Evaluation of institutional readiness at sites within the UK NHS using a novel advanced therapy medicinal product assessment tool.

Aim: This paper reports on a study to assess institutional readiness (IR) of UK National Health Service sites that form part of the Northern Alliance Advanced Therapy Treatment Centre to deliver advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs). The paper discusses the development of an assessment tool to support self-assessment of IR in healthcare institutions. Methods: The tool utilized criteria developed by clinicians to self-assess IR to deliver four classes of ATMP over a series of time points. Each assessment was independently analyzed and validated by independent expert groups. Results & conclusion: The collated results indicated an overall trend toward IR for all classes of ATMP. The study highlighted areas where IR is evidenced, areas where work is ongoing and areas where further work is required to achieve IR. The study also facilitated validation of the IR assessment tool.

Tweetable abstract This paper describes the development of a novel tool for assessment of healthcare institutions' capacity to deliver advanced therapies and use of the tool to evaluate institutional readiness within selected UK National Health Service sites. #advancedtherapies @NAATTC @innovateuk.

Repeated nebulisation of non-viral CFTR gene therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial.

BACKGROUND: Lung delivery of plasmid DNA encoding the CFTR gene complexed with a cationic liposome is a potential treatment option for patients with cystic fibrosis. We aimed to assess the efficacy of non-viral CFTR gene therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis. METHODS: We did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial in two cystic fibrosis centres with patients recruited from 18 sites in the UK. Patients (aged ≥12 years) with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 50-90% predicted and any combination of CFTR mutations, were randomly assigned, via a computer-based randomisation system, to receive 5 mL of either nebulised pGM169/GL67A gene-liposome complex or 0.9% saline (placebo) every 28 days (plus or minus 5 days) for 1 year. Randomisation was stratified by % predicted FEV1 (<70 vs ≥70%), age (<18 vs ≥18 years), inclusion in the mechanistic substudy, and dosing site (London or Edinburgh). Participants and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the relative change in % predicted FEV1. The primary analysis was per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01621867. FINDINGS: Between June 12, 2012, and June 24, 2013, we randomly assigned 140 patients to receive placebo (n=62) or pGM169/GL67A (n=78), of whom 116 (83%) patients comprised the per-protocol population. We noted a significant, albeit modest, treatment effect in the pGM169/GL67A group versus placebo at 12 months' follow-up (3.7%, 95% CI 0.1-7.3; p=0.046). This outcome was associated with a stabilisation of lung function in the pGM169/GL67A group compared with a decline in the placebo group. We recorded no significant difference in treatment-attributable adverse events between groups. INTERPRETATION: Monthly application of the pGM169/GL67A gene therapy formulation was associated with a significant, albeit modest, benefit in FEV1 compared with placebo at 1 year, indicating a stabilisation of lung function in the treatment group. Further improvements in efficacy and consistency of response to the current formulation are needed before gene therapy is suitable for clinical care; however, our findings should also encourage the rapid introduction of more potent gene transfer vectors into early phase trials. FUNDING: Medical Research Council/National Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme.