RESUMEN
Background: Bronchodilator therapy is a foundation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation treatment. Although international guidelines recommend short-acting formulations given multiple times per day, long-acting formulations have not been adequately evaluated. The objective of our study was to determine the effectiveness of umeclidinium-vilanterol (UME/VIL), long-acting beta2-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LABA/LAMA) as a once-daily alternative for treating COPD exacerbations in hospitalized patients. Methods: In this retrospective sequential period analysis, we reviewed electronic medical records of patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbations before (September 1, 2015 to February 29, 2016) and after (April 1, 2016 to September 30, 2016) incorporation of UME/VIL into our standard COPD protocol. Before implementation, patients received a daily anticholinergic plus twice-daily long-acting beta2-agonist therapy (tiotropium plus formoterol, n=65). After implementation, UME/VIL replaced the previous regimen (n=58). No other changes were made to the COPD protocol. The primary outcome was 30-day hospital readmission rate. Hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and cost of care were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Results: A trend toward increased 30-day readmission rates in the post-intervention group (24.1% versus 10.8%, p=0.049) was no longer statistically significant after adjustment for severity of illness (based on case-mix index) and complications or comorbidities based on diagnosis-related group codes (adjusted odds ratio: 2.499; 95% confidence interval: 0.916-7.380; p=0.074). Conclusion: After adjustment for potential confounders,the implementation of a LABA/LAMA combination product was not statistically associated with an increased 30-day readmission rate but was associated with lower cost of care.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gatifloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibiotic with a broad spectrum of in vitro and in vivo activity against the gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens frequently implicated in urinary tract infections (UTIs). OBJECTIVE: This study compared the clinical and bacteriologic efficacy and tolerability of gatifloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in adult patients with complicated UTIs or pyelonephritis. METHODS: In this double-blind, multicenter, randomized, comparative study, patients were treated with either gatifloxacin 400 mg once daily or ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily for 7 to 10 days. Bacteriologic eradication (by quantitative urine culture) and clinical efficacy rates were assessed at a test-of-cure visit (5 to 9 days and 4 to 11 days posttreatment, respectively) and at an extended follow-up visit (29-42 days and 25-50 days posttreatment, respectively). RESULTS: A total of 372 adults were randomized to treatment, 189 to gatifloxacin and 183 to ciprofloxacin. The most commonly isolated pretreatment pathogens (n = 292) were Escherichia coli (53%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (13%). Pathogen eradication rates for complicated UTIs were 92% and 83% with gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively (95% CI, -4.1% to 24.5%); for pyelonephritis, the respective rates were 92% and 85% (95% CI, -20% to 37%). Clinical response rates of >90% were observed in both treatment groups among patients with complicated UTIs as well as those with pyelonephritis. Sustained eradication rates were 76% (64/84) with gatifloxacin and 66% (52/79) with ciprofloxacin. Both drugs were well tolerated, with the most common adverse events in both treatment groups being nausea, dizziness, diarrhea, and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Gatifloxacin is comparable to ciprofloxacin based on clinical efficacy and bacteriologic eradication rates for the treatment of complicated UTIs or pyelonephri- tis and is associated with a low incidence of clinically significant adverse events.