Metal-on-metal (MoM) hip implants and pregnancy: are MoM implants good for mom?-a systematic review.

Metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing surfaces were historically used for young patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), and remain commonplace in modern hip resurfacing. A substantial number of female patients with MoM bearings subsequently gave birth following implantation of the bearings before a full understanding of metal ions exposure in these patients was established. In theory, it has been postulated that metal ions released from such implants may cross the placental barrier and cause harm to the fetus. In light of this potential risk, recommendations against the use of MoM components in women of child-bearing age have been advocated. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate: (I) the MoM bearing types and ion levels found; (II) the concentrations of metals in maternal circulation and the umbilical cord; and (III) the presence of abnormalities in the fetus or delivered child. A comprehensive literature review was conducted of studies published between January 1st, 1975 and April 1st, 2019 using specific keywords. We defined the inclusion criteria for qualifying studies for this review as follows: (I) studies that reported on the women who experienced pregnancy and who had a MoM hip implant; (II) studies that reported on maternal metal ions blood and umbilical cord levels; and (III) studies that reported on the occurrence of fetal complications. Data on cobalt and chromium ion levels in the maternal blood and umbilical cord blood, as well as the presence of adverse effects in the infant were collected. Age at parturition and time from MoM implant to parturition were also collected. A total of six studies were included in the final analysis that reported on a total of 21 females and 21 infants born. The mean age at parturition was 31 years (range, 24 to 41 years), and the mean time from MoM implantation to parturition was 47 months (range, 11 to 119 months). Maternal blood cobalt levels were found as a weighted average of 34.09 µg/L (0.425 to 138 µg/L), while umbilical cord blood cobalt levels were found to be 22.61 µg/L (0.52 to 51.11 µg/L). Cobalt levels were reduced by an average of 34% between maternal and umbilical cord blood. Maternal cord blood chromium levels were found as a weighted average of 18.18 µg/L (0.225 to 75 µg/L), while umbilical cord chromium levels were found to be 3.96 µg/L (0.14 to 11.96 µg/L). Chromium levels were reduced by an average of 78% between maternal and umbilical cord blood. No cobalt or chromium was detected in the umbilical cord blood of three patients. Out of the 21 infants born to women with MoM implants, 20 were born healthy with no adverse effects or complications. Only one complication was recorded in single infant that did not appear to be related to the maternal MoM implant. To date, there is a lack of consensus as to whether MoM hip arthroplasty implants are to be avoided in the child-bearing female population and whether they constitute a hazard to the fetus in utero. Both chromium and cobalt ions were markedly reduced in levels when transitioning from maternal to cord blood. In particular, chromium showed a greater reduction on average than cobalt (78% vs. 34%). Based on the current evidence, there appears to be no correlation between the presence of metal ions in umbilical cord blood and complications, as none of the infants experienced abnormalities uniquely attributable to the presence of metal ions.

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty as an alternative to total hip arthroplasty in patients aged under 40 years.

Aims: The aims of the study were to report for a cohort aged younger than 40 years: 1) indications for HRA; 2) patient-reported outcomes in terms of the modified Harris Hip Score (HHS); 3) dislocation rate; and 4) revision rate. Methods: This retrospective analysis identified 267 hips from 224 patients who underwent an hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) from a single fellowship-trained surgeon using the direct lateral approach between 2007 and 2019. Inclusion criteria was minimum two-year follow-up, and age younger than 40 years. Patients were followed using a prospectively maintained institutional database. Results: A total of 217 hips (81%) were included for follow-up analysis at a mean of 3.8 years. Of the 23 females who underwent HRA, none were revised, and the median head size was 46 mm (compared to 50 mm for males). The most common indication for HRA was femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (n = 133), and avascular necrosis ( (n = 53). Mean postoperative HHS was 100 at two and five years. No dislocations occurred. A total of four hips (1.8%) required reoperation for resection of heterotopic ossification, removal of components for infection, and subsidence with loosening. The overall revision rate was 0.9%. Conclusion: For younger patients with higher functional expectations and increased lifetime risk for revision, HRA is an excellent bone preserving intervention carrying low complication rates, revision rates, and excellent patient outcomes without lifetime restrictions allowing these patients to return to activity and sport. Thus, in younger male patients with end-stage hip disease and higher demands, referral to a high-volume HRA surgeon should be considered.

Do patient-reported outcome measures improve after aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) changes in: (1) pain, function and global health; and (2) predictors of PROMs in patients undergoing aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) using a multilevel model with patients nested within surgeon. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 216 patients with baseline and 1-year PROMs who underwent aseptic rTHA between January 2016 and December 2017 were analysed. The most common indication for rTHA was aseptic loosening, instability, and implant failure. The PROMs included in this study were HOOS Pain and HOOS Physical Function Short-form (PS), Veterans RAND-12 Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (MCS). Multivariable linear regression models were constructed for predicting 1-year PROMs. RESULTS: Mean 1-year PROMs improvement for aseptic revisions were 30.4 points for HOOS Pain and 22.1 points for HOOS PS. Predictors of better pain relief were patients with higher baseline pain scores. Predictors of better 1-year function were patients with higher baseline function and patients with a posterolateral hip surgical approach during revision. Although VR-12 PCS scores had an overall improvement, nearly 50% of patients saw no improvement or had worse physical component scores. Only 30.7% of patients reported improvements in VR-12 MCS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients undergoing aseptic rTHA improved in pain and function PROMs at 1 year. Although global health assessment improved overall, nearly half of aseptic rTHA patients reported no change in physical/mental health status. The associations highlighted in this study can help guide the shared decision-making process by setting expectations before aseptic revision THA.

Hip Resurfacing: A Single Surgeon U.S. Series With Minimum Ten-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is an alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to determine implant survivorship, analyze patient-reported outcomes measures and to determine patient satisfaction for patients who underwent metal-on-metal hip resurfacing at a large US academic institution by a single surgeon with a minimum of 10-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients who underwent hip resurfacing from September 2006 through November 2009 were included. Patient demographics and variables were collected from a prospectively maintained institutional database and patients completed an additional questionnaire with patient-reported outcomes measures. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients (389 hips) out of 371 (433 hips) with a minimum 10-year follow-up were successfully contacted (94.3% follow-up). Mean age was 53 years, 258 were male (73%). 377 out of 389 hips (96.9%) did not require additional surgery. Gender was significantly related to implant survivorship (males 99.0%, females 90.9%; P < .001). 330 patients (369 hips, 94.8%) were satisfied with their surgery. Males had higher proportion of satisfaction scores (P = .02) and higher modified Harris Hip Score (odds ratio = 2.63 (1.39, 4.98), P = .003). Median modified Harris Hip Score score for non-revised hips was 84.0 [80.0; 86.0] versus those requiring revision, 81.5 [74.0; 83.0], (P = .009). CONCLUSION: At a minimum 10-year follow-up, hip resurfacing, using an implant with a good track record, demonstrates 99.0% survivorship in male patients with an average age of 52 years. We believe that the continued use of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty in this population is justified by both positive patient reported outcomes and survivorship.

No clinically meaningful difference in 1-year patient-reported outcomes among major approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Debate continues around the most effective surgical approach for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study's purpose was to compare 1-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of patients who underwent direct anterior (DA), transgluteal anterolateral (AL)/direct lateral (DL), and posterolateral (PL) approaches. METHODS: A prospective consecutive series of primary THA for osteoarthritis (n = 2390) were performed at 5 sites within a single institution with standardised care pathways (20 surgeons). Patients were categorised by approach: DA (n = 913; 38%), AL/DL (n = 505; 21%), or PL (n = 972; 41%). Primary outcomes were pain, function, and activity assessed by 1-year postoperative PROMs. Multivariable regression modeling was used to control for differences among the groups. Wald tests were performed to test the significance of select patient factors and simultaneous 95% confidence intervals were constructed. RESULTS: At 1-year postoperative, PROMs were successfully collected from 1842 (77.1%) patients. Approach was a statistically significant factor for 1-year HOOS pain (p = 0.002). Approach was not a significant factor for 1-year HOOS-PS (p = 0.16) or 1-year UCLA activity (p = 0.382). Pairwise comparisons showed no significant difference in 1-year HOOS pain scores between DA and PL approach (p > 0.05). AL/DL approach had lower (worse) pain scores than DA or PL approaches with differences in adjusted median score of 3.47 and 2.43, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving the AL/DL approach had a small statistical difference in pain scores at 1 year, but no clinically meaningful differences in pain, activity, or function exist at 1-year postoperative.

