Is running good or bad for your knees? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cartilage morphology and composition changes in the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints.

BACKGROUND: The general health benefits of running are well-established, yet concern exists regarding the development and progression of osteoarthritis. AIM: To systematically review the immediate (within 20 min) and delayed (20 min-48 h) effect of running on hip and knee cartilage, as assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHOD: Studies using MRI to measure change in hip or knee cartilage within 48 h pre- and post-running were identified. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Percentage change in cartilage outcomes were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. Certainty of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included, evaluating 446 knees only. One third of studies were low risk of bias. Knee cartilage thickness and volume decreased immediately after running, with declines ranging from 3.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6%, 4.1%) for weight-bearing femoral cartilage volume to 4.9% (95% CI: 4.43.6%, 6.2%) for patellar cartilage volume. T1ρ and T2 relaxation times were also reduced immediately after running, with the largest decline being 13.1% (95% CI: -14.4%, -11.7%) in femoral trochlear cartilage. Tibiofemoral cartilage T2 relaxation times recovered to baseline levels within 91 min. Existing cartilage defects were unchanged within 48 h post-run. CONCLUSIONS: There is very low certainty evidence that running immediately decreases the thickness, volume, and relaxation times of patellofemoral and tibiofemoral cartilage. Hip cartilage changes are unknown, but knee changes are small and appear transient suggesting that a single bout of running is not detrimental to knee cartilage.

Should return to pivoting sport be avoided for the secondary prevention of osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective cohort study with MRI, radiographic and symptomatic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if returning to pivoting sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is associated with longitudinal structural and symptomatic osteoarthritis outcomes. DESIGN: Eighty-one adults aged 18-50 years were followed prospectively 1- to 5-years post-ACLR. Return to pivoting sport was assessed at 1-, 3- and 5-years. Longitudinal changes in osteoarthritis features were evaluated from 1- and 5-year magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)s using MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS). Radiographic osteoarthritis and self-reported knee symptoms, function and quality of life were assessed using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) atlas and Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), respectively, at 5 years post-ACLR. Generalised linear models (adjusted for baseline characteristics) assessed whether returning to pivoting sport was associated with risk of worsening osteoarthritis features on MRI, radiographic osteoarthritis and KOOS. RESULTS: Thirty participants returned to pivoting sport 1-year post-ACLR and 50 returned at any time (i.e., 1-, 3- or 5-years). Returning to pivoting sport was not associated with worsening of any MRI osteoarthritis feature (risk ratio (RR) range: 0.59-2.91) or 5-year KOOS (ß range: -2.73-3.69). Returning to pivoting sport at 1-year and up to 5-years post-ACLR was associated with a 50% (RR 0.49, 95%CI 0.10-2.37) and 40% (RR 0.60, 95%CI 0.16-2.17) reduced risk of radiographic osteoarthritis, respectively, but these risk reductions were inconclusive due to wide confidence intervals. CONCLUSION: After ACLR, returning to pivoting sport was not associated with increased risk of worsening knee osteoarthritis features on MRI, radiographic osteoarthritis or knee symptoms. Participation in pivoting sport need not be avoided as part of osteoarthritis secondary prevention strategies.

Co-creation of a sport-specific anterior cruciate ligament injury risk reduction program for women: A concept mapping approach.

OBJECTIVES: To engage physiotherapists experienced in female elite sport and athletes to co-create a sport-specific anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk reduction program. DESIGN: Concept Mapping. METHODS: The Concept Systems Global MAX™ web platform was used to collect and analyse data from 27 context and content experts (22 physiotherapists, 5 athletes). Participants brainstormed statements representing the critical elements that should be included in an ACL injury risk reduction program for women playing elite Australian Football (AF). RESULTS: Twenty-two participants brainstormed 56 statements that were synthesised and edited to 62 statements. Statements were sorted into clusters by twenty-three participants and rated on importance and feasibility using six-point scales. Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis identified a 5-cluster solution as follows: Football-specific preparation (15 statements); Movement skills (17 statements); Strength and conditioning (15 statements); Individual preparation (7 statements); and Education (8 statements). Calculation of mean ratings for each cluster and statement identified the Movement skills cluster as most important (mean=3.61 out of 5) and the Football-specific preparation cluster as most feasible (3.75 out of 5). By contrast, the Individual preparation cluster was rated the least important (mean=2.9 out of 5), and the least feasible (3.12 out of 5), to include in the program. CONCLUSIONS: The five clusters of critical elements to include in an ACL injury risk reduction program for women playing elite AF, in order of most to least importance were: movement skills, football-specific preparation, education, strength and conditioning and individual preparation.