Viscoelastometric-guided early fibrinogen concentrate replacement during postpartum haemorrhage: OBS2, a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) can be exacerbated by haemostatic failure. We hypothesized that early fibrinogen replacement, guided by viscoelastometric testing, reduces blood product usage and bleed size. METHODS: Women with PPH 1000-1500 ml were enrolled. If Fibtem A5 was ≤15 mm and bleeding continued, subjects were randomized to fibrinogen concentrate or placebo. The primary outcome compared the number of units of red blood cells, plasma, cryoprecipitate and platelets transfused. RESULTS: Of 663 women enrolled 55 were randomized. The adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) (95% CI) for the number of allogeneic units transfused in the fibrinogen group compared with placebo was 0.72 (0.3-1.7), P =0.45. In pre-specified subgroup analyses, subjects who had a Fibtem A5 ≤12 mm at the time of randomization and who received fibrinogen concentrate received a median (25th-75th centile) of 1 (0-4.5) unit of allogeneic blood products and had an additional 300 (100-350) ml blood loss whereas those who received placebo also received 3 (0-6) units of allogeneic blood products and had 700 (200-1550) ml additional blood loss; these differences were not statistically significantly different. There was one thrombotic event in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of fibrinogen concentrate triggered by Fibtem A5 ≤15 mm did not improve outcomes in PPH. Pre-specified subgroup analyses suggest that fibrinogen replacement is not required if the Fibtem A5 is > 12 mm or Clauss fibrinogen >2 g litre -1 , but an effect below these levels cannot be excluded. The raised fibrinogen at term appears to be a physiological buffer rather than required for haemostasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN46295339 ( http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN46295339 , last accessed 5 July 2017), EudraCT 2012-005511-11 ( https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2012-005511-11 , last accessed 5 July 2017).

Viscoelastometry guided fresh frozen plasma infusion for postpartum haemorrhage: OBS2, an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) can be exacerbated by haemostatic failure. Based on data from trauma studies, empirical infusions of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) are often given during severe PPH if coagulation tests are unavailable. This study observed a cohort of women with moderate/severe PPH in whom FFP infusion was guided by the use of viscoelastometric point-of-care testing (VE-POCT) and clinical assessment. METHODS: Women were enrolled into this observational study when blood loss was measured or suspected to be about 1000 mL. If Fibtem A5 determined by Rotem ® thromboelastometry remained >15 mm, or bleeding stopped, FFP was withheld. If Fibtem A5 was ≤15 mm and bleeding ongoing, women were randomized into an interventional study as previously reported. Clinical and laboratory outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: The study recruited 605 women and 98% had FFP withheld. The median (25 th -75 th centile) total blood loss was 1500 (1300-2000) mL with 300 (50-545) mL occurring after enrolment. Total blood loss was >2500 mL in 40/605 (6.6%) women. RBCs were transfused in 141/605 (23.3%) patients and 11 (1.8%) received ≥4 units. At least one invasive procedure was performed in 283/605 (46.8%) women. Level 3 care was required for 10/605 (1.7%) women. No women developed clinically significant haemostatic impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Restrictive use of FFP guided by clinical assessment of bleeding and VE-POCT is feasible and did not result in clinically significant haemostatic impairment. Studies should compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of empirical FFP infusions, according to current guidelines, with targeted use of FFP based on VE-POCT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN46295339 ( http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN46295339 ) (accessed July 24, 2017), EudraCT 2012-005511-11 ( https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search?query=2011-005511-11 ) (accessed July 24, 2017).

Measurement of blood loss during postpartum haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: We set out to validate the accuracy of gravimetric quantification of blood loss during simulated major postpartum haemorrhage and to evaluate the technique in a consecutive cohort of women experiencing major postpartum haemorrhage. The study took part in a large UK delivery suite over a one-year period. All women who experienced major postpartum haemorrhage were eligible for inclusion. METHODS: For the validation exercise, in a simulated postpartum haemorrhage scenario using known volumes of artificial blood, the accuracy of gravimetric measurement was compared with visual estimation made by delivery suite staff. In the clinical observation study, the blood volume lost during postpartum haemorrhage was measured gravimetrically according to our routine institutional protocol and was correlated with fall in haemoglobin. The main outcome measure was the accuracy of gravimetric measurement of blood loss. RESULTS: Validation exercise: the mean percentage error of gravimetrically measured blood volume was 4.0±2.7% compared to visually estimated blood volume with a mean percentage error of 34.7±32.1%. Clinical observation study: 356 out of 6187 deliveries were identified as having major postpartum haemorrhage. The correlation coefficient between measured blood loss and corrected fall in haemoglobin for all patients was 0.77; correlation was stronger (0.80) for postpartum haemorrhage >1500mL, and similar during routine and out-of-hours working. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the gravimetric method was confirmed in simulated postpartum haemorrhage. The clinical study shows that gravimetric measurement of blood loss is correlated with the fall in haemoglobin in postpartum haemorrhage where blood loss exceeds 1500mL. The method is simple to perform, requires only basic equipment, and can be taught and used by all maternity services during major postpartum haemorrhage.