Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dig Liver Dis ; 42(7): 515-9, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19914153

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The role of prognostic variables in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is controversial. AIMS: To evaluate the survival of patients with HCC on cirrhosis treated with TACE and to analyse the prognostic factors affecting survival. METHODS: From 1996 to 2006, 580 consecutive patients with HCC in cirrhosis were observed. Of these 194 patients underwent TACE. The primary end-point was survival. Independent predictors of survival were identified using the Cox model. RESULTS: The cumulative 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 96%, 60%, and 41%, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed significant reduction of survival among patients with serum bilirubin values >2mg/dl compared to patients with values <2mg/dl (Hazard ratio 3.84; CI 95% 1.70-8.66; p-value=0.001). Multivariate analysis performed in the group of patients treated with TACE alone showed that elevated serum bilirubin (Hazard ratio 2.96; CI 95% 1.20-7.3; p-value 0.02) and incomplete tumour response (Hazard ratio 2.88; CI 95% 1.18-7.05; p-value 0.02) are correlated with a worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: TACE was well tolerated and overall survival rate was 41% after 5 years. Complete tumour response and serum bilirubin <2mg/dl were identified as predictors of survival.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Hemostáticos/administración & dosificación , Arteria Hepática , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
3.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 11(2): 139-45, 2005 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15677907

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Small intestine contrast ultrasonography (SICUS), when performed after distention of the small bowel lumen with an iso-osmolar polyethylene glycol electrolyte-balanced solution, shows high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (97%) in detecting small bowel abnormalities in patients who have not received a diagnosis but in whom there is a suspicion of intestinal diseases. The diagnostic yield of SICUS remains to be established in detecting small bowel lesions in patients with proven Crohn's disease (CD) in comparison with transabdominal ultrasonography (TUS), and in relationship to the experience of the operator, using small bowel enema (SBE) as the "gold standard." AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of SICUS, when performed by a sonologist with 1 year of experience, and TUS, when performed by a sonologist with 10 years of experience, compared to SBE in the assessment of the site, extension, and stenosis of small intestinal lesions in CD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 28 consecutive patients (men, 16; women, 12; age range, 21 to 60 yr) with a diagnosis of CD underwent TUS and SICUS, which were performed by 2 sonologists who were unaware of the radiologic findings, on the same day. SICUS was performed after the ingestion of 375 mL of a polyethylene glycol contrast solution. A standard SBE was performed on a different day by an expert radiologist who was unaware of the sonographic findings. RESULTS: Sensitivities in the detection of small bowel lesions were 96% for TUS and 100% for SICUS. Compared with SBE, SICUS detected the presence of 4 lesions in the jejunum that had been missed by TUS. The mean (+/-SD) extent of the ileal disease was 22 +/- 12.5 cm when measured during SBE, 14.5 +/- 8.6 cm when measured during TUS, and 19.5 +/- 12.5 cm when measured during SICUS [P = 0.05 (SICUS versus SBE)]. The correlation of the extension of the lesions between SICUS and SBE (r = 0.88) was better than that between TUS and SBE (r = 0.64). The sensitivities of TUS and SICUS in the detection of at least 1 stricture were 76% and 94%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity in assessing prestenotic dilatation were 50% and 100%, respectively, at TUS, and 100% and 90%, respectively, at SICUS. CONCLUSION: In inexperienced hands, SICUS is a more accurate technique for assessing CD lesions, and the accuracy is better than that of TUS performed by an expert sonologist. The use of SICUS, instead of SBE, could be indicated for the follow-up of patients with CD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Crohn/patología , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Abdomen/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Medios de Contraste , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Dilatación Patológica , Enema , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polietilenglicoles , Competencia Profesional , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Solventes
4.
Radiol Med ; 108(5-6): 515-21, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés, Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15722997

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the current role of small bowel (SB) radiologic barium examinations in adult celiac disease (ACD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 61 SB barium examinations in 280 ACD patients. Sixty-one examinations in 61 patients were performed: 7/61 with small bowel ''follow-through'' (SBFT) method, and 54/61 with small bowel double-contrast enteroclysis (SBE). Radiological criteria for ACD diagnosis were divided in four groups: 1) definite ACD (reversal of jejuno-ileal fold pattern); 2) possible ACD (malabsorption pattern and ileal jejunization); 3) malabsorption (fluid, dilatation, ''moulage'', flocculation); 4) complicated ACD (irregular, thickened, nodular folds; wall thickening; masses). RESULTS: In 49/61 patients RX examinations were performed before ACD diagnosis. In this group, clinical presentations included one or more of the following: diarrhea, weight loss, malabsorption, anemia, abdominal pain; 7/49 had a SBFT, and 42/49 a SBE. All 7 SBFTs showed pattern 3, and 8/42 SBEs showed pattern 2 (suspected ACD). In 34/42 patients SBE allowed a definite ACD diagnosis (pattern 1); however, 6/34 were also false-positive for complicated ACD (pattern 4). Ten out of sixty-one patients were clinically suspected of having complicated ACD, correctly excluded (8/8) or confirmed (2/2) by SBE. None of these 59/61 patients had a radiologic diagnosis of normal' SB. The last 2/61 patients with ACD, examined for persisting chronic anemia, had a normal SBE. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirm that SB radiology may be of value either in ACD diagnosis or in excluding complications: SBE is currently the most accurate examination. SBE alone is however less accurate in confirming complicated ACD; further imaging techniques are always needed in this clinical context.


Asunto(s)
Sulfato de Bario , Enfermedad Celíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Medios de Contraste , Enema , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Celíaca/complicaciones , Enfermedad Celíaca/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA