Chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor failure in metastatic melanoma: a retrospective multicentre analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Despite remarkably improved outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibition, many patients with metastatic melanoma will eventually require further therapy. Chemotherapy has limited activity when used first-line but can alter the tumour microenvironment and does improve efficacy when used in combination with immunotherapy in lung cancer. Whether chemotherapy after checkpoint inhibitor failure has relevant activity in patients with metastatic melanoma is unknown. METHODS: Patients with metastatic melanoma treated with chemotherapy after progression on immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors were identified retrospectively from 24 melanoma centres. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were examined. RESULTS: In total, 463 patients were treated between 2007 and 2017. Fifty-six per cent had received PD-1-based therapy before chemotherapy. Chemotherapy regimens included carboplatin + paclitaxel (32%), dacarbazine (25%), temozolomide (15%), taxanes (9%, nab-paclitaxel 4%), fotemustine (6%) and others (13%). Median duration of therapy was 7.9 weeks (0-108). Responses included 0.4% complete response (CR), 12% partial response (PR), 21% stable disease (SD) and 67% progressive disease (PD). Median PFS was 2.6 months (2.2, 3.0), and median PFS in responders was 8.7 months (6.3, 16.3), respectively. Twelve-month PFS was 12% (95% CI 2-15%). In patients who had received anti-PD-1 before chemotherapy, the ORR was 11%, and median PFS was 2.5 months (2.1, 2.8). The highest activity was achieved with single-agent taxanes (N = 40), with ORR 25% and median PFS 3.9 months (2.1, 6.2). Median OS from chemotherapy start was 7.1 months (6.5, 8.0). Subsequent treatment with checkpoint inhibitors achieved a response rate of 16% with a median PFS of 19.1 months (2.0-43.1 months). No unexpected toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy has a low response rate and short PFS in patients with metastatic melanoma who have failed checkpoint inhibitor therapy, although activity varied between regimens. Chemotherapy has a limited role in the management of metastatic melanoma.

Arthralgia Induced by BRAF Inhibitor Therapy in Melanoma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi), commonly used in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma (MM) treatment, frequently cause arthralgia. Although this is one of the most common side effects, it has not been characterized yet. METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients treated with BRAFi +/- MEK inhibitors (MEKi) for MM at the National Center for Tumor Diseases (Heidelberg) between 2010 and 2018 and reviewed patient charts for the occurrence and management of arthralgia. The evaluation was supplemented by an analysis of frozen sera. RESULTS: We included 154 patients (63% males); 31% (48/154) of them reported arthralgia with a median onset of 21 days after the start of the therapy. Arthralgia mostly affected small joints (27/36, 75%) and less frequently large joints (19/36, 53%). The most commonly affected joints were in fingers (19/36, 53%), wrists (16/36, 44%), and knees (12/36, 33%). In 67% (24/36) of the patients, arthralgia occurred with a symmetrical polyarthritis, mainly of small joints, resembling the pattern typically observed in patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), for which a role of the MAPK signaling pathway was previously described. Patients were negative for antinuclear antibodies, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, and rheumatoid factor; arthritis was visible in 10 of 13 available PET-CT scans. The development of arthralgia was linked to better progression-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Arthralgia is a common side effect in patients receiving BRAFi +/- MEKi therapy and often presents a clinical pattern similar to that observed in RA patients. Its occurrence was associated with longer-lasting tumor control.

Biomarkers for Clinical Benefit of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment-A Review From the Melanoma Perspective and Beyond.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD-1 antibodies is standard treatment for metastatic melanoma. Anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and anti-PD-L1 antibodies (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) have been approved for treatment of several other advanced malignancies, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); renal cell, and urothelial carcinoma; head and neck cancer; gastric, hepatocellular, and Merkel-cell carcinoma; and classical Hodgkin lymphoma. In some of these malignancies approval was based on the detection of biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression or high microsatellite instability. METHODS: We review the current status of prognostic and predictive biomarkers used in ICI for melanoma and other malignancies. We include clinical, tissue, blood, and stool biomarkers, as well as imaging biomarkers. RESULTS: Several biomarkers have been studied in ICI for metastatic melanoma. In clinical practice, pre-treatment tumor burden measured by means of imaging and serum lactate dehydrogenase level is already being used to estimate the likelihood of effective ICI treatment. In peripheral blood, the number of different immune cell types, such as lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils, as well as different soluble factors, have been correlated with clinical outcome. For intra-tumoral biomarkers, expression of the PD-1 ligand PD-L1 has been found to be of some predictive value for anti-PD-1-directed therapy for NSCLC and melanoma. A high mutational load, particularly when accompanied by neoantigens, seems to facilitate immune response and correlates with patient survival for all entities treated by use of ICI. Tumor microenvironment also seems to be of major importance. Interestingly, even the gut microbiome has been found to correlate with response to ICI, most likely through immuno-stimulatory effects of distinct bacteria. New imaging biomarkers, e.g., for PET, and magnetic resonance imaging are also being investigated, and results suggest they will make early prediction of patient response possible. CONCLUSION: Several promising results are available regarding possible biomarkers for response to ICI, which need to be validated in large clinical trials. A better understanding of how ICI works will enable the development of biomarkers that can predict the response of individual patients.

Merkel cell carcinoma expresses the immunoregulatory ligand CD200 and induces immunosuppressive macrophages and regulatory T cells.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer that responds to PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. CD200 is another checkpoint modulator whose receptor is found on tumor-promoting myeloid cells, including M2 macrophages. We found high CD200 mRNA expression in MCC tumors, and CD200 immunostaining was demonstrated on 95.5% of MCC tumors. CD200R-expressing myeloid cells were present in the MCC tumor microenvironment. MCC-associated macrophages had a higher average CD163:CD68 staining ratio (2.67) than controls (1.13), indicating an immunosuppressive M2 phenotype. Accordingly, MCC tumors contained increased densities of FOXP3+ regulatory T-cells. Intravenous administration of blocking anti-CD200 antibody to MCC xenograft mice revealed specific targeting of drug to tumor. In conclusion, MCC are highly CD200 positive and associated with immunosuppressive M2 macrophages and regulatory T-cells. As anti-CD200 antibody effectively targets CD200 on MCC tumor cells in vivo, this treatment may provide a novel immunotherapy for MCC independent of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.

Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists.

Background: Deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNN) may facilitate melanoma detection, but data comparing a CNN's diagnostic performance to larger groups of dermatologists are lacking. Methods: Google's Inception v4 CNN architecture was trained and validated using dermoscopic images and corresponding diagnoses. In a comparative cross-sectional reader study a 100-image test-set was used (level-I: dermoscopy only; level-II: dermoscopy plus clinical information and images). Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) for diagnostic classification (dichotomous) of lesions by the CNN versus an international group of 58 dermatologists during level-I or -II of the reader study. Secondary end points included the dermatologists' diagnostic performance in their management decisions and differences in the diagnostic performance of dermatologists during level-I and -II of the reader study. Additionally, the CNN's performance was compared with the top-five algorithms of the 2016 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) challenge. Results: In level-I dermatologists achieved a mean (±standard deviation) sensitivity and specificity for lesion classification of 86.6% (±9.3%) and 71.3% (±11.2%), respectively. More clinical information (level-II) improved the sensitivity to 88.9% (±9.6%, P = 0.19) and specificity to 75.7% (±11.7%, P < 0.05). The CNN ROC curve revealed a higher specificity of 82.5% when compared with dermatologists in level-I (71.3%, P < 0.01) and level-II (75.7%, P < 0.01) at their sensitivities of 86.6% and 88.9%, respectively. The CNN ROC AUC was greater than the mean ROC area of dermatologists (0.86 versus 0.79, P < 0.01). The CNN scored results close to the top three algorithms of the ISBI 2016 challenge. Conclusions: For the first time we compared a CNN's diagnostic performance with a large international group of 58 dermatologists, including 30 experts. Most dermatologists were outperformed by the CNN. Irrespective of any physicians' experience, they may benefit from assistance by a CNN's image classification. Clinical trial number: This study was registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS-Study-ID: DRKS00013570; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/).

STAT5 expression correlates with recurrence and survival in melanoma patients treated with interferon-α.

Interferons (IFN) have a direct growth-inhibiting effect on tumor cells through Janus kinase-dependent activation of the transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT1). In vitro, signaling through STAT5 has been demonstrated to counteract this effect and lead to IFN resistance of melanoma cell lines. In 32 patients treated with IFN-α in an adjuvant setting, we investigated paraffin-embedded tumor tissue from primary melanomas and melanoma metastases for expression of STAT3 and STAT5, by immunohistochemistry, and for expression of phosphorylated signaling transduction activating transcription factor (pSTAT)3 and pSTAT5, by immunofluorescence. Tumor cell expression levels of these proteins were correlated with patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. The patient cohort consisted of 12 (37.5%) patients at AJCC stage I/II (primary melanoma) and 20 (62.5%) at stage III/IV (metastatic melanoma). Recurrence was observed for 25 (78.1%) either during or after IFN-α therapy. χ Correlation of staining intensities with clinical data revealed association of pSTAT3 and STAT5 expression with sex (P=0.003 and 0.016, respectively) and of STAT3 with tumor stage (P=0.019). Recurrence of melanoma was found to be associated with high STAT5 expression (P=0.017). Multivariable regression analysis revealed STAT5 expression as an independent factor for predicting progression-free survival (P<0.0001) and overall survival (P=0.022). In summary, high expression of STAT5 correlated with melanoma recurrence and survival of patients treated with IFN-α in the adjuvant setting. Recently, it has been suggested that mutations of Janus kinases are involved in resistance to immune checkpoint blocker treatments implying a possible role of STAT5 for immune checkpoint resistance.

Progression patterns under BRAF inhibitor treatment and treatment beyond progression in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Despite markedly improved treatment options for metastatic melanoma, resistance to targeted therapies such as BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) or BRAFi plus MEK inhibitors (MEKi) remains a major problem. Our aim was to characterize progression on BRAFi therapy and outcome of subsequent treatment. One hundred and eighty patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma who had progressed on treatment with single-agent BRAFi from February 2010 to April 2015 were included in a retrospective data analysis focused on patterns of progression, treatment beyond progression (TBP) and subsequent treatments after BRAFi therapy. Analysis revealed that 51.1% of patients progressed with both new and existing metastases opposed to progression of only preexisting (28.3%) or only new (20.6%) metastases. Exclusive extracranial progression occurred in 50.6% of patients compared to both extra- and intracranial (29.4%) or sole cerebral progression (20%). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that single site progression and primary response to BRAFi were associated with improved progression-free survival. Progression with exclusively new or only existing metastases and a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) of 0 were associated with prolonged overall survival (OS). TBP had no significant impact on OS. Other subsequent treatments showed low efficacy with the exception of anti-PD-1 antibodies. In conclusion we identified specific patterns of progression which significantly correlate with further prognosis after progression on BRAFi treatment. In contrast to previously published data, we could not demonstrate a significant survival benefit for BRAFi TBP. Subsequent therapies had strikingly low efficacy except for PD-1 inhibitors.

Characterization of arthralgia induced by PD-1 antibody treatment in patients with metastasized cutaneous malignancies.

BACKGROUND: PD-1 antibodies (PD1ab) are increasingly used in metastatic melanoma and other malignancies. Arthralgia is an underestimated side effect of PD-1 antibody treatment with unknown cause. Our aim was to characterize PD1ab-induced arthralgia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included patients with metastatic cutaneous malignancies treated with pembrolizumab or nivolumab ± ipilimumab at the National Center for Tumor Diseases (Heidelberg) between 01/2013 and 09/2016. Arthralgia was characterized by laboratory diagnostics, imaging, and if indicated, rheumatologic consultation. RESULTS: 26 of 195 patients (13.3%) developed arthralgia. The median onset of symptoms was 100 days (7-780 days). Most frequently, arthralgia involved large joints (shoulders, knees) in a predominantly symmetrical pattern. Only two patients were seropositive for rheumatoid factor and/or anti-citrullinated protein antibodies. Ten patients developed the clinical picture of arthritis, with seven of them showing synovitis in MRI or PET/CT. Five patients showed inflammation in joints pre-damaged by osteoarthritis. In 11 patients arthralgia could not be specified. The majority of patients was satisfactorily treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 23.1% required additional low-dose corticosteroids and only 7.6% of our patients received further immunosuppressive treatment. Patients with arthralgia showed a better treatment response and improved PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Arthralgia is frequent during PD1ab treatment. The clinical picture varies between synovitis of predominantly large joints, progressive osteoarthritis and arthralgia without evident joint damage. Vast majority of cases can be satisfactorily managed by NSAID and/or low-dose corticosteroids.

Bisphosphonate-Mediated Oral Ulcers: A Rare Differential Diagnosis of Erosive Oral Lesions.

Oral bisphosphonates are widely used drugs for the treatment of various indications such as postmenopausal osteoporosis. Ulcerations of the upper gastrointestinal tract, predominantly reported for alendronate, are common side effects. The occurrence of ulcerations within the oral cavity is less well known and probably underreported. Especially in cases of incorrect mode of intake, oral bisphosphonates are prone to induce oral ulcerations by as yet incompletely delineated mechanisms. We herein report on 2 elderly female patients suffering from oral ulcerations, which could be attributed to inadequate ingestion of alendronate. Possible ways to cause damage to the oral mucosa include non-specific toxic and pro-apoptotic effects, partly via bisphosphonate-mediated interference with intracellular signalling such as the mevalonate downstream pathway. Adequate patient advice in terms of correct use of oral bisphosphonates is crucial in order to prevent mucosal damage. Otherwise, prompt treatment cessation or a switch to an intravenously administered bisphosphonate is likely to achieve complete healing.