Accelerated rehabilitation program following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction does not increase risk of recurrent instability.

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation protocols following medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction were historically restrictive, with patients often immobilized and/or given weightbearing restrictions. However, more recently published protocols have been more aggressive. We compared patient-reported outcomes and recurrent dislocation risk between patients treated with a restrictive rehabilitation program (early post-operative bracing and weightbearing restrictions) and an accelerated rehabilitation protocol (no post-operative bracing or weightbearing restrictions) following MPFL reconstruction. METHODS: Patients who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction at an academic center between 2008 and 2016 were identified. Patient demographics, anatomical measurements, surgical details, and outcomes were collected. During this period, the rehabilitation protocol at the center transitioned from a restrictive to an accelerated rehabilitation protocol. Failure risk and patient-reported outcomes were compared based on rehabilitation protocol. RESULTS: Of the163 isolated MPFL reconstructions performed during the study period, 123 (75%) were available for minimum one-year follow up at a mean of 4.0 years post-operative. Overall, 53 knees (43%) underwent the accelerated rehabilitation protocol and the remaining 70 knees (57%) underwent the restrictive protocol. There were 3 recurrent dislocations during the study period (2.4%), all of which occurred in the restrictive rehabilitation group. Multiple linear regression demonstrated that being in the accelerated rehabilitation group was not associated with poorer Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales controlling for age, sex, body mass index, Caton-Deschamps Index, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance, sulcus angle, MPFL graft choice, and length of follow-up. CONCLUSION: An accelerated rehabilitation protocol without immobilization or weightbearing restrictions does not increase risk of recurrent patellar dislocation or poorer patient-reported outcome following isolated MPFL reconstruction.

Return-to-sport quadriceps strength symmetry impacts 5-year cartilage integrity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A preliminary analysis.

Quadriceps femoris strength asymmetry at the time of return to sports participation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction contributes to worse function and asymmetric landing patterns, but the impact on longitudinal outcomes is not known. This study determined if young athletes after ACL reconstruction with quadriceps femoris strength asymmetry at a return to sports clearance would demonstrate markers of knee cartilage degeneration 5 years later compared to those with symmetric quadriceps femoris strength at return to sports. Participants (n = 27) were enrolled at the time of medical clearance for sports participation (baseline testing) and followed for 5 years. At baseline, quadriceps femoris strength was measured bilaterally and a limb symmetry index was used to divide the cohort into two groups: return to sport clearance with high quadriceps femoris strength (RTS-HQ; limb symmetry index ≥ 90%) and return to sport clearance with low quadriceps femoris strength (RTS-LQ; limb symmetry index < 85%). At 5 years post-baseline, quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (T2 relaxation times (ms): involved knee medial/lateral femoral condyle and tibial plateau) data were collected. Group differences were evaluated with independent samples t tests. At 5 years post-return to sports, the RTS-LQ strength group (n = 14) demonstrated elevated T2 relaxation times at the anterior region of the lateral femoral condyle compared to the RTS-HQ strength group (n = 13). Clinical Significance: Just over 50% of this cohort was cleared for sports participation with involved limb quadriceps femoris strength deficits that may contribute to early markers of knee cartilage degeneration within the subsequent 5 years.

Identification and Predictors of Age-Relevant and Activity-Relevant Hop Test Targets in Young Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Performance symmetry between limbs (limb symmetry index [LSI] ≥ 90%) on a battery of single-leg hop tests is recommended to inform return-to-sport (RTS) decisions after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Achieving current hop test symmetry values has not been associated with future clinical outcomes. The identification of age-relevant and activity-relevant target values to benchmark the hop test performance of young athletes post-ACLR may provide greater specificity and clinical relevance for interpretation of hop test data. OBJECTIVE: To identify single-leg hop test-target values for individual-limb performance and symmetry between limbs for athletes without a history of ACL injury and evaluate the proportion of young athletes post-ACLR who met the newly derived target values at the time of RTS clearance. The secondary objective was to test the hypothesis that better function and strength would be associated with achieving the newly derived hop test target values. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Pediatric medical center and academic medical center. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 159 young athletes (age = 16.9 ± 2.2 years) at the time of RTS clearance after primary, unilateral ACLR and 47 uninjured control athletes (age = 17.0 ± 2.3 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): All participants completed a single-leg hop test battery (single hop, triple hop, and crossover hop for distance [cm], and 6-m timed hop [seconds]). Raw distance values were normalized by body height, and LSI (%) was calculated for each hop test. Target values were defined as the lower bound of the 95% CI for each hop test, using control group data. Participants with ACLR also completed the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales and a quadriceps femoris strength (newton meters/kilogram) assessment. Logistic regression determined predictors of achieving hop test target values in the ACLR group among injury, function, and strength data (P < .05). RESULTS: In the ACLR group, 79% to 84% of participants met the 90% LSI threshold on each hop test. They achieved the target values for surgical-limb performance in the following proportions (% participants): single hop = 29%, triple hop = 24%, crossover hop = 30%, 6-m timed hop = 18%, all hops= 12%. Also, they met the target values for LSI in the following proportions: single hop = 43%, triple hop = 48%, crossover hop = 50%, 6-m timed hop = 69%, all hops = 25%. The only predictor of achieving all hop test targets for surgical-limb performance was greater surgical-limb quadriceps femoris strength (odds ratio = 4.10, P = .007). We noted a trend toward quadriceps femoris strength LSI ≥ 90% (odds ratio = 2.44, P = .058) as a predictor for meeting all hop test symmetry targets. CONCLUSIONS: At the time of RTS post-ACLR, only a small proportion of young athletes achieved the age-relevant and activity-relevant single-leg hop test targets for surgical-limb performance or symmetry between limbs, even though a majority met the traditionally recommended 90% LSI threshold on hop tests.

Integrating neurocognitive challenges into injury prevention training: A clinical commentary.

Despite the efforts of many traditional lower extremity injury prevention programs (IPP), the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in young athletes continues to rise. Current best practices for IPPs include training lower extremity neuromuscular control and movement quality during cutting, jumping, and pivoting. Emerging evidence indicates neurocognition may contribute to injury incidence and injury risk biomechanics. Therefore, IPP outcomes may improve if clinicians also consider neurocognitive contributions to neuromuscular control and athletic performance. A substantial barrier to neurocognitive challenge integration during injury prevention training in the group setting is the lack of structured neuromuscular and neurocognitive progressions. Therefore, our aim is to provide clinicians with a defined framework and recommendations from clinical experience for how to implement neurocognitive challenges within group IPPs that requires minimal extra time and resources. This clinical commentary proposes a three-phase model adopted from motor learning literature to simultaneously progress neuromuscular and neurocognitive challenges through a structured IPP.