A non-invasive approach to measuring body dimensions of wildlife with camera traps: A felid field trial.

Dimensions of body size are an important measurement in animal ecology, although they can be difficult to obtain due to the effort and cost associated with the invasive nature of these measurements. We avoid these limitations by using camera trap images to derive dimensions of animal size. To obtain measurements of object dimensions using this method, the size of the object in pixels, the focal length of the camera, and the distance to that object must be known. We describe a novel approach of obtaining the distance to the object through the creation of a portable distance marker, which, when photographed, creates a "reference image" to determine the position of the animal within an image. This method allows for the retrospective analysis of existing datasets and eliminates the need for permanent in-field distance markers. We tested the accuracy of this methodology under controlled conditions with objects of known size resembling Felis catus, our study species, validating the legitimacy of our method of size estimation. We then apply our method to measure feral cat body size using images collected in Tasmania, Australia. The precision of our methodology was evaluated by comparing size estimates across individual cats, revealing consistent and reliable results. The average height (front paw to shoulder) of the feral cats sampled was 25.25 cm (CI = 24.4, 26.1) and the average length (base of tail to nose) was 47.48 cm (CI = 46.0, 48.9), suggesting wild feral cats in our study area are no larger than their domestic counterparts. Given the success of its application within our study, we call for further trails with this method across a variety of species.

Putative extinction of two sawfish species in Mexico and the United States

All species of sawfish are listed by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as endangered or critically endangered. In fact, the smalltooth sawfish Pristis pectinata, and the largetooth sawfish Pristis pristis, have been declared to be regionally and locally extinct from the US Atlantic coast and the Gulf of California, Mexico, respectively, likely due to overfishing. However, here we dispute these claims by illustrating how lack of existence of a given species within a region can be misconstrued as evidence for extinction.(AU)

Todas as espécies de peixe-serra são qualificadas pela União Internacional para a Conservação da Natureza como ameaçadas ou criticamente ameaçadas de extinção. De fato, o peixe-serra-de-dentes-pequenos, Pristis pectinata, bem como o peixe-serrade-dentes-grandes, Pristis pristis, têm sido declarados como regionalmente e localmente extintos da costa atlântica dos EUA e do Golfo da Califórnia e México, respectivamente, provavelmente devido ao excesso da pesca. No entanto, aqui pretendemos questionar estas extinções ilustrando como a falta de evidências da existência de uma espécie em uma região pode ser mal interpretada como evidência de extinção.(AU)

Extinciones en el mar: mitos y realidades / Extinctions in the sea: myths and realities

No hay duda de que el hombre ha provocado cantidad de extinciones, sobre todo en el medio terrestre. En el mar, en cambio, comprobar más allá de la duda razonable que el último representante de una especie ha desaparecido de la faz de la tierra es una tarea más difícil. En el presente trabajo se muestran los resultados más importantes de una rigurosa revisión de las extinciones marinas documentadas durante los últimos 200 años. Se encontró que ~50 por ciento de las extinciones y extirpaciones de especies marinas resultan dudosas porque no se considera información crítica acerca de su distribución espacio-temporal, o bien la evidencia que se utiliza para evaluarlas es insuficiente o inadecuada. Se concluye que 1) el hombre es capaz de eliminar especies marinas, en particular aquellas que naturalmente son más propensas a la extinción; 2) las extinciones registradas en el mar son menos frecuentes que las del medio terrestre, y a pesar de que existe una tendencia positiva en el número promedio de extinciones documentadas durante los siglos XIX y XX, la tendencia de las extinciones registradas es negativa en los últimos 100 años; 3) antes de declarar una especie como extinta, la evidencia que apoya tal declaración debe ser evaluada con todo el rigor científico; y 4) declarar de manera prematura la extinción de especies, pudiera afectar negativamente los propios esfuerzos que se inviertan para la conservación.