Evaluating Risk Factors for Biceps Tendon Injuries in Softball Players: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Softball players commonly suffer overuse injuries due to the demands of repetitive throwing. The biceps tendon plays an important role in stabilizing the shoulder during the windmill pitch. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the measures used to identify and study biceps tendon pathology in softball players. DESIGN: This was a systematic review. SETTING: PubMed MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched. PARTICIPANTS: Studies that investigated biceps tendon injuries in softball players. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Range of motion (ROM), strength, and visual analog scale data were collected. RESULTS: Of 152 search results, 18 were included. A total of 536 of 705 athletes (76%) were softball players (average age 14-25 years). Five of 18 articles (27.7%) studied changes in external rotation with the shoulder at 90 degrees of abduction, and 4 of 18 (22.2%) studied internal rotation. Two of 18 studies (11.1%) examined ROM or strength changes in forward flexion. CONCLUSIONS: While researchers agree that the windmill pitch places significant stress on the biceps tendon, our study finds that the metrics used to evaluate shoulder pathology in these players primarily evaluate the rotator cuff without isolating the biceps tendon. Future studies should include clinical tests and biomechanical metrics more specific to identifying biceps and labral pathology (eg, strength, fatigue, and ROM in glenohumeral forward flexion, elbow flexion, and forearm supination) and attempt to clarify differences in pathology between pitchers and position players to better characterize the frequency and severity of biceps tendon pathology in softball players.

Softball pitching mechanics and shoulder injuries: a narrative review.

Softball is the third most popular women's collegiate sport in the United States, with 19,680 total athletes as of the 2015-2016 season. Despite its popularity and growth in recent years, research focusing on the biomechanics of the windmill pitch and its associated shoulder injuries is relatively scarce. The incidence of shoulder injury is highest during the preseason and the beginning of the regular season. The windmill pitch can be divided into distinct phases, with the shoulder experiencing the greatest force during the delivery phase. Significant demands placed on the shoulder during the windmill pitch put pitchers at a higher risk of developing shoulder injuries than position players. Maximum shoulder compression/distraction forces during the windmill pitch have been shown to be comparable to those experienced during the baseball overhand throw, dispelling the myth that the windmill pitch is not taxing on the shoulder. Injuries associated with the high compression/distraction forces include lesions to the rotator cuff, glenoid labrum, and biceps brachii. Pitcher-specific training, cross-training, and whole-body conditioning should be incorporated into current training regimens to decrease the risk of shoulder injuries.

The relationship between the orthopedic job market and sports medicine fellowship applications between 2010 and 2017.

Objectives: More than 90% of graduating orthopedic residents pursue at least one year of fellowship training. There are no studies to date that examine the trends for sports medicine positions in the orthopedic job market. The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in orthopedic sports medicine positions using postings from four orthopedic journals. Methods: Print advertisements for job positions in three American orthopedic journals (Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and American Journal of Sports Medicine) between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. The results were compared to sports medicine fellowship match trends. Results: Between 2010 and 2017, there were a total of 403 postings for orthopedic sports medicine positions, 186 in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 113 in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and 52 in American Journal of Sports Medicine. There was a 43% decline in print sports medicine advertisements from 2010 to 2015. The number of job advertisements for sports medicine positions remained consistent (approximately 10%) from 2010 to 2015, then dropped to 2.1% (57/2698) and 1.4% (66/4735) in 2016 and 2017, respectively. Conclusion: There is no direct correlation between job positions advertised in orthopedic journals and sports medicine fellowship positions offered. Additionally, there has been an increase in job advertisements requiring fellowship training, indicating an increased demand for sub-specialty trained orthopedic surgeons. Lastly, the drop in total orthopedic advertisements in the years proceedi ng 2015 may serve as a harbinger for the transition to largely online content, and job postings in journals may not be the most reliable source of job opportunities, but further investigation should be done in relation to this topic.

Program Directors' Perception of the Role of Personal Statements in the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Selection Process.

The purpose of this study was (1) to determine how much emphasis is placed on the Personal Statement (PS) by program directors (PDs) and (2) to gain a better understanding of what factors within the PS are considered most important to PDs. An anonymous survey was distributed to PDs at allopathic orthopaedic residency programs in the United States using Survey Monkey (San Mateo, CA). Survey responses were received from 51 of 152 (34%) PDs. Forty-five (88.2%) identified as male, five (9.8%) identified as female, and one (1.9%) chose not to disclose. PDs reported the PS was of average importance, with an average score of 2.82 (range,1-4). Although the PS is still given consideration as part of the overall orthopaedic surgery residency application process, it does not play a major role in determining which applicants will be invited for an interview or how they will be ranked. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(2):090-095, 2022).

Effective Interventions for Improving Functional Movement Screen Scores Among "High-Risk" Athletes: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The Functional Movement ScreenTM (FMSTM) is a tool designed to screen a series of movements that aids in the identification of compensatory fundamental movement patterns, functional limitations, and asymmetrical movement patterns. A previous systematic review and meta-analysis has shown that athletes with an FMSTM score <13-14 are considered "high-risk" and are more likely to be injured. There are discrepancies regarding the efficacy of physical intervention programs in improving FMSTM scores. PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the role of physical intervention programs in increasing functional movement in "high-risk" athletes as measured by the FMSTM. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review. METHODS: A computerized search was performed in 2019 according to PRISMA guidelines searching Embase, Science Direct, Ovid, and PubMed. The studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the Modified Downs and Black checklist. Participant demographics, intervention routines, and FMSTM scores were extracted from the included studies. RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria and demonstrated a fair methodological quality. Comparisons across all studies revealed significant improvement in FMSTM scores following implementation of a variety of physical intervention programs. These programs included those that utilized functional training, foot muscle strengthening, Pilates, core stability training, and resistance movements. Despite variations in the corrective exercises performed, the number of training sessions, and the length of the intervention program, all studies demonstrated an increase in the total FMSTM score following program implementation. CONCLUSION: The included intervention programs significantly improved total FMSTM scores in "high-risk" athletes. Despite variations in the corrective exercises (interventions) performed, the number of training sessions, and the length of the program, all studies demonstrated a significant increase in the total FMSTM score following program implementation.

Gap Year Research Fellowship Opportunities for Medical Students Interested in Orthopaedic Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic surgery is becoming an increasingly competitive specialty. The purpose of this study was to identify existing orthopaedic research fellowships in the United States and to determine important characteristics including the number of positions offered by each program and the average number of publications from completing the program. METHODS: An online search was performed to identify year-long orthopaedic research fellowship programs available for medical students and recent medical school graduates. The number of positions per program and average number of publications of recent program graduates were also obtained. RESULTS: A total of 30 research fellowship programs were identified throughout the United States (13 in the northeast; six in the south; nine in the midwest; and two in the west) that are offered consistently each year. The average number of fellows per program was 3.1 (range 1 to 10) and the average number of publications was 10.8 (range 2 to 20). CONCLUSION: At least 30 orthopaedic research fellowships in the United States are available to students who are looking to acquire more research experience and strengthen their application for orthopaedic residency. These fellowships can help medical students increase their probability of matching into orthopaedics through publications, networking, and clinical exposure.

Representation of Male and Female Orthopedic Surgeons in Specialty Societies.

Women represent only 15.3% of all residents and fellows in the field of orthopedic surgery. The rate of increase of women in the field of orthopedics continues to lag behind all other surgical specialties. The purpose of this study was 2-fold: (1) to evaluate male/female representation in orthopedic specialty societies and (2) to examine the involvement of male/female orthopedic surgeons on committees, in leadership roles, at annual meetings, and in receipt of monetary awards. A 12-question, anonymous survey was distributed to the executive directors of all 23 orthopedic specialty societies. The survey included questions about the breakdown of male/female membership as well as male/female orthopedic surgeon participation in various functions of the society. Fourteen (60.9%) of 23 executive directors from orthopedic specialty societies responded to the survey. Seven (50.0%) of 14 survey respondents reported society membership of more than 1000. Six (42.9%) of 14 survey respondents reported male membership of more than 1000, while only the Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society reported female membership of more than 1000. Eleven (78.6%) of 14 survey respondents (eg, American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine) reported having more than 10 men in leadership positions, whereas 13 (92.9%) of 14 respondents reported 10 or fewer women in leadership positions. Most orthopedic specialty societies have lower female than male membership, fewer women in leadership positions, and fewer monetary awards granted to women compared with men. This disparity was more evident in anatomic societies (eg, American Association of Hip & Knee Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) compared with general orthopedic societies (eg, Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society, Orthopaedic Research Society). Female orthopedic surgeons remain underrepresented in orthopedic specialty societies. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(5):289-292.].

Defining Return to Sport: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Return to sport (RTS) commonly serves as a measure for assessment of clinical outcomes in orthopaedic sports medicine surgery. Unfortunately, while RTS is commonly utilized in research for this purpose, currently there is no widely accepted or standardized definition for when an athlete has officially returned to his or her sport. PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review to evaluate and report the differences in specific definitions of RTS utilized in the orthopaedic surgery literature. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Trials databases per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Search terms consisted of variations of "RTS" combined with variations of "orthopedic surgery" and "define" to capture as many relevant articles as possible. The definition of RTS was recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 718 articles were identified in the initial search, 29 of which met eligibility criteria, providing a clear definition of RTS. Of the 29 studies included, 20 (69.0%) defined RTS as an athlete competing in a game or other competitive play. Three (10.3%) defined this as the athlete competing in a game or other competitive play but with an explicitly stated competition-level modifier of the athlete returning to his or her preinjury level of competition. Two articles (6.9%) included returning to training or practice, and the remaining 4 articles (13.8%) used terminology other than the standard RTS. CONCLUSION: There is variability in the definition of RTS used in orthopaedic sports medicine literature. Most studies refer to the athlete competing in a game or other competitive play. Other variants include returning to practice/training and explicitly defined competition levels and objectives. Future studies should aim to standardize the definition of RTS to facilitate more precise assessment of outcome after sports medicine surgery. Using terminology that describes components of the recovery and rehabilitation process, such as "return to participation" and "return to performance," in addition to RTS will allow us to more clearly understand the athlete's recovery and associated level of competition or performance.

Research Productivity of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Programs in the United States.

PURPOSE: To survey orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship program directors to determine the current research productivity of both fellows and faculty in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship programs in the United States. METHODS: An anonymous 18-question survey was distributed via e-mail to all 95 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship program directors in the United States. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Questions included whether fellows are required to complete a certain number of projects during their fellowship year and whether fellows have protected research time. RESULTS: Of the programs, 31 (33%) responded to the survey. Twenty-four programs (80%) require fellows to complete 1 to 4 projects. Twenty-one programs (71%) provide 4 to 8 hours of weekly protected research time. Twenty-four programs (77%) publish 1 to 2 manuscripts per fellow during the fellowship. Twenty-two programs (71%) have fellows work on 1 to 2 projects at a time. Annually, 26 programs (84%) give 0 to 5 podium presentations, 24 (80%) present 0 to 5 posters, and 15 (48%) report 0 to 5 publications. Twenty-four programs (77%) have research fellows and/or assistants to help with research. The presence of dedicated research assistants and more than 25 annual fellowship program publications were found to be useful screening data for more than 2 and more than 4 average publications per fellow, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The research productivity of orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship programs may be an important consideration for applicants. Applicants who desire to be productive in research during their fellowship year should consider programs with dedicated research assistants and/or programs that publish more than 25 times annually. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This is a descriptive epidemiologic study that helps define the research productivity landscape in orthopaedic sports medicine fellowships. A more accurate understanding of sports medicine fellowship research experience may facilitate a better match between a program's research expectations and an applicant's research interests.

Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Websites: Information Considered Most Important to Fellowship Applicants.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine which components of sports medicine fellowships are most important to applicants when reviewing fellowship websites during the application process. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed to 492 fellowship applicants from the 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 cycles. The survey included questions about the importance of including components of fellow education, recruitment, and experience on program websites. The weighted average of responses determined each component's rank, with 5 being "very important" and 1 being "not at all important." Responses were analyzed by application cycle, current position, and sex using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: Sixty-five applicants participated in the survey and completed the demographics section, resulting in a 13.2% response rate. According to participants, the most important components to include on fellowship websites were exposure to advanced operative sports medicine techniques (weighted average, 4.62), complexity of cases performed (4.52), and number of cases performed (4.50). Analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences in opinion between application cycles for flexibility for conducting a remote interview (P = .0074), jobs obtained by previous fellows (P = .019), national rank of department (P = .021), program's geographic location (P = .026), protected academic time (P = .038), current positions for criteria for fellows' performance evaluations (P = .028), program's geographic location (P = .0097), and protected academic time (P = .0079). There were statistically significant differences in opinion between current positions regarding flexibility for conducting a remote interview (P = .0026), jobs obtained by previous fellows (P = .012), and national rank of department (P = .0013). CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship applicants believe that it is most important to include information about the volume and complexity of fellows' cases and their day-to-day commitments on program websites. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This information would enable applicants to identify programs that will support professional development and allow program directors to communicate expectations.

