Pathologic and clinical tumor size discordance in early-stage cervical cancer: Does it matter?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the rate of discordance between clinical and pathologic tumor size for women with stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009 criteria), assess risk factors for discordance, and determine the impact of discordance on oncologic outcomes. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a prior multi-institutional retrospective review of patients diagnosed with stage IB1 (FIGO 2009 staging) cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy between 2010 and 2017. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and oncologic data were collected. Pathologic upstaging was defined as having a preoperative diagnosis of stage IB1 cervical cancer with pathology demonstrating a tumor size >4 cm. Demographic and clinicopathologic data was compared using chi-square, fisher exact or 2-sided t-test. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of the 630 patients, 77 (12%) were upstaged. Patients who were upstaged had lower rates of preoperative conization (p < .001) or preoperative tumor sizes ≤2 cm (p < .001). Upstaged patients had increased odds of deep stromal invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, positive margins and positive lymph nodes. Almost 88% of upstaged patients received adjuvant therapy compared to 29% of patients with tumors ≤4 cm (odds 18.49, 95% CI 8.99-37.94). Finally, pathologic upstaging was associated with an increased hazard of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.95, 95% CI 1.03-3.67) and all-cause death (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.04-5.11). CONCLUSIONS: Pathologic upstaging in stage IB1 cervical cancer is relatively common. Upstaging is associated with an 18-fold increased risk of receipt of adjuvant therapy. Patients undergoing preoperative conization and those with tumors <2 cm had lower risks of upstaging. Improvement in preoperative assessment of tumor size may better inform primary treatment decisions.

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: Risk factors for recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: We studied a large population of women with high-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) in order to identify patient and treatment-related risk factors for recurrence and progression to cancer. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study of women with a histologic diagnosis of VIN within Southern California Permanente Medical Group between 1995 and 2007 medical records were reviewed; clinical, demographic and pathologic data were collected. Statistical analyses included Chi-squared and Student's t-tests, univariate and multivariate logistic regression, and cumulative incidence analysis. RESULTS: 914 patients with high-grade VIN were identified; 784 met inclusion criteria. We found 26.3% recurrences among treated women, with 2.2% progression to cancer (8.2% among those with recurrence). Risk factors for recurrence on multivariate analysis were: age >50years (OR, 1.44; 95%CI 1.01-2.07), immunosuppression (OR 2.08; 95%CI 1.42-3.06), metasynchronous VAIN or CIN (OR 1.76; 95%CI 1.08-2.88) in addition to margin status (OR 8.17; 95%CI 4.60-14.51) and adjacent LSA (OR 9.91; 95%CI 1.53-31.32) or HPV (OR 2.15; 95%CI 1.13-3.37) with excisional treatment. Recurrence rates did not differ significantly by smoking status and treatment modalities. Median time to recurrence was 16.9months; 25% had late recurrences (44-196months). Cumulative incidence analyses of time to recurrence shows a significantly higher risk among patients over age 50 (log-rank p=0.0031). CONCLUSION: We identified independent risk factors for recurrence including age >50years, immunosuppression, metasynchronous vaginal or intraepithelial neoplasia, positive excision margins, and adjacent lichen sclerosus or human papilloma-virus. Regardless of treatment modality, 25% of recurrences occurred late, highlighting the need for long-term surveillance in women treated for VIN.