The Potential Effects of Imposing a Body Mass Index Threshold on Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Operative eligibility thresholds based on body mass index (BMI) alone may risk restricting access to improved pain control, function, and quality of life. This study evaluated the use of BMI-cutoffs to offering TKA in avoiding: 1) 90-day readmission, 2) one-year mortality, and 3) failure to achieve clinically important one-year PROMS improvement (MCID). METHODS: A total of 4126 primary elective unilateral TKA patients from 2015 to 2018 were prospectively collected. For specific BMI(kg/m2) cutoffs: 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50, the positive predictive value (PPV) for 90-day readmission, one-year mortality, and failure to achieve one-year MCID were calculated. The number of patients denied complication-free postoperative courses per averted adverse outcome/failed improvement was estimated. RESULTS: Rates of 90-day readmission and one-year mortality were similar across BMI categories (P > .05, each). PPVs for preventing 90-day readmission and one-year mortality were low across all models of BMI cutoffs. The highest PPV for 90-day readmission and one-year mortality was detected at cutoffs of 45 (6.4%) and 40 (0.87%), respectively. BMI cutoff of 40 would deny 18 patients 90-day readmission-free, and 194 patients one-year mortality-free postoperative courses for each averted 90-day readmission/one-year mortality. Such cutoff would also deny 11 patients an MCID per avoided failure. Implementing BMI thresholds alone did not influence the rate of improvements in KOOS-PS, KRQOL, or VR-12. CONCLUSION: Utilizing BMI cutoffs as the sole determinants of TKA ineligibility may deny patients complication-free postoperative courses and clinically important improvements. Shared decision-making supported by predictive tools may aid in balancing the potential benefit TKA offers to obese patients with the potentially increased complication risk and cost of care provision.

How Are We Measuring Cost-Effectiveness in Total Joint Arthroplasty Studies? Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: As volumes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continue to rise, it is important to understand their economic impact. No systematic review on cost-effectiveness of THA/TKA has been performed since 2016 despite recent changes in the healthcare environment. The purpose of the study is to provide a contemporary analysis of the cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty and the use of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). METHODS: A systematic review was performed from 2005 to 2020. Online databases (OVID Medline, PubMed, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, Google Scholar, Elton B. Stephens Co) were queried to identify economic analyses that evaluated the cost-effectiveness of THA/TKA. RESULTS: In total, 38 studies met the screening criteria. Study designs were primarily Markov models (68%), cohort studies (16%), and randomized trials (8%). Most studies adopted either a societal perspective (45%) or a health system perspective (39%). Analysis revealed that THA/TKA was strongly cost-effective compared to nonsurgical treatment. THA/TKA procedures that were not delayed were more cost-effective than delayed intervention. The majority of studies used QALYs as the primary quality metric (82%); in all these studies there was a significant improvement in QALYs gained. CONCLUSION: Given the high economic impact of arthroplasty, ongoing assessment of cost-effectiveness is needed. Twenty-four percent of studies included in this systematic review were published in the last 4 years of this 15-year study period, highlighting the need for continuous assessment of aggregate data. Future studies should incorporate the cost-effectiveness of THA and TKA with respect to the work-value provided by surgeon providers to support health policy and reimbursement.

Preoperative cut-off values for body mass index deny patients clinically significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty.

AIMS: Thresholds for operative eligibility based on body mass index (BMI) alone may restrict patient access to the benefits of arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between BMI and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and to determine how many patients would have been denied improvements in PROMs if BMI cut-offs were to be implemented. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 3,449 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. The following one-year PROMs were evaluated: hip injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) pain, HOOS Physical Function Shortform (PS), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity, Veterans Rand-12 Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (VR-12 MCS). Positive predictive values for failure to improve and the number of patients denied surgery in order to avoid a failed improvement were calculated for each PROM at different BMI cut-offs. RESULTS: There was a trend to improved outcomes in terms of pain and function improvements with higher BMI. Patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 had median (Q1, Q3) HOOS pain improvements of 58 points (interquartile range (IQR) 41 to 70) and those with BMI 35 to 40 kg/m2 had median improvements of 55 (IQR 40 to 68). With a BMI cut-off of 30 kg/m2, 21 patients would have been denied a meaningful improvement in HOOS pain score in order to avoid one failed improvement. At a 35 kg/m2 cut-off, 18 patients would be denied improvement, at a 40 kg/m2 cut-off 21 patients would be denied improvement, and at a 45 kg/m2 cut-off 21 patients would be denied improvement. Similar findings were observed for HOOS-PS, UCLA, and VR-12 scores. CONCLUSION: Patients with higher BMIs show greater improvements in PROMs. Using BMI alone to determine eligibility criteria did not improve the rate of clinically meaningful improvements. BMI thresholds prevent patients who may benefit the most from surgery from undergoing THA. Surgeons should consider PROMs improvements in determining eligibility for THA while balancing traditional metrics of preoperative risk stratification. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6):683-692.

Surgical hip dislocation through a modified direct lateral approach: real-time perfusion monitoring.

This study aimed to measure femoral head perfusion during hip resurfacing arthroplasty through a trochanter-sparing modified direct lateral approach. High-power laser Doppler probes were inserted into the femoral heads of 26 patients (26 hips, age range 35-70 years). Changes in blood flow were recorded (1) pre-capsulectomy (reference), (2) post-capsulectomy, and (3) following femoral head dislocation and reduction. There were no statistically significant changes in perfusion amplitudes post-capsulectomy and following femoral head dislocation and reduction (mean -10%, P = .134 and +27%, P = .166, respectively). Prolonged dislocation with the hip maximally flexed and externally rotated resulted in significantly decreased perfusion (mean -28%, P = .002). This study provides in vivo evidence that surgical hip dislocation is feasible using a modified direct lateral approach.

Mortality after hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty in young patients: a single surgeon experience.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate the following questions: (I) what are the mortality rates in patients age 55 years and younger who underwent a hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) versus a standard total hip arthroplasty (THA)? (II) is the type of operation independently associated with mortality? METHODS: The database of a single high-volume surgeon was reviewed for patient's age 55 years and younger who underwent a hip arthroplasty between 2002 and 2010. This yielded 505 HRA patients and 124 THA patients. Chi-square analysis was performed to identify a 5-year mortality rate difference between the two cohorts. Multivariable Cox-Regression analyses were used to determine whether the type of operation was independently associated with mortality. RESULTS: There were 8 mortalities (1.6%) in the HRA cohort and 11 (8.9%) in the THA cohort, a statistically significant difference (P<0.001) on univariate analysis. Low mortality rates produced underpowered multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that patients age 55 and younger who undergo HRA have a significantly lower mortality rate than those undergoing THA. This is consistent with multiple previously published large database studies.

Birmingham hip resurfacing versus cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients 55 years or younger: A minimum five-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal reconstructive method for advanced degenerative hip disease in young adults is a topic of ongoing discussion. The purpose of this study is to report the largest single institution experience from the United States on the outcomes of Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) vs. cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients 55 years or younger at a minimum follow-up of five years. Currently, BHR is the only FDA-approved hip resurfacing implant available in the US. METHODS: A cohort of 505 patients representing all BHR cases performed at our institution between 2006 and 2010 was compared with an identical size cohort of consecutive patients who underwent primary cementless THA. Exclusion criteria were age greater than 55 years, non-elective cases, revision procedures, and those performed for fractures, tumors, or by low-volume arthroplasty surgeons. THAs with metal on metal articulation were also excluded. OUTCOMES: assessed were all-cause reoperations, complications, patient satisfaction, and mortality. After exclusions, 442 patients with BHR and 327 with THA were included. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 73.2 months. After controlling for potential confounding factors, multivariate analyses showed significant increase in the rates of revision surgery (p < 0.001), overall complications (p < 0.001), all-cause reoperations (p = 0.014), and mortality (p < 0.001) in the THA cohort. Component loosening was the most common cause for revision in the THA group. Patients with THA were also less likely to be satisfied (p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: This is largest US study to report on the midterm outcomes of BHR vs. THA. The results demonstrate favorable results for BHR in patients 55 years or younger. Long-term multicenter studies are needed to better understand the optimal patient characteristics when deciding between THA versus BHR.

Total hip arthroplasty in patients 55 years or younger: Risk factors for poor midterm outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasingly performed in younger patients. The purpose of this study is to report on the midterm outcomes of primary cementless THA in patients 55 years and younger; and specifically to examine the risk factors for aseptic failure, all-cause revision, and mortality in this patient population. METHODS: Four hundred and twenty-six consecutive patients with minimum 5-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate analyses were conducted to control for potential confounding factors identified by univariate analyses. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 92.12 ± 30.9 months. The overall 5-year implant survival rate was 90.8% and the aseptic survival rate was 92.6%. Among the potential risk factors, only bearing surface had a significant relationship with aseptic revision (P = 0.041). Aseptic revisions occurred more frequently with metal-on-polyethylene articulation (P = 0.012). Higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was a significant risk factor for all-cause complications (P = 0.04) while higher CCI and lower body mass index were significant risk factors for mortality (P = 0.001 and 0.006 respectively). CONCLUSION: Bearing type was the only risk factor for revision surgery, particularly metal-on-polyethylene bearing. Patients with higher comorbidities were at increased risk for postoperative complications and mortality, while higher body weight appeared to have a protective effect against mortality. These findings should be considered before surgery for risk modification and management of patient expectations. While it appears that bearing couples other than metal-on-polyethylene are especially suitable for young patients, more studies are needed to determine the best bearing couple and to reduce the rates of postoperative complications in this patient population.

Surgical hip dislocation through a direct lateral approach: A cadaveric study of vascular danger zones.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited information on the potential danger to the vascularity of the femoral head during surgical dislocation of the hip using the direct lateral approach. The objective of this study was to investigate the topographical anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery (MFCA), the primary source of blood supply to the femoral head, in relationship to the direct lateral approach. METHODS: Seven unembalmed cadaver hips had dye injection into either the profunda femoris artery or the MFCA. Surgical hip dislocation was then performed through a direct lateral approach, noting the danger zones to the MFCA branches during each step of the exposure. RESULTS: None of the MFCA branches were found to cross the anterior surgical field superficial to the capsule. The deep (main) branch of the MFCA pierced the inferior capsule at the level of the lesser trochanter after emerging posterior to iliopsoas tendon. Ascending branches up the medial femoral neck were identified at this level. The deep branch then coursed posteriorly terminating in a variable number of vessels ascending the posterior femoral neck. Dislocation of the femoral head did not stretch or alter the course of the deep branch of the MFCA. CONCLUSION: Safe surgical hip dislocation preserving the MFCA can be performed though a direct lateral approach as long as the inferomedial portion of the anterior capsule is preserved (main branch of the MFCA pierces the capsule at this level). Extracapsular injury is possible from inadvertent dissection at the level of the lesser trochanter or aggressive retraction on the iliopsoas. The posterior capsule should be left intact and instrumentation around the posterior neck should be avoided.

Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in Patients 55 Years or Younger: Risk Factors for Poor Midterm Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved hip resurfacing system available in the United States and is used as an alternative to conventional total hip arthroplasty in younger patients. The purpose of this study is to report on the midterm outcomes of BHR in patients 55 years and younger, and specifically to examine the risk factors for aseptic failure, all-cause revision, and complications in this patient population. METHODS: Four hundred forty-two consecutive patients with 5-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate analyses were conducted to control for potential confounding factors identified by univariate analyses. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 71.68 ± 10.24 months. Among the potential risk factors, only female gender and smaller head sizes had a significant univariate relationship with aseptic revision, all-cause revision, and all-cause complications. When both risk factors were included in a multivariable logistic regression model, analyses showed both variables were closely related, with female gender a better predictor of adverse outcomes than head size (ie, small head size can be thought of as a proxy for female gender). The 5-year implant survival is 95.1% females compared to 99.0% in males. CONCLUSION: Hip resurfacing with BHR has excellent survival rates in young patients with degenerative hip disease. Although this study suggests that females with small templated head sizes may not be suitable candidates for BHR, further studies are needed to better understand the underlying differences in gender.

Mid-Term Results and Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing.

BACKGROUND: Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) is the only Food and Drug Administration approved resurfacing option currently available in the United States. While adequate BHR outcomes are established, there is a paucity of US-based literature demonstrating factors critical to improve patient reported outcomes (PROs). This study answers: (1) What is the implant survivorship in a large US cohort? (2) Which preoperative factors result in higher PRO scores over 5 years postoperatively? METHODS: A retrospective 541 hip single-surgeon cohort with mean of 6.2 years follow-up (range 5-8.1) was collected. Preoperative patient/implant variables, including postoperative radiographic acetabular inclination and femoral component position, clinical outcomes, and follow-up PRO questionnaire information were collected. Validated PROs included the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Veterans Rand-12, and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity. PROs were modeled with ordinary least squares then used to create nomograms. RESULTS: Average patient age was 53 years with 391 (72%) males. Seven hips were revised, resulting in an overall survival of 98.8% at 5 years. Predictive modeling identified preoperative variables (sex, body mass index, smoking, and comorbidity) that had statistically significant associations with HOOS pain (P = .049), HOOS activities of daily living (P = .017), UCLA activity (P < .001), and Veterans Rand-12 physical (P < .001) PROs at latest follow-up. Nomograms predicted follow-up PROs using preoperative patient-specific variables. CONCLUSION: This study documents excellent survival of the largest reported single-center cohort of BHRs in the United States with a mean 6.2 years follow-up. Multivariate modeling shows male nonsmokers with low body mass index, and no comorbidities will have less hip pain, better function in daily life, higher activity, and better general physical health after BHR arthroplasty.

Short-term Results of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in the United States.

Previous data on the survivorship of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implant have come from design surgeons and large national databases outside of the United States, and there is a lack of reported outcomes of surface replacement arthroplasty from US centers. A retrospective study was undertaken of 1271 hips treated with a BHR system (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee) between June 2006 and September 2008 at 6 high-volume total joint centers in the United States. Demographic features, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and radiographic findings were recorded. Patients who did not have a 2-year follow-up visit were contacted by telephone. All patients were asked about complications, reoperations, or failure of the implants. Of the treated hips, 1144 (90%) had a minimum of 2 years of clinical follow-up (mean, 2.9 years; range, 1.8-4.2 years). Mean age was 52.3 years, and 75% of patients were men. Mean HHS improved from 55.8 preoperatively to 97.4 at the most recent follow-up (P<.001). There were 16 (1.4%) revisions to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for fracture (7), early dislocation (3), acetabular component malpositioning with pain (3; 1 with metallosis), infection (1), femoral loosening (1), and pseudotumor (1). There were 9 additional complications (0.8%) that did not require revision, including 3 dislocations treated with closed reduction, 2 fractures, 3 nerve injuries, and 1 pseudotumor. At 2 to 4 years of follow-up, the revision rate and the major complication rate with the BHR system were similar to those in previous reports of primary THA. Excellent clinical results were observed, but further follow-up is necessary to assess mid- and long-term results with the BHR system in US patients.

Incidence and Location of Pain in Young, Active Patients Following Hip Arthroplasty.

Persistent pain following hip arthroplasty remains a concern, especially in young, active patients. Four hundred twenty patients less than 60 years of age with a pre-symptomatic UCLA score ≥ 6 (196 total hip arthroplasty [THA]; 224 surface replacement arthroplasty [SRA]) completed a pain-drawing questionnaire investigating the location, severity, and frequency of pain around the hip. At a mean of 2.9 years of follow-up, 40% reported pain in at least one location around the hip. There was no difference in the incidence of groin pain between SRA and THA patients (32% vs. 29%, P=0.6), but THA patients had a greater incidence of anterior (25% vs. 8%, P<0.001) and lateral (20% vs. 10%, P=0.01) thigh pain. A high percentage of young, active patients experience persistent pain following hip arthroplasty.

Radiographic parameters associated with pain following total hip and surface arthroplasty.

Pain following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and surface arthroplasty (SRA) remains a significant source of patient dissatisfaction. Two hundred twenty-four SRA and 196 THA patients completed a pain drawing questionnaire and postoperative radiographic measurements of component positioning were performed. In the SRA cohort, 11 of 21 patients (52%) with acetabular uncoverage of ≥5 mm versus 43 of 147 (29%) with acetabular uncoverage of ≤4.9 mm reported groin pain (P=.03). In the THA cohort, an increased distal-third canal fill ratio and a lower canal calcar ratio trended towards a higher incidence of thigh pain (P=.10 and .06), while a decreased mid-third canal fill ratio was associated with increased severity of thigh pain (P=.04). This study identifies associations between radiographic findings and pain following THA and SRA.

Design, implementation, and comparison of methods for collecting implant registry data at different hospital types.

Practical issues surrounding the official establishment of a national arthroplasty registry in the United States remain. The purpose of this study was to compare compliance and accuracy rates associated with 3 methods for voluntarily collecting implant registry data at 3 different hospital types. Methods examined included (1) scannable paper forms, (2) online forms comprising keypunching for implant data input, and (3) the same electronic form but incorporating barcode scanning for implant data entry. Overall compliance was low (930/1761; 52.8%) and decreased with each successive data collection phase. Total accuracy rate was 62.5% (578/925) and varied significantly among sites (P < .001). Even with relatively simple reporting systems, compliance was poor. This emphasizes the need for direct surgeon involvement, strict oversight, and a feedback system to ensure validity, particularly if a volunteer-based system is used.

The dislocator, early and late: the 3 am phone call.

Hip dislocation is one of the most common causes of patient and surgeon dissatisfaction following hip replacement. To correctly treat dislocation, the causes must first be understood. Patient factors include age older than 70 years, medical comorbidities, female sex, musculoligamentous laxity, revision surgery, issues with the abductors and trochanter, and lack of education. Issues related to the surgeon and technique are surgical volume and experience, surgical approach and repair, adequate restoration of femoral offset and leg length, correct component position, and avoidance of soft tissue or bony impingement. Chief among implant-related factors is the design of the head and neck region. Is the femoral head diameter sufficient, and, in concert with the prosthetic neck, is there an adequate head-neck ratio? Skirts on longer neck lengths greatly reduce the head-neck ratio and should be avoided if possible. There must be available offset choices to restore soft tissue tension. Lipped liners aid in gaining stability, yet may result in impingement and dislocation if improperly placed. Late dislocation may result from polyethylene wear, soft tissue destruction, trochanteric or abductor disruption and weakness, or infection. Understanding the causes of hip dislocation allow prevention in a majority of instances. Proper preoperative planning includes the identification of high-offset patients in whom inadequate restoration of offset will reduce soft tissue tension and abductor efficiency. Component position must be accurate to achieve stability without impingement. Finally, patient education cannot be overemphasized, as most dislocations occur early and are preventable with proper instructions.