Variety and Complexity of Surgical Exposure, Operative Autonomy, and Program Reputation Are Important Factors for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Applicants.

PURPOSE: To identify the factors considered most important by sports medicine fellowship applicants when deciding where to apply and ultimately interview. METHODS: An anonymous, electronic survey was distributed in 2018 via e-mail to orthopaedic surgery residents who applied to a specific orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship program in 2015 and 2016. The survey included questions regarding the number of fellowships applications per respondent and the number of interviews they were offered and accepted. Questions regarding the application process were included. Participants also were asked to rank 9 criteria from most to least important (1 being most important; 9 being least important) when deciding where to apply or accept interviews. Each criterion's score reflects its average ranking among respondents. RESULTS: Among the 99 orthopaedic surgery residents applying to this fellowship program, 42 (42.4%) completed the survey. The factors considered most influential included variety and complexity of surgical exposure (2.16), autonomy (3.72), and reputation of faculty members (4.05). The factors considered least important were program size (7.21), job placement of past fellows (7.07), and geographic location (5.68). CONCLUSIONS: Variety and complexity of surgical exposure, operative autonomy, and program reputation were valued as the most important factors for orthopaedic surgery residents applying to sports medicine fellowship programs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The information obtained in this study may provide sports medicine fellowship programs and orthopaedic residents with a better understanding of factors that are considered to be important by sports medicine fellowship applicants. This will improve training for future sports medicine specialists, thus improving the care that they provide to their patients.

Prophylaxis for Heterotopic Ossification Following Distal Biceps Tendon Repair.

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a possible complication of distal biceps tendon repair (DBTR). Several agents can prevent HO formation, although relatively few studies have investigated prophylaxis specifically after DBTR. The purposes of this study were to survey members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) to determine (1) what percentage use HO prophylaxis after DBTR; (2) type, dosage, and duration of prophylaxis used; and (3) use of single-incision or double-incision surgical technique. An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to ASES members to determine the use of HO prophylaxis and DBTR technique. The survey included questions regarding the number of DBTRs performed annually; preferred surgical technique and implants; and type, dosage, and duration of HO prophylaxis used before, during, and after surgery. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results. Of 173 respondents, 98 (56.6%) performed 1 to 10 DBTRs per year, 65 (37.6%) performed 11 to 25 DBTRs per year, and 10 (5.8%) performed 26 to 50 DBTRs per year. A total of 131 (75.7%) preferred the single-incision technique, whereas 42 (24.3%) preferred the double-incision technique. A total of 94 (54.3%) performed DBTR using a metal button and interference screw, 35 (20.2%) through drill holes, 25 (14.5%) with suture anchors, and 19 (11.0%) with a metal button alone. A total of 132 (76.3%) respondents did not use HO prophylaxis, and 41 (23.7%) used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs following surgery. A total of 35 (85.4%) used indomethacin, 18 (51.4%) of whom preferred 75 mg/d for 3 to 4 weeks. Heterotopic ossification is a commonly reported complication following DBTR, especially with the double-incision technique. Prophylaxis with anti-inflammatory medications and suppressive modalities (radiation therapy) appear to reduce the incidence of HO. Despite these data, most surgeons (76.3%) do not use HO prophylaxis. Low annual volume of cases, lack of large-volume studies with outcome data, and the dominant use of the single-incision repair technique may explain this. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e588-e592.].

The Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the process of applying to orthopaedic sports medicine fellowships from the applicant's perspective, with a focus on number of program applications, interviews, interview day importance, and financial burden. METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to all orthopaedic surgery residents who applied to orthopaedic sports medicine fellowships in the United States in 2016 and 2017. The survey contained 26 questions, with 10 pertaining to applicant demographics, accolades, and examination scores. A follow up e-mail was distributed at 2 and 4 weeks to increase participation. RESULTS: The survey was distributed to 453 sports medicine fellowship applicants; 148 (34.1%) completed the survey. Of the respondents, 130 (87.8%) were male and 18 (12.2%) were female. When analyzing United States Medical Licensing Examination scores, respondents who scored above a 251 on Step 2 CK were more likely to receive more than 20 interviews compared with those who scored lower (P = .013). Previous collegiate or professional athlete status did not influence the number of interviews received. In total, 94 of 147 (64.0%) respondents applied to more than 20 programs, and 73 respondents (49.7%) attended between 11 and 15 interviews. The majority of respondents spent between $4001 and $6000 (49; 33.1%) throughout the application process. Interaction with faculty and case volume/complexity were the most important factors in ranking programs. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of orthopaedic surgery residents pursue at least 1 year of fellowship training following residency, with sports medicine being one of the most popular specialties. The application process for sports medicine fellowships is complex, competitive, and a financial burden for applicants. Most applicants apply to more than 20 programs, spend between $4000 and $6,000 over the course of the application process, and value faculty interaction and case volume/complexity over other factors associated with a program. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As other surgical fellowships have detailed their application process from the applicant's perspective, there remains a need for increased transparency of the sports medicine fellowship application in order to offer additional insight and guidance for future applicants.

Professional Athlete Return to Play and Performance After Shoulder Arthroscopy Varies by Sport.

PURPOSE: To determine whether differences in return-to-play (RTP) rate and performance-based outcomes exist following shoulder arthroscopy in athletes from the National Football League (NFL), National Basketball League (NBA), Major League Baseball (MLB), and National Hockey League (NHL). METHODS: Professional athletes from the NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL who underwent shoulder arthroscopy between January 1998 and December 2016 were identified through an established review of injury reports and public archives. Sport-specific statistics were collected before and after shoulder arthroscopy for each athlete, providing a performance score. RTP was defined as the first game played postsurgery. RESULTS: Of the 208 professional athletes who met the inclusion criteria, 167 (80.3%) returned to play following shoulder arthroscopy, with MLB players returning at a significantly lower rate than those of other sports (P < .0001). NBA players had significantly shorter recovery times (201 days; P < .01) and MLB players had significantly longer recovery times (413 days; P < .001) when compared with athletes in other sports. The mean number of seasons played after shoulder arthroscopy was 3.7, 4.7, 4.8, and 5.8 for MLB, NFL, NHL, and NBA, respectively. NBA players performed worse in their first season postoperative compared with their preoperative performance (P = .0017), but their postoperative season 2 performance returned to their preoperative performance level (P = .1893). Similarly, NHL players performed worse in their postoperative season 1 compared with preoperative performance (P = .0274), but their postoperative season 2 performance improved upon their preinjury performance level (P = .0861). CONCLUSIONS: There is a modest RTP rate among professional athletes following shoulder arthroscopy. MLB players have the longest average time to RTP and the shortest postinjury careers following shoulder arthroscopy. However, they demonstrate no significant decline in performance following their injury. Conversely, NBA players had the shortest average time to RTP and the longest post-injury career. Both NBA and NHL athletes experienced a decrease in performance in post-operative season one. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Used After Proximal Hamstring Repair.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures are important to determine outcomes after orthopaedic procedures. There is currently no standard for outcome measures in the evaluation of patient outcomes after proximal hamstring repair. PURPOSE: To identify and evaluate outcome measures used after proximal hamstring repair. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify all English-language articles assessing outcomes after proximal hamstring repair in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, MEDLINE via OvidSP, and Web of Science between 2000 and 2019. After duplicates were removed, studies were selected using eligibility criteria established by the authors. Image reviews, anatomic/histology studies, literature reviews, surgical technique reports, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, case studies, and studies with <5 patients were excluded. Extraction, synthesis, and analysis of outcome measure data were performed using Microsoft Excel. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. RESULTS: After duplicate articles were removed, a total of 304 unique articles were identified and 27 met the inclusion criteria. The mean number of patients with proximal hamstring repairs per study was 40. The most frequently reported outcome measures were return to sport (14/27; 51.9%), custom survey/questionnaire (13/27; 48.1%), and isokinetic hamstring strength testing (13/27; 48.1%). Six of the 10 most commonly used outcome measures were validated and included Lower Extremity Functional Scale, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, visual analog scale for pain, Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Tegner Activity Scale. Of those, PHAT was the only validated outcome measure designed for proximal hamstring repair. CONCLUSION: There is currently no consensus on the best outcome measurements for the evaluation of patients after proximal hamstring repair. We recommend an increased commitment to the use of return to sport, isokinetic strength testing, Lower Extremity Functional Scale, and PHAT when assessing such injuries. Future studies should aim to define the most reliable methods of outcome measurement in this patient population through consistent use of tools that are clinically relevant and important to patients and can easily be employed in a variety of clinical scenarios.

Orthopaedic In-training Exam Preparation among Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs.

OBJECTIVE: The Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) is given annually to residents to assess their knowledge of clinical orthopaedics and orthopaedic basic science. This study sought to determine what resources orthopaedic residency programs recommend and/or require for residents as preparative tools for the OITE and to understand which resources are most beneficial. DESIGN: An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to program directors of orthopaedic surgery residency programs. It included questions about resources that program directors recommended or required residents to use when preparing for the OITE. SETTING: The survey was prepared and the results analyzed at two academic medical institutions in Louisiana. The survey was available to respondents in December 2019 and January 2020. PARTICIPANTS: The survey was delivered to program directors of 148 ACGME accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the United States. RESULTS: 148 orthopaedic surgery residency program directors received the survey and 44 responded (response rate: 29.7%). Twenty-nine programs (73.2%) reported that practice tests/review of old OITE exams positively correlated with better scores. The most recommended resources for OITE preparation were Orthobullets (35 programs; 85%) and Res Study (AAOS) (27 programs; 67.5%). Programs having formal/required preparation programs had lower mean overall scores on the OITE than programs that did not. Those without a formal/required program scored in the 60th percentile, while those with a formal/required program scored in the 53.3rd percentile, a difference of 6.7 percentile points (p = 0.049). The mean overall percentiles were significantly higher for programs that reported having a threshold/goal OITE score for residents compared to those that didn't. Programs with a threshold/goal score scored in the 60.6th percentile on average, while those without a threshold/goal score scored in the 51.7th percentile on average, a difference of 8.9 percentile points (p = 0.0095). CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variability in the resources that are utilized in preparation for the OITE, with the most commonly recommended resource being Orthobullets. The study method most cited as having a positive impact on scores was practice tests/review of old OITE exams. Having a formal/required program resulted in programs having lower OITE scores. Setting a goal/threshold score correlates positively with an increase in OITE score. Encouraging residents to use practice questions/old OITE tests, setting a goal/threshold score and avoiding formal/required preparation programs may improve resident performance on the OITE.

Injury Profile of Mixed Martial Arts Competitions in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The popularity of mixed martial arts (MMA) continues to grow in the United States. Although prior work has provided valuable insight concerning injuries in the sport, much of the available literature is limited by factors such as small sample sizes, varying athlete demographics, and inconsistent data collection methods. PURPOSE: To report injury rates and types in MMA and analyze potential variance between competition and match variables. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of injuries sustained by fighters during MMA contests between 2018 and 2019 using ringside physician postmatch injury reports from Wisconsin and Arizona. The prevalence of overall injuries and specific injury types was compared by location (Arizona vs Wisconsin), competition level (amateur vs professional), match result (decisions vs any other result), and match winners versus losers. RESULTS: In 503 contests, 285 (57%) had at least 1 injury. In these 285 matches, participants experienced 401 injuries: 197 (49%) in professional bouts and 204 (51%) in amateur bouts. The match injury rate was higher in professional bouts than in amateur contests (68% vs 51%; P < .001). Amateur fighters had more contusions and hematomas (31% vs 22%; P < .001), while professional fighters had more lacerations (39% vs 23%; P < .001). Losers exhibited a higher match injury rate than winners (48% vs 24%; P < .001). Winners experienced a higher proportion of fractures (19% vs 9%; P = .005), and losers experienced more concussions (17% vs 2%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Professional fighters and losers of MMA bouts exhibited higher injury rates relative to amateurs and winners. The prevalence of specific injury types varied by competition level, match result, and match winners versus losers. The results of this study may be used to better understand the current injury profile in MMA and to develop targeted strategies for injury prevention.

Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) against placebo and active controls for improving pain and physical function of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). We hypothesize that topical NSAIDs will be safe and effective for relieving symptoms in patients with knee OA. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Randomized control trials that investigated topical NSAIDs that are widely available in many countries against both placebo and active controls in primary knee osteoarthritis were included. Studies that investigated other treatment modalities or treated nonspecific OA were excluded. A meta-analysis was performed to quantify the effect sizes and heterogeneity of the NSAIDs used. RESULTS: Upon initial search, 259 records were identified with 18 studies remaining after duplicate removal, abstract, and full-text screening. All NSAIDs demonstrated statistically significant reduction in at least one parameter of OA symptoms. The majority of included studies (66.7%) evaluated diclofenac. In the meta-analysis, standardized mean differences (SMD) of topical NSAIDs versus placebo were calculated and interpreted as having moderate effect size for improvement in pain (0.365, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.240, 0.490) and physical function (0.354, 95% CI 0.268, 0.493). With regard to safety, studies that used patches or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in the carrier reported a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs) than other carriers. Skin AEs were higher in the treatment group than the placebo group and gastrointestinal AEs were lower in the treatment group than placebo. CONCLUSION: Topical diclofenac and ketoprofen are the most rigorously studied topical NSAIDs in the treatment of knee OA and have demonstrated the most significant reduction in pain and improvement of function. Ibuprofen was effective for pain relief and physical function improvement, but more high-powered studies are needed to make a confident comparison of efficacy. Additionally, the 'carrier' used to deliver the topical NSAID has an impact on the adverse event profile. This has safety implications for prescribers and pharmaceutical development. Topical diclofenac is widely available internationally and is the only topical NSAID approved for over-the-counter use in the US. It should be recommended to patients as a first-line conservative management for OA of the knee.

Injury Prevention Programs for Throwing Injuries in Softball Players: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Throwing-related injuries occur commonly in softball players. Preventative programs can be implemented to assist in identifying and correcting risk factors that could potentially lead to injury and therefore time missed from both practice and games. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if position-specific injury prevention programs have been developed to decrease the risk of throwing-related injuries in softball players. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was performed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, PMC, and EBSCO were searched for articles on injury prevention programs using the following key terms: softball, injury prevention, throwing injuries, pitcher, and shoulder. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that involved fast-pitch softball and included female participants as well as rehabilitation programs were included. Articles that highlighted slow-pitch softball or did not include female participants were excluded. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1. DATA EXTRACTION: The initial search identified 1605 articles. After implementing a filter, 131 articles remained. Thirteen articles were screened out as duplicates. After screening for inclusion criteria, 7 articles remained and were included in the systematic review. RESULTS: Decreased range of motion (ROM) in both the upper and the lower extremities, unbalanced muscular strength, and fatigue were identified as risk factors for throwing injuries in softball players. Within the upper extremity, strength and ROM of the rotator cuff muscles, biceps, and extensors of the forearm were emphasized. The main focus of the lower extremity was the strength of the gluteal muscles and ROM of the lumbopelvic-hip complex. Only 1 study detailed an injury prevention program for softball players. The prevention program outlined was generalized for all softball players and was not position specific. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of information about injury prevention programs for softball players. Of the evidence analyzed, balanced strengthening of the upper and lower extremities while maintaining dynamic range of motion was frequently utilized in developing an injury prevention program.

Pectoralis Major Injuries: Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management.

¼: In the past 20 years, there has been a substantial increase in the prevalence of pectoralis major injuries, largely related to the rising popularity of weight-lifting and participation in contact sports. ¼: Treatment options are influenced by the severity of the injury, patient age, and the amount and type of physical activity. ¼: Although there is no consensus as to which treatment method is most effective, previous studies have demonstrated increased satisfaction among patients who undergo operative treatment. ¼: The average length of time from surgery to return to activity ranges from 6 to 24 months.