow-up and/or 12 or more months of clinical follow-up. Interreader agreement among seven readers of varying experience was assessed by Fleiss kappa. RESULTS. Among 215 patients with acute pancreatitis, 116 (54%) had no identifiable explanation and formed the study sample. A total of 100 of 116 (86%) patients (59 men, 41 women; mean age, 57 ± 18 [SD] years) had nondistal acute pancreatitis; 16 of 116 (14%) patients (10 men, six women; mean age, 66 ± 14 years) had distal acute pancreatitis. Among patients with nondistal pancreatitis, none were subsequently diagnosed with pancreatic cancer; 62 had sufficient follow-up (median, 2.5 years) to be classified as having negative follow-up for pancreatic cancer. Among patients with distal pancreatitis, nine were subsequently diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (median interval to suspected cancer on subsequent CT, 174 days); five had sufficient follow-up (median, 3.1 years) to be classified as having negative follow-up for pancreatic cancer. The frequency of pancreatic cancer was higher (p < .001) in patients with distal pancreatitis (9/14 [64%; 95% CI, 35-87%]) than in with those with nondistal pancreatitis (0/62 [0%; 95% CI, 0-6%]). Interreader agreement on classification of distal versus nondistal pancreatitis was almost perfect (κ = 0.81). CONCLUSION. Distal pancreatitis without identifiable cause on CT is an uncommon but unique imaging subtype of acute pancreatitis that is associated with a high frequency of pancreatic cancer. CLINICAL IMPACT. In patients with acute distal pancreatitis without identifiable cause, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy should be considered to evaluate for an underlying small cancer.

Management of Mammographic Architectural Distortion Based on Contrast-enhanced MRI and US Correlation.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate outcomes of mammographic architectural distortion (AD) with and without MRI and US correlates. METHODS: A retrospective review of unexplained mammographic AD with subsequent MRI from January 1, 2007 to September 30, 2017 was performed using a reader-based study design. Mammographic, MRI, and US features and outcomes were documented. Truth was based on biopsy results or minimum two-year imaging follow-up. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-six cases of AD were included: 29 (51.8%) detected on 2D mammogram and 27 (48.2%) detected on digital breast tomosynthesis. Of 35.7% (20/56) with MRI correlate, 40.0% (8/20) were enhancing masses, 55.0% (11/20) were non-mass enhancement (NME), and 5.0% (1/20) were nonenhancing AD. Of eight enhancing masses, 75.0% (6/8) were invasive cancers, and 25.0% (2/8) were high-risk lesions. Of 11 NME, 18.2% (2/11) were ductal carcinoma in situ, 36.4% (4/11) were high-risk lesions, and 45.4% (5/11) were benign. Of 64.3% (36/56) without MRI correlate, 94.4% (34/36) were benign by pathology or follow-up, one (2.8%, 1/36) was a 4-mm focus of invasive cancer with US correlate, and one (1/36, 2.8%) was a high-risk lesion. Of cases without MRI and US correlates, one (3.0%, 1/33) was a high-risk lesion and 97.0% (32/33) were benign. The negative predictive value of mammographic AD without MRI correlate was 97.2% (35/36) and without both MRI and US correlates was 100.0% (33/33). CONCLUSION: Mammographic AD without MRI or US correlate was not cancer in our small cohort and follow-up could be considered, reducing interventions.

Yield of pelvic CT in emergency department patients undergoing CT torso for generalized or multiple complaints.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of pelvic computed tomography (CT) in emergency department (ED) patients undergoing chest CT angiogram (CTA) for chest pain or suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) followed by abdominopelvic CT in the same session for additional multisystem or generalized complaints. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive adult ED patients from January 2017 to December 2019 who underwent CTA for suspected PE followed by portovenous abdominopelvic CT for multisystem or generalized complaints. Patient demographics, vitals, laboratory values, exam indication, malignancy history, and recent surgery/intervention were recorded. CT reports were reviewed for acute chest, abdomen, and/or pelvic pathology. RESULTS: There were 400 patients with 243 (61%) women and mean age of 59.8 years. Acute pelvic findings were seen in 11% (45/400). In 53% (24/45) of these, pelvic pathology could be diagnosed based on the abdominal portion of the CT. Five percent (21/400) of patients demonstrated isolated acute pelvic findings with 86% of these (18/21) clinically suspected prior to imaging. Acute pelvic pathology was associated with female gender (p = 0.015) and elevated white blood cell count (WBC) (p = 0.03). Specific pelvic CT indications and female gender were significantly associated with (p = 0.02 each) and independent predictors of isolated acute pelvic pathology. CONCLUSION: In ED patients undergoing chest CTA for chest pain or suspected PE combined with abdominopelvic CT, the presence of acute pelvic-related pathology not visualized on abdominal CT is low. For this ED patient cohort, pelvic CT may not be necessary in men with normal WBC and a low pre-imaging clinical suspicion for acute pelvic pathology.

Enhancement Type at Contrast-enhanced Mammography and Association with Malignancy.

Background Despite the increasing use of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), there are limited data on the evaluation of findings on recombined images and the association with malignancy. Purpose To determine the rates of malignancy of enhancement findings on CEM images in the presence or absence of low-energy findings using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon developed for mammography and MRI. Materials and Methods All diagnostic CEM examinations performed at one academic institution between December 2015 and December 2019 had low-energy and recombined images retrospectively. Data were independently reviewed by three breast imaging radiologists with 5-25 years of experience using the BI-RADS mammography and MRI lexicon. Outcome was determined with pathologic analysis or 1-year imaging or clinical follow-up. The χ2 and Fisher exact tests were used for analysis. Results A total of 371 diagnostic CEM studies were performed in 371 women (mean age, 54 years ± 11[SD]). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value of enhancement on CEM images was 95% (104 of 109 [95% CI: 90, 98]), 67% (176 of 262 [95% CI: 61, 73]), 55% (104 of 190 [95% CI: 47, 62]), and 97% (176 of 181 [95% CI: 94, 99]), respectively. Among 190 CEM studies with enhancing findings, enhancing lesions were more likely to be malignant when associated with low-energy findings (26% vs 59%, P < .001). Among enhancement types, mass enhancement composed 71% (99 of 140) of all malignancies with PPV of 63% when associated with low-energy findings. Foci, non-mass enhancement, and mass enhancement without low-energy findings had PPV of 6%, 24%, and 38%, respectively. Neither background parenchymal enhancement nor density was associated with enhancement type (P = .19 and P = .28, respectively). Conclusion Mass enhancement on recombined images using CEM was most commonly associated with malignancy, especially when associated with low-energy findings. Enhancement types were more likely to be benign when not associated with low-energy findings; however, they should still be viewed with suspicion, given the high association with malignancy. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In response to COVID-19, our institution implemented three virtual readout systems: a commercial HIPAA compliant web-based video conferencing platform used for screen-sharing (Starleaf), an interactive control sharing system integrated into PACS allowing simultaneous multi-user mouse control over images (Collaborate), and the telephone. Our aim was to assess overall satisfaction with and perceived effectiveness of these virtual readout methods to optimize best practices for the future. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-exempt survey was electronically distributed to 64 trainees and 76 attendings at one tertiary-care institution via Survey Monkey. Questions focused on overall satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, technical difficulties, and continued future use of the three virtual readout strategies. Answers were collected with Likert scales, tick boxes, and open-ended questions. RESULTS: 32/64 trainees (50%) and 32/76 attendings (42%) completed the survey. Trainees and attendings were more satisfied with screen sharing (Starleaf) and perceived it more effective than control sharing (Collaborate) or the telephone (p < 0.0001). Respondents experienced more technical difficulties with control sharing versus screen sharing (p = 0.0004) with a negative correlation between level of technical difficulties and satisfaction with screen sharing (r = -0.50, p < 0.0001) and control sharing (r = -0.38, p = 0.0006). Trainees and faculty supported a combination of in-person and virtual readouts in the future (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Platforms mirroring in-person readouts, such as Starleaf, are preferred by both trainees and attendings over non-screen sharing platforms such as the telephone. However, technical stability determines satisfaction between similar platforms. Both trainees and attendings support incorporation of virtual readout methods in combination with traditional in-person readouts in the post-COVID-19 era.

Paraspinal soft tissue edema ratio: An accurate marker for early lumbar spine spondylodiscitis on an unenhanced MRI.

PURPOSE: MRI is currently the gold standard imaging modality in the diagnosis of lumbar spine discitis/osteomyelitis. However, even with supportive clinical and laboratory data, the accuracy of MRI remains limited by several degenerative and inflammatory mimics, such that it continues to represent a challenge for radiologists. This study reports a new quantitative imaging marker of lumbar paraspinal soft tissue edema which shows significant accuracy for spondylodiscitis. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with equivocal MRI findings of lumbar discitis/osteomyelitis vs endplate degenerative changes were reviewed over a 24-month period. Patients with a history of surgery, fractures/recent trauma, signs of advanced infection such as abscesses, phlegmon or severe osseous destruction were excluded. Two ABR board certified neuroradiologists who were blinded to the final diagnosis evaluated a new marker; the superior-inferior paraspinal edema ratio (SI-PER). The SI-PER was obtained by measuring the superior-inferior extent of increased signal/edema in the paraspinal soft tissues on the paraspinal inversion recovery images divided by the vertebral body height measured at midpoint. Cases positive for spondylodiscitis were those confirmed by biopsy, aspiration/drainage, surgery, or clinical improvement following antibiotic treatment. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of SI-PER were determined by Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: In 23/35 (66%) patients, the diagnosis of discitis/osteomyelitis was confirmed. The SI-PER showed a significant association with a positive MRI diagnosis (p = 0.001). Inter-observer correlation for SI-PER was 0.92. ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.84. A SI-PER of 2.5 was 96% sensitive and 75% specific for the diagnosis of discitis/osteomyelitis, with a PPV of 88% and a NPV of 90%. CONCLUSION: In this study, the superior inferior paraspinal edema ratio (SI-PER), a newly defined MRI marker, was found to have high sensitivity for differentiating spondylodiscitis from endplate degenerative changes on lumbar spine MRI.

Incidence of pancreatic cancer during long-term follow-up in patients with incidental pancreatic cysts smaller than 2 cm.

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term malignancy risk of incidental small pancreatic cysts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved, retrospective, multi-institutional study, the long-term incidence of pancreatic cancer was compared between patients with and without small pancreatic cysts. Patients with incidental pancreatic cysts ≥ 0.5 and < 2.0 cm in maximal diameter, detected on MRI performed between 1999 and 2011, represented the "small pancreatic cyst" group. Patients that underwent MRI between 2005 and 2011 and had no reported pancreatic cysts represented the comparison "no cyst" group. RESULTS: The "small pancreatic cyst" group included 267 patients, ages 63.4 ± 11.8 years, 166/267 (62%) women with a mean follow-up of 8.6 ± 4.3 years, median 9.2 years; the "no cyst" group included 1,459 patients, ages 64.6 ± 12 years, 794/1,459 (54%) women with a mean follow-up of 7.0 ± 4.2 years, median 7.8 (p values 0.12, 0.02, < 0.001, respectively). Two/267 (0.7%) patients developed pancreatic cancer at a separate location from the known cyst in the "small pancreatic cyst" group, with a cancer rate of 0.9 (95% CI 0.1-3.1) cases per 1,000 patient-years. In the "no cyst" cohort, 18/1,459 (1.2%) patients developed pancreatic cancer, with a cancer rate of 1.8 (95% CI 1.2-3.1) cases per 1,000 patient-years (p = 0.6). The all-cause mortality was similar in both groups: 57/267 (21%) vs. 384/1,459 (26%) (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: The long-term risk of pancreatic malignancy in asymptomatic patients with incidental pancreatic cysts less than 2 cm is 0.9 cases per 1,000 patient-years of follow-up, similar to those without pancreatic cysts. These very few pancreatic cancers developed at a separate location from the known cyst. KEY POINTS: • After a median of 9.2 years of follow-up, the risk of pancreatic malignancy in patients with an asymptomatic small pancreatic cyst was 0.9 cases per 1,000 patient-years of follow-up, similar to those without pancreatic cysts. • Very few pancreatic cancer cases developed in the location separate from the known pancreatic cyst.

Patient preferences regarding use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer screening.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Our purpose is to understand patient preferences towards contrast-enhanced imaging such as CEM or MRI for breast cancer screening. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous survey was offered to all patients having screening mammography at a single academic institution from December 27 th 2019 to March 6 th 2020. Survey questions related to: (1) patients' background experiences (2) patients' concern for aspects of MRI and CEM measured using a 5-point Likert scale, and (3) financial considerations. RESULTS: 75% (1011/1349) patients completed the survey. 53.0% reported dense breasts and of those, 47.6% had additional screening. 49.6% had experienced a callback, 29.0% had a benign biopsy, and 13.7% had prior CEM/MRI. 34.7% were satisfied with mammography for screening. A majority were neutral or not concerned with radiation exposure, contrast allergy, IV line placement, claustrophobia, and false positive exams. 54.7% were willing to pay at least $250-500 for screening MRI. Those reporting dense breasts were less satisfied with mammography for screening (p<0.001) and willing to pay more for MRI (p<0.001). If patients had prior CEM/MRI, there was less concern for an allergic reaction (p<0.001), IV placement (p=0.025), and claustrophobia (p=0.006). There was less concern for false positives if they had a prior benign biopsy (p=0.029) or prior CEM/MRI (p=0.005) and less concern for IV placement if they had dense breasts (p=0.007) or a previous callback (p=0.013). CONCLUSION: The screening population may accept CEM or MRI as a screening exam despite its risks and cost, especially patients with dense breasts and patients who have had prior CEM/MRI.

Upgrade Rates of Pure, Radiology-Pathology Concordant Lobular Neoplasia Diagnosed on Breast Core Needle Biopsy: Is Surgical Excision Warranted?

OBJECTIVE: To determine upgrade rates of lobular neoplasia (LN) to malignancy and evaluate factors that may predict upgrade. METHODS: From 5/1/2003 to 12/30/2015, breast lesions diagnosed as LN (atypical lobular hyperplasia [ALH] or classic lobular carcinoma in-situ [LCIS]) on core biopsy that underwent surgical excision or at least 2 years imaging follow-up were identified. A subspecialty trained breast radiologist and pathologist reviewed imaging and pathology slides to confirm diagnosis and to determine if LN represented the target lesion, part of the target lesion, or an incidental finding. Imaging features, original BI-RADS final assessment category, biopsy method, biopsy device and final pathologic diagnosis were documented. Cases with both ALH and LCIS were classified as LCIS for analysis. Reason for biopsy of BI-RADS 2-3 was patient or referring physician preference. Upgrade rates to malignancy were determined for all cases. RESULTS: In this study 73.7% (115/156) lesions were ALH and 26.3% (41/156) were LCIS+/-ALH. Surgical excision and imaging follow-up were performed in 71.2% (111/156) and 28.8% (45/156), respectively. Upgrade rates for ALH and LCIS were 0.0% (0/115) and 7.3% (3/41), respectively. Cancer developed at a site separate from core biopsy in 1.7% (2/115) ALH and 7.3% (3/41) LCIS cases. We found no association of upgrade rate with biopsy type, BI-RADS or target/part of target lesion versus incidental. CONCLUSION: Our study supports consideration of excision for LCIS, given 7.3% upgrade rate. Conversely, imaging surveillance might be appropriate following diagnosis of ALH alone.