Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 38(3): 262-271, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37027131

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction programs led by a nurse/community health worker team are effective in urban settings. This strategy has not been adequately tested in rural settings. OBJECTIVE: A pilot study was conducted to examine the feasibility of implementing an evidence-based CVD risk reduction intervention adapted to a rural setting and evaluate the potential impact on CVD risk factors and health behaviors. METHODS: A 2-group, experimental, repeated-measures design was used; participants were randomized to a standard primary care group (n = 30) or an intervention group (n = 30) where a registered nurse/community health worker team delivered self-management strategies in person, by phone, or by videoconferencing. Outcomes were measured at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. A sample of 60 participants was recruited and retained in the study. RESULTS: In-person (46.3%) and telephone (42.3%) meetings were used more than the videoconferencing application (9%). Mean change at 3 months differed significantly between the intervention and control groups for CVD risk (-1.0 [95% confidence interval (CI), -3.1 to 1.1] vs +1.4 [95% CI, -0.4 to 3.3], respectively), total cholesterol (-13.2 [95% CI, -32.1 to 5.7.] vs +21.0 [95% CI, 4.1-38.1], respectively), and low-density lipoprotein (-11.5 [95% CI, -30.8 to 7.7] vs +19.6 [95% CI, 1.9-37.2], respectively). No between-group differences were seen in high-density lipoprotein, blood pressure, or triglycerides. CONCLUSIONS: Participants receiving the nurse/community health worker-delivered intervention improved their risk CVD profiles, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein levels at 3 months. A larger study to explore the intervention impact on CVD risk factor disparities experienced by rural populations is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Adulto , Humanos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Proyectos Piloto , Población Rural , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud , Colesterol , Lipoproteínas LDL
2.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 30(2): 618-636, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31130541

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Using the RE-AIM framework, the primary purpose of this qualitative study was to conduct focus groups to identify areas for future adaptation of an evidence-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk intervention (COACH) developed for an urban primary care setting to urban American Indian (AI)-serving settings. METHODS: This qualitative study involved conducting three focus groups with 31 urban AI patients with two or more CVD risk factors to maximize reach and efficacy of COACH. The patients had not yet participated in an adapted COACH program. RESULTS: Findings from the focus groups indicate that a culturally adapted CVD risk reduction program modeled after COACH would be acceptable among urban AI populations. Recommendations for cultural adaptation include a need for images of AI people, traditional AI exercise activities and AI foods, information on the portion sizes of traditional foods, and expanded information on tobacco use and resources. CONCLUSION: With cultural adaptations, the COACH program can be pilot-tested in urban AI-serving primary care settings to address health concerns and behaviors that affect cardiovascular health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Indígenas Norteamericanos , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etnología , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Población Urbana
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA