Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Thromb Res ; 202: 59-66, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33740536

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: An increased risk of ischemic stroke in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) was reported but few data exist regarding prognostic outcomes of those patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using data in the RIETE registry, we compared the characteristics, therapeutic approaches and outcomes of patients with PE according to the presence or absence of PFO. RESULTS: From August 2016 to January 2020, 4148 patients with acute PE were enrolled. Of these, 2775 (67%) had no transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), 993 (24%) underwent TTE but had no reported results on PFO. Among the remaining 380 patients, 287 (74%) did not have PFO and 93 (26%) had PFO. Patients with PFO were more likely to have chronic heart failure, prior myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke than those without PFO. Patients with PFO had a higher rate of subsequent ischemic stroke than those without PFO (hazard ratio (HR): 9.28; 95% CI: 1.83-69.1), than those with TTE but no data on PFO (HR: 10.1; 95% CI: 2.56-42.4) or without TTE (HR: 9.78; 95% CI: 3.02-28.4). On multivariable analysis, patients with PFO were at increased risk for subsequent ischemic stroke than those without PFO (HR: 8.96; 95% CI: 1.68-47.7). CONCLUSIONS: PFO was searched in a minority of patients with an acute PE in real life setting. Subject to possible selection and measurement biases, our results confirmed a higher risk of ischemic stroke in PE patients with PFO compared to those without PFO. This association warrants further investigation before determining the best therapeutic option in patients with acute PE and concomitant PFO.


Asunto(s)
Foramen Oval Permeable , Embolia Pulmonar , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Foramen Oval Permeable/complicaciones , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología
2.
J Thromb Haemost ; 16(2): 271-278, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29125695

RESUMEN

Essentials The accuracy of the age-adjusted D-dimer in suspected venous thromboembolism is still debated. We assessed the performance of age-adjusted D-dimer combined with the PALLADIO algorithm. The age-adjusted threshold can reduce the need for imaging tests compared to the fixed cut-off. The safety of this approach should be confirmed in large management studies. SUMMARY: Background Age-adjusted D-dimer has been proposed to increase specificity for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the accuracy of this threshold has been recently questioned. Objectives To assess the diagnostic performance of age-adjusted D-dimer combined with clinical pretest probability (PTP) in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Methods PALLADIO (NCT01412242) was a multicenter management study that validated a new diagnostic algorithm, incorporating PTP, D-dimer (using the manufacturer's cut-off) and limited or extended compression ultrasonography (CUS) in outpatients with clinically suspected DVT. Patients with unlikely PTP and negative D-dimer had DVT ruled out without further testing (group 1); patients with likely PTP or positive D-dimer underwent limited CUS (group 2); patients with likely PTP and positive D-dimer underwent extended CUS (group 3). Patients with DVT ruled out at baseline had a 3-month follow-up. In this post-hoc analysis we evaluated age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off (defined as age times 10 µg L-1 , or age times 5 µg L-1 for D-dimers with a lower manufacturer's cut-off, in patients > 50 years). Results In total, 1162 patients were enrolled. At initial visit, DVT was detected in 4.0% of patients in group 2 and 53.0% in group 3. The age-adjusted D-dimer, compared with the fixed cut-off, resulted in 5.1% (95% CI, 4.0-6.5%) reduction of CUS. The incidence of symptomatic VTE during follow-up was: 0.24% (95% CI, 0.04-1.37) in group 1; 1.12% (95% CI, 0.44-2.85) in group 2; and 1.89% (95% CI, 0.64-5.40) in group 3. Conclusions The PALLADIO algorithm using age-adjusted D-dimer slightly decreased the number of required imaging tests, but this approach should be confirmed in large management studies.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/análisis , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Ultrasonografía , Procedimientos Innecesarios , Tromboembolia Venosa/sangre , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/sangre , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología
3.
J Thromb Haemost ; 10(6): 1026-35, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22487001

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Optimal doses and duration of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for the treatment of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) are still uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of different doses and durations of LMWH parnaparin for symptomatic lower limb SVT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Outpatients with at least a 4-cm-long SVT of long or short saphenous veins or their collaterals were randomized to receive parnaparin either 8500 UI once daily ( o.d.) for 10 days followed by placebo for 20 days (group A) or 8500 UI o.d. for 10 days followed by 6400 UI once daily (o.d.) for 20 days (group B) or 4250 UI o.d. for 30 days (group C) in a double-blind fashion in 16 clinics. Primary outcome was the composite of symptomatic and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) and relapse and/or symptomatic or asymptomatic SVT recurrence in the first 33 days with 60 days follow-up. RESULTS: Among 664 patients, primary outcome occurred in 33/212 (15.6%), 4/219 (1.8%) and 16/217 (7.3%) subjects in groups A, B and C, respectively (B vs. A: absolute risk reduction [ARR]: 13.7%, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 8-18.9 P<0.001; B vs. C: ARR: 5.5%; 95% CI: 1.6-9.4 P= 0.011; C vs. A: ARR: 8.2%, 95% CI: 2-14 P=0.012). During days 0-93, the event rate was higher in group A (22.6%) than either in group B (8.7%; P=0.001) or C (14.3%, P=0.034). No major hemorrhages occurred. CONCLUSIONS: An intermediate dose of parnaparin for 30 days is superior to either a 30-day prophylactic dose or a 10-day intermediate dose for lower limb SVT treatment.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/administración & dosificación , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/efectos adversos , Humanos , Italia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Recurrencia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/mortalidